AT&T finally gives up plans to acquire T-Mobile

AT&T has finally realized what the government has been trying to get through for a while: the T-Mobile acquisition just isn't going to happen. So, AT&T is paying the breakup fee and looking to strike a roaming deal instead...
This is a discussion for a news article. To read the whole news, click here

69 Comments

34. corporateJP

Posts: 2458; Member since: Nov 28, 2009

I don't necessarily agree with the first part of your arguement, but the second part I most definitely do.

36. robinrisk unregistered

I really like that idea, that way also the standards would be better implemented. For example: 2G on 800Mhz Band, 3G on 900 Mhz Band and 4G on 700Mhz band. As they get over capacity and outdated, the spectrum could be used for newer technologies. Thats a very nice idea, but impossible to implement for current technologies sadly.

63. corporateJP

Posts: 2458; Member since: Nov 28, 2009

The government can't implement anything it has NOW properly, there's no way that the ball wouldn't get dropped on something like this. That's where my issue lies.

10. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

Hooray.. finally a win for the consumer!!

13. WirelessCon

Posts: 311; Member since: May 11, 2010

Please explain how the consumer wins. I see the opposite happening.

17. WirelessCon

Posts: 311; Member since: May 11, 2010

Let me elaborate. T-Mobile is not in a competitive position. Yes they have cheap plans, but they are losing their capacity to keep such plans feasible. As they lose contracts, they will dwindle. The consumer must go elsewhere.

21. TheInfamousCJ

Posts: 20; Member since: Nov 24, 2011

The consumer wins because the market will not have a duopoly. If the merger had happened you would have had VZW with 107.7 million subscribers and At&t with over 130 million plus. Phone manufacturers would sell their product to VZW and At&t because of the number of potential buyers for their goods; with no incentive to go to the smaller carriers including sprint they could control they market based on selling goods that are not on any of the smaller carriers, once that happens they dictate the market by raising their prices to maximize profit. In this case its called competition and competition drives capitalism

38. ph00ny

Posts: 2033; Member since: May 26, 2011

There are certain "uncertain" future associated with T-Mobile USA whose parent company is not really pouring any funds into saving it. If it survives, it's a win for its customers. If not then it's a big loss for its customers as well as at&t customers who could have benefited greatly from the merger

52. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

ATT customers wouldnt have had a "big benefit" from the merger as 98% of their networks overlap. You might see slightly stronger network signals, but nothing that couldnt be done by popping up a few towers for 1/100th of the cost of buying T-Mobile. The "big benefit" was actually to T-Mobile customers who were promised to keep their plans while getting expanded coverage. As long as T-Mobile is around, it will continue to exert downward force on the market prices. The moment Tmobile dissapears the market loses one of its biggest downward pressures. That said, if T-Mo wants to stay competitive, they need to rethink their advertising strategies.. or lack there of. We had a huge sale over the weekend and unless you were in the know, you probably didnt know.. lol.

12. WirelessCon

Posts: 311; Member since: May 11, 2010

T-mobile (USA) doesn't really want to continue, so those jobs will be lost anyways. T-Mobile is a lost cause either way. At&t could have been in an innovative position. Now, not so much. Someone needs to threaten the Verizon empire.

37. robinrisk unregistered

now another company will be in position. Att, Verizon, Sprint and X company will be on the market. Better than ATT and Verizon, since they would essentialy have a duopoly.

14. gallitoking

Posts: 4721; Member since: May 17, 2011

now that they would not be bought.. is LTE and option because with every major carrier switching... their 3.5G (outside buildings) speed will not cut it...

16. GALAXY-S

Posts: 701; Member since: Jun 07, 2011

Yea soo happy now!! im glad i didnt have to move to cricket or even sprint!! :) !!

18. WirelessCon

Posts: 311; Member since: May 11, 2010

AT least the T-Mobile girl will still have a job in 6 months! At least until T-Mobile cuts back their marketing to a turtles pace.

19. joseg81

Posts: 204; Member since: Jul 15, 2011

question for me is if at&t roams on t-mobile spectrum will t-mobile be able to roam on theirs??? that would be fkn awesome for me :D

20. erikg26

Posts: 8; Member since: Apr 11, 2011

Oowww... I was waiting for the purchase !! :S

22. MorePhonesThanNeeded

Posts: 645; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

Oh boy, some people on here talk too much. Challenge the Verizon empire? Exaggerate much? AT&T is only slightly smaller than Verizon, not sure what kind of stupid juice you have been drinking though good one! You must be mad if you thought that AT&T acquiring T-Mobile would have meant better prices, how would less competition equal better prices for the customer? More competition drives the fight for our money, since you people don't seem to understand how competition works in the capitalist system. We need 4 big boys in the Telcom space to take care of major metropolis areas that way we can have them fight over our dollars. Even if we go down to 3 major telcoms at least one doesn't get swallowed up by another big telcom. T-Mobile needs a partner to help them out and I hope Dish gives them a hand. AT&T needs to work on their network, they cry about spectrum but it's their own fault for not acquiring spectrum when it was up for bid. Don't come crying now about it, get your stuff together and build your network right. These guys charge as much as Verizon yet their network isn't as large nor as efficient, so what are you paying so much for? I seriously hope AT&T doesn't pull a Sprint and start charging extra for 4G, that would be character suicide. Verizon is run by some pretty savvy guys, they split off from their Vodaphone bosses and became self sufficient and are now viable. Expensive but you get the best(arguably) network in the US, they did what they had to, went after the technology, implemented it and where are they now? Come on Verizon like the rest of the telcoms are here to make money, so why is it Verizon is the only one pushing the envelope. Sure they aren't the nicest guys, but heck they do know how to keep customers happy. Now if Verizon FioS would go down in price I would get that so I can get synchronous internet, tired of the split up and down speeds.

54. Forsaken77

Posts: 553; Member since: Jun 09, 2011

TMo is not a "big boy." They're a budget carrier for people who can't afford or don't want to pay higher cell phone bills and settle for sh!t service. AT&T is about $25 cheaper per month than Verizon when you combine a $10 savings here, $5 savings there ect... I know, I used to have Verizon and Sprint, and then landed at AT&T because I get the same exact coverage as Verizon in my area, NY, and pay $25 less per month. Yes, AT%T F'ed up with acquiring spectrum in the past but it doesn't make the fact invalid they they need it now. I wish they did get rid of TMo and adsorb all their spectrum/frequencies into one carrier. Everyone who has AT&T/TMo would have better signals all around the country. And gimme a break with the "throttling the top 5% bs." For you to actually be in the top 5% out of millions of people you have to be one serious burden on the network. These are people that are taxing the hell out of the network by doing things like letting their phone/access point feed half an apt. building. That's what a guy in my complex was doing. He was leaving his connection open to anyone in range, meaning next to him and above/below him got very good reception. So don't make it seem like the top 5% is anyone going over 2GB, because that's FAARRR from the truth.

23. taz89

Posts: 2014; Member since: May 03, 2011

t-mo wants to leave the US and they will eventually,all the gov have done is delayed it and the US will end with only 3 big carriers even though this deal did not go through...so they should have just allowed it....

24. squallz506

Posts: 1075; Member since: Oct 19, 2011

Cant you just let me enjoy it while it lasts lol?

50. ILikeBubbles

Posts: 525; Member since: Jan 17, 2011

not if they're bought out by Google. :)

26. InspectorGadget80 unregistered

Thank goodness. just hope AT&T WON'T JACK UP THEIR PHONE PRICES

27. Alantef

Posts: 288; Member since: Sep 14, 2011

PARTY TIME.....NOW GOOGLE STEP UP AND DO WHATS RIGHT!!!!!!BUY T-MOBILE!!!!

28. GALAXY-S

Posts: 701; Member since: Jun 07, 2011

that would be sweet!!

53. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

LOL, that was the first thing i said to myself. "OK Google, now is your chance!!" If we become google wireless, does that mean we get free nexus's too?? heck yea!! :)

30. Carlitos

Posts: 670; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

Not trying to be a spoiler, but not everything good comes from this. Few bad things actually. At&t customers could possibly experience an increase in prices. As for slower slower speeds, because not much spectrum. Also T-mobile better put that money to good use, because if they dont, bye bye tmobile USA very soon. (unless someone else buys them, but dishnetwork, is the only one so far) I'm an AT&t customer and even i know whats going on. No need to hide the facts, all aT7t said was probably not a lie, i do find it believeable that they are running out of spectrum, but oh well.

39. robinrisk unregistered

yes, att customers will experience the same network that they have. They can switch to T mobile, Verizon or Sprint. With better prices (Tmobile and Sprint) or a better network (Verizon and possibly sprint with the network vision) Better prices or a better network. How┬┤s that not a win for consumers?

31. rigo

Posts: 8; Member since: Jan 13, 2010

glad it did not go their way..... AT&T's... they are always ripping people off, with their break downs on options...they charge for just about everything and get away with it, text .......extra, pictures extra, tether extra, unlimited data extra...........paper bill, extra...haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa hear this from my dumb ass frien who wanted to have an Iphone"............. now he is sorry but would have to pay a lot of money to get out of it........ thank youuuuuuu uncle sam

43. DOGIEFRESH

Posts: 316; Member since: Jul 15, 2009

Tmo will desapear anyway they wanna leave the US so rather than getting purchace with right value the goverment is forcing DT to go bankrupt and sell out for cheap....!!!!

47. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

Meanwhile, verizon is allowed to add more spectrum - guess who has the politicians in their back pocket....lol. At least I am on the right network.
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.