x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900

Pages
Interface and Functionality:

So here we are with yet another comparison between an Android powered smartphone and one running Windows Phone. Needless to say, they both have their perks and strengths, but there’s simply no comparison as the Galaxy S III’s TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich is simply more comprehensive.  Specifically, it beats the Window Phone 7.5 Mango experience of the Nokia Lumia 900 in the personalization department, but beyond that, Samsung’s beauty begins to differentiate itself with its expansive tertiary functionality with things like S Voice, S Beam, ShareShot, AllShare, SmartStay, GroupCast, and much more. Still, we have to give the Windows Phone credit for its dynamic start screen and ease of use – though, it lacks some deep personalization.

The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900

The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 ICS


The interface of the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The interface of the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The interface of the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The interface of the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900

The interface of the Nokia Lumia 900


At the core of things, both handsets’ organizer apps function relatively in the same manner, but there’s some advanced functions attached with the Android experience of the Samsung Galaxy S III. Since it’s running Google’s mobile platform, it provides for the best experience with the Google ecosystem – like what we find with Gmail.

Even though Samsung’s pride and joy has the more spacious on-screen keyboard, we can’t count out the Windows Phone keyboard of the Lumia 900 – mainly due to the fact that it offers one of the best auto-correct feature on any platform. Regardless of that, both are extremely responsive in keeping up with our pace.

The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900

The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III


On-screen keyboard of the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
On-screen keyboard of the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900

On-screen keyboard of the Nokia Lumia 900



Processor and Memory:

Here’s a perfect example why hardware sometimes can’t predict the performance of a device. Since it’s the newer of the two, the Galaxy S III is blessed with a dual-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 processor with a whopping 2GB of RAM. Certainly, that’ll raise some eyebrows over the Lumia 900’s single-core 1.4GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU with 512MB of RAM. However, when it comes down to it, they perform very similar to one another, as every operation is accompanied with fluid movements and instantaneous actions. Ultimately, we can agree that these two handsets are at tip-top shape when it comes to providing a very peppy performance.

Pulling them right of their packaging, the Nokia Lumia 900 has the higher free storage capacity at 13.61GB – versus the 12.05GB available with the Samsung Galaxy S III. Despite that, it’s the latter that offers expandable storage via its microSD card slot.


Internet and Connectivity:

Being the flagship device for each respective platform right now, there’s no surprise that the these two lovely devices fully take advantage of their 4G LTE radios. However, when it comes down to the actual web browsing performance, we have to stick with the Galaxy S III on this one, namely because it coughs up that near perfect desktop experience. Indeed, we love that the two are extremely responsive with their navigational controls, but the support of Adobe Flash on the Galaxy S III is simply icing on the cake.

The Samsung Galaxy S III is presenting us to a brilliant web browser - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The Samsung Galaxy S III is presenting us to a brilliant web browser - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The Samsung Galaxy S III is presenting us to a brilliant web browser - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
The Samsung Galaxy S III is presenting us to a brilliant web browser - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900

The Samsung Galaxy S III is presenting us to a brilliant web browser


Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900
Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Nokia Lumia 900

Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900


Since the two are GSM devices, there’s no worry if you plan on traveling internationally, since they’re both compatible with a wide array of GSM networks. Domestically, they can surf the web very quickly while relying on AT&T’s 4G LTE network. And of course, they feature the typical set of connectivity features, but it’s worth noting that the Galaxy S III trumps the Lumia 900 with Bluetooth 3.0, NFC, and 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi.

66 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 26 Jun 2012, 05:40 22

1. rinawan (Posts: 4; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


i vote lumia 900 :))

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 08:08 8

24. wendygarett (unregistered)


You must be Siri fanboy too :)

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 08:18 6

27. zhypher_23 (Posts: 195; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


Don't know what to do vote up/down cause both phones are great WP=Basic Fundamentals Sammy=Flexible, But GS3 is Better 4 Me IMO :)

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 09:13 6

31. shy2papa (Posts: 334; Member since: 23 Jan 2010)


its like Comparing a GS3 Mercedes amg SLR McLaren to a Lunia 900 kia picanto LOL

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 10:47 4

36. SleepingOz (unregistered)


Nah It's more like comparing an Agera R(GSIII) to a mini cooper or maybe a Fiat 500(Lumia900)..

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 11:51 2

41. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


Hey guys, johhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnnnn V here. :))

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 15:11 1

50. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3116; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)


For the love of god, stop comparing cell phones to cars. lol

posted on 08 Jul 2012, 07:01

64. GJanee (Posts: 214; Member since: 29 Jun 2011)


says the droidboy... by the way please let us know: what the hell does the lumia900 and siri have in common?

posted on 08 Jul 2012, 07:03

65. GJanee (Posts: 214; Member since: 29 Jun 2011)


agreed. these kids need to grow up first...

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 05:42 19

2. sorcio46 (Posts: 435; Member since: 27 Jul 2011)


Galaxy SIII is light years away from Lumia 900, and ICS offers more features than Window Phone, there is no doubt what to choose :-)

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 09:51 6

34. Birds (Posts: 1171; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


I'd think the Lumia 900 needs to be compared to the Sony Xperia Ion rather than the GSIII, considering the two devices are in the same price range.

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 11:33 3

38. SleepingOz (unregistered)


Go for an XPERIA instead, you'll get the best of both, Android and aesthetics. =]
And beauty is subjective anyway..

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 09:54 9

35. RamyRamz69 (Posts: 390; Member since: 12 Dec 2011)


If you want something that doesn't look ugly, get a Lumia.

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 11:47

40. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


I'd say One S. Talk about design and build quality. Performance? One of the best in Android ecosystem.

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 12:09 2

44. SleepingOz (unregistered)


You're right, but some might not like its HTCish design..

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 05:45 9

3. lpeixoto92 (Posts: 3; Member since: 26 Jun 2012)


I can see the Lumia´s pixels away.

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 06:15 4

7. lubba (Posts: 1313; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)


It will surely happen. Then it will be a more exciting comparison: gs3 vs Nokia wp8 vs galaxy wp8.

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 05:49 12

4. microsoftnokiawin (Posts: 1231; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)


you should compare s3 to new wp8 nokia phone
when they come out of course

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 06:44 2

11. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


whatever Nokia will be offering in WP8 is... unpredictable.
Nokia has never had an HD phone nor a multicore device. PureView was worked on for 5 years and was released and heard of only now...

The endless possibilities... too bad WP doesn't sideload and no mass storage mode, :(

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 11:44 4

39. SleepingOz (unregistered)


I'd love that.. But imo, the GSIII will remain the best smartphone for a long time as WP8 seem to still be as closed as WP7 and ios, so..

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 22:56 1

55. vslayer (Posts: 34; Member since: 12 Dec 2011)


baseless comment have u heard that windows phone 8 will support now micro SD card and will support 18 months of software support ...

i wonder how long this galaxy will be upgraded to jelly bean....

watch out dude ...wp8 will be a BANG by the end of the year

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 05:59 7

5. lubba (Posts: 1313; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)


Its nice to compare products, but there is no comparing here. We all know which is the better. Obviously its old against new. Nothing more.

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 06:08 7

6. stipe (Posts: 33; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


Why do you use white backgroun when Nokias screen work best on the black background . Have you ever heard of ClearBlack technology ? Aa

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 06:29 4

8. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


clear black is only polarized filter
so who cares

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 06:41 2

9. stipe (Posts: 33; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


You wont see piksels on a black beckground .

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 07:02 3

16. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


because black is magic?

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 08:16 1

25. stipe (Posts: 33; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


Please . I have a Lumia 800 and when you use black it is harder to recognize every piksel . Thank you .

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 08:48 4

29. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


and i have sgs3 it is impossible to recognize any pixel white or black .
white text on black background or black text on white background it doesn't matter
Thank you

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 08:59 1

30. stipe (Posts: 33; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


I think you are afraid . .... Something big is comming .... wait for Nokia World ..

posted on 26 Jun 2012, 11:03 3

37. SleepingOz (unregistered)


Afraid of what? HAHAHA!!
Seriously, how old are you?

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories