ZTE Grand X Pro Review
In reality, the results aren't horrible by any means, especially if you're looking to do some casual photography, though there are some key takeaways to consider. First and foremost, the amount of light (or lack thereof) is detrimental to the performance of the snapper. Said otherwise, as soon as the lights go down (or out), the already overexposed snaps get an awful cyan tint to them, making them a pain to look at. The amount of detail is on the low-side, and photos often have more than average noise to them.
The front shooter is a lowly 0.3-megapixel unit that offers passable quality for the occasional video call.
Sample Images Fullscreen
More popular slideshows
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 2
14 Oct 2013, 05:28
Apple iPhone 5s vs Samsung Galaxy S4
27 Sep 2013, 05:59
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One
26 Mar 2013, 06:51
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Samsung Galaxy S4
15 Oct 2013, 05:44
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact Review
23 Jan 2014, 09:22
Google Nexus 5 vs LG G2
11 Nov 2013, 06:01
Apple iPad Air vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition
16 Nov 2013, 04:22
Apple iPhone 5s vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
03 Oct 2013, 06:30
There isn't a whole lot to be said about the multimedia capabilities of the ZTE Grand X Pro – they cover the essentials, but you'll struggle playing something fancier in an .mkv or .mov encoding for example. Speaking of playback, the speaker (found on the lower back) is pretty loud, but quality goes down the toilet as soon as you crank it up.
The built-in players are your normal stock Android representatives, they simply have a skinned icon, which some people may confuse for something custom-made. They perform fine, as they always have, though you do have an incredible amount of alternatives to pick from on the Play Store, in case they're not your cup of tea.
Headphones output power (Volts)
Higher is better
HTC Desire 300 0.59
ZTE Grand X Pro 0.3
Loudspeaker loudness (dB)
Higher is better
HTC Desire 300 67
ZTE Grand X Pro 75
1. darkvadervip (Posts: 260; Member since: 08 Dec 2010)
Another failed android device but yet google brags about all the activations.
2. PapaSmurf (Posts: 5770; Member since: 14 May 2012)
What seems to be a 'fail' to you could possibly be a great device for others, especially those who don't want to dish out a lot of money for a smartphone. Stop being ignorant and learn to live a little yeah?
3. apexKBC (Posts: 84; Member since: 10 Dec 2012)
PA should think abt their rating's.....??????
As always BIASED
4. KingDingaLing (Posts: 49; Member since: 11 Oct 2013)
Cmon man. Nobody is waiting in line for this phone.
5. KingDingaLing (Posts: 49; Member since: 11 Oct 2013)
The majority want the latest and greatest. A ton of people do whatever they can to rock the newest device out. People on welfare are rocking late model high end phones.
6. jp1132 (Posts: 1; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Speak for yourself, I personally prefer inexpensive devices like the Lumia 521. Also i would never make a line to get a new device that is just ridiculous.
7. WestFiasco (Posts: 12; Member since: 29 May 2013)
I would appreciate some video reviews, i like mobile devices. i like to see what's available, unless i plan on buying the phone i'm not going to read a review. Though I would watch it.
|Display||4.5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels (326 ppi) TFT|
MediaTek MT6577T, Dual core, 1200 MHz, ARM Cortex-A9 processor
1024 MB RAM
|Size||5.22 x 2.54 x 0.37 inches|
(132.6 x 64.4 x 9.4 mm)
5.15 oz (146 g)
|Battery||2000 mAh, 11.25 hours talk time|