Samsung SGH-F480 Review
0. phoneArena posted on 25 Jun 2008, 09:50
The first Samsung non-smart phones with a large touch screen were based on the Croix interface. It had a ton of drawbacks – monochrome, ugly and not very user-friendly. Apparently, the manufacturer has decided to fix that and has developed new software, called TouchWiz. Its debut was in the F480, which is the subject of our review. This is a high-end device with a very attractive appearance, equipped with a 2.8-inch display, a 5-megapixel camera and HDSPA 7.2Mbps support ...
This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here
19. (unregistered) posted on 26 Jun 2008, 21:44 0 0
yes. and ~550 is a VERY good price for the phone.
20. (unregistered) posted on 27 Jun 2008, 01:35 0 0
yeah after 1 year the price will be ~300... and THAT's A VERY GOOD price for the phone
21. (unregistered) posted on 27 Jun 2008, 08:11 0 0
lol after one year..i'm sure theres gonna be a lot of other phones released
22. (unregistered) posted on 27 Jun 2008, 11:37 0 0
Yeah, and also the iPhone and Touch Diamond are around the same price, if not more expensive yet they both got very high for the Average Joe rating??
25. (unregistered) posted on 28 Jun 2008, 12:19 0 0
I was just making a comment that prices are starting to fall. It's about 495 on plemix, I believe. By American standards yes it is quite expensive. But people got to remember that without provider's subsidy on the phone, even average basic phone costs around 2xx already no? If Average Joe just have enough buying sense, instead of signing up for a contract for 2 years and get some shitty phones, they can go to independent sellers and get better phones at a reduced price as well. I'm just saying that there is more than ONE way to purchase a phone. PLUS my only real comment was that they misspelled AND 550 IS NOT expensive for a touted FASHION phone. Yes, it doesn't have the "Armani" branding attached to it, but using that definition Nokia "7xxx" series are not fashion devices either, and so aren't "8xxx" series.
26. (unregistered) posted on 05 Jul 2008, 15:31 0 0
7xxx is fashion device and 8xxx is luxury series
27. Vuja021 (unregistered) posted on 23 Jul 2008, 09:35 0 0
Hi .. You talk to much! Phone is GREAT... If you wont great pictures by cam! It is a only phone! You answer , you call ... send sms mms ... do you need more ..Great looking.. thats all I need.. touchscreen not great but its work when you using more time
28. (unregistered) posted on 01 Aug 2008, 13:42 0 0
I'm curious who sponsores this site: Nokia...or Apple?....the review is so much anti-Samsung oriented...much more than needed, so it sucks!!
34. radystar posted on 12 May 2009, 08:43 0 0
yeah you're right...the only phones that have good reviews are the nokia and the apple...and the rest....
30. Riverholder (unregistered) posted on 15 Sep 2008, 17:29 0 0
This review sucks... This phone is simply great! I had no probs with the sound! The widgets are superb, too! It's definitely worth to buy this phone! It's nice, it's user-friendly! So, like i said: THIS REVIEW DEFINITELY S U C K S ! ! !
31. (unregistered) posted on 22 Oct 2008, 09:02 0 0
I have the tocco for 3 months now. its a realy nice phone, and i don't find the anoying lag in the menu's maybe the lag is only in your test-model. i agree on the fact that the camera isn't that good. But i think this phone is a bit underrated. i normally switch between phones once in 2 months but i am keeping this phone, becouse of its look and the quality of the touch-screen
32. (unregistered) posted on 09 Nov 2008, 18:39 0 0
agree, the camera isn't as good, especially if they're going to advertise is as 5MP, but we can't expect too much from a camera phone afterall. I find the phone pleasant to use, and after the upgrade of a firmware, it's even better. New widgets and the camera is better. :D
35. lejko (unregistered) posted on 03 Oct 2010, 09:20 0 0
touch screen totaly not working after a year and a half ....!!!! bulshit samsung
