Samsung Omnia W Review
in-call audio quality is well above the average. Voices sound loud and distinct through the earpiece without being distorted even at the highest volume setting. On the other side of the line our voice was loud enough, with only a hint of digitizing.
Its 1500 mAh battery is rated for 6.5 hours of 3G talk time or 380 hours in stand-by mode, which is not anything spectacular, but pretty decent considering the battery life of an average smartphone nowadays.
After weighing in all its positives and negatives, we can say that the Samsung Omnia W is one decent all-around smartphone, especially when we take its price point into account. Sure, it may not come bragging with a dual-core processor, tons of RAM, or any bells and whistles of that kind, but its performance is nothing short of flawless despite the mid-range hardware that is listed on its specs sheet.
If you are looking for a well-balanced handset, the Samsung Omnia W should do the trick, yet here are a few alternatives that you might also want to take a look at. The HTC Radar, for example, is a similarly priced Windows Phone offering that comes with a solid unibody construction and a sharper, 3.8-inch WVGA display. Another option is to check out some Android handsets, such as the Samsung GALAXY W, which comes at a similar price and with a similar specs sheet, yet offers a lot more flexibility when it comes to customization, not to mention the broader choice of software in the Android Market. You might also like the Sony Ericsson Xperia ray, which is just as compact and lightweight as the Omnia W, but has a high-res display and a slightly better camera.
OS Version: 7.10.7720.68
Samsung Omnia W Video Review:
- Compact and lightweight
- Silky smooth navigation
- Very good in-call audio quality
- Storage cannot be expanded
- Somewhat underwhelming multimedia performance
1. Diego! (Posts: 474; Member since: 15 Jun 2009)
Nice review! But when are you going to review Samsung Focus S? I want to see that review A-S-A-P! LOL :)
2. stunningsid (Posts: 5; Member since: 20 Jun 2011)
ohh! come on phonearena....well your criteria
if its android..with above 4' inches screen...and dual core then its above 9
if its ios then its definitely 9.5
and rest of it 7.5
and for nokia below 7
3. deacz (Posts: 147; Member since: 02 Nov 2011)
lol same verdict as the lumia 800 :| another fail review
6. kainy (Posts: 165; Member since: 10 Aug 2011)
If you check the all scores of WP devices ... almost all of the first gen devices have better "review" score than Nokia Lumia 800 ... That's pure bull ...
12. elliotsilva (Posts: 11; Member since: 04 Sep 2011)
why is that "pure bull" if it doesnt do anything much better than that 1 year old phones?
4. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
To put it simply...PA just doesn't like Windows phone and they are mesmerized by IOS and the most powerful andro phones.
The most important factor is: NUMBERS. Bigger cpu, bigger amount of ram, bigger mpx, bigger SCREEN. Then phone is good.
Usability and real life performance are irrelevant.
8. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1037; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)
I have to agree with you based on their reviews. My biggest complaint is that their reviews for windows phones all have different pros and cons yet they all get 7.5. Well not all windows phones are equal so why are they all getting the same score. Plus, who cares about specs. Any windows phone from last year can keep up with the Droid RAZR not including benchmark tests which don't even matter.
10. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
That's the point. I mean for most of the users (not counting geeks) this spec is more than enough.
What for more if I can get everything using this specs?
It's more introducing a new technologies and selling "better" and bigger phones, not better for average joe.
I really don't need quad core for silky smooth performance. And if system in a mobile phone (MOBILE PHONE!!!) needs such a raw power there's something wrong with it.
5. NilSeaman (Posts: 6; Member since: 28 Nov 2011)
PA is not completely anti-Windows. But sometimes dismal reviews like this makes me wanna think otherwise.
7. lubba (Posts: 1310; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)
Research and trust user reviews. Not some one who is given a product to review. In the case with PA, they have show the obvious.
9. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Samsung (not only samsung of course, Nokia, Motorola, HTC) has showed many times that he can make phone which has no trouble at all with multimedia (videos playback and so on).
So, why in this newest phone there is such a problem?
The same goes to the audio quality. Can't they just use proper and checked technology?
Older units but much more better.
11. ReturningToNokia (Posts: 130; Member since: 09 Jul 2011)
For everyone commenting on the ratings that devices garner from PhoneArena, keep in mind that each device that has been reviewed has been reviewed by a different reviewer each and every time! Their opinions are going to vary, and each will list what they feel is a pro or con.
These reviews, when reviewed by a different person, with a different perspective, can't be expected to have the same comments, pros, or cons. It just so happens that each of the reviewers had an average score of 7.5 for these WP devices.
I like Windows Phone; I like the Dell Venue Pro; I like the Lumia 800; I am not a fan of the HTC Titan or the Samsung Focus S. Some love the Android OS, but don't like all models, or a particular skin. Some like Symbian, but not all Nokia devices are toyour each persons liking, for whatever reason....
13. snowgator (Posts: 3159; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)
First of all, returning, I have read lots of your posts and understand you are a very good at judging devices on their own merits even if you have a preference. I repect your posts a lot.
However, a pattern is a pattern regardless who writes the reviews, and right now Phone Arena writers are in agreement on Windows Phones- no matter how much improved they are, they are inferior to Androids and the iPhone. All of the first generation WP's were rated in the 8.5 area. The Titan has an improved screen, an improved camera, a quicker processor, and Windows Mango added hundreds of new features and it is rated below the Surrond??? The Focus S has a better screen and all the new features, and it isn't better than the Focus? And in my opinion, the Focus S is a flawless experience, zero lag or hesitations.
Phone Arena is a great site and I won't botcott them or anything stupid like that. But WP's experience is equal to most droids, period end of story. Only some features set them apart. Rating every WP at 7.5 is just mailing in a review. Very little effort.
14. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
They just don't like Windows.
Just like you said. No matter how many improvements they will add, windows phone is "evil".
Look at Ip4S. I could say the level of add ons is almost the same as in Mango (against 7). And was rated higher.
I will be telling this to the very end (of me or PA:])...if device is smooth and handles everything perfectly why bother to put such a stupid con like: outdated hardware".
I think that this rapid progress messed people's heads.
16. ngo2dd (Posts: 773; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
All you fanboy are so butthurt. No there is not a bias. The last 2 ios phone not 9.5. Android phone are mainly 8
19. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1037; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)
Yeah maybe most androids don't get a 9.5 but some still do. So why would ALL of the Wp7s get a 7.5 rating?
Maybe PA thinks they're being funny by giving a device with mango(7.5) a rating of 7.5
And fanboy? We're not dissing on any other phones or saying Wp7 is the best. Just saying it can keep up with the best. Fanboys would never admit something like that.
17. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Yes, and I4s is mostly the same as 4 is. And get quite a high score.
I don't see any fanboy here.
Snowgator is right. Read carefully his post once again. Maybe you get a clue.
18. senbobaggins (Posts: 6; Member since: 22 May 2011)
Terrible review yet again. They believe this is a mid range phone, when in local phone shops they are selling first generation windows phones as high end devices. And what's with this 7.5 crap?? Something doesn't sit right with Phonearenas reviews for windows. This guy obviously just copied the review rating for Samsung omnia flash for the US. Judging by all the comments lately, you would hope phonearena might acknowledge that there seems to be unnecessary negativity toward windows phone.
20. ngo2dd (Posts: 773; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
You fanboy are funny. Here are some window phone over 7.5 Arrive, Mozart, HD7, surround. So what do you people have to say. The new window phone are not that much better beside the upgrade OS.
21. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
"beside the os". i wonder if you say the same about ginngerbread
24. ngo2dd (Posts: 773; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
But the android phone are a big upgrade from the last year model. They have more ram, higher resolution, faster and are dual core. Higher and better camera. So that is why they get higher school.
25. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
You know the reason hy? Because new android needs more power. This should justified the final higher score of android devices?
MS focus on deliver better performance and more ads on to WIndows. they don't have to put inside "bigger" hardware because system is silky smooth.
For me that is a progress. Not putting inside bigger hardware only because system needs it to be fluid.
23. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
I tried twice say something about ics as a comment to post above and it didn't work properly...PA you're doing something?:]
26. jy20051992 (Posts: 13; Member since: 09 Jan 2012)
sometimes it feels like phonearena is getting biased to android smartphones ...
and they are do a unsatisfactory review of WP 7 ... :(
27. samboycott (Posts: 11; Member since: 19 Jan 2012)
The phone looks so dull like all of its predecessors. why is samsung not changing the cheap material used for the body. It is so disgusting.