5 things that could have made the Samsung Galaxy S5 better
posted by Victor H. / Feb 26, 2014, 4:35 AM
Many will be quick to point out that the Galaxy S5 did not live up to all the hype. It did not have the rumored Quad HD display, nor a Snapdragon 805 chip, nor an iris scanner, after all. Truth is, it was almost impossible to live up to all these expectations as they were based on wishes rather than reality.
However, there are other things that Samsung could have done in the Galaxy S5 to make it better. Righ below, you can see the 5 features that Samsung could have implemented without going into sci-fi territory, but didn’t.
Samsung Galaxy S5 OS: Android 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop, 5.0 Lollipop, 4.4.4, 4.4.2 View Full specs
- Display 5.1" 1080 x 1920 pixels
- Camera 16 MP / 2.1 MP front
- Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 801, Quad-core, 2500 MHz
- Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
- Battery 2800 mAh(21h 3G talk time)
Posts: 621; Member since: Jul 31, 2013
Quad display won't make any phone better, stop it. Quad displays are stupid and i'm glad they didn't put that stupid s**t on their already bad phone. What would have made this phone better, is it not being made. But honestly, band aid backing, heart rate monitor, finger print scanner, ugly bezels bigger than the S4 because of copying water proofing. Awful flagship is awful and QUAD HD would not have saved it
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 4:38 AM 24
Posts: 439; Member since: May 12, 2012
Am just stunned the only touched on size when it comes to design.. I mean the phone is obviously the ugliest of all flagship phones!! How can victor miss that?? It just heightens the notion that phonearena are in samsungs deep pockets
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 5:15 AM 10
Posts: 474; Member since: Dec 29, 2013
Design is a matter of opinion buddy. What you just said is like me saying "The HTC One has a terrible design because it's not in my favorite color." It's obvious they did something wrong when the majority if people think it looks bad but the gold is the only one that live up to the hate for me.
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 5:48 AM 6
Posts: 81; Member since: Jan 13, 2013
while you are correct that it is a matter of opinion, but you have to admit most ppl will think the phone got uglier. The dimpled back.... The iPhone, the HTC One and the Nexus 5 are much more aesthetically pleasing to the eye. It appears samsung changed it just for the sake of change. its still a great phone tho
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 12:32 PM 2
Posts: 236; Member since: Feb 16, 2013
i couldn't agree more. i've been following PhoneArena and other sites like GSMarena for several years and PA has always been partial to Samsung and i bet (in fact, i am 100% sure) that the review score on the S5 will be at least 9 out of 10, which is obviously not deserving of the S5's incredibly huge deception. Why did Samsung even release the S5? If u really want a Galaxy phone, just buy the now cheaper S4 - it's more pocketable with its smaller size and looks exactly the same as the S5.
posted on Feb 27, 2014, 2:11 AM 0
Posts: 263; Member since: Jul 05, 2011
Spec wise the phone is average (not including 3GB is unforgivable Samsung!) but the worst thing about this phone is it's FUGLY!! The whole Samsung design department needs to be FIRED!
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 5:28 AM 10
Posts: 236; Member since: Feb 16, 2013
I was waiting in anticipation for the live S5 reveal since last year! and right after i saw the S5 on the live stream video, my hopes sank faster than the titanic. I closed the youtube broadcast and went off to read articles about other manufacturers' upcoming flagships. The only real hopes left for this year are HTC One+ and LG G3. The S5 is simply the biggest disappointment in smartphone flagship history!! To think i waited months and saved up to buy that uninspired, boring, phablet-like plastic device... So many rumors... Design 3.0? yeah right!
posted on Feb 27, 2014, 2:18 AM 0
Posts: 208; Member since: Sep 14, 2012
I am huge Samsung fan and convinced 10s of my friends to buy galaxy devices and they were happy but this time I am totally upset and won't recommend S5. The Galaxy Note 3 is still the most powerful phone in the world, by powerful I mean the overall performance and productivity offered by it.
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 8:02 AM 4
Posts: 3; Member since: Jun 27, 2012
imran86 I am totally with you on this. I am a fan also and the reveal of the S5 made me think this is the most disappointing reveal I have seen and the S4 reveal wasn't exciting either. As Foneaddict said the lack of 3GB of RAM is unbelieveable considering you just did it on the Note3. Really don't like the back at all. A smooth matte finish would have looked better..unexciting..but better. And maybe it's just me but I really don't care about fingerprint scanners either so there is nothing here for me. If the Note 4 is just a Note 3 with waterproofing and a fingerprint scanner, I will be keeping my Note 3 for another year or looking to HTC
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 10:44 AM 3
Posts: 81; Member since: Jan 13, 2013
I have the N5 but if I was a samsung person I would get the Note 3 too. Totally agree with you. I like the stylus features. I may get samsung phone or tablet some day and its def gonna be one that has the stylus features
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 12:36 PM 0
Posts: 752; Member since: Jan 18, 2013
Hire LG's, HTC's, and Sony's R&D.
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 4:40 AM 4
Posts: 1106; Member since: Feb 23, 2012
They're only used to copying. They couldn't copy this time because everyone is suing left right and center, these days. So they did the next possible thing for them. Copy their previous design.
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 4:51 AM 5
Posts: 1129; Member since: Feb 15, 2013
you can't really complain on the size. they had to go water-resistant. it's even good that they managed to bring a slightly smalelr size than the xperia z2 althought the z2 has a slightly bigger display, considerably bigger battery, and bigger camera sensor.
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 4:41 AM 2
Posts: 565; Member since: Mar 29, 2013
I for one do not care about water-resistance. I do not take my phone near the shower or pool nor use it in the rain. If I wanted it to be water-resistant, I would buy a case or buy nano-coating to it. They could have gone the way of the S4 and release an active version but nooooooo, they assumed everyone will adapt to the bigger size. Wrong move samsung, you just lost a customer passionate about your products (I'll stick with my S4 and get the iPhone 6)
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 5:19 AM 5
Posts: 20; Member since: Jul 02, 2013
and they did not only went water resistant but also managed to have a removable battery
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 8:11 AM 0
Posts: 2541; Member since: Oct 31, 2011
But *why* did they have to go water resistant? Is this really that big a selling point for all that many users? It's absolutely nowhere near my checklist when going through what I want from a device. And granted different people have different opinions, I just don't see it being this massively important feature for all that many people. Size however, is.
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 9:16 AM 1
Posts: 2263; Member since: Apr 26, 2012
How about a better design that doesn't look like a band aid?
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 4:41 AM 13
Posts: 5629; Member since: Mar 08, 2013
Samsung Galaxy S5 Designed for doctors and nurses.
posted on Feb 26, 2014, 4:48 AM 12
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):