x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Hard-hitting prices for the Galaxy S8 and the S8+ tipped again

0. phoneArena posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:06

Hot on the heels of a credible tip that the Galaxy S8 will cost EUR 800 in Europe, and the S8+ will command a hundred more, comes another confirmation that this year's flagship Galaxy edition will be the most expensive in the history of Samsung's top-shelf line.

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:10 3

1. mastachaz (Posts: 43; Member since: 19 Feb 2016)

they are crazy not so many changes except screen from s7 edge.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:33 4

5. kumar1234 (unregistered)

If the rumored spec of S8 is true than at this price point there is no need to upgrade for S7 users. The design looks a downgrade from S7, battery will be worse than S7. Even S6 user should buy S7 over S8 because the upgrade S8 offer over S7 is not worth $400 more price.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:45 6

8. androiduser (Posts: 233; Member since: 18 Jun 2014)

Tbh i don't think the battery will be worse because of the new more efficient processors

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:47 3

9. manojmcn (Posts: 624; Member since: 16 Jul 2015)

hahahahaha hahahahaha hahahahaha

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 07:59 1

25. tedkord (Posts: 13863; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)

He thinks he can! He thinks he can! Since the iPhone 8 is just going to be a GS6, there is no reason for iPhone users to upgrade to it. Honestly, with the Note 8 coming, there's no reason for any to upgrade to any other phone.

Every single year we see these stories, and every single year they they're wrong. They don't take into account the VAT. And, they're never a currency conversion, they are a direct change. €700 becomes $700 in the US.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 08:57 1

32. xfire99 (Posts: 934; Member since: 14 Mar 2012)

You are an idiot that compare S8 release price with S7 current price.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 11:30

40. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 14112; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)

You are a fool bruh.

Dude the Note 5 had a 3000Mah battery. I am trying to understand, how you think a 5.8" device is goign to use more battery than the Note 5 which had a 5.7" display at 1440p?

Please explain how you come up with this BS?


The Note 5 with a 3200MaH battery, last up to 28hrs in standby.

Samsung Galaxy Note5
28:34h 10:43h 13:51h 85h


So the S8 which is goign to have new chips, made on a smaller die vs the Note 7 as an example, which also had a 5.7" display...the new chips have been pegged to have a 20%+ less battery draw. Samsung display I woudl assume will use equal or less power than the one in the Note 7.

You have no facst to back up any of yoru claims. You have no idea how much power the device if goign to use.

Te device hasnt even been tested for batterylife.

So what how how did you draw that conclusion?

I'm curious? How come you've never ripped Apple from using such small batteries in their phones?

How come the iPhone Plus models in a much larger phone, have a smaller batter then the Note 4,5,6,7 and the S5,S6,S7 and the S8 for a device about the same size?!

Hey Dick, stop trolling. You have no facts. You are guessing and you are guessing wrong.

The Note 5 has a smaller battery than the Note 4, yet it lasted longer in majority of all battery tests. Your claim is BS.

The S7 as a 3000MaH battery. I dont see how you think the S8 which will have the same size battery is going to last not as long?! Especially since no one has the phone to confirm it!

You are begin foolish. Troll somewhere else.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 11:46

44. omnitech (Posts: 869; Member since: 28 Sep 2016)

This guy actually got 3 thumbs up for this ridiculous comment? What?! Lol

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:12 10

2. haruken (Posts: 112; Member since: 06 Nov 2013)

S7 Edge 32 GB = 799
S8 64GB + bigger screen => 799

I really don't see the issue...

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:30 8

4. Tyrion_Lannister (unregistered)

The problem is that this is the base model of the phone. There is no cheaper alternative. With the regular s7 at $650, we had a cheaper option if we were not into the gimmicky edge screen.

BTW, the screen is not bigger. Just because it's 5.8" doesn't mean it's bigger than the S7 edge's 5.5" screen. 18.5:9 aspect ratio actually means it will be a bit smaller.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:42 3

6. Macready (Posts: 1475; Member since: 08 Dec 2014)

No, a suggested 5.8" 18.5:9 screen will be about 85.4 cm², the 5.5" screen from the S7 Edge is around 83.4 cm².

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 05:11 2

11. Tyrion_Lannister (unregistered)

Too lazy to calculate that right now, but even if what you're saying is true, we will have lower screen estate to work with. There are on-screen buttons here.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 05:37

14. Macready (Posts: 1475; Member since: 08 Dec 2014)

Yes, when actively operating the screen this is true, when just observing (video, images etc) it is not. For this reason I've never been a big fan of on screen buttons.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 05:59 1

15. Tabby_Tiger (Posts: 275; Member since: 23 Jan 2017)

On the home screen....yes, but on screen buttons should auto hide when your apps load up

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 06:59 1

22. Tyrion_Lannister (unregistered)

That's true for only full screen apps. For system apps and most non-media apps, the buttons are always there, and for good reason.

Also what about the apps which don't use 18.5:9 at all and just work in 16:9. In that case, we will get an even smaller screen, somewhere around 5.3".

Also a factor to consider is that when the buttons hide, it's an added effort to use them since you have to glide them up and then click them. That

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 09:02

33. trojan_horse (Posts: 4647; Member since: 06 May 2016)

"Also what about the apps which don't use 18.5:9 at all and just work in 16:9. In that case, we will get an even smaller screen, somewhere around 5.3".

Yeah, but it won't take too long before devs update their apps to adapt to the 18:9/18.5:9 aspect ratio.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 09:21

35. Tyrion_Lannister (unregistered)

Apps in general will scale anyway. The real issue is existing games/videos. They will need to be cropped.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 11:43

43. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 14112; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)

So what! The buttons are on the same screen. What is changing dude? The buttons arent on all the time. When they are off, the rest of the screen is available to you. What is the problem? I dont understand?

You are trying to insert some BS when you don't even have a lick of fact to support your claim.

Why dont you just wait for the phone to get here and lets get 100% facts and not your lame assertions which make no sense whatsoever!

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 11:46

45. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 14112; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)

Dont you use Windows? The taskbar takes up part of the screen. Hwoever when you watch a video when you switch to full screen, the taskbar does not show in the move, even though it is still on the desktop. Right?

So why are you trying to subtract the onscreen buttons location?

Oh and the taskbar can also be hidden from view when not being used...right?

Here is the problem. You are trying to make your assertions into some BS that doesn't even matter.

Dude if you don't like the phone, don't buy it. But you have ZERO basis of your claim made from uneducated guesses.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 11:57 2

48. Tyrion_Lannister (unregistered)

I don't use windows. Linux for life. And it's not the same thing. On a desktop, you can use keyboard shortcuts, while on a phone, you just have the on-screen controls.

When they are hidden, you have to swipe up and then use them. That's why I always hated on-screen buttons and didn't buy a phone which had them to this date.

If oneplus stops putting real buttons too, I will be forced to move. But until then, buttons all the way. On-screen sucks.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 12:10 2

49. ecmedic4 (Posts: 420; Member since: 02 May 2013)

Your trying to reason with Techie, and you may as well give up. He will defend Samsung no matter what they do. As you can already see, soon as someone says anything about not liking something Samsung did, he's right there to defend it and tell the person how stupid they are. He doesn't understand or refuses to understand that ppl have their own preference. To him Samsung is perfect and everyone else should think so too.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:43 3

7. androiduser (Posts: 233; Member since: 18 Jun 2014)

Exactly, i don't like this new aspect ratio it's just a gimmick to trick people into thinking that they have a bigger screen on a smaller phone, it might be useful for some stuff but overall it's not worth it

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 06:03

16. Tabby_Tiger (Posts: 275; Member since: 23 Jan 2017)

Bigger screen for when the keyboard pops up such as emailing or sms in portrait mode but landscape mode might not be very useful in such cases.

Most apps are made for 16:10 or 4:3

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 11:39

42. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 14112; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)

How exactly is the phone smaller? The display is larger man, no matter just size the phone is. The S8 is roughly physically the same size as the S7 edge. The display is larger no matter what you claim.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 11:37

41. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 14112; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)

What? Please explain how an 18:5.9 aspect ration would fit on a display "smaller" than the screen on the S7 edge?

Dude that doesn't make sense.

Go look at the phone screen dude. You can see in all the photos the S8 is larger than the S7 edge as far as the display.

You can't be that blind...right?

Most of the people in the US buy phone son "contract". Basically you will be adding $45 to the bill per month vs the $32 for the S7.

I honestly dont see the problem.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 06:07 1

18. chbanks512 (Posts: 34; Member since: 07 Mar 2017)

Me neither. People freaked out about the S7 prices to and they sold in droves. They freaked out about the Note 7 price and they sold over 2.5 million before the recall.

The way I see it, I'm buying it on installments anyway, so I'm only going to pay for half the phone before I trade it in for a Note 8, so whatevs.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 06:40 2

20. piyath (Posts: 999; Member since: 23 Mar 2012)

The problem is S7 Edge is = S8+, not the S8. Normal S7 was $670 when it launched which should be equal to the S8. And the other problem is there is another great phone called LG G6 which also has a 5.7" display and only costs $650 along with few free goodies.

S8 screen is not exactly large because it's narrower and longer than S7. Also due to that edge display, usable screen area is lower than LG G6. Oh there are on screen button this times in S8 and S8+ that means low usable screen anyway. Edge display is a gimmick thus Samsung just cannot increase prices just because of that.

S7 $670, S7 Edge $780, S8 $799, S8+ 899, LG G6 $650 - 700

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 08:19

28. medtxa (Posts: 1325; Member since: 02 Jun 2014)

Okay, it's not as large as regular 5.7" screen, so what?

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 10:20

37. omnitech (Posts: 869; Member since: 28 Sep 2016)

Sure they can. You increase prices if it costs more to manufacture, there's no better way to gauge a fair price increase.

Apple increases prices just to raise their profit margin, the worse reason.

posted on 20 Mar 2017, 04:15 3

3. Bondurant (Posts: 573; Member since: 04 Jun 2014)

wait for the one plus fanboy comment: "wtf is Samsung thinking. This should be no more than 400$"

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories