x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC EVO 4G LTE

Posted: , by Brian K.

Tags:

Pages
Call quality:

Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC EVO 4G LTE
Callers told us that the EVO 4G LTE was probably the best sounding phone we’ve ever tested, and on our end they were loud and clear as well. With the Galaxy S III they sounded equally as good if not better on our end, but callers complained of a wax paper effect at times and described us as having a hollow echo and being intermittently hard to hear. They rated the EVO a 9/10 while the Galaxy got a 7.5/10. Though the network isn’t yet capable of it, the EVO 4G LTE has HD voice technology baked in so it will get even better.


Battery:

The EVO 4G LTE has a fixed battery, putting it at an immediate disadvantage to the Galaxy S III’s removable one. The Galaxy’s battery is also slightly larger at 2100mAh compared to 2000mAh found on the EVO. Both batteries are powerful enough to get the average user though the day, but under heavy use it is possible to run through them thanks in part to the large displays. Samsung claims an extra two hours of usage with their phone, but in our testing the HTC battery held up slightly better.


Conclusion:

So, the big question remains: which device is better? As always we’re going to remind you that this is a subjective question, and what you value in a phone is most important to you. Are you a Sense or TouchWiz person? Do you prefer the heavier HTC, made of aluminum, or the lighter, plastic Galaxy S III with its color options? The S-LCD2 display of the EVO 4G LTE is slightly better, but Samsung’s HD Super AMOLED panel is slightly bigger and more eye-catchy. While the EVO runs better in benchmarks and real world usage, the Galaxy S III will get you double the RAM and storage along with a removable battery. Both devices are at the top of the mobile mountain right now, with blazing fast processors, gobs of memory, good cameras and tons of cool features, and no matter which you choose you’re going to have a phone that should last the next two years without any problems.





Pages:

76 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:13 1

1. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


I like how your video samples show on my YouTube Subscription feed before the review is released --- I always know the smackdowns before hand lol.

Because of this Jellybean mania, I kinda got my eyes of the Galaxy S III. I want a JB device! First device to get JB wins (between the smackdown) :))

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 09:04

19. DonkeySauce (Posts: 194; Member since: 03 Dec 2011)


If you want Jelly Bean, I'm not sure about Samsung. They're notorious for taking forever to updated their Galaxy phones in the US. I waited forever for updates to my original Epic, and the GSII still has no ICS.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 16:36

31. phoenixpr (Posts: 167; Member since: 28 Mar 2012)


Agree! SGSIII will get JB first, Loved the Evo LTE, was going to get it. However my #1 things of MUST HAVE on a phone is a removable battery. Sorry Evo LTE your lost...

posted on 11 Jul 2012, 04:24 2

59. Raymond_htc (Posts: 430; Member since: 06 Apr 2012)


.....Man, you cant judge a phone by removable battery. thats the same way as you saying all the tablets in this world sucks, cuz they all don't have removable batteries.

posted on 11 Jul 2012, 15:01

60. phoenixpr (Posts: 167; Member since: 28 Mar 2012)


I don't want a tablet ever for the very reason. I have my big iMac when I am at home, My big TV to watch my program, my smartphone to do basic email, web and some app. I know what kind of user I am. I removable battery is number 1 of MUST have on my list, then everything else follows down my check list.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 20:14 3

40. lsutigers (Posts: 820; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)


Wow, EVO LTE wins just about every round. I picked up both of them and I am testing them out. I have to say, I agree with the comparison review, in my opinion, the EVO is a more refined device and has the few extras that were missing out of the One X to be up to par with the Galaxy S III.

I think I will keep the EVO and return the SGS3, both great phones though.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:15 2

2. tiara6918 (Posts: 2075; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


Very good review! Wish that the htc evo 4g lte was sold internationally as it had better performance and specs than that of the one x. Now, the Samsung Galaxy S 3 has it's true competitor in the smartphone industry!

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:21 4

3. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3109; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)


What's the point in doing a vs if you don't pick a winner? Come on PA

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 16:01 3

30. Birds (Posts: 1164; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


Lol, they left us off with a cliff hanger. Its like a bad movie. I pick the Evo. Nothing against the SGSIII but still I like the evo.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 18:56 1

37. pandakilla (Posts: 5; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


They pretty much said who was the winner....HTC better over all...I like Samsung.........for thier displays

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:35 1

4. exidor01 (Posts: 8; Member since: 17 Dec 2011)


I thought the galaxy s 3 had 2gb of RAM. Am I incorrect?

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:42 1

5. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3109; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)


Indeed it does, the US version anyway.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:42 4

6. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


"The EVO had its way with the Galaxy S III, beating it convincingly in all three tests we ran it through."

...What? If basic mathematics serve me correctly (and for the most part they do), the GSIII's 12,016 on AnTuTu is just a TAD BIT HIGHER than the Evo's 6,973...

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 06:48 1

9. baldilocks (Posts: 753; Member since: 14 Dec 2008)


PhoneArena has a problem with reality lately...

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 08:05 3

13. Fallout09 (Posts: 421; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Where are you getting 12016 on AnTuTu? Article states SG3 had 5740 vs EVO 6973.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 08:57

17. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


Brian changed it from what it was before.That's where I was getting it, to answer your question.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 08:21 1

16. true1984 (Posts: 825; Member since: 23 May 2012)


thats the international version not the US version tested here

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 09:27 1

21. PhoneArena Team (Posts: 258; Member since: 27 Jun 2006)


We had a mistake with the Galaxy S III benchmarks results; it is corrected now :)

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 22:48 4

48. ananya22 (Posts: 93; Member since: 23 Apr 2012)


EVO 4G lte is better at everything. wow htc!

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:42 3

7. Slammer (Posts: 1515; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


I've owned HTC devices for many years with no major issues. I can't praise their build quality enough. I'm not a fan of stationary batteries. I like the option to remove them. However, This review has helped me keep me in check that I maybe purchasing an HTC product once again.

John B.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 05:49

8. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


As far as not integrating Google's cloud storage into the music app, the app does allow you to add Play Music as a shortcut.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 07:20 1

10. lzsbleach (Posts: 155; Member since: 20 May 2012)


Just pick a winner.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 07:54 5

11. Slammer (Posts: 1515; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


Why pick a winner? The comparison was done and it is up to the potential buyer to make their decision based on the info given.

Picking a winner would be a matter of PA's personal opinion. Not necessarily the same interests of the purchaser.

IMO, based on past experiences, I believe the HTC is a better purchase for shear build quality and Sense's ability to interact better with Android. TouchWiz seems to develope glitches after months of use. Constant factory resets seems to be the norm with TouchWiz/Android integration.

John B.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 16:46 2

32. SleepingOz (unregistered)


"Sense's ability to interact better with Android"
HAHAHA YOU JUST MADE MY DAY!
Oh really? based on what? I've been using my GSII for nearly a year now and I've never experienced any of these glitches you're talking about.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 20:19 2

41. lsutigers (Posts: 820; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)


I think its pretty obvious they think the EVO is a better phone, they probably just don't want to pick it as a winner instead of the SGS3 as many will probably be upset about this.

Having used both of them, I have to agree with the review, I like the EVO better.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 07:58 2

12. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


With the results being so close between the two handsets, I have to wonder why the HTC snagged an 8.5 score while the Sammy got 9.3. I think the HTC is worthy of at least a 9.0.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 08:12 4

14. Fallout09 (Posts: 421; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Because Brian K. took off points for Sprint not having an LTE network, issues with camera and non removable battery. Funny because neither can get LTE right now. Accourding to this article, the EVO also had an edge on camera comparison and matched the SG3 pound for pound in battery dept. If you factor this comparison into the previous review.... EVO LTE should be a 9.5.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 18:23 1

35. evoMike (Posts: 10; Member since: 29 Jul 2011)


I agree with both of the above comments. Both versions of the S3 got 9.3. I wondered why the EVO review was so low after reading the comparison. The LG Viper LTE and Galaxy Nexus reviews both had pros as "LTE enabled" but for the EVO its a con.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 12:14 2

26. mr. anderson (Posts: 92; Member since: 16 Apr 2009)


I've been reading this site for years and I think the editors have a significant say in the scoring. What the articles say often don't jive with the final scores, and the EVO is a prime example. Brian praised it pretty much all the way around, but then it got a relatively low score.

Even if you read this article it seems that the EVO comes out the clear winner, but at the end there they leave it open. The reviews on this site are usually great (with a one very biased reviewer as an exception), but the scores are often confusing. My advice is to not even bother with scores, and read the review (or at least the conclusion) for the author's true feelings on the phone.

posted on 28 Jun 2012, 08:15 3

15. thenoodge (Posts: 32; Member since: 01 Sep 2011)


The Htc Evo Lte also has talk and surf at the same time over 3g which i thought was crazy that they are not promoting that makes it the winner to me being able to be on the phone and surf the web at the same time on 3g not wifi or LTE

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories