Sony Xperia Z vs Apple iPhone 5
Sony has done a really good job streamlining the Android user interface and making it a bit more simple to use. That said, Android is Android, which means that it simply has way more options and settings for the user to play with than the iPhone's iOS 6. The choice when it comes to the user experience delivered by both platforms is a pretty simple one: If you want a device which you can tweak and customize to your liking, then you should get the Xperia Z. However, if you want a device that is really easy to use, then make no mistake about it – the iPhone 5 has the much more straightforward experience. Heavy multitaskers will enjoy the support for widgets and small apps in the Xperia Z, but casual users will appreciate the simplistic layout and lengthy battery life of the iPhone 5. In the end, neither experience is better, you just have to decide which one suits your usage style better.
Thanks to its bigger screen, the Xperia Z has the upper hand as far typing on the on-screen keyboard goes. Naturally, both the portrait and landscape keyboards are much more spacious on Sony's device, which can make the life of heavy texters that much easier.
Processor and Memory
Of course, there's not much use in comparing the hardware of smartphones that are running different operating systems, but we'll still do so for all the silicon aficionados out there.
Specs-wise, the Xperia Z is the more impressive handset, as it features a powerful quad-core processor – the Snapdragon S4 Pro, clocked at 1.5 GHz. The CPU is accompanied by the Adreno 320 GPU, which is also quite powerful, and together, this hardware can easily perform even the most demanding tasks with ease.
Meanwhile, the iPhone 5 is equipped with the dual-core A6 SoC, clocked at 1.3 GHz. The GPU is the powerful PowerVR SGX543MP3. As you can imagine, this combo is also capable of running every app incredibly smoothly, without a hint of lag.
The Sony Xperia Z comes with 16 GB of internal storage, but it also features a microSD card slot, allowing you to easily expand its storage space if need be. In contrast, the Apple iPhone 5 is offered in 16, 32 or 64 GB flavors, with no microSD support.
Internet and Connectivity
Internet browsing is a very important area, because one of the coolest and most frequently used features of a smartphone is the browser.
With Jelly Bean, Google decided to remove the stock browser from Android 4.0 ICS and replace it with mobile Chrome. There are good and bad sides to this. Among the things that Chrome does better are the double-tap zooming, the artificial font size increase of the important text areas, and the tabs. On the other hand, it's has a bit more lag and lacks Flash Player support. If having to use multiple browsers for different stuff doesn't bother you, though, this can be remedied by installing an additional, third-party browser and side-loading the Flash Player plug-in from Adobe's site.
A bit less flexible is the trusty Safari browser found on the iPhone 5. It also doesn't allow you to install the Flash Player, though you can get partial Flash support by installing some of the third-party browsers available. Still, lag is pretty much non-existent, and browsing feels tight, fun and satisfying. In the end, both handsets are great for browsing the web, with the Xperia Z being a bit more versatile, and the iPhone 5 being a bit more precise in terms of navigation.
Both the Xperia Z and iPhone 5 feature LTE and high-speed HSPA+ connectivity for up to 42.2 Mbit/s download speed. In addition, they both have Bluetooth 4.0 and support all the Wi-Fi profiles including 'n' on the 5GHz band, but only the Xperia Z has NFC.
1. hung2900 (Posts: 805; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
As usual iPhone wins this game. We know that's from the beginning when visiting PhoneArena.
However I totally agree about the screen and camera. The camera of Sony's recent phones are very disappointing. But anyway Android is way better than iOS, so overall for me Xperia Z is much more superior than the flat boring iPhone.
4. tiara6918 (Posts: 1447; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
How exactly did the iPhone5 win against the xperia z?it's only better in terms of image,video and call quality but other than that xperia tops it all
6. hung2900 (Posts: 805; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
Yes, that's exactly what I said, only the screen and camera (I don't care abt call quality) are two areas Xperia loses against iPhone, the the rest are not.
And the most important, it's running Android.
10. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5482; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)
I don't think that iPhone 5 camera is better...
52. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3013; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Cool down boys...cool down!
Why don't we dunk, hell dip!!!, them two smartphones in the water and see who wins??
Ray S, please??? Can you try that?
We all know which phone is going to win hands down in real time challenge...
63. timaustin2000 (Posts: 35; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
I agree, PhoneArenaUser - check the focal length, people. The crop means that the Z's image is zoomed in far more than the 5's. Zoom both to the same framing or, better yet, frame them identically when you take the photograph. Now I'm not going to say that the Xperia ain't a little softer on detail, it is, but zoom the iPhone in to match the crop of the Xperia and you're going to get a mess of blocky pixels: no better.
And the video may be darker on the Xperia but i'm looking at the detailing - the window, the cracks in the road: they're both sharper on the Xperia.
This seems rushed to me.
65. timaustin2000 (Posts: 35; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
Hold on,... is it me or is the zoom tool used on the comparison shots a different size?! Open a couple of browser windows, guys: compare them. The zoom window used on the iPhone is clearly cropping a different ratio to the Xperia.
I'm more than happy to accept that the Xperia is inferior if the side by side comparison was fair. Forgive me, Phonearena, but there seems some jiggery-pokery going on, whether intentional or not.
13. gmracer1 (Posts: 646; Member since: 28 Dec 2012)
You are a smacktard. The iPhone 5 doesn't even have a full 720p screen. And Sony makes the iPhone's camera, btw.
Sigh...another clueless fanboy.
28. SleepingOz (unregistered)
Dude, you are the "smacktard" here. A good screen is not just about dpi, you know. I'm not praising the iphone(God knows how I "love" the iphone) but it has one of the best display out there.
And so what's with sony making the iphone's camera?! Doesn't change the fact that the iphone's camera is better than the one on the XZ.
44. gmracer1 (Posts: 646; Member since: 28 Dec 2012)
LMMFAO I love when people try to talk sh*t and don't even have a clue. Do you what DPI even means? DPI = Dots Per Inch. When did I ever talk about DPI, in my comment?
Yeah, the Retina display is nice, but the ONLY good looking thing on the iPhone screen is the icons.......and that's it. Go compare a YouTube video on both the iPhone 5 and the Galaxy S3. You will see such a difference. The S3 (which has a full 720p screen) shows a gorgeous playback--without the fuzz and color fade that the iPhones show. Hell, even my Razr Maxx has better video playback quality than the iPhone.
I work in this business, pimpslice. I deal with these phones every single day. Until you know exactly what you're talking about, please refrain from commenting.
And here are a few fun facts for ya:
Computer monitors use the DPI measurement. Cell phones use the PPI (pixels per inch) measurement.
iPhone 5 screen = 640 x 1136 @ 326ppi
Galaxy S3 screen = 720 x 1280 @ 306ppi
Razr Maxx screen = 540 x 960 @ 256ppi
75. daftastic (Posts: 87; Member since: 07 Jan 2013)
Your argument fell upon itself. The denser the screen the better the picture.
e.g. 720p on 3.5 inch screen will always look better than 720p on a 13.5 inch screen.
79. gmracer1 (Posts: 646; Member since: 28 Dec 2012)
You would really try to cram 720 lines on a 3.5" screen? It would look blotchy. It's like when someone tries to shrink an 8MP picture into a thumbnail--trying to maintain all quality. It looks like crap until it's blown up into a larger picture. Even comparing my Nexus 7's screen to the S3's (both 720p), I find the Nexus' picture to be finer. If the Nexus' pixel count was higher, it would be even better.
Another great example is on tv's. Ever see the 20"-32" range tv's that have a supposed 1080p resolution? They look like crap. Compare those little tv's to ones in the range of 50" and higher (both 720p and 1080p).
80. daftastic (Posts: 87; Member since: 07 Jan 2013)
Not literally of course. The point is the denser the screen the better. A 128DPI screen playing a 720p video would look worse than a 300+PPI playing the same video right? Which is why 720p videos look crisper on mobile devices than laptops/computers.
I dunno about you, but text in my 1080p 22" Samsung LED show chromatic aberration compared to my 13" Macbook LCD screen.
82. gmracer1 (Posts: 646; Member since: 28 Dec 2012)
Have you recalibrated your tv--if even possible? I know it's usually a problem with the lens(es).
127. tokyojo (Posts: 2; Member since: 12 Mar 2013)
just read your post.. im in tokyo just about to buy a new smart phone!! iphone 5 xeperia Z or Eluga?? which would you choose ? and why thanks! justin
130. KazutoR7 (Posts: 1; Member since: 25 May 2013)
both screen and camera are better on xperia z
76. giri555 (Posts: 95; Member since: 15 Mar 2012)
I have received 2 "WARNINGS" from Moderators Of PA, for Speaking Truth....by highlighting how Poor, Biased and Flawed these Reviews are....
108. sonykov (Posts: 7; Member since: 22 Nov 2012)
the point is whatever is being compared to the piece of sh*t (iphone), phonearena will make the iphone win
55. giri555 (Posts: 95; Member since: 15 Mar 2012)
Poor Review, followed by Poor Comparison...Thumbs down PA...you are losing credibility, among people who read tech reviews, and know a thing or two about technology, the real smartphone users...
iPhone users don't read reviews, they blindly follow, so this dosen't matter to them though...
84. dynamo.one (Posts: 63; Member since: 14 Feb 2013)
worst screen ever from sony..not a fun of apple but the retina display looks better..
111. dynamo.one (Posts: 63; Member since: 14 Feb 2013)
Low contrast display with below-par viewing angles
92. XperiaPrince (Posts: 108; Member since: 25 Dec 2012)
iPhone 5 better than xperia Z? Im not suprised that iPhoneArena would say this. But i checked out other sources they said that xperia Z is better and in my opinion, Xperia Z is clearly a better and more capable phone.This comparison is nonesense. comparing a sexy rugged smartphone to a brick phone.
2. emadshiny (Posts: 1135; Member since: 05 Dec 2012)
Xperia Z all the way.
for the attention of those who criticize Sony's camera. just take a look at pictures taken by both devices and see how Sony put Iphone into shame.
3. Savage (unregistered)
So Xperia Z is not reliable and capable?
Well done Ray.
72. GTR722 (Posts: 241; Member since: 20 Oct 2012)
Just look at this: "The CPU is accompanied by the Adreno 320 GPU, which is also quite powerful" and now for the iPhone: "The GPU is the powerful PowerVR SGX543MP3". PhoneArena = Apple and Samsung slaves.
5. aokde (Posts: 186; Member since: 09 Jul 2012)
ofcourse, according to iphonearena iphone 5 is not beatable. i really don't understand you ray, iphone is passé.
11. lee480 (Posts: 176; Member since: 24 Sep 2012)
Wait!!! Didn't Sony make Apple's camera sensors??
62. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6599; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
he's just too damn stupid and a idiot he's stlil in love with his iphone and don't even know SONY makes Apples camera. Ray is a biased SOB
12. emadshiny (Posts: 1135; Member since: 05 Dec 2012)
what we see here is a phone which has a 8.5 score can defeat a 9 point scorer. thats interesting.
15. affandi (Posts: 85; Member since: 25 Jan 2013)
Haha, as soon as I read the word "superior", I pronounced it in my mind with the accent of Ray, and in an instant I knew that the Xperia was lost.
16. kobainez (Posts: 302; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
So where's the screen comparison? I bet if there's a screen comparison Iphonearena wouldn't turn on the bravia engine. I think this xperia Z is not the retail one just a pre production unit. Other sites the xperia Z camera is superior to Iphone 5 camera. This site is the most biased site ever!
20. kobainez (Posts: 302; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Now all of U xperia Z haters look at this and tell me which one better. This is screen comparison from other websiteshttp://i582.photobucket.com/al
bums/ss269/netbookc/XB1/viPhonXperia screen is superior to Iphone 5 screen and im nt just saying there's the link e5_2.jpg
39. _Bone_ (Posts: 2135; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
A low-res dark room photo from the front is hardly doing any justice, you'll use it mostly under heavy light and mostly a bit off perfect viewing angle, and that's where the TFT suffers. Look at black levels and contrast here:
In any case I'd easily pick up the Sony between the two.
46. kobainez (Posts: 302; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Stop posting protoype unit of the Z. Xperia Z screen is better than most of them only the viewing angles is a lil bad. I dont watch my phone sideways like most Crapmoled fans would do
49. _Bone_ (Posts: 2135; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
not a prototype unit dummy, it has the release HW & SW and produces the same results your certified official reviews mention heh
It has a TFT screen. Deal with it.
47. kobainez (Posts: 302; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
78. daftastic (Posts: 87; Member since: 07 Jan 2013)
Don't mean to be the bearer of bad news, but the viewing angles of the Xperia Z are terrible and fall flat against S-LCD etc.
Just pointing it out looking from your link, but otherwise the screen beats the others. Just not in viewing angles.
17. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 1408; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)
I don't understand why reviewers point out that the Iphone's OS is easier to use. Obvously, there is such thing as a manual for all phones, including Android, for those that find it hard to use (which I don't see why anyone would), so I don't see what makes it harder to use.
61. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6599; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
we should VOTE & petition too GET RID OF RAY for his unbiased reviews HE should moved to this biased blog site ibgr.com
18. RobotMan (Posts: 132; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Every reviewer forget to mention that you have to pay for flash browser in ios but you can get it for free in android.
19. pyradark (Posts: 776; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
Wait a minute, they say xperia z average contrast and saturation, did the reviewer forgot that this phone support display calibration. Means they can adjust saturation, so they dont brag the bravia engine is only for photo and video!!
My god theres so much features in this phone and yet they judge it biased.
68. pwnarena (Posts: 945; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
even lowering the brightness can already make a world of difference. the greying of the on-screen capacitive buttons already shouts excessive brightness of the display.
21. 2beornot2be (Posts: 1; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
I don't understand how this guy still does tech reviews. What is the point? I already know what he is going to promote.
22. pwnarena (Posts: 945; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
hints that the reviewer is indeed biased:
1. the display comparison shows the xperia z at high brightness with the awful homescreen that uses a faded image. look at how the on-screen capacitive buttons grey out. in the actual device, those are supposed to be as black as they could get. evidences avallable at the xda xperia z thread. the IPHONE display is ADMITTEDLY SUPERIOR but the xperia z's isn't as inferior as what the reviewer wants to make it out.
2. the camera still and video samples are dubious. photos and videos posted by those who have already bought the xperia z (in japan and singapore in particular) show brighter and clearer results.
3. comparison of loudspeaker does not make sense. what i know is most people listen to their smartphones' music through earphones. the people i know who listen to music through their loudspeakers are those who can't afford to buy good enough speaker systems. it's a different issue if the loudspeaker is used for communication. in this case, a very loud output is not that necessary.
the reviewer is basically nitpicking to make the iphone look better or the device being reviewed is not what the actual xperia z really is. if sony gave them such a defective device, it's sony's fault. i can't really believe those are photos taken by the z when many other photos uploaded online are significantly better.
24. kobainez (Posts: 302; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Its a seriously stupid screen comparison from phone arena. Why dont they compare the screen with the same pictures? Why they compare the home screen with different wallpapers? super biased if u asked me!
27. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5482; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)
And that's why I never trust photo and video samples from single source because they easily may be "corrected" by biased reviewer!
37. giri555 (Posts: 95; Member since: 15 Mar 2012)
these guys got it wrong from the start...i dont know if this is real bias or lack of ability from them to fairly compare the two devices.....
99. vincelongman (Posts: 1352; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)
Also the Xperia Z has a better music player compared to the iPhone 5, because it has more features like equalizer (iPhone 5 has a preset equalizer, but the Xperia has preset and manual equalizer) and 3D surround (with studio, club or concert Hall modes)
23. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 1408; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)
Can't wait for the S3 comparison :D
32. pwnarena (Posts: 945; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
well s3 will win definitely. it's phonearena after all. the scores the site has given is enough hint.
120. anig_98 (Posts: 1; Member since: 28 Feb 2013)
bitch dont even try to compare SIII with Xperia Z ..Z simply wins :P