Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1) Review
Call it a shocker, especially when we tend to see improvements with successive devices, but in this case, it’s a big step backwards. For starters, Samsung decided to keep the same 3.2-megapixel camera from before – albeit, it’s without auto-focus and an LED flash. With the results, they’re nothing pretty as the images appear simultaneously muddy and hazy – as details appear extremely soft in tone. Forget about using it indoors or under low lighting, seeing that we’re repulsed by the extravagant amount of graininess and noise ruining the shots.
video capture, there’s nothing wonderful to say since it’s only boasting 720p – as opposed to 1080p that many devices are offering. Seriously, the only thing going for it is the clear audio recording it’s able to cough up, but aside from that, everything else is downright unimpressive. Well, it specifically consists of soft details, a lot of artifacting when panning, and a constant trouble with looking over-exposed.
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1) Sample Video:
Like a tape player set on repeat, the music player interface is nothing more than a rehash of what we’ve seen with TouchWiz for Honeycomb. No doubt functional at its core, its presentation is lacking the visual allure. As for its stereo speakers, they’re point enough to deliver some strong and robust tones without any hint of crackling.
As expected, the tablet fares well when it comes to playing high-definition videos, as it’s able to perfectly play our test video that’s encoded in DivX 1920 x 1080 resolution. Additionally, it has support for a wide array of codecs, like XviD, MPEG-4, and H.264, to ensure you’re covered with all your video watching needs.
For those with DLNA compatible devices in the home, you’ll be able to wirelessly stream local media content from the tablet thanks to the AllShare app. However, if you prefer a wired connection, you’ll need to purchase an additional accessory to gain a video-out function.
1. sorcio46 posted on 15 May 2012, 09:45 4 7
- Uninspiring design?
What do you expect from a tablet?
It's thin and lightweight, what do you want more ?!?
- Shoots terrible photos & videos?
It's a damn tablet, put more importance on the front facing camera that is the only camera that SHOULD have quality in a tablet !
- Sluggish overall performance
Little disapponted by this, it's not the best that you cant find in the market, but it does the job.
- Stereo speakers and audio quality should be in the PROS.
3. sorcio46 posted on 15 May 2012, 09:47 4 2
I think that you won't rate the front facing camera until Apple will give to its iPads a decent one... totally unfair
20. ivanko34 posted on 15 May 2012, 15:29 0 0
He is right
I own the previous tab and it it's not really fast
Not a really good tab
It works but not very well
2. theoak posted on 15 May 2012, 09:46 8 0
From the Conclusion:
"... we can honestly say that this is a step backwards in the wrong direction .. "
Would this not then be a step in the right direction??? ;)
4. bubbadoes posted on 15 May 2012, 09:48 4 2
6.5 review...what a slap in the face to the #1 smartphone maker in the world...I am still trying to figure out how they assumed that title also...because I have never been impressed with none of the phones Samsung makes...especially SIGNAL strength.
7. jamrockjones posted on 15 May 2012, 10:00 2 0
I agree, the specs on the device are way outdated... My friend just purchased one and it's completely sluggish. My Acer Iconia A500 that came out almost a year ago performs better than this tablet. I think Samsung really needs to step up in this category.
9. lpratas posted on 15 May 2012, 10:06 1 3
Galaxy S III 9.3 review. Take this slap too. Do you like it or not?
13. bubbadoes posted on 15 May 2012, 10:21 1 3
SG1, 2 or 3..none of them have a decent signal!! So what's the point of a 9.3...and the ratings come from PA, not actual users. Look at the Nexus on VW...after massive updates that phone still can't stay connected to LTE or have a decent 3G signal...
17. PackMan posted on 15 May 2012, 11:31 7 0
They all have better signal than an iPhone by the way.
21. paulyyd posted on 15 May 2012, 15:32 0 4
lol keep telling yourself that buddy
31. pilot91 posted on 26 Jan 2013, 14:14 0 0
Actually, as an iPhone tech who happens to own an s3, the s3 does get better reception than the i5. Both on sprint (not my smartest decision) the s3 had 1 bar more than the i5, both had the same at my house, however gs3 had 1 more bar in my bathroom. Ill tell you why. Gs3 is made from mostly plastic ( i know you iphone people hate plastic, but it doesn't interrupt signal ) while the back of the iPhone is metal.
22. TimTebow posted on 15 May 2012, 17:04 0 0
Just cause you are #1 does not make every product great.
Nokia was #1 for a long time too.....
What's the point of this tablet? Score is probably spot on.
5. bubbadoes posted on 15 May 2012, 09:55 0 0
Fire Sale! in two months. Only Asus is the closest to challenging Apple in the tablet market...All others are just repeats of the same thing over and over....This new tablet by Samsung is the same version as last years model with only a few cosmetic changes (speaker layout)
11. lpratas posted on 15 May 2012, 10:11 0 1
We will see in the Galaxy Note 10.1. You will take another slap in the face without the hand.
18. mrochester (unregistered) posted on 15 May 2012, 11:42 0 1
I thought it was only Amazon who were close to challenging Apple in the tablet market? Although thinking about it, that might just be in the US.
23. Hemlocke posted on 15 May 2012, 21:26 0 0
I'm not sure that ASUS is anything to the iPad, although it IS the nicest Android tablet. The 2,000 sales figure in the Oracle trial really casts Android tablets as poor competitors, and even the Fire has completely dropped off a cliff since the holiday season.
6. android1234 posted on 15 May 2012, 09:56 3 0
Wrong pricing. This tablet shold have been marketed at $349.99. The Asus Pad 300 has a Tegra 3 quadcore processor, and overall better features and design at a better price of $379.99.
12. sorcio46 posted on 15 May 2012, 10:13 1 0
That is true, better Asus Pad 300 even with 100$ dollars of difference.
8. AppleConspiracy posted on 15 May 2012, 10:05 0 0
"...this is a step backwards in the wrong direction..."
Does this mean it's a step forward in the right direction?
10. AppleConspiracy posted on 15 May 2012, 10:06 0 0
Only now I see theoak's same comment above. Sorry.
14. bobfreking55 posted on 15 May 2012, 10:29 2 0
samsung just can't get the tablet right.
fix it with the Note 10.1 or whatever it is you have with the 2560x1440 Exynos 5 with the new GPU if you want tablet sales! show me another series, the tab and note series looks crowded to start with.
15. Iphone4 (unregistered) posted on 15 May 2012, 11:03 0 1
I don’t have tablet and I don’t want either as reader of phone arena that tell me Ipad is the king of tablet. after all that time still no one can touch the ipad. Hard to believe this. ipad 3 is cheaper then that let alone ipad 2
16. downphoenix posted on 15 May 2012, 11:15 3 0
This is just overpriced. For $50 more you can get a damn Transformer Prime or New Ipad, which blow this thing away. $350 would be the most this should go for (and I would imagine that it will be going for that soon enough).
19. CeluGeek posted on 15 May 2012, 13:55 0 0
The price is $400, not $450. I've had the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 for 10 days and it is a great tablet for the price you pay. Not sure the same can be said about the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 but I'll see because I just bought one and will be delivered this Friday -- my mom will get a belated Mother's Day gift as I'm giving her the 7.0 tablet.
25. VinoJeff posted on 22 May 2012, 04:40 0 0
I bought the new 10.1 tab 2, and I absolutely love it. I've been wanting a tablet for over a year. I could do easy internet stuff like twitter, facebook, surfing, and listening to internet radio, podcasts, and music that was smaller and more mobile then my laptop. And also i like play HD game with this gadget and run smoothly. Music sounds great. YouTube is cool to watch. Its nice to review my photos on a lightweight screen while sitting in bed.The display is bright and crisp, text is very easy to read even when I have screen brightness all the way turned down. There is nothing negative I have to say. This is THE tablet to have!
If you want to buy one, just buy on amazon the cheapest and trusted merchant on the earth. Simply click this link :http://amzn.to/samsunggalaxyta
26. biohazard posted on 28 May 2012, 09:46 0 0
I am a huge Samsung fan (Sammy 24/7 every day all day) and I am extremely disappointed with this offering. In my honest opinion, it sure looks like Samsung threw Apple a bone on this offering perhaps in an attempt to resolve the international lawsuits Apple has against its smartphones. Its almost like Samsung told Apple "Drop your smartphone copyright infringement suit and we wont take you on in the tablet market".... Why else would Samsung roll out the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 with specs so inferior to that of the latest Ipad? They have the technology to blow the ipad out of the water (if they wanted to), yet release this offering. This has the feel of a HP level mistake made here by Samsung.
My understanding is they make the display for the new ipad... So why not make a high resolution display for Galaxy Tab 2 10.1? Why not offer this product in 16 32 and 64gb versions? Why not build it with a HD front facing camera and a 8mp autofocus rear facing camera (found on most of Samsungs new phones)? What about the "NOTE" version Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 with stylus?
The only feature that has me interested is the ability to use the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 as a universal remote control. However, its not enough for me to run out and purchase Galaxy Tab 2 10.1.
I understand the price point battle that may have been a factor here. However, if they built it, with the specs I mentioned, and had to slap a $699 tag on it (wifi version)... I would have ponied up the loot and made a purchase.
Samsung has the technology. Samsung could have given the new ipad a real challenger and made the tablet wars interesting. I guess my inner conspiracy theorist smells a rat.
Samsung... Dont hold back. If you build it... We will purchase it.
27. CeluGeek posted on 30 May 2012, 08:37 0 0
The iPad killer you (and many reviewers) are expecting is indeed coming, but last time I heard it is to be called the Galaxy Note 10.1.
I wonder if Samsung has realized the mistake they made switching around product lines like this. I think the Galaxy Note 10.1 should've been released first because with the cravings for higher specs satisfied, bloggers and high-end users would've had an easier time understanding that Galaxy Tab 2 is a product line for entry-level and midrange devices instead of the natural expectation of Galaxy Tab 2 being a sequel to the original Galaxy Tabs.
28. cristianer posted on 27 Jun 2012, 11:22 0 0
So guys. Should I buy this or the Xoom from 2011? I have the money to buy the New iPad but this one doesn't support Flash and I need it :-(
29. rhema2001bn posted on 11 Jul 2012, 05:56 0 0
Bought the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (GT2 10.1) and regretting it every minute.
Performance- The wireless comes and go as it like. The device says that it is connected wirelessly but once you try to go to the internet, it will not connect. The problem lies with the OS. The IP does not flush eventho its in dhcp mode making it difficult to connect if you have another device trying to connect wirelessly. You may end up with both devices not able to connect at all. Thats what happened to me when i tried to connect the GT2 and my ipod wirelessly. Dare not try the camera as more dissapointment will surface.
Sluggish. Sometimes will just blank out.
Price-Over the top.
Verdict:- can't wait to replace to another other than Samsung unless the OS update CAN FIX THE SILLY IP problem. Please reconsider before you BUY one.
30. kelvind13 posted on 14 Nov 2012, 07:02 0 0
when is the galaxy tab 2 10.1 is getting jelly bean!!!!!!