x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Apple iPad PowerVR GPU vs Intel's HD4000: new benchmarks compare both

0. phoneArena posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:20

The iPhone brought the mobile revolution and Apple has continued its laser-focus on it with the iPad. Both devices are performing extremely well in the graphics department…

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:24 9

1. papss (unregistered)

The iPad does pretty well on a tablet for sure.. It best even the N10

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:34 3

3. tedkord (Posts: 14192; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)

It does, but remember, the N10 pushes quite a few more pixels.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:40 7

6. feres13 (Posts: 307; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)

It's an offscreen benchmark, resolution doesn't affect the final score

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 09:06

12. tedkord (Posts: 14192; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)

Doesn't it? I mean, vsync won't limit framerates if it's offscreen, but it's still pushing the tablets native res, isn't it? Or am i wrong?

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 09:11 3

14. tedkord (Posts: 14192; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)

Nevermind. I just checked the benchmark, and offscreen does output at 1080p with vsync disabled in all platforms, so tablet resolution isn't a factor. I'm a dumbass.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 23:44

25. zibbyzib2000 (Posts: 221; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)

If only everyone would own up to their mistakes and be like you Mr.tedkord... The world would be a better place.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:26 2

2. thelegend6657 (unregistered)

One day I am gonna make an android tablet with full Intel i5 with Intel HD4000 GPU .
Its will destroy every other android tablets on the market .
Multitask like a boss

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 08:48 2

10. Pedro0x (Posts: 271; Member since: 19 Oct 2012)

Did you even look at anandtech´s review, surface pro doesn´t last very long on battery. Ipad lasts like 2x or more. The performance is ofcourse very good but it compensates with being a battery hog.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 09:40 1

16. thelegend6657 (unregistered)

Put in a larger battery for god's sake
Also , android is more efficient on battery than windows 8

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 11:42 2

20. feres13 (Posts: 307; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)

It's not that easy, an intel i5 with HD4000 graphics will be burning HOT, aso you'll need vents on your tablet, making them noisy, thicker and heavier and it's not what a tablet is meant to be, a tablet is meant to be thin, light, efficient, silent and has a battery that lasts at least 8Hrs, Intel should work on making more efficient processors

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 19:08

23. simplyj (Posts: 406; Member since: 23 Dec 2009)

That's because Android is designed to be a mobile OS where as Windows has slowly been improved on through time and is not truly designed with mobility in mind, although it has gotten better with Windows 8.

Also, have you seen the Surface Pro? It's very thick for a tablet. Microsoft had to sacrifice battery life for style, or else it would be too thick and no one would want that.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 11:15 1

18. yougotkilled1 (Posts: 167; Member since: 27 Apr 2011)

Even though the iPad lasts much longer than the pro, I have no problem with the battery at all in terms of it lasting all day while I'm in school. I get a good 4 and a half hours on power save mode.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:36 3

4. StreetNerd (Posts: 836; Member since: 08 Dec 2010)

Waiting for Surface with Haswell chip :D GG WP

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:39

5. Dunknown (Posts: 84; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)

This is not enough. In the future, I want to see a tablet powered with superconductor that could consume maybe 1w with a similar performance of intel Xeon Quadruple core.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:45 2

7. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

How long are you prepared to wait for your preferred architecture?

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 08:35 2

9. haseebzahid (Posts: 1853; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)

we may skip ur ideas and move to differnt technology

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 07:58

8. AamirSIII (banned) (Posts: 187; Member since: 04 Oct 2012)

lol waiting for the intel 5nm processors... lol :D

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 08:55 1

11. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

From what I've read about the HD4600,it will bring only a modest improvement in comparison to 4000 (200mhz clock speed increase and 20 vs 16 PCUs)
Also, it will NOT be nearly frugal enough in configuration with 22nm Haswell CPU to be put in a normal 500 gram tablet.

On the other hand Rogue line of chips promise enormous leap in performance compared to even the SGX 554 MP4, and Mali 658/678 could also be up there, all that while keeping or even lowering the power consumption.

In short, Intel is still far from getting competitive in true tablet space imo.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 09:10 2

13. aphrophyre (Posts: 24; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)

Compare it against the ATOM chipsets please

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 09:20

15. Rehankhan (Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)

i dont know about PowerVR GPU but i can play crysis 3 on hd 4000

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 15:09

22. downphoenix (Posts: 3165; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)

maybe at 20 FPS with lowest settings at 720p resolution. Tops. HD 4000 is crap chipset, even the budget NVidia and AMDs usually top it.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 11:01 1

17. lolol (Posts: 64; Member since: 14 Nov 2012)

Its obvious that Intel HD is better , I even played crysis 2 on a Intel HD 3000 :)

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 11:37 1

19. OpTiMuS_BlAcK (Posts: 418; Member since: 04 May 2012)

Let's see how the next gen PowerVR GPUs will compare.

posted on 01 Apr 2013, 12:08 1

21. howardbarrett (Posts: 45; Member since: 11 Jan 2013)

with rogue 6, it will become more apparent ARM SoC is the king of performance/watt.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 06:40

24. Mobile-X-Pert (Posts: 565; Member since: 20 Dec 2010)

As far as I know the Surface Pro has an Intel i5 processor not an i3.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories