x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Galaxy S III Review

Samsung Galaxy S III 9.3

Posted: , by

Tags:

Pages
Performance:

Samsung Galaxy S III Review
The sound quality during phone calls has also been worked on. Samsung has implemented an equalizer designed to enhance the voices of your callers, so that they sound more natural and not as... well, phone-like. This technique has obviously worked, as we liked what we heard from the handset's earpiece. The sound is by no means perfect, but it's loud and relatively clear. What's really cool is how the noise-cancellation microphone of the S III manages to filter out all external noises. This way, the person on the other end of the line can hear only you, and nothing else.

The 2,100mAh battery of the Galaxy S III will be enough to keep the handset going for a full day, even if you are a heavy user. If you use it for just a few calls and texts during the day, and maybe a quick Facebook check, it might as well be able to run for two days on a single charge.


Conclusion:

The Samsung Galaxy S III is a spectacular phone. A big part of what makes it spectacular is its incredible specs sheet. Yeah, although its specs can easily be rivaled by strong competitors like the HTC One X, which also has a quad-core processor and the other beloved tech goodies, the Galaxy S III manages to shine brighter, thanks to its superior user experience. It doesn't falter as far as core functionality goes, and it even takes care of the minor stuff, trying to improve every possible aspect of your usage.

For a first time ever, TouchWiz actually feels like a good thing. It doesn't completely cover up the great ICS UI, but changes it just enough to make the phone feel different from the stock experience. It adds a lot of nice touches here and there, providing you with more options and customization, without appearing cluttered. We absolutely loved the fact that Samsung has left little hints at some places, which definitely help make the learning curve a lot smoother.

Well, the device is bulky. You'll definitely have to forget about the comfort of using it with one hand only. But that's the way it is with this new breed of Android superphones. If you want to have a giant touchscreen, then you'll have to put up with having a giant phone.

Except for this one little thingy, everything else regarding the phone is on the positive side. The camera isn't perfect, but it's at least good, better than most of the competition. However, when you factor in the flawless user experience of the Galaxy S III, it quickly becomes evident that there's hardly a better Android smartphone currently around. Samsung has once again nailed it with the Galaxy S III and HTC better sell as many of those One Xs while it still can, because the king of the Android jungle is back, and it seems to be very pissed off.

Software version of the reviewed unit: Android 4.0.4, Baseband I9300XXLE6, Build IMM76D.I9300XXALE6


Samsung Galaxy S III Video Review:





Pros

  • Super-fluid performance
  • Refined user experience
  • S Voice natural language recognition

Cons

  • Camera photos tend to be a bit overexposed
  • The polycarbonate used doesn't give the impression of something premium
PhoneArena rating:
9.3 Excellent
User rating:
8.7 113 Reviews
Pages:

172 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 15 May 2012, 05:24 53

1. android_hitman (unregistered)


WOW!!! that's a really good score .. I can't believe my eyes PA ...
nice review btw :D

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:32 16

4. Birds (Posts: 1164; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


It is. I don't like the GSIII though. I mean it is a great phone and a worthy buy but IDK why I don't like it. lol I guess I would have to play with it for a while then my opinions will change.

posted on 15 May 2012, 19:04 3

106. Saamic (Posts: 119; Member since: 20 Feb 2012)


lol sometimes I don't get why people thumbs down a comment... I mean what did you say there that was irrational, offensive, or biased?

In my opinion I think this phone is amazing because it's the full package with a unique beneficial software, it's very fast, highly customizable, innovative and clean. My only problem with it is the plastic and the fingerprints it's prone to.

I'll be waiting at in line for it on its U.S. release =)

posted on 15 May 2012, 22:37 2

117. BravoTeam127 (unregistered)


Well the design on those have a good chance at changing depending on carriers. Take the t-mobile one for example, that one changed a whole lot with the galaxy s ii

posted on 21 May 2012, 01:45 3

139. Dadler22 (Posts: 161; Member since: 11 Dec 2008)


AT&T generally doesn't alter the design so much on at least the flagship launch device, HTC One X for example. However, Firmware wise the unlocked version will always be far superior than the ones the carriers rape.

posted on 26 May 2012, 10:50 1

146. jdot104 (Posts: 95; Member since: 17 Jun 2011)


AT&T's version of the past two Galaxy devices was different from the flagship. The GS2 even had a smaller display.

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:34 22

6. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


The 9+ score prediction came true!
PA should have this feature where you can display all the phones according to their score.

If I had the money, I'd get the blue one NOW.
still waiting on the PA knows best lol, PA never answered my e-mail.

Smackdowns are coming, HTC One X vs S III, and the iPhone 4S I'm sure.

posted on 15 May 2012, 14:20

97. tluv00 (Posts: 134; Member since: 18 Oct 2007)


They do have that sort of. It's by carrier or by OEM.

posted on 24 May 2012, 09:52 5

143. jmoita2 (Posts: 930; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)


The iphone 4s??? Why even bother? It will be completely outclassed, kinda like comparing a destroyer to an aircraft carrier.

posted on 15 May 2012, 12:28 6

78. stillaPOS (Posts: 2; Member since: 15 May 2012)


the sgs3 is still a POS compared to the SGS2:

-the design is the same
-same old screen found on the gnex
-same soc found on so many F+ing phones (for the ones here in the US)
-for international version the gpu is the same one on the GS2 just overclocked!!!

everything about this phone is a recycled, rehashed, and reused just being sold again for full price. Nothing my overclocked and rooted GS2 can't do better

posted on 15 May 2012, 13:58 8

94. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


you have zero understanding of the phone or what's inside it.

posted on 15 May 2012, 16:21 5

100. sgtdisturbed47 (Posts: 670; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)


Good review, but the phone itself looks pretty cheapie. It doesn't look like they spent a lot of time on ergonomics and design. Looks like it's just about "shove the biggest screen in there as we can, without it being another Note".

It might perform well, but ergonomics are more important.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 09:45 2

160. zhypher_23 (Posts: 195; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


Cheapy? Polycarbonate is not cheap man, it's one of the most durable things to put on a smartphone, try to kill a gs2 landing on it's back, it's gonna take you a long time man...

posted on 15 May 2012, 22:28 4

116. medalaster01 (Posts: 42; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)


WOW! It may be the highest score till date,of all the phones on P.A.

posted on 16 May 2012, 03:38 4

124. smacsteve (Posts: 68; Member since: 16 May 2012)


Nope, the Galaxy Nexus on VZN was higher at 9.5 Which raise's an interesting question... A phone reviewed a year ago by then standard gets a great score and a phone that is reviewed today with raised standards due to much better technology is being judged by a different set of standards. What is one to do? Clearly a HTC One X is a better phone than the GNexus, but according to the score it would appear otherwise.

posted on 16 May 2012, 17:12

131. Shocky (unregistered)


No consistency in the reviewing process, so the scores are meaningless

Might as well just be some guy’s random blog.

posted on 11 Oct 2013, 05:02

173. MobileKicker (Posts: 212; Member since: 19 Sep 2013)


Still the iphone 4s wins

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:27 21

2. Birds (Posts: 1164; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


I have to say this. I like PhoneArena and all but it's reviews are inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have a standard for what makes a great phone a great phone, what makes a good phone an good phone, and what makes a bad phone an bad phone. I only could hope that it is because each reviewer has a different opinion, but I've come to realize that certain reviewers on this site run back over their previous opinions as well. I'm not trolling I just want to know if the reason they were so inconsistent with their opinions on phones between reviewers was because of them waiting for the next phone-to-beat (GSIII)? I just wish that all the reviews had a scale or something so I can know each particular flaw to category. That will keep it really consistent....But still a good review...

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:57 2

14. Dr_fajardo (Posts: 32; Member since: 29 Apr 2012)


very true.

posted on 15 May 2012, 08:44 7

44. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


There was a time when reviews were authored by "the PhoneArena Team." What happened to those days? If nothing else, at least all high-end devices should be compared by the same person/team, for consistency's sake (my vote is for John V, as I'm sure most people would agree with.)

Also factor in the fact that Ray clearly has some sort of vendetta against HTC. The last sentence of this review takes a completely unnecessary shot at them (and he just recycled it from his preview of the device, mind you.) Sure, the Global One X wasn't perfect, and the Galaxy S III is almost certainly a better phone, but it damn-well deserved a better score than a 7.8 considering that when it was launched it was unanimously hailed as the greatest Android device ever made.

posted on 15 May 2012, 11:31 2

71. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


I agree on this one and every PA reviewer out there has their own standard, and I did notice that Vendetta part for quite awhile now.

Oh, and also, WHERE"S THE VIDEO? lol, i have been waiting for it to download so that I can watch it on my nerd time alone.

posted on 15 May 2012, 11:41 2

74. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


oh and Sir Ray, if you ever happen to conduct the smackdown between the One X and the S III, please don't be too harsh on the One X. We would also want to know the advantages and disadvantages of each.

well, since I'm not the only one who feels like you're angry with HTC. *just a feeling though lol*

and for constructive criticism, please take this positively, you say too much "uhmm." :)

posted on 15 May 2012, 13:03

82. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 1176; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)


Agreed on all points here. The reviewer especially has his own opinionated reviews in my opinion. Was this such a great review or was it more like we anted so very much to hear only great things that we had presupposed high marks for this phone.

I am not taking away from any thing said; However the reviewers many reviews have left my opinion of his reviews jaded, and distrusting. I feel to validate reviews on this site I need to read else where to make an informed opinion in the last few months.

posted on 15 May 2012, 13:10

83. Jonathan41 (Posts: 532; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)


I just said that yesterday! I would give you another thumbs up if I could.

posted on 15 May 2012, 13:52

93. Jonathan41 (Posts: 532; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)


dk but phonearena's reviews lack a certain consistancy that I would expect from such a otherwise carefully though out sight. Reviews seem inconsistent between reviewer and devices. Something that are cons for one device aren't for others. Sometimes more powerful international unlocked phones get lesser scores then their supsidized versions (this is especially peculiar when the only differance between the two is more powerful chipset of the international version). Sometimes the reviewer puts something into cons that's more opinon then actual fact. It's like PA reviews and comparisons are generally mostly based more on opinon then fact. During review they never actually test devices with benckmarks or test to compare statistics. You usually just hear the reviewer say 'this device feels/looks like it does xxxx better'. Meaning that however trained that reviews eye is we are still subject to their perspective on thing much less then actual device performance. PA attempt to tell the reader which device is better for day to day use. That's impossible to do without generalizing your audience in someway and if each reviewer has a slightly different idea of what the readers want it's very hard to keep consistency between all the reviewer when scoring phones. I used to live buy pa review but I have grown weary. I love PA but, at times I see thing that seem like contradictions.

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:28 13

3. Muhannad (Posts: 455; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)


My only problem is that plastic is collects a lot of fingerprints but I think the white version makes up for that. Nevertheless, this is definitely my next phone. Also, what's the point of an extremely detailed preview followed by a 26 minute video preview if the review was a few days away?

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:33 3

5. Birds (Posts: 1164; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


because Ray S. has a sexy voice.... lol jk

posted on 01 Jun 2012, 07:47 1

150. jeraldjamescapao (Posts: 23; Member since: 17 May 2012)


Hahaha!

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:34 8

7. Jericho (unregistered)


WOW! Incredable score from phonearena to THE galaxy s3. Between lg optimus 4x, htc one x and samsung galaxy SIII I was going to buy the phone which had the highest score on phonearena but i think LG can't beat SAMSUNG here.

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:36 3

8. Birds (Posts: 1164; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


I'm actually rooting for LG this time. LG has the power they are just naive about the UI design.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Samsung Galaxy S III

Samsung Galaxy S III

OS: Android 4.3 4.1.2 4.1.1 4.0.4
view full specs
Display4.8 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels (306 ppi) Super AMOLED
Camera8 megapixels
Hardware
Samsung Exynos 4 Quad, Quad-core, 1400 MHz, ARM Cortex-A9 processor
1 GB RAM
Size5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches
(136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 mm)
4.69 oz  (133 g)
Battery2100 mAh, 22.5 hours talk time

Latest stories