Sony Xperia L ReviewSony Xperia L 6.5
The Sony Xperia L comes with an 8-megapixel rear camera with Exmor RS sensor for improved low-light performance.
It’s a decent camera but nothing more. Colors on most images are overblown and they skew towards a warmer than normal tonality with a purple undertone all across. Dynamic range is not great. Looking at fine detail you’d often notice images turn out soft and spongy.
Sony Xperia L Sample Images
The same goes for the video capture - colors are a bit off balance with a tendency to go on the warm side. The basic Snapdragon chip is only capable of recording 720p videos at 30 frames per second.
Sony Xperia L Sample Video:
Sony Xperia L Indoor Sample Video:
The device also features a VGA front camera that would come to use for video conferencing, funny impromptu self-portraits and little else.
We do like the camera controls and interface in general. Having two dedicated buttons - one for image stills and one for video capture - makes it effortless to start shooting the right type of footage quickly. The device comes with some capabilities like HDR shots that were reserved to higher end devices in the past. The usual set of options like exposure, self-timer, ISO settings and so on is also easily accessible. Some settings like burst shot though are not available on this device.
However there are some problems like an occasional failure to launch the camera application from the lockscreen that we have to mention. We’ve seen the issue on other Xperia handsets as well, but blamed it on a minor software bug as it wasn’t that recurrent as it is here.
Sony has put some effort in resurrecting its Walkman brand into the Xperia lineup with a revamped music and video player applications. Both are very well made and offer a solid amount of options.
The Walkman music player looks great, can be controlled straight from the lockscreen and even has a widget. It will automatically grab album art and lyrics, and comes with fine tuning options like an equalizer and bass booster.
The video player also has great looks in that same Sony aesthetic. It does handle a wide array of formats like DivX at around the native resolution, but it struggles with higher-definition videos. While colors are generally a bit bleak on the 4.3 inch screen, this particular app comes with Bravia 2 engine support that blows them up a bit. Plus, those on-screen buttons disappear while you watch videos freeing all the screen space for your viewing pleasure.
Sound output through the loudspeaker gets very loud. It is definitely annoyingly tinny, with little bass to it and sounds just like an average smartphone speaker just louder.
1. tadaa (Posts: 267; Member since: 18 Apr 2013)
I don't think 6.5 justifies the phone. If compared to flagships then yes, but this is a mid-to-low range device and i cannot see how it isn't better than other mid range offerings from major manufacturers. And why put the soc used as a con? Isn't it the norm for mid-rangers like the L720 and s2 plus to feature a processor of that caliber? I think the device deserves no less than a 7.5
3. emadshiny (Posts: 1142; Member since: 05 Dec 2012)
i think you're new here
low rates for Sony are common in PA
4. tadaa (Posts: 267; Member since: 18 Apr 2013)
On the contrary, i knew that but i still expected them to rate it fairly
5. boosook (Posts: 1254; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
The problem is the price: the price is INSANE, it's currently selling for EUR 270 on Amazon.de, consider that with EUR 300 you can get an Xperia S that sits in a completely different league. The L is not even a mid ranger anymore: in 2013, it can be considered between entry level and mid range. Everything in the L speaks entry level: low res screen, slow processor, ridiculous amount of internal storage, underperforming camera. The price should 100 EUR less. IMO the final rating of 6.5 is right once you consider what you can get at the same price or a just little more. With just a few euros more you can get the S and this means hi-res screen, better camera, better performance, better design. Sony is just trying to milk its users.
12. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
oh so the problem is the price?? i don't think so just check GS2 PLUS review even with low specs can have 7.5
GS2 PLUS also Pricey at launch and i can find many better phone with the same price point.
so i think the problem is :
Samsung paid PA reviewer, PA reviewer is Samsung fanboys, or PA just hates Sony so bad.
i don't know for sure but the rating with almost all Sony devices is not fair
18. boosook (Posts: 1254; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
I agree that the GS2 plus is just a marketing gimmick and it's even worse than the model it replaces, but right now it can be purchased for a lower price than the L (about 250 euros). Its specifications are more or less the same of the L, actually it is slightly better IMHO since it has an AMOLED screen and a faster CPU. Sony should price its products slightly lower than Samsung, because they have to gain some market share. With the L at that price, the chance that people will choose the L over the GS2/GS2 plus is close to zero.
20. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
HAH... what are talking about its not about market share but we talking about unfair PA rating
i don't think AMOLED 480 x 800 pixels, 4.3 inches (~217 ppi pixel density) with maximum brightness 358 cd/m2 is good display
faster cpu??? you must be doesn't know anything about CPU.
Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9 and Broadcom VideoCore IV GPU vs Dual-core 1 GHz Krait and Adreno 305 GPU
Xperia L CPU and GPU is not only faster, but also more battery efficient, and better thermal efficiency
3833 (GS2 Plus) vs 4223 (XP L)
8228 (GS2 Plus) vs 9225 (XP L)
21. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
GS2 Plus rating 7.5 even when PA mention there is
better phone with the same price point
like HTC One S, Xperia SL, G Grand, and Nexus 4
8. stychill (unregistered)
You're a funny guy, are we seeing the same things? Those specs are the low end of 2013.
33. beastuct (Posts: 1; Member since: 25 May 2013)
i agree with u.i think it worths 7.5 - 8.5 at least!!
2. istitch (Posts: 178; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)
is PA expecting S600 chip with 2gb of ram, 12mp camera, with full hd display from a sony midranger?
6. boosook (Posts: 1254; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
No, but users are expecting a real midranger for the price sony is asking for the L.
9. stychill (unregistered)
A sony low range device you mean, from what i see calling this mid range and giving it a rating of 6.5 is generous.
7. stychill (unregistered)
This phone seems more along the lines of a low end device, these specs are considered mid range? I think the rating of 6.5 was being rather generous. Lol, 1gb of internal storage.
10. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
if you think the rating is fair please explain to me why GS2 plus with low specs can have 7.5 points???
26. Commentator (Posts: 2859; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Because the Galaxy S II Plus review was written five months ago before the new standard for high-end was set in the Galaxy S IV, One, Optimus G Pro, etc. If the standards for high-end are going to change, the standards for mid-range have to change to. It might seem unfair but timing is everything.
That being said, I wouldn't have rated the Xperia L any lower than a 7 considering other mid-range reviews (such as the Galaxy S II Plus), but these are all done by different reviewers (Nick T. vs. Victor H.) and I don't think there's some Grand Council over at PhoneArena World Headquarters that decides upon a uniform rating for every single review. Maybe there should be.
29. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
what timing ??
in that time you can have better phone like HTC One S, Xperia SL. G Grand, and Nexus 4 with the same price
even PA metion about it
PA really hates SONY so bad
11. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
haha... its SAMSUNGARENA.COM
Xperia L 6.5
GS2 plus even with more lower specs than XP L can have 7.5
GS2 PLUS also Pricey at launch and i can find many better phone with the same price point.
i think for PA even Galaxy Y still better than Xperia Z
24. aditya.k (Posts: 492; Member since: 10 Mar 2013)
At least here in India, the Galaxy S2+ and Grand are priced higher than the Xperia L!
No NFC for the Galaxy devices but Xperia L has. Better CPU, GPU on the Xperia L. I can also say better camera though doesn't support FHD capture (not a big deal). RAM and storage same.
This should easily get a 9!
This seriously is disappointing from PA.
13. TheBitterTruth (unregistered)
PA never appreciates Sony and LG. That is not fair.
15. Ninny (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 May 2013)
This review sucks !! This phone should get atleast 8. I bought this phone for my sister , It got great camera at this price , no lag thanks to snapdragon S4 MSM8230 1.2 GHz Dual-core clocked at 1 GHz., Its internal memory is not 1GB it has 4GB internal memory .
Phone arena Sucks in review wait for GSMARENA review . They review phones very better ....not like
16. najib1312 (Posts: 103; Member since: 08 May 2013)
PA, r u sure about that price?? US$350 is just insane!! U can get 1 in Malaysia for $280 from Sony centre and some shops sell it even for $240, which is definitely a bargain!!
Nevertheless, that score is really HARSH!! Y do u hate Sony so much? This is a low-to-mid range phone for God's sake!! The way I see it, the competition for Xperia L includes Galaxy S3 mini, Galaxy S2 plus and Xperia P. But I can righfully say Xperia L is MUCH BETTER than all these devices due to:
1) Newer software (therefore, longer support)
2) Bettter processer
3) Sexier design (with the iconic power/lock button)
19. SonyFindOneDroidple (Posts: 736; Member since: 11 May 2013)
Sony Honami will turn Phonearena On!! I SWEAR!!!
22. zeiz67 (unregistered)
There is something that is completely weird.
When you look at the sopecs of the phone listed on the phonearena page, you only pros and no cons : among those pros, they list the dual core processor.
In the review... the same processor is a con ! Why did that change in a couple of days?
And regarding the internal storage memore it's not 1 GB nor 4 GB - officiallly it's 8 GB, but there are only like 5,6 GB remaining for usage. [Not to mention the microSD slot that expands the memory up to 32 GB].
I was planning on buying that phone - i've already seen some reviews in France (I'm french) and the said the complete opposite. Here the phone is a real mid-ranger with good mi-range phone specs.
I've always looked at phonearena reviews before investing in a phone - and I have to admit that I'm a litle bit surprised by the 6,5 average... where in France the same phone gets at least a 7,3 to 7,5...
It certainly doesn't have the same capabilities as the Xperie SP or the Xperia S, but I know so many people with the Xperia S that have so many issues with that phoe that I would invest a dime in it.
The Xperia L appeared like a good alternative, and I still think it is.
28. Rexperia (Posts: 121; Member since: 28 Sep 2012)
No wonder and no surprised because PA is really, really, really hates SONY, no matter what the phone is, you blind PA, open your eyes and mind widely!!!
32. Ambrose41 (Posts: 3; Member since: 22 May 2013)
I don't knw why PA hate Sony phone so much, 6.5 that not fair
34. carboy00 (Posts: 1; Member since: 26 May 2013)
Doesn't really make sense when the LG Optimus L5 II and Acer Liquid E2 both got a 7.5 and this got a 6.5. Personally I think this is a much better phone than those 2. Just my thoughts, PA ought to be more fair in ratings.
35. Sondae (Posts: 220; Member since: 02 Jan 2013)
This device deserve higher rate rather than 6.5. It has a very good feature for a midrange unlike samsung you wont get that most of there feature like Sony does. This is so bias.
37. hms2407 (Posts: 94; Member since: 25 Apr 2013)
worst review by PA,they only talked about the drawbacks of the phone...according to other sites xperia l is a beast (for its price) puts smartphones like the galaxy grand,lumnia 520 and other mid end smartphones to a shame even the htc one x (in quadrant)...According to phonearena only samsung and htc make good phones and only smartphone with quadcore cpu's can play games
38. cttan456 (Posts: 62; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)
Xperia L - USD250
S3 Mini - USD280
Xperia L is the best phone at this price.
41. hashanmunasinghe (Posts: 2; Member since: 13 Jul 2013)
dude....do u got any headphones with packages?
43. hms2407 (Posts: 94; Member since: 25 Apr 2013)
yes!! atlest with the international variant
39. cttan456 (Posts: 62; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)
Quote from review "When it comes to internal storage, there is only a gigabyte of it available to the user."
Wrong info! Please do your corrections Phonearena, available memory to user for is 5.6GB and not 1GB.
40. Mayurb (Posts: 1; Member since: 04 Jul 2013)
Is this a paid review by Samsung guys, apart from good performance... Any Samsung phone will look like a piece of plastic in front of this phone.... This phone is so sleek n stylish Think Samsung can even dream of makin such designphones.
44. AhmedIbrahim (Posts: 1; Member since: 21 Mar 2013)
i need to know what is the meaning of (processor is not a fufure proof ) and whether it is really or not
45. taojj (Posts: 33; Member since: 01 Aug 2013)
This is the best midrange smartfone and one of the best for gaming. Handles every game superbly. It surely deserves 8.5 - 9. Seems like some Alien reviewed it for phone arena or may be this guy has never used anything but Samsung.
46. Rein94 (Posts: 3; Member since: 24 Sep 2013)
Hey guys i need your help, i can't decide between the Xperia L and Xperia M. The Xperia L is about 20 euros more expensive than than M and it looks so damn sexy, but i'm concerned about the score it got. Should i ignore the review? Also, can the xperia L record video? Thanks in advance.
47. Madun (Posts: 1; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
the review so bias
go for Xperia L.
yes XL can recording videos
capable of recording is 720p videos at 30 frames per second
|Display||4.3 inches, 480 x 854 pixels (228 ppi) TFT|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230, Dual core, 1000 MHz, Krait processor
1024 MB RAM
|Size||5.07 x 2.56 x 0.38 inches|
(128.7 x 65 x 9.7 mm)
4.83 oz (137 g)
|Battery||1750 mAh, 8.5 hours talk time|