Jailbreaking phones becomes legal, but you'd need your carrier's permission to unlock a handset from 2013

Jailbreaking phones becomes legal, but you'd need your carrier's permission to unlock a handset from 2013
Jailbreaking your phone is now finally officially legal in the United States, but if you are trying to treat your tablet to the same level of freedom you’d be in violation of the law. What sounds like an absurd decision comes straight from the US Copyright Office, saying that jailbreaking a phone doesn’t break copyright law, but this does not apply to other devices.

Why are tablets so weirdly not included? It seems that tablets are simply too hard to define and an exemption could have been used for e-readers and mobile gaming consoles. The decision comes in a triennial review of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

But what’s even more baffling, is the fact that unlocking your phone to work with any carrier - while still legal - is now much more limited. You’d be able to unlock your phone freely by January 2013. What happens next? Starting in 2013, you’d need permission from your carrier to unlock your phone to have it work on other carriers.

Outside mobile, the Copyright Office decided that making personal backups of DVDs is still illegal, and modding game consoles is a breach of the law as well.

What are your thoughts about those rulings?

source: US Copyright Office via TheVerge

FEATURED VIDEO

30 Comments

1. RaKithAPeiRiZ

Posts: 1488; Member since: Dec 29, 2011

What if i told you i give a .... About copyright laws , anyways happy jailbreaking my phone from "2011"

26. metalpoet unregistered

how about just choosing the right carrier and dealing with it. or go pre paid

2. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

You'd need to ask your carrier to unlock? How stupid is that? This is a slap to the face to those who spent a lot on money on their phones and can't take it to another carrier.

27. metalpoet unregistered

how bout they buy that great device on the carrier that thay want?

3. wendygarett unregistered

I don't see a need to jailbreak it, It's nothing but ruined your warranty...

9. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

You don't see the need for freedom and customization?

24. HäckeMáte

Posts: 168; Member since: Feb 28, 2012

Here's a few reasons 1: Google voice integration app for calls (also integrates with iMessage) 2: Hide all the apple bloatware like newstand, itunes etc 3: MusicBox for downloading free music 4: Double tap power button to activate flashlight 5: free wifi hotspot tethering 6: Installous gets you apps for free An iPhone without jb is useless.

28. metalpoet unregistered

dont get an iPhone....SIMPLE AS THAT!

12. tedkord

Posts: 17298; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

Do you see the need for people who bought a device and own it to be able to modify it however they like? What right does anyone have to tell me what I can or cannot do with something I own (so long as I'm not endangering anyone or their property)?

16. uofmrules

Posts: 48; Member since: Oct 11, 2010

If you paid a subsidized rate then you do not own the phone.

19. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

And off contract?

22. Mxyzptlk unregistered

Some people have to root to get the new Android. Getting the new iOS doesn't require jailbreaking.

4. PAPINYC

Posts: 2315; Member since: Jul 30, 2011

"i" Applaud the U.S. Copyright Office for their interpretation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and their commitment to its' enforcement. My iPhone 4, though, is already Jailbroken, unfortunately, I just use it as an MP3 player.

5. rihel_95

Posts: 305; Member since: Mar 21, 2012

Waiting for untethered jailbreak for iP5

6. Lawliet

Posts: 160; Member since: Jul 02, 2012

"Starting in 2013, you’d need permission from your carrier to unlock your phone " Ain't nobody got time for that !

7. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

My Nexus 7 is rooted - who is going to arrest me? No one....that is who.

13. aahmed215

Posts: 169; Member since: Jun 18, 2012

You can't get arrested for breaking intellectual property laws anyway.

21. JC557

Posts: 1918; Member since: Dec 07, 2011

It's not like Android is listed anyway. From what I gather from the Anandtech/ Dailytech article: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=29047 Besides, considering how Google is with Android and open source there would be quite an uproar if they decide to stop modders. If the OEMs do it well then we know who NOT to buy from.

8. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

You have to jailbreak your iphone to be able to have a level of customization that is 30% closer to that of an Android device.

10. speed4evr

Posts: 79; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

I love how they say "The Library of Congress explained that it believes there are enough unlocked handsets available in the market at this time" - phonescoop.com. Im pretty sure all carriers(for sure VZW and Sprint) lock the phones from the get go. It seems quite arbitrary that phones can be unlocked but not tablets.

11. dragonscourgex

Posts: 307; Member since: Jan 16, 2012

Why do we even have laws concerning this? If a person pays for a device. It is there to do with as they please. This idea that company can make a product, take someone money in trade for it, then turn around and still act as they own it is complete bull.

14. frydaexiii

Posts: 1476; Member since: Dec 01, 2011

This is bullsh*t...If I paid for something, I do whatever the f**k I wanna do with it. I love the US, but some of their laws and practices are just plain retarded. Heavy carrier branding on phones? Get permission from carriers to jailbreak my phone? Paying to tether? Carrier specific phones? How can you people live under this kind of tyranny?

20. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Carrier specific phones really blows. AT&T gets the Lumia 920 for 6 months as an exclusive? Come on!

15. uofmrules

Posts: 48; Member since: Oct 11, 2010

Sorry but anyone who uses the argument that "they paid for it so they can do whatever they want" is false. Anyone who didn't pay full retail did not buy the phone. Which is why you signed a contract tying you to that carrier, which in turn is why they don't want you to take that marked down phone where ever you want. Also, you can't complain about not being able to mess with software in your phone, because when you mess the phone up the first thing you will want is a warranty replacement. Well sorry, but you don't deserve the warranty since this is no different then dropping it or getting it wet. You are the reason the phone messed up, no the manufacturer. If you pay full price for the phone, then do whatever you want with it....But if you signed a contract then you have no place to complain.

17. IEatApples

Posts: 66; Member since: Jul 06, 2011

i disagree with you. Even if i buy a phone at a subsidized price I have the right to sell it therefore it is mine. I do it all the time. I have 5 lines so I get an upgrade every 4 months or so and I buy, sell and trade subsidized phones all the time. So my point is that if I can sell something then it must belong to me.

23. dragonscourgex

Posts: 307; Member since: Jan 16, 2012

I half way disagree with you. Regardless if the phone is subsidize or not, you are making the agreement to pay the carrier back through the course of two year. So they are not giving you anything. So it is your property and yours to do with as you please. Now i do agree with you about the warranty. If you mess with your phone and screw it up....it is on you. not the carrier or manufacturer fault.

25. toreddouei2011

Posts: 1; Member since: Apr 06, 2011

I disagree with you because its mandatory to get a decent price on a phone. In the U.S. phone subsidies distort the market. Laws this article explains out make this problem worse. If I don't want to sign a contract, a decent phone will cost me at least 400-700 bucks and the service costs are rediculous because they are designed to make phone subsidies affordable for the carrier. If the Government got out of the way of the phone industry carriers would eventually abandon phone subsidies and make plans cheaper. This would make phones about 200-600 bucks on average and you would be able to buy phones straight from the manufactuer or from an electronic store. The business would be similar to other electronic purchases like a computer or laptop.

18. speckledapple

Posts: 902; Member since: Sep 29, 2011

If I am paying the money for my device, I should not have to ask anyone else for permission to do what i want with my property.

29. yingcong6

Posts: 22; Member since: Feb 09, 2012

The law enforcement is not acceptable. What if people pay for their cars monthly, can they do what they want with the cars but not damaging, negatively affecting, and harming others? In this case, some phones are subsidized, but we still paying the bills until the contracts end. We also forced to pay terminal fees if we want to jump out of the contract. So the in or out of contracts phone's are our properties, not the carriers'.

30. SassyGirl

Posts: 1; Member since: Oct 29, 2012

That's ridiculous. That would be like having to buy a new car when changing car insurance, or a new TV and computer when you switched cable and internet. And I'm sure Verizon (using them as an example since that's who I have) would not make it an easy process of allowing you jailbreak your phone.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.