x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One

0. phoneArena 26 Mar 2013, 06:51 posted on

This is it, the most epic Android face-off for the first half of 2013. The Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC One are coming out at about the same time to go ahead and have it out with one another. When the Galaxy S4 and One are in the same room, there sure ain't much love in the air, which is going to make this fight all the more interesting. Which side will you take? Wait till you've read our comparison!...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 07:51 12

37. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)

S4 for me, main reason for me is the bigger screen and battery in a smaller device and also because of removable storage and battery.. My brother is getting the HTC one mainly due to the aluminum build and front speakers.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:10 9

44. Diego! (Posts: 621; Member since: 15 Jun 2009)

I like both designs. It's true!

S4 looks way better than S III. IMHO! *CLARIFIES* And HTC One looks exquisite.

I'm getting, tough,Samsung Galaxy S4 due to its flexibility.

I can use it with gloves (like Nokia Lumia 920) and exchange its battery and add more memory via microSD card. That alone is a plus that HTC One can't match yet.

And I prefer bigger screens too. Sammy, come to papa!

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:15 11

48. poping (unregistered)

S4 for me because key lime pie update this year. htc key lime update is next year or maybe not...

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:18 4

49. Esf_Kid (Posts: 49; Member since: 28 Feb 2013)

Really like to experience both of these sweet handsets.
One will offer one of the most premium designs and UIs while S4 will give us the best experience of perfect optimization and software richness
love them both.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:29 7

51. supa_dupa (Posts: 78; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)

Why no night shots?

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:32 7

52. rsiders (Posts: 940; Member since: 17 Nov 2011)

So no low-light camera comparisons? Video performance?

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:38 2

55. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)

Should be on its way soon, if not GsmArena

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:39 3

58. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 765; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)

there is a blind comparison..

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:38 8

56. cornerofthemoon (Posts: 590; Member since: 20 Apr 2010)

Galaxy S4, built by Fisher Price.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:42 2

62. cornerofthemoon (Posts: 590; Member since: 20 Apr 2010)

The Galaxy Design is atrocious, particularly the black model. However it could probably take a beating better than the HTC as the aluminum body (sans case) would be probably be scratched up to Hell within a few weeks.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:44 4

63. Note2waitingonNote3 (banned) (Posts: 87; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)

Galaxy S4 with it's software development and implementation of features as well as user enhancements sdcard expansion and removable battery. Htc One for it's crafted design and blinkfeed and boom sound speakers in the front clever idea definitely. It's all subjective i prefer Galaxy S4.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:44 4

64. true1984 (Posts: 823; Member since: 23 May 2012)

gonna go with the one since it won the most important category in my opinion. call quality

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 08:45 10

65. Jonathan41 (Posts: 532; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)

Very nice! HTC gets the win. Nice head to head PA, and a well deserved victory to HTC.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 09:09 7

67. lyndon420 (Posts: 4460; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)

The One and only.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 09:18 5

70. Kasual (Posts: 1; Member since: 26 Mar 2013)

HTC made a great looking phone that's for sure. Looks aside, if the S4 maintains similar or better battery life than the Note II, it get's my vote over the HTC one.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 09:35 7

72. piyath (Posts: 445; Member since: 23 Mar 2012)

Galaxy S4 for me! I guess people are so blind as they don't see the advanced S4 campared to dumb and useless htc one.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 08:02

184. qwerty1234 (Posts: 7; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)

is HTC One really useless??? srsly are you dumb???

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 09:52 4

75. cornerofthemoon (Posts: 590; Member since: 20 Apr 2010)

The HTC One is the hot babe that you could afford to take on one date. However the Galaxy S4 is probably the more reliable wallflower that you would ultimately marry for the long haul.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 12:47 2

108. amats69 (Posts: 1461; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)

LOL! id rather love to go for a one night date with the hot babe that can make me happy with just one night than marrying an ugly lady and see that ugly face when you open your eyes everyday in your entire life LOL!

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 10:09 5

79. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

I wish HTC won only hbecause samsung domination gone too far

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 11:51 3

101. Galactic (Posts: 19; Member since: 07 Feb 2013)

You may have unwittingly but perfectly described the HTC fanboy predicament. l tip my hat to You, good sir.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 10:13 1

81. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

To my liking PA did too mouch buzz around S IV. Good phone, progress for sure but what's about this hype?? I really do hope that samsun'g domination will end very soon as one sidfe domination is never good for customers.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 10:20 6

82. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Just the fact that the GS4 with a 5 inch screen feels significantly smaller than the HTC One with a 4.7 inch screen tells you which handset is better. The HTC One is just way too big for a 4.7 inch phone.

Add in the guaranteed HTC quality control issues and you have another major HTC fail. Sorry HTC, no matter how many amps or speakers you put in it still doesn't justify the size. This is almost as bad as a fail as the giant brick Nokia Lumia 920.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 10:21 7

83. poping (unregistered)

s4 is full of screen. one is full bezels

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 10:24 1

84. jphillips63 (Posts: 222; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

It's funny how you folks bicker over a bezel or buttons or how many icons are on the screen. Phones are phones they are not a DSLR or a gaming system and they are not a mass storage device. Bottom line is we buy a phone to use as a phone. I bet if you took both phones out to a fringe area you'll see that the HTC will have a better radio in it and get a better signal over the Samsung.
Why is all lost on everything but what the phone is for a phone, why are there never any tests of which radio inside is better. It's all about gimicks and gadgets the phones can do.
the differeneces here are screen size type of screen and what they are made out of. Damn folks everything else is the same on the inside. If you want gimmicks you can download them in the app store if one particular model don't have what another does. What I want in a phone is it to work when I need it to when I'm outside the city and in those fringe areas. I also want it to last an entire day on moderate to heavy use as well. The rest of the stuff is to me is junk that I disable as it is anyhow.
One last thing lets see how many of you go drooling over the Moto X or the nexus 5 when it finally shows some light.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 10:32 3

88. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Because those things matter.....

If you want call quality, use a cordless phone or an older brick indestructible Nokia of the 90's.

How it fits in your pocket, how it feels in your hand, how comfortable it is to use the buttons are all pretty important things for a portable phone. And guess who wins in those areas easily? Yup, the GS4.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 10:58 2

92. jphillips63 (Posts: 222; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Really? show me a cordless phone that works 100 miles from home? hell show me one that works within a mile from home? Lets be real here I said a phone to use in fringe areas not at your home or in the office. I say you're right on the pocket thing Samsung will have stay in your pockets once you leave a major metroploitan area as there radios inside just don't have what it takes to use as a phone once you get away from the cell towers or wifi.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 11:18 2

94. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Haha so the true nature of your post comes out. My GS3 was fine in all signal areas.

And if you wanted to prop up the HTC, you would have been better off not mentioning battery life.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 11:55 1

104. jphillips63 (Posts: 222; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Nature of my post is to get past the gimmicks and test these phones in real world circumstances away from wifi and a cell tower nearby. Battery life is important and regardles of the brand if it can't make it thru a day of moderate to heavy use then what good is it?
I myself need a phone that works in the fringe areas and to have a decent battery. I've yet to see any samsung phone gold a good signal against the HTC and the Motorola phones. That can even be proven in the stores just turn off wifi on them and go check the signal strengths.

posted on 26 Mar 2013, 13:07 2

110. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Sure you have....

And in what kind of bizarro world does HTC have better reception than Samsung phones. I couldn't even use my bluetooth headset with it, I had to buy some ear phones with a mic to talk to my gf.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories