Did Apple steal the Wi-Fi Sync feature for iOS 5 from a developer whose similar app was rejected?

A developer submitted his "Wi-Fi Sync" app to the App Store last year and was told via a phone call from Apple why it was rejected; now, a year later, Apple announces the similarly named feature for its updated OS and even introduced a similar logo...
This is a discussion for a news article. To read the whole news, click here

76 Comments

1. gaby1451

Posts: 119; Member since: Mar 30, 2011

Oh he should totally get in on this. This is a blatant copy of his app and he needs to make an example of this that developers will not be pushed around.

19. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

Of course, iFanboys who disagree with you will probably be the ones who were in favor of "making an example of" the teenager who got white iPhone 4 parts and made and sold conversion kits out of them.

20. Fanboys Suck

Posts: 609; Member since: Dec 12, 2008

Serious, so those bastards. I really like Apple products, their ethics as a company suck hardcore.

51. stealthd unregistered

The apple tv has had wifi syncing since 2007. They didnt have to copy anything. You could actually argue he stole the idea from apple, or any other app out there that does this already for other platforms. There's nothing special or unique about this app to warrant the need to copy it, especially for a company that spends as much on R&D as apple.

61. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

honestly, this is a general idea... this is super general... wifi syncing? wp7 does it.. android does it.. is ios not allowed to do it cause this guy did it... what about the the others? but ya, just give him some money and he will be happy... idk apple wud win it in court but they will probably just be nice and offer a deal

63. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

oh ya, and if this was specific enough that it wud be stealing, wudnt the guy have a copyright?

72. DylanDinh

Posts: 10; Member since: Jun 13, 2011

we're living in the USA dude? what are you asking for is mental copyright which mean an idea automatically become a copyright if you have a proof to prove that. For example: take a picture and print it out with you name and date on it. It's also call your own property and you have a right to sue anyone who take that picture away from you and put their name on it. you're welcome:)

75. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

yes, i understand, but as i said they just need to check the code... cause like so many times in history, u can copy someones idea if u use it in ur own way and they arent smart enough to protect it... but ya, apple shud give him a few thousand or something

65. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

This IS a very specific functionality. The functionality is wifi syncing to iTunes while on a power source. It's not a general wifi sync function. And we don't know if the guy has a patent, which could arguably and sadly sink his entire case. But it won't erase the fact of the matter, which is that the evidence points to Apple stealing a good idea that someone else had and giving no one else the credit.

70. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

this is sooooo general though... and they shud check the code... cause if it is the same then ya they stole but if not then it is obviously general enough that they cud make their own...

2. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

When other companies see someone do something extraordinary that they should have thought of, they hire the person or buy the rights to the person's creation. Apple just gives them the finger and walks away with the creation. Best way to tell if they completely stole his idea would be to see if the code is about the same. Btw, I wonder how the iFanboys will defend this one.

5. AppleFUD unregistered

Generally speaking you are right on. I read an article a little while back about some developers making a media player for the Mac pre iTunes. Apple started iTunes and tried to hire them but they said no thanks, so apple highered a rival and blatantly took many of the features form the other media player and incorporated them into iTunes. The thing was, Apple was never straight about it to the devs. They wanted to hire them but didn't tell them. . . oh, btw, we are developing a direct competitor to your media player with all your IP. Just told them they loved their work and wanted to hire them--BS, buy the freaking product and stop trying to get off cheap. Apple has been stealing blatantly from other companies and devs since day one. The slick thing about apple is, they convince their user base that they invented all this stolen IP.

8. RORYREVOLUTION

Posts: 3131; Member since: Jan 12, 2010

To the sheep apple can do no wrong. This kid had it coming they will say. I wish the isheep would drink the koolaid.

23. Hallucinator

Posts: 390; Member since: May 24, 2010

Probably the same way Android fanboys defend Android everytime they steal an idea. Get off your high horse jack ass

25. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

When is the last time Android stole an idea from a developer and kicked them to the curb? Yeah, didn't think so. Nice use of the word "jackass" though.

62. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

what about android in general... didnt they steal javame code and are getting sued by oracle? and geez i mean if we say this wifi sync thing is a copyright cant we say android multitasking is a copy off of backgrounder?

66. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

Android didn't steal java from an independent developer. And Oracle itself didn't develop Java.

76. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

ya but they still stole it... and oracle bought java just to sue android... haha

77. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

They used Java, but a lot of applications use it. They didn't say they invented Java, they just used their code, supposedly without proper licensing. But the matter hasn't been entirely cleared up yet.

78. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

basically u just said stealing in a nice way...

34. stealthd unregistered

There's nothing extraordinary about this app. If you honestly think there's a chance a company as large as apple would steal code for such a simple feature then you're nuts.

35. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

When the company is Apple, and when the code is good enough for Apple to compliment the kid over it, and when another solution would take a long time and a different workaround to figure out, I find it plausible.

47. stealthd unregistered

The jailbreak app is a workaround. Apple's app isn't. Apple built wifi syncing into iTunes, there's no way they used the same workaround as this app.

40. corps1089

Posts: 492; Member since: Jan 20, 2010

It's not the code that matters, its the idea.

48. stealthd unregistered

The Apple TV has had wifi syncing since 2007. This app has been out for a year. So using the same flimsy correlation as this article, you could argue the developer actually copied Apple.

3. lolz unregistered

This kid does not have resources for a lawsuit, Apple knows this. So they stole his work and will offer him SCRAPS to shut him up. Hey maybe he gets free iPhone 5. lol!

17. bossmt_2

Posts: 459; Member since: Oct 13, 2009

Someone will take this case as it's a slam dunk for settlement and they'll get paid a percentage.

18. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

all they have to do is have a lawyer find an independant coder familiar with apple app language and compare the original code to apple's code. If its extremely similar apple will find themselves in a lawsuit pretty quickly as any decent lawyer will take the case on a "i get paid if we get paid" basis, knowing there is like a 90% chance of a quick settlement by apple for probably 6 figures or more.

32. lolz unregistered

It will come down to who OWNS a patent(s) and not an actual CODE. Patent infringement IS big $$$ for any lawyer. If there is/are no patent(s), then all the kid will get is ,,I,, Sad, sad day for him tho, to see this happen to him.

73. DylanDinh

Posts: 10; Member since: Jun 13, 2011

lol, If I were that kid I will try to sue apple until death instead of taking their iPhone 5.. Why? because I will become a millionaire because of that.. it's a way better than $599.99 and ~$650 included taxes teehee :P
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.