x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Sony Xperia S Review

0. phoneArena 02 Mar 2012, 09:35 posted on

Sony is starting fresh after 10 years of marriage with Ericsson, and thus the Xperia S marks a whole lot of firsts for it. It is the first handset branded simply “Sony”, as well as the first with the new “Iconic Identity” design of the renamed Xperia NXT line. That’s the big picture, but the device itself also consists of elements that have never been in a Sony smartphone, like an HD display, multicore chipset and microSIM card slot...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 09:39 12

1. buggerrer (Posts: 306; Member since: 21 Sep 2011)


nice phone, for 2011 !

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 09:47 13

2. Mozarrt (Posts: 301; Member since: 08 Oct 2011)


Could you at least tell us why you think its a phone for 2011.

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 10:25 10

7. leftheodo (Posts: 101; Member since: 21 Oct 2011)


- Android 2.3 not ICS
-2011 CPU ( Snapdragon S3 not S4 )
-2011 GPU (Adreno 220)

The 2012 phones will be out in april ( One X, Optimus 4x, possibly GS3 as the korean ZDnet mentioned today)
Xperia S is a nice looking phone but Sony is to late!

posted on 07 Mar 2012, 09:16 2

54. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


There must be a lot of Sony fanboys out there voting you down, because everything you said makes perfect sense, especially the point about its S3 processor. What differentiates this from, say, an HTC Rezound?

posted on 02 Nov 2012, 13:50 4

94. SalmanAhmad (Posts: 2; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)


ICS upgrade is now available and the phone will get Jellybean soon hopefully.

2011 CPU Snapdragon S3? I have the phone and it barely lags and it is extremely responsive.

Adreno 220 and 225 isn't that much of a difference.

The phone has amazing PPI, great graphics, fast processor 1GB of RAM and is made out of durable materials.

Last but not least it's much less expensive than all phones of 2012(One X, Optimus 4x, GS3.)

It also features an amazing camera, how I know all this? I bought the phone about a month ago.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 08:40 1

96. nsnk86 (Posts: 43; Member since: 18 Jun 2012)


i totally agree with you Salman!! am using this phone for more than 4months......

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 11:47 5

12. metoyou (Posts: 279; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


Sony always late in smart phone, they now release this phone in 2012 and will release quad-cores in 2013..hm...
But I do like this phone design but not gonna get it IF it has S4 in it then it's another story. btw. reviewer is correct the capacitive buttons arent really repsonsive (friend have this fone)

posted on 02 Nov 2012, 13:56 2

95. SalmanAhmad (Posts: 2; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)


The buttons are a bit unresponsive at first but once you get the hang of it they aren't really a problem.

If you can't find the appropriate place of the buttons, slowly swipe upwards with your finger on the buttons and you will eventually find their places and it won't be a problem any longer.

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 18:30 16

23. darknight307rc (Posts: 7; Member since: 26 Feb 2012)


and what are u guys "Quadcore lovers" gonna do with a quadcore "cellphone"? work with "Auto CAD" or "Adobe photoshop" on ur cell phone??? what do u really use ur phone for other than..calling of course..surfing the net..music..photo or video shooting..check ur mail...gaming & stay connected to facebook or twitter. all that can be simply done by only a single core & 512MB RAM...even Android itself as an OS it doesn't need more than this to operate fast. and here is a phone with dual-core & 1GB RAM which will make any app goes very fast plus a 12 MP cam captures photos from sleep mode to shooting in less than 1.5 secs which makes it the fastest phone in market. it's just not about putting in a phone the latest tech or specs. if u really need the quadcore or the 3 or 5 GB RAM in ur phone for ur daily life tasks...wait for the GSIII or HTC one X. but with all respect the Xperia S is not an old one..it's fits all the needs & even more for a Smartphone in 2012

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 04:47

91. radreadiano (Posts: 1; Member since: 19 Aug 2012)


u did good!!! i absolut love this phone

posted on 18 Oct 2012, 09:51

93. nsnk86 (Posts: 43; Member since: 18 Jun 2012)


i totally agree with you darknight307rc.... if u guys wanna spend all d cash for a quadcore phone with like 2gb ram, instead you can get an ultrabook or a gud laptop coz it wil hv bigger display & using all these latest specs in a laptop will prove much useful....

posted on 25 Sep 2012, 20:13

92. lintek (Posts: 8; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


EXACTLY!!!

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 09:48 10

3. kshell1 (Posts: 1143; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)


so let me get this straight, every other phone that launches with 2.3 gets a con and points taken off but this one doesn't? Hypocritical if you ask me

posted on 03 Mar 2012, 10:23 13

30. RamyRamz69 (Posts: 390; Member since: 12 Dec 2011)


Perhaps because Sony's version of Gingerbread allows much more customization than the normal GB.

Or maybe because this deice will be upgraded to ICS before other devices hit the shelf.

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 09:49 10

4. henrickrw (Posts: 408; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


Get yourself a galaxy s 2 or a note

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 09:52 21

5. Mozarrt (Posts: 301; Member since: 08 Oct 2011)


Why get an ugly platic slab if you can have this. Only the Nokia 800/N9 rivals this handset in looks.

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 10:13 4

6. kshell1 (Posts: 1143; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)


i personally think it looks like a decent phone and great scores for the processor its using mostly because crapdragons are horrible

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 15:38 10

18. Chronos (Posts: 258; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)


Only because that "ugly plastic slab" looks better than the Sony Xperia S.

posted on 03 Mar 2012, 08:09

28. ivanprskalo (Posts: 123; Member since: 09 Dec 2010)


It is not. These matters are personal oppinion and please keep your to youself, or else... :-)

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 10:44

8. Giggity (Posts: 147; Member since: 17 Nov 2011)


Is the S also sports the aluminum body like the P?

posted on 03 Mar 2012, 02:51 3

26. r41nier (Posts: 70; Member since: 13 Oct 2011)


no, it's just plastic but it does have an anti-stain UV nano coating

posted on 03 Mar 2012, 12:56

32. CivicSi89 (Posts: 348; Member since: 23 Jul 2011)


Anti Stain... Giggety

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 10:49 4

9. robocopvn (Posts: 436; Member since: 10 Mar 2010)


Need to mention that Sony Xperia S and brothers still you S3 snapdragon, which is outdated comparing to S4 used in many phones and tablet

Sony seems to be so slow on upgrading their hardwares ! But I love their designs

posted on 04 Mar 2012, 22:39 3

40. bayusuputra (Posts: 963; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)


but it is better in most benchmarks than the S2.. i think it's not whether it is outdated, but whether Sony could optimised it in this handset, which i believe they did..

posted on 06 Mar 2012, 08:38 1

52. robocopvn (Posts: 436; Member since: 10 Mar 2010)


Qualcomm SOC always get better points in benchmarks apps. But in games and real apps, their GPU is worse than PowerVR :D

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 11:43 10

11. Aaron_R96 (Posts: 198; Member since: 22 Jan 2012)


Firstly, I disagree that its a 2011 phone, sure it has many of the same specs of the galaxy s2 and the likes, but has a better screen and camera by far, also those moaning it has no quad core processor, I dont see why it would need one, particularly ifit runs so well on dual core, just because the technology is available, doesnt mesn it needs to be used, it wont make anawful lot of difference to theaverage phone user anyway, plus it looks on of the best devices recently released, the one x looks like your typical htc device anyway, lacks creativity, tbh, id much rather show this off. Sorry.

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 16:15 5

20. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)


have the s2 and agree that quad is not necessary but the should have atleast used the new s4 dual core instead of last years s3. love the design of this but hate the fact that the capacitive buttons seem unresponsive,hopefully can be fixed via software and oh the charging speed of this phone looks awesome,the s2 takes forever to charge and is the only negative of the s2. cant wait to have a play round with the s,brithers already ordered it but for me i am waiting for the s3.

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 16:25 2

22. Aaron_R96 (Posts: 198; Member since: 22 Jan 2012)


Yes they should've done I do agree with that point, just see quad core as a tad unnecerssary for the casual user, but S4 would have been preffered and yes, it is also a shame about the capacitive buttons too, but currently deciding between this and the Xperia P, so looks like that'll be an issue for me either way!

posted on 05 May 2012, 08:59

78. itiswhatitis (Posts: 423; Member since: 23 Jan 2012)


believe me i've tried it at the store the capacitive buttons are no way unresponsive its just the review opinion, i mean i dont even need to try its like everything else!

posted on 02 Mar 2012, 14:08 4

13. bolaG (Posts: 468; Member since: 15 Aug 2011)


If this would have come out in Nov of last year I would have been all over it :(

Love the design
Love the camera quality and functions
Love Sony.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories