x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Intel executive says 14nm Bay Trail chip provides more power and energy efficiency than Apple's A7

0. phoneArena posted on 16 Oct 2013, 13:22

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich took some time during Tuesday's conference call with the media, to answer a question posed by an inquiring mind; the analyst wanted to know what the advantages were of Intel going to a 14nm process versus the 28nm process used for the Apple A7 chip. The analyst noted that Apple was able to score good benchmark results with its silicon...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 13:27 3

1. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)

The a7 is weak with apples ios7 being used to fake benchmarks. Intel is about to begin its invasion into mobile, the snapdragon 800 is horrible compared to a quad core baytrail.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 13:33 23

2. NexusPhan (Posts: 632; Member since: 11 Jul 2013)

No way man. A7 is a great mobile processor. It was nothing to do with the fact that it's 64 bit either. Unfortunately it's trapped inside a tiny phony who's restricted OS doesn't make use of it at all other than one or two games.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:45 10

12. user996 (Posts: 221; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)

that restricted OS with A7 has beaten S800 with 2x more FPS in graphics benchmarks and almost same results for cpu scores and S800 is 2.3 GHz monster but A7 is 1.3 as i remember. what is main reason for that? yes sir, main reason is OS. may be iOS7 is not the best but anyway it can beat quad core 2.3 ghz cpu with android 4.2.x running on it. i'm not apple fan. i'm nokia fan (not MS) optimization and once again optimization makes those miracles out of those "slow" CPUs. on of the first was ARM11 on nokia 808 and 701 not even minimal lag on a single core that was optimized symbian doing that job.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:56 2

22. Finalflash (Posts: 3536; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)

Yea, because graphics heavy games are all played on the CPU, and really that is the only thing that is running in the system at all. /sarcasm

You have to be pretty retarded to peg FPS to the cpu in any high detail gaming environment. Hats off to PowerVR for their excellent design and optimizations. Though the A7 does get thrashed in pure core heavy benchmarks such as the physics test in 3d mark. Otherwise the A7 only wins when single or dual core tests are conducted and it doesn't even win them all. Not that the A7 is a bad chip, its is an amazing good cpu, but over blown in its reputation by people who know little about how tech actually functions. Just like the idiot analyst who asked about the process shrink, there is no question about it. The process shrink is advantageous whether you like it or not, less power and cheaper to produce. They don't shrink the die so they can increase performance, they do it for economics and power reasons.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:57

23. brrunopt (Posts: 742; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)

, the cores on the A7 are massive.. each core is a lot bigger than the rest (about 2x or more the size). The A7 its actually the largest ARM chip on a phone.. That why it gets that great performance with 2 cores at those frequencies...

and on the GPU its nowhere near 2x the performance of the s800, it's barely better...

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 16:23 2

26. ahomad (Posts: 175; Member since: 15 May 2012)

2X more FBS isn't accurate at all, yes the A7 Gpu more powerful than S800 but only because it has 1/3 amount of pixels compared to what S800 phones have

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 20:08 3

31. saffant (Posts: 274; Member since: 04 Jul 2011)

2x more FPS? Are you naively counting the on-screen GFX benchmarks of each of the phones? Cuz you know they're different resolutions.

Main reason for the great performance is the architecture. The ARMv8 64bit architecture is outstanding.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:51 4

13. Reality_Check (Posts: 277; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)

S800 is an SoC that provides power, performance, efficiency, connectivity, antenna and other benefits for the OEMs in one place thus reducing cost of production and increasing profit margins. When Intel's BayTrail starts offering this and more, OEMs will start to include Intel made SoCs. Till then Qualcomm will rule.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:15

15. livyatan (Posts: 867; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)

For gosh sake, when will you stop spewing this deluded crap of yours??
Intel whore, get a freking clue for once.

And get this through your skull - at the very least, Snapdragon 800 is comparable to a TABLET version quad core Bay Trail in terms of CPU, and clearly superior in terms of GPU.
Add an integrated LTE modem, dedicated motion and imaging processing units, all packed into a 50$ piece of sillicon and you get a product that rightfully dominates the SoC space.

Again, Bay Trail wins in JS browser benchmarks but those are heavily software based, single threaded tests that show next to nothing on raw processing potential.
The only cross platform benchmark that is trying to measure raw processing is Geekbench.
And there, a phone Snapdragon 800 actually smokes Intel's tablet BT chip.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 13:35 1

3. TheLolGuy (Posts: 483; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)

At more than a 10 nanometer advantage I would certainly hope that is the case...

Their chips on a similar process seems to at best match the top offerings which would seem to indicate that their designs aren't all that better than the competition.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 13:38

4. hboy857 (Posts: 349; Member since: 03 Jun 2013)

Hey, Alan Bay Trail is build on 22-nanometer technology not 14 nm, you should correct your title.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 13:45 10

5. Champion (Posts: 12; Member since: 14 Oct 2013)

Apple will die one day

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:06 4

8. Sauce (unregistered)

I sure hope not. When Apple does die, the competition rate between companies will go down, and phones won't continue to grow as fast with pushed ideas and tech. Think about it, rather than replying with an easy to say "fanboy" response.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:41 2

21. darkkjedii (Posts: 25100; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)

Well said, why would you want any of these companies to die? He just wants some green thumbs.

posted on 17 Oct 2013, 14:03

39. Sauce (unregistered)


Anyway, love or hate Apple, you can thank them for your innovative Samsungs and other flagships that keep getting rushed out to keep up with the popularity and drive that Apple holds.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:33 4

11. power_x (Posts: 264; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)

everyone will die one day my friend , everyone will .

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:23

16. Kalevro (Posts: 56; Member since: 11 Sep 2011)

Well What will Newton rely on then ? Grape..

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:31 1

19. noler (Posts: 325; Member since: 19 Aug 2013)

And also you will die one day.

posted on 21 Oct 2013, 10:11

41. sarge77 (Posts: 202; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)

Not likely they have to many partnerships for any of there partners to let this giant die.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:00 1

6. ajonly (Posts: 16; Member since: 25 May 2013)

wow.. the most stupid title i had read in PA (And i wrote this before the author edited the title.... just in case he cared to )

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:01

7. twens (Posts: 1066; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)

Hehehe, the iPhone and Apple are already dying. Where do you think samsung,htc,LG and other OEM's are getting their sales from?.....lol

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:15 2

9. Ninetysix (Posts: 2692; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)

LOL....What does this graph tell you?


Do you see a negative number next to Apple? You just went full potato bro.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 17:40 1

27. EclipseGSX (Posts: 1743; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)

LOL unit shipments (not sales) are up but market share is down from 2012 which is where it really counts. Truth hurts

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 18:27

29. Ninetysix (Posts: 2692; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)

LOL yeah. Apple is dying even if they're selling more phones now vs last year.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 20:58

33. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 2236; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)

Really? I didn't realize market share had finally been monetized. So, I guess all that market share has rescued HTC, LG, Motorola, and the rest from their slide toward insolvency?

I know, you will say that having dominant market share will finally tip developers toward thinking Android first, leaving iOS to pick up dev scraps like WP8.

Wait, that hasn't happened? You said "market share...is where it really counts," right? How can this be that NOTHING has changed? Apple still makes truckloads of money AND gets all the great apps first? Insanity, I tell you, insanity.

posted on 17 Oct 2013, 15:08

40. Googler (Posts: 813; Member since: 10 Jun 2013)

All that market share doesn't belong to HTC, LG, and Motorola, it belongs mostly to Samsung. Last I read, Samsung is dominating on many fronts.

posted on 21 Oct 2013, 10:12

42. sarge77 (Posts: 202; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)

Their ahead mostly in the US not across the globe.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 14:29 2

10. ZeroCide (Posts: 785; Member since: 09 Jan 2013)

x86 FTW!!!!

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:10

14. bigstrudel (Posts: 530; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)

Anandtech showed the A7 in a dead heat with Bay Trail even with the more advanced fab process.

posted on 16 Oct 2013, 15:31 4

18. brrunopt (Posts: 742; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)

the A7 only won on the benchs running on safari (witch is way more lightweight than others), so not really comparable...

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories