Samsung Galaxy Stellar Review
0. phoneArena posted on 13 Sep 2012, 05:50
Recently, Samsung has been receiving praise for its high-end Galaxy S III smartphone, though it will cost you a few hundred bucks to buy one, even with a 2-year contract. But let’s face it, not everyone can afford it. Verizon hopes to appease those customers with the new Samsung Galaxy Stellar – and the main thing that is “stellar” is its price: FREE with contract...
This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here
1. redmd posted on 13 Sep 2012, 05:58 0
6.5 is a bit low. does each con really worth 1.75 points?
3. Nathan_ingx posted on 13 Sep 2012, 06:35 1
"Let’s see is the Samsung Galaxy Stellar can do better."...with the ratings i saw before i even read the first word in the review, it's funny going through that line!!
4. g2a5b0e posted on 13 Sep 2012, 09:27 3
That's way too simplistic a method of looking at how the review score is tabulated. Try reading the entire review. There are a lot more cons than just the two listed in that section.
6. Nathan_ingx posted on 13 Sep 2012, 11:47 2
Now, now...'LAUGHABLE camera and video recording quality' is a l'le too cruel...it's a 3.2 megapixel sensor. What do you expect from it?? And you would expect a 720p video from it? Come on!
7. Nathan_ingx posted on 13 Sep 2012, 11:48 2
Now, now...'LAUGHABLE camera and video recording quality' is a l'le too cruel...it's a 3.2 megapixel sensor. What do you expect from it?? And you would expect a 720p video from it? Come on!
8. Raymond_htc posted on 14 Sep 2012, 04:25 0
Its not ugly.. its actually ok. PERSONAL PREFERENCES! NO PHONES ARE UGLY!
Also, if u're those dckheads who keep hating on the phone name.... as its not related to the phone's looks.. COME ON! DOES HTC DESIRE RELATES TO ITS LOOKS? DOES THE S WORD IN S3 AND S2 RELATES TO ITS PHONE DESIGN!?!?






