x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound

Posted: , by FAUguy

Tags:

Go to page
Interface:

Samsung is using their TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich, while the Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread. HTC says an ICS update for the Rezound will be released.

Both are heavily integrated, and you really don’t see anything of the stock Android interface. There are 5 static icons on the bottom of the Galaxy S III, while the Rezound has 3 (apps, phone, and personalize). Even though the Rezound is months older, it allows for greater customization with its assortment of Scenes and Skins, though both phones do come with a nice selection of desktop widgets.

The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound

The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX interface layered over Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich


The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound

The HTC Rezound is using HTC’s Sense UI over Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread


We like what Samsung has done with its TouchWiz Nature UX, but wish they would take is a step further and allow more customizations of its appearance.


Messaging:


There is very little difference between the E-Mail programs on the Galaxy S III and Rezound, as both allow you to accomplish the same tasks and allow you to access pretty much any E-Mail account you may have. GMail still uses its own dedicated app, and can check multiple GMail accounts.

Between the two phones, we found the on-screen QWERTY keyboard on the HTC Rezound to be the easiest to use, as the buttons are larger and populate more of the screen than the keyboard on the Galaxy S III. Also, the auto word completion seems to be more accurate on the Rezound.

Samsung Galaxy S III - On-screen QWERTY keyboards - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
HTC Rezound - On-screen QWERTY keyboards - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound

Samsung Galaxy S III

HTC Rezound

On-screen QWERTY keyboards



Processor and Memory:

It is no surprise that the newer 1.5GHz dual-core Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 processor on the Galaxy S III does a better job overall than the 1.5GHz dual-core Qualcomm MSM8660 Snapdragon S3 on the Rezound. Not only can you see the difference in the benchmarks, but the Galaxy S III feels faster and more fluid, and having an extra 1GB of RAM doesn’t hurt either.


Quadrant Standard AnTuTu NenaMark 2
Samsung Galaxy S III 5022 6396 58,7
HTC Rezound 2490 5603 33,9

The HTC Rezound comes with 16GB of internal memory and also a 16GB microSDHC memory card pre-installed, while the Samsung Galaxy S III is available with either 16GB or 32GB of internal memory – but still has a microSD memory card slot if you need more storage room.


Internet and Connectivity:

The included web browser on both the HTC Rezound and Samsung Galaxy S III does a great job of properly rendering web pages, including those with embedded Flash content. Pinch-to-zoom and kinetic scrolling is fast and fluid on both devices. Of course, you can always download a 3rd party browser if you prefer, such as Dolphin, Chrome, or FireFox.

Samsung Galaxy S III - Web browsers - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
Web browsers - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
HTC Rezound - Web browsers - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound
Web browsers - Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC Rezound

Samsung Galaxy S III

 

HTC Rezound

 

Web browsers


Even though the Rezound and Galaxy S III run on Verizon’s 4G LTE data network, we did see some differences. When used outside and with the SpeedTest.net app, the Galaxy S III continually got the fastest speeds around town, while the Rezound was a bit slower. For example, we ran one test outside our house at night after 1am so there would be lower internet traffic, and the Galaxy S III got a download speed of 14.29 Mbps and an upload speed of 7.26 Mbps with a 99ms Ping time. The HTC Rezound got download speed of 7.80 Mbps and an upload speed of 4.59 Mbps with a 93ms Ping time.

Both phones also support Bluetooth and Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n at 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands. The Galaxy S III also supports NFC, and S Beam, so you can transfer files easily to another S Beam enabled phone.

37 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 18 Jul 2012, 09:17 3

1. good2great (Posts: 1039; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


really PA??!! smh

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 09:20 6

3. ajac09 (Posts: 1358; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


next they will go "iphone 4s vs galaxy s 1 "

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 14:47 9

9. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 2938; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)


In PA's defense....THEY ARE BOTH THE SAME PRICE. So yes I think it's fair to compare the two if they ARE THE SAME PRICE ON CONTRACT.

It clearly shows that Verizon needs to lower their price on the Rezound, like now.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 18:51

31. jroc74 (Posts: 4720; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


I dont know....a comparison is a comparison, regardless.

Just the pics on the 1st page alone tell my story. I hate the Rezound screen. It really does look washed out next to an Amoled screen. Its too reflective and has bad viewing angles. Its like the brightness and contrast is cranked up too high.

Anytime I can see myself in it almost like a mirror vs my RAZR....its no good for outdoor viewing.

posted on 13 Aug 2012, 03:02

41. dmckay12 (Posts: 243; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)


While I would not trade my Rezound for just about anything, I agree about outdoor viewing. There is a lot of reflecting (though I and everyone else loves seeing my face) and it is annoying. I could not use it on the way to my car ever. I think that the screen is great. It is much better than my Mom's Razr to watch movies on.

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 09:19

2. ajac09 (Posts: 1358; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


such a miss match but I guess its putting the "old" vs the new. The rezond 2 aka the htc x one for Verizon should be out in a few months

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 18:47

11. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5555; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


at this point Verizon just needs an all new One variant. still plenty of letters in the Alphabet.

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 10:36

4. pmgvsa5 (Posts: 2; Member since: 18 Jul 2012)


hallo. i want to say that you maybe make a mistake. In AN TU TU benchmark the score is from 10560-12156. Never less. I have the SGS 3 EU and i check it again. And in Quadrant from 5000-5590. I have before htc,nokia,sony ericsson. Sgs3 its realy in the top of the phone market!! i dont know what else you need from a phone today. bye.

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 11:33 6

6. FAUguy (Posts: 77; Member since: 09 Apr 2008)


The US version is dual core, that is why the benchmarks are lower than the quad core EU model.

posted on 23 Jul 2012, 13:58

23. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


Question on how PA works:
Do you guys share the phones for review, or do you do one phone per person? How does it work with you guys since there is no "office".

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 06:09 2

14. pmgvsa5 (Posts: 2; Member since: 18 Jul 2012)


ok thanks for the information.i did not see that its another model.

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 10:55 5

5. Markizzle21 (Posts: 30; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)


Dumbest comparison this is not even interesting

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 13:00 2

7. BiN4RY (Posts: 80; Member since: 22 Jun 2012)


What a pointless comparison

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 13:02 5

8. Cyan3boN (Posts: 425; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)


the rezound has a more premium feel to it and scores in ergonomics too.

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 15:01 1

10. rferrerca (Posts: 2; Member since: 18 Jul 2012)


As european reader of phonearena, It would be nice to show also units of weight, height, width and fatness in international units, as not all your readers are American... Thanks

posted on 04 Aug 2012, 08:25

36. OptimusOne (Posts: 694; Member since: 22 May 2012)


isn't phonearena based in america. just because european people live in america, does it mean we have to convert to inte3rnational units whie you are here?

posted on 18 Jul 2012, 21:05

12. markreif (Posts: 7; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)


What BS - anyone with any "Sense" at all would take the Rez - S-OFF it and load something like NeWts zOnE XxX RLS 3.2.1 BLUE ROM before lining it up against Samsungs latest and greatest. I'd venture to guess that the conclusion would in fact be significantly different. And for what it's worth - you couldn't pay me to switch my as is described Rezound for the GSIII....

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 08:49 3

15. OptimusOne (Posts: 694; Member since: 22 May 2012)


Regardless of what you think
The average consumer will probably not be able load a custom ROM
Remember Phone arena is aimed for average consumers a and iPhone fanboys
Not hardcore android modders

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 18:56

32. jroc74 (Posts: 4720; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Even tho I have a Droid 1 that I put a load of ROMs on, I had a G nex....

I have yet to even root me Rezound. I had it since Jan this year.

A phone with a custom ROM vs a stock phone is never a good or fair comparison. Like the post above me says....these comparisons are and should be meant for the general public.

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 00:31 4

13. mas11 (Posts: 1028; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)


I'm really looking forward to the SGSIII vs. the RAZR HD comparison. That should be quite the epic battle.

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 08:50

16. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


[[Hey guys, I think the Rezound is better!]]
What's the point?
If you look at it, the SGS3 is really the only phone to get on VZW. If you say it's not comparable to the Rezound or the Razr ["and no where close to the iPhone"], what phone is to compare?
For people buying phones, this is actually a good comparison.

posted on 19 Jul 2012, 11:42

17. preet27in (banned) (Posts: 173; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)


what??? r u serious? this aint any comparison. old phone with old hardware vs a whole new breed.? sammy fades in front of one x. compare that.... lcd ips is better in nyways. some idiot sammy fanboy might have posted this comparison. grow up!!!1

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 18:58

33. jroc74 (Posts: 4720; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


It does show a con for the Rezound screen tho. It really does look washed out like that next to an Amoled screen in certain situations.

posted on 20 Jul 2012, 09:33 1

18. shaxar (Posts: 7; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)


If sound quality is what you want out of a phone (in addition to what was compared here), I don't see how both phones being @ the $199 price point, yet one coming with $100 ear buds in the box... how is that not automatically the better deal? Guess it just depends on what you're looking for in a phone...

posted on 21 Jul 2012, 13:40 2

19. bambamboogy02 (Posts: 16; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


I have a rezound, and was thinking about what the differnces actually are between the two. I had a chance to play with the SG3 and i still like my rezound a little better since I do read on my phone a lot. The smaller print looks better on the Rezound. There are people who own the OLDER phones, and would like to know what the differnces happen to be with the NEWER models. Even if you think phonearena is dumb for comparing these, I have a question for you:

Why did you take time out of your day to comment on how stupid this article is?

Quit being cry babys because you personally think something is stupid. All comparisons give good info to everyone about old and new phones. So take it for informative material and give it a rest.

posted on 21 Jul 2012, 20:33 2

20. cakell09 (Posts: 1; Member since: 21 Jul 2012)


My girlfriend has had the Rezound since it came out, and it's a really solid (literally and figuratively) phone. Yeah it's heavy and as PA mentioned, the weight isn't for everyone. It's not perfect, and I'm hoping to see some fixes with 4.0 (and 4.1 which is sure to come soon after, or at least in 2043). I've used the S3 quite a bit, and while I do like the feel of it, and the screen is EXTREMELY vibrant, they've been having quite a bit of issues with the paint chipping and cracking. This isn't too big of a concern for me because I'm more interested in function than fashion, but both phones are very nice. Yes, the S3 will win in a lot of benchmarks, it's a good phone. It also comes 4.0 out of the box. I'm one of the few people who still like sense nowadays apparently, so I still prefer the Rezound. But... Samsung makes one helluva phone.

posted on 21 Jul 2012, 21:49 1

21. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5555; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


you'd probably be more interested in the Incredible 4G LTE then since it uses the same S4 processor that the SIII has sans a few MHz and Sense 4.0 which naturally comes with ICS.

i personally don't mind the weight myself. it makes the phone feel more premium, sturdy & substantial to me.

posted on 21 Jul 2012, 22:37

22. joey18 (Posts: 506; Member since: 20 Jul 2010)


Two weeks we the phone drop easy wifi and 4g always on 3g i hate svoice dont know anythin in spanish only 6 thins i wan to root to jelly bean my question is when jelly bean update is coming

posted on 24 Jul 2012, 01:19

24. ricky0702 (Posts: 11; Member since: 09 Jul 2012)


Fantastic phone. Received my white 16GB pre-order yesterday, and have been having fun with it ever since. I'm impressed with the battery life considering it's using the battery-hogging 4G LTE signal. Speaking of which, I am coming from a 3G phone and I have to say that 4G is a godsend; I live in Riverside County, CA and get great 4G signal -- this thing loads web pages just as fast as a high quality WiFi connection. The display is beautiful and is usable in direct sunlight.
http://www.careace.net/2012/06/07/a-review-ofhtcs-ridiculously-biased-comparison-of-the-one-x-and-galaxy-s-iii/

posted on 24 Jul 2012, 16:40

25. richardyarrell2011 (banned) (Posts: 510; Member since: 16 Mar 2011)


This is a useless comparison. The Galaxy S3 PIMP SLAPS THIS RAZR MAX and the other useless HTC REZOUND...

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 18:59

34. jroc74 (Posts: 4720; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Wasnt you a Sprint/EVO fanboy a few months ago?

Make up your mind....

posted on 07 Aug 2012, 16:16

39. richardyarrell2011 (banned) (Posts: 510; Member since: 16 Mar 2011)


You are years off the mark my friend. Been there done that with all the carriers these last 3years. Yes I had the EVO 4G, EVO 3D, Lg Revolution, Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, Galaxy Nexus, and now Galaxy S3 on tmobile. I kicked VERIZON to the curb for it's crappy dBm/asu as well as it's poor reception/signal strength. Tmobile BITCH SLAPS Verizon all day long..

posted on 31 Jul 2012, 15:27 1

29. cangie (Posts: 14; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


hmmm... no questions about it... S3 wins hands down

posted on 31 Jul 2012, 17:08

30. yooyoojohn (Posts: 4; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


Isn't the SIII much better than the HTC Rezound. I don't even think the rezound was a flagship phone.

posted on 03 Aug 2012, 19:01 1

35. jroc74 (Posts: 4720; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


It was flagship at the time for HTC on Verizon. The G Nex and RAZR/ Maxx were too.

Some would argue that it is still flagship for HTC on Verizon vs the Incredible 4G. I actually think the Inc 4G might be better tho.

posted on 13 Aug 2012, 05:03

42. Jonathan41 (Posts: 526; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)


What is with that clock widget Samsung? Why haven't they re-designed it yet?.

posted on 20 Sep 2012, 15:09

43. merman1983 (Posts: 1; Member since: 20 Sep 2012)


I thought this seemed crazy, but with the Rezound at $75 vs $199 it's food for thought. (I still kick myself that I didn't jump when the Rezound was $25 for a week or so).

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories