x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.
x PhoneArena.com наема във Варна! Ако технологиите са в кръвта ти и имаш перфектен писмен английски,
ние ти даваме възможността да станеш част от екипа ни. - виж повече
  • Options
    Close




Samsung Galaxy Xcover Review

0. phoneArena 28 Dec 2011, 02:46 posted on

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover stands out with its rugged design and IP67 certification. So in theory, it is shaping up like a blend between an entry-level smartphone and a tough phone combining various bits of both worlds. But will the end result from such a concoction really deserve your attention? Let's take it for a spin and find out...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 28 Dec 2011, 03:28

1. RamyRamz69 (Posts: 390; Member since: 12 Dec 2011)


Not getting ICS....pass

Would rather get the much better Xperia Active :)

posted on 28 Dec 2011, 12:10 1

2. fervid (Posts: 173; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)


Why is it when they make good rugged phones and/or phones with good battery life that people want they give them poor specs like this? Make some good phones already people!

posted on 28 Dec 2011, 20:43

3. AnttiV (Posts: 5; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)


First of all, what do you consider "entry level"? Please don't compare devices via numerals only. This device is easily as fast as the HTC Desire, which was their flashship not two years ago. It easily beats Galaxy Mini, Gio and even Ace.

Yes, it does not have a high resolution display, nor is one required. This is not a "superphone". The display is by no means pretty when compared to a SuperAMOLED screen. But, even when comparing to a relatively good screen, say, HTC Desire HD, the Xcover's screen is *bright*. It easily gives double the light output of Desire HD's screen.

IMO, the screen is good enough to read even rather small text (and I do have glasses). I wouldn't start to read a book with it, but then again it isn't designed to do so.

If you care about camera/youtube/movies/reading, this isn't the device you should be looking at. This is for people who care about durability, usability, reliability. The device has very good call quality, the battery lasts for a good while and as a bonus it doubles as a quite good Android phone with the ability to run most apps (not games, though). And can be used as a mp3 player. GPS is very accurate, though slow to lock (but that might be location).

Some of these MAY me different from yours, because here in Finland they sell this phone loaded with Android 2.3.6 (not 2.3.4). It may have some additional tweaks baked in.

Also, the screen in Xcover (note, not display) is miles better than Defy's. I don't know why, but the Xcover's screen is easily one of the best touchscreens I've ever used. It is very sensitive and works even through most gloves. Defy's, on the other hand, is one of the worst considering sensibility. If you have dry hands, good luck on using it. The display is clearer and looks waaaay better in Defy due to more pixels and better density overall, but the general experience of using the phone is better on the Xcover.

posted on 25 Jan 2012, 23:44

4. G2Noobin (Posts: 81; Member since: 17 Dec 2011)


Great conceptual try.....gotta up the ante (better screen) or make it suuuper affordable....

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories