Golden Samsung Galaxy F (S5 Prime) shows up

While there's still no word on when we should expect to officially see the Galaxy F, we assume Samsung will announce it in the near future...
This is a discussion for a news article. To read the whole news, click here

44 Comments

1. DONUT

Posts: 436; Member since: Jun 27, 2013

the back looks more like wood tho

2. Birds

Posts: 1172; Member since: Nov 21, 2011

Brushed gold looks like wood period...terrible aesthetic IMHO.

6. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

It actually doesn't look bad at all.. Not better than my M8, but nonetheless catching to the eye imo.

11. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

You have an M8 too? Jeez

47. RuiBacelar

Posts: 153; Member since: Feb 25, 2014

Once you reach the awsome build quality of the M8 evertything else is...somewhat mediocre. The dark version of the M8 is trully killer beauty.

79. dratomic

Posts: 483; Member since: Oct 09, 2013

htc is always inferior to nokia in build quality. get over it.

60. CoastCity

Posts: 257; Member since: Mar 07, 2014

Brushed metal = Rough , Gold = Premium. Rough and premium is difficult to match. Maybe a more classy texture because in reality could look like brushed yellow bronze

61. Chunkyspudface

Posts: 65; Member since: May 31, 2013

I think I'm the only one who things "gold" backed phones are a little bit tacky...

20. DONUT

Posts: 436; Member since: Jun 27, 2013

i just hope its some lousy ass rendering like the G3. the gold G3 renders look awful but the live images of it actually look pretty great

25. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

Renderings look always awful. Even from M8, Z2 or some beautiful cars.

31. DONUT

Posts: 436; Member since: Jun 27, 2013

true. the Z2 and S5 renderings look pretty okay tho

29. bob_monkeywarts unregistered

I think it looks better than the normal S5 bandage edition.

14. Lampriya

Posts: 245; Member since: Oct 05, 2013

It is nowhere near the iPhone 6 quality. wait till sept, Apple is gonna change the world again.

16. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

So according to my calculations, it would be the second time. Last time was in 2007, wasn't it? Yeah. I think it was.

19. StraightEdgeNexus

Posts: 3689; Member since: Feb 14, 2014

Lamepriya, the typical iSh33p troll, strikes again.....

39. shuaibhere

Posts: 1986; Member since: Jul 07, 2012

"It is nowhere near the iPhone 6 quality" So where do you had hands on ip6??? I would like to know....

56. Cicero

Posts: 1129; Member since: Jan 22, 2014

Come on Lampriya, wakeup man. You became a izombie now. Stop dreaming.

57. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

It's a SHE

62. Miracles

Posts: 560; Member since: Aug 31, 2013

Or is she?

50. Synack

Posts: 688; Member since: Jul 05, 2011

Launching on Wednesday September 12th.

3. xplayer57

Posts: 34; Member since: Dec 24, 2012

If this is the real deal then it actually looks quite good On a side note..... I think that Samsung is trying to replace the timing of announcement of its Galaxy S flagship with the Note series as it is rumored that it will be announced in September to directly compete with Apple but thats just my opinion

4. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

Samsung listened and got rid of the Band Aid finish. And what happened? They made it look like a potato.

7. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

People like you always have something negative to say about Samsung... They can release a flagship that looks better than the 5S or M8 and would still be called garbage.

8. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

It was a jooooke. It looks more like wood. Who knows what would happen then? The thing just is, they don't seem to be releasing a phone in the near future that would look better than many of it's competitors. But I know that I can easily say that their TVs and fridges look very nice. Maybe they should hire the same team to design their mobiles too.

43. pwnarena

Posts: 1129; Member since: Feb 15, 2013

haha. i actually see the cartoon/illustration potato. the s5 active looks way better!

45. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

Yeah. Active is the best looking S5 version so far.

10. Desmortibus

Posts: 66; Member since: Apr 04, 2014

To deserve the "prime" moniker, instead of "going metal" (if it is the real thing it looks even cheaper than the Galaxy S5...) Samsung should go downright to 64-bit with a Snapdragon 810 for instance. This would impress me a lot more than a gimmicky Quad HD display and HTC metal copycat...

67. Gamas_K

Posts: 88; Member since: Nov 02, 2013

Wait till next year to see the first phone running SD810, this year maybe 610 or 615

15. Anonn

Posts: 230; Member since: Jun 04, 2014

Killer beauty and kickass beast

22. StraightEdgeNexus

Posts: 3689; Member since: Feb 14, 2014

Hope they bring something different rather than just a boring worthless spec sheet, the design is still bland, I'm dying to see someone bring back the old Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX design with cool kevlar back.
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.