Sony Xperia ZL ReviewSony Xperia ZL 8
With its 2370mAh battery, the Sony Xperia ZL can deliver 10 hours of continuous talk time or 500 hours of stand-by – figures that other handsets can top, but still a decent result nonetheless. The battery's longevity can be extended with the built-in Stamina mode, which disables the phone's power-hungry features whenever they aren't needed. Note that the smartphone's battery is sealed and cannot be swapped if required.
If the Sony Xperia Z was Batman, then the Sony Xperia ZL would be Robin – a less exciting sidekick, yet a superhero nonetheless. At first we were a bit underwhelmed by the latter's lack of visual appeal, but the more we used it, the more we got used to its peculiarities, so we eventually grew quite fond of Sony's new device.
Note that the Sony Xperia ZL is not a smartphone for those who value fashion over functionality. Rather, it is a capable multimedia device meant to be used extensively, not admired behind a glass window. It delivers nearly flawless performance with its powerful, quad-core processor, while its 13MP will capture those precious moments in great clarity.
Of course, checking out some of the Sony Xperia ZL alternatives before actually getting one would be a wise move. The first one that comes to mind is the Xperia Z, which is just as capable, but it is better looking and resistant to water damage. An even better, but a tad pricier choice would be the Samsung Galaxy S4, which is currently one of the best smartphones money can buy. If you're a fan of premium materials, then HTC One is the handset to try, although you'll have to settle with a slightly smaller screen.
Sony Xperia ZL Video Review:
- Fast quad-core processor delivers great performance
- Camera launches fast even from lock screen
- IR blaster
- Boring design
- Awkward front-facing camera placement
- Sharp corners make it feel less compact than it is
1. lee480 (Posts: 197; Member since: 24 Sep 2012)
So S4's horrible design got praised? Wow! Not surprising at all. It's PA! :)
6. Jason2k13 (Posts: 1215; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)
They never praised the S4 design, they just mentioned that the S4 was very comfortable to hold and the fact that it has no sharp edges like what XZ and XZL has.
The ZL design is not mind blowing either, unless a black rectangle design is unique to you?
9. istitch (Posts: 181; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)
by simply using the word boring in design, you are actually being so subjective, i mean, you see every samsung's handset(except for s2) is rounded and share the same design, can we not say the design is boring too?
I have personally tried holding the ZL, it's comfortable enough, and the smaller footprint is noticeable, making it easier to manage.
10. Jason2k13 (Posts: 1215; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)
Most flagship such as the lumia, galaxy, xperia etc. All share the same design concept not just samsung phones, and when one says "boring" that's their own opinion and personal choice. It's got nothing to do with being subjective.
I quite like the ZL to, but I agree with the slightly sharp edges.
14. istitch (Posts: 181; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)
opinion itself is subjective, i beg to differ.
What i've seen up there, i can only sense downsides of the ZL in terms of design, and it's slightly thicker, somehow it's not entirely bad, some people like that for being more sturdy and comfortable to hold
41. skyguy7567 (Posts: 148; Member since: 17 Nov 2012)
I'm using the Xperia Z to comment this RIGHT NOW but I don't think the edges are uncomfortable. I think that the SIII/IV'S rounded design doesn't feel that you are holding a phone but a disk.
11. SleepingOz (unregistered)
Horrible aesthetic is debatable but horrible design, not so much.
Design, first of all, is about ergonomy and anthropometry. The GSIV excels in both! You can't bash Samsung for their recurring design while praising Sony for doing the same. Sony has been using this rectangular design since XS, it was good-looking last year but it's becoming boring now.
Also no matter how beautiful a phone may be, if the specs, features and performance disappoint, it's an uber fail.
42. skyguy7567 (Posts: 148; Member since: 17 Nov 2012)
Samsung has been using rounded designs since the Galaxy S. Then why isn't that boring? I am bored by that.
2. tiara6918 (Posts: 2045; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
With the phones tag price(slightly cheaper than the xperia z), I think this phone is meant to compete with the one x+/butterfly,optimus g and maybe even the note2(the price already depreciated). As for the screen,it might be a bit washed out at an angle but the screen is still viewable, I had already seen people holding the xperia z/zl and the screen isn't that bad
5. istitch (Posts: 181; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)
Not sure if biased, or just too dumb to judge
8. Scarambay (Posts: 93; Member since: 18 Jan 2013)
Boring Design? Ever seen Samsung phones, Nick?
28. Nick_T (Posts: 170; Member since: 27 May 2011)
Yes, I have, but I wouldn't call them boring even though they are all alike. The thing with Samsung is that people like the design of its smartphones, judging by how much they sell each quarter. Why would Samsung change a working formula? Why does a Porsche 911 sold today looks so similar to the way it did in 1963?
30. Scarambay (Posts: 93; Member since: 18 Jan 2013)
Oh boy! You mean to say sales is directly proportional to design? Samsung Galaxy phones get sold because of three main reasons: (1) The flagship S series' hardware i.e, brutal processing power and the software features that come along. (2) The entry-level and mid-range phones of Samsung are pretty cheap compared to other OEMs' phones making most of the people to opt for them. (3) The smartphone market is flooded with zillion number of variants of Samsung phones. So an average user, who has no technical knowledge, has higher chances of getting a Samsung phone compared to other OEMs.
As a matter of fact, the design of Galaxy phones including the flagship S series has always been under scrutiny.
36. istitch (Posts: 181; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)
FIRST THING FIRST, people buy the smartphone doesnt mean it's not boring, the fact that samsung devices sell so well is because of marketing, they flood all the advertising board, the newspaper, everything you see out there.
just because they succeed in sale, and now you say their design is better than the others
38. Xenaz (Posts: 144; Member since: 28 Apr 2013)
So this is how you judge a phone's design? Seriously? So you mean Toyota sell more than the Lamborghini, and Lamborghini's desgin is boring?!! What a joke!!
I think PA shouldn't let ppl with this kind of mindset to review any phone in the future, this is ridiculous......
12. siluro (Posts: 46; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
Lots of people seem hurt a $760 phone from Sony doesn't quite live up to everything it was made out to be... If you complain about the S4, remember that even the S4 is over $100 cheaper, and the HTC over $150 cheaper.
Sony gives you, a compact yet cheap package such as a plastic textured back, mediocre camera (compared to other high end), poor viewing angles on its display, no microsd, lesser CPU and the list goes on.
I will look elsewhere for a phone thanks.
15. Scarambay (Posts: 93; Member since: 18 Jan 2013)
Both Xperia Z and ZL have got MicroSD slot, Smartypants. The hype you mentioned was always about Xperia Z and yes, it does manage to live up to the expectations with its sleek and glassy design, water and dust resistant ability barring the not-so-good camera and poor contrast.
18. GTR722 (Posts: 261; Member since: 20 Oct 2012)
ZL is $579 at amazon my friend, GS4 is over 700$
21. Feanor (Posts: 725; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)
You mention the pricing policy of Sony in the USA but elsewhere in the world the Xperia Z has a similar price to the GS4 and the HTC One and the ZL is quite a bit cheaper.
22. buccob (Posts: 2573; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
And, if you want to see a well balance and professional review... go to GSMArena.. they reviewed the ZL recently and it shows that excels Xperia Z in display, and some performance...
Sony is good for optimizing the chips they put in their phones... even if they are older ones...
Also there are many "hidden" benefits for getting a xperia... they do have some software and hardware innovation that until recently wasn't matched... But I also notice that Samsung puts great effort on software innovation and thats where the market is heading
23. XperiaUser (unregistered)
absolutely correct. but i think samsung have some vary little advantage over sony in hardware .but in software aside, all goodies provided by samsung is totally waste bloatware, its only good on paper and only for showing your friend while sony have some serious goodies which is really useful . they optimize there hardware perfectly ,and they have really awesome polished UI.
but SONY really needs to improve there camera software :(
13. Rexperia (Posts: 134; Member since: 28 Sep 2012)
PA never been satisfied with Sony's smartphone, no matter what it is, i keep wondering why...???
17. emadshiny (Posts: 1144; Member since: 05 Dec 2012)
No surprise to see PA came to this conclusion that there are other alternatives and of course the best is a Sammy branded phone. don't you think you have missed something? i mean IP5?! LOL
20. anleoflippy (Posts: 595; Member since: 03 Jan 2013)
I own the Xperia ZL the phone is just great all around.
The design of the phone to me seems to be more attarctive than the Z, but this is my perspective. And this is one of the most compact 5 inch screen smartphone, along with the S4 and the Pantech Vega. Iron. I do use a back jelly case so the sharp edges is minor but I do notice that. Although the ZL is thicker but it has the curve back which makes it very comfortable in the hand. I do agree on the position of the front facing camera, I am a right hand user and it does blocks the camera when I'm using it it potrait. However, using in landsacpe is just fine. And yes, I don't care about the viewing angles, at least it has white balance settings. The screen is just tad better than the Z.
Again, the Xperia ZL fits "my" requirements, a compact 5 inch screen with good specs and usability. The keyword here is "me" as in myself. And the price is just way cheaper (RM1899) here in Asia (East Malaysia specifically) than the Z (RM2199) and Galaxy S3 (at Samsung Stores RM1999).
25. pyradark (Posts: 863; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
What to expect from PA. Even the mid range nokia got 9.0 with nothin to offer!!
Still review on this site will not damage millions of people who want to buy a sony product.
CNet score it very good
26. bgdkid (Posts: 13; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)
people like yoou "nick" deserve low quality junk... you have no idea what you are talking about just like all the phonearena reviewers.. all these so called experts has no idea about how to do journalism, never even taken a lesson for it. people like you guys will never get a professional job in established media. will always be a fan boy website crap. people like you guys are destroying journalism....
29. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3913; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Ya fink you cunh do bettah??
You need not come here if you have to criticize someone that bad...you can go somewhere else. You chose to register yourself on this site, you chose to read this article...PA or Nick didn't choose you.
|Display||5.0 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels (441 ppi) TFT|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro, Quad-core, 1500 MHz, Krait processor
2 GB RAM
|Size||5.18 x 2.75 x 0.39 inches|
(131.6 x 69.8 x 9.8 mm)
5.33 oz (151 g)
|Battery||2370 mAh, 10 hours talk time|