Samsung Galaxy S5 vs Sony Xperia Z1
The Galaxy S5 has two noise-canceling mics, and the call quality is nothing to write home about in terms of claity, though the sound comes out pretty strong on both side of the fence. On our side the earpiece shows good volume, but the voices sounded somewhat muffled. The microphones on the S5 relayed our voice with a slight hissing and distortion over to the other end, but the sound remained powerful, and the ambient noises were taken out of the call.
Although not really amazing, the Xperia Z1 does a good job when it comes to sound quality during calls. Loudness is just enough, while voices tend to sound clear enough to be easy to comprehend. Its earpiece, however, sounds a bit weaker and more distorted than the S5's unit.
The old TN-LCD display tech of the Z1 drains its battery juice almost twice faster than what the Galaxy S5 is able to score.
The Xperia Z1 has a 3000 mAh battery, but it musters almost twice shorter battery life than the Galaxy S5, which sports a 2800 mah unit. The culprit is its older display technology that is a power hog, and barely survives 5-6 hours of browsing and video, while the S5 goes up to 10 hours in browsing, and up to 12 in video playback. Xperia Z1 is also cited to last 15 hours of talk time in 3G mode, while the Galaxy S5 is pegged by Samsung as able to endure 21 hours of chatting.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 and Sony Xperia Z1 offer two very distinct vessels to enjoy Android KitKat. Sony's handset is the one with the more premium, steel-and-glass waterproof design, while Samsung counters with a plastic water-resistant chassis, that lets you easily swap the battery, if needed. We aren't pointing out its Fingerprint Scanner and heart rate sensor as grand advantages over the Z1, as they are a bit cumbersome to use, and most people won't use them on a regular basis.
Even if we isolate those two extra features, the Galaxy S5 still registers as the better handset, if you don't mind the plastic build. It has a better display in most aspects, superior graphics and image processing power, thanks to the Snapdragon 801 processor, and an IR blaster. Its camera might be of lower resolution than the Z1, but is on par in terms of detail, and on top of that it offers neat options like 4K video, real-time HDR and Selective Focus, which the Z1 can't muster.
When we add to this laundry list of advantages almost twice longer battery life than the Z1, the scales will be easily tipped in the Galaxy S5's favor, if the higher price isn't an issue.
1. danny_a2005 (Posts: 117; Member since: 06 Oct 2011)
What I really want to see its S5 trying to beat Sony Z2...
8. HansGoneInsane (Posts: 348; Member since: 09 Aug 2013)
guess we need 4 more weeks to find out.
5. HansGoneInsane (Posts: 348; Member since: 09 Aug 2013)
I'd rather say Z2=S5 with each device having strenghs and weaknesses.
3. spiderpig2894 (Posts: 413; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)
Z1 has real-time HDR on both stills and video. In stills, the HDR mode is activated when on Superior Auto Mode.
4. dmn666 (Posts: 194; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
TN-LCD is also a true HD and the amoled is a penile fake HD with much much less subpixels that gives it an unfair advantage in battery tests. It's common sense, but PA just had to declare that LCD drains battery twice as faster without mentioning it is a penile crap. I know you made few pennies, but hey, you could play it smart.
6. dmn666 (Posts: 194; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
Also show us some lowlight photos before calling it a tie on image quality. Z1 rapes s5 hard in lowlight shots. Oh, the pros over DXOmark already ranked z2 as the best cameraphone. I'm looking forward to the comparison the PA noobs will do shortly to convince s5 camera is also "on par" with z2
7. mokhtar (Posts: 196; Member since: 06 Jan 2014)
wow my phone still compare and better than samsung 2014 smartphones .. damn
9. romeo1 (Posts: 174; Member since: 06 Jan 2012)
im not sure about how honest this review is done as the z1 phones ive seen and had did around the 34-35k antutu and calling with the released software was 25hrs on 3g and with the updates battery time got better each time. so did the camera. but i have to use the s5 for myself before knowing about the camera as phonearenas camera tests aren't really good. the s4 for example doesn't make good low light pictures but according to pa its pretty good and even better than the sony and even the nokia counterparts if im not mistaken.
10. TMach (Posts: 348; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)
Personally, waiting for the Z2 and delivery due next week from Carphonewarehouse! If I had to choose right now, will still go for the Z1 over the S5!