x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung Galaxy S III Review

0. phoneArena 15 May 2012, 05:19 posted on

Well, it is now 2012, and the time has finally come for the Galaxy S III to show up on stage. The difference between this launch and those of the Galaxy S's before it is that the expectations of the audience are much higher now. It is time to take a good, in-depth look at the device and see just how much of a Galaxy S this new Galaxy S III happens to be...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:43 2

10. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


if it comes with Tegra 3 and an LG UI, well expect it to be like the One X.

I'm saying this without any fanboysim, but Samsung just raised the bar again with Super AMOLED, Exynos, the Camera and the software - without anything better or equal to those 4, i don't think it will be a success.

posted on 15 May 2012, 06:33 5

21. Filly (Posts: 16; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)


Raised the bar with s**tty short-living pentile amoled? LGs AH-IPS Screen is much better then samsungs hd amoled screen. Its comparable with the display in the htc one x

posted on 15 May 2012, 10:25

61. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


well played. :) maybe except that part I went wrong.

posted on 15 May 2012, 10:28 1

62. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


maybe u cant read but samsung just put out a statement proving that pentile arangements last a lot longer than RGB. My sgs1 is 2 years old and still beautiful without any dead pixels or anything.. so i can atleast attest to that.

Samsung's LCD2 and Amoled/+ screens are all superior to IPS.
But then again, its user choice at the end of the day.

posted on 15 May 2012, 11:36 1

73. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


Yeah. Everyone also praised the display on the One X so much - dubbed it as the best display ever... HTC sucked at making displays until that 'one' day. (pun)

but again, here's the Samsung Galaxy S III's display. Is there a difference between the attributes of the Gnex's and S3's screen? (no idea on that, answers?)

- cause if they are different, then we should have a display comparison.

posted on 15 May 2012, 11:41

75. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


HTC didnt make that display, Samsung did. Its samsung's LCD2 display that is riding the OneX.

posted on 15 May 2012, 13:15

85. rpostel (Posts: 2; Member since: 29 Feb 2012)


Samsung did not make the displays for HTC. HTC has 3 manufacterers for their screen for the One line: Sony, Acer, and Sharp.

posted on 15 May 2012, 23:55

123. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


then... which is better? :)

posted on 15 May 2012, 13:15

84. ph00ny (Posts: 1268; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Sony and LG makes those displays

posted on 15 May 2012, 07:38 6

29. henrickrw (Posts: 408; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


I´m glad you understand. The S3 is the beast.

posted on 15 May 2012, 10:01 3

57. Jericho (unregistered)


Hey i am a BIG LG! fan but if the 4x couldn't even come close to S3 then i will buy this phone. And i really want LG to win They still haven't revealed 6 unique features.

posted on 15 May 2012, 12:29

79. stillaPOS (Posts: 2; Member since: 15 May 2012)


umm didn't the GS2 and the iphone beat this score when it came out???

posted on 15 May 2012, 13:35 2

88. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


Don't worry too much, PhoneArena's rating system goes by nothing more than the personal preferences of whoever is doing the review (not to fault anyone, it's human nature to be biased. I know I'd probably rate certain phones higher than others based on my ideas of what makes a good phone.) At any rate, it's probably better to take the number system with a grain of salt and go by the content of the review instead.

To address your specific question, yes the GS2 and iPhone both had higher scores than this, but that's because they were the best phones of their generation. If they compared generations of phones to each other, PhoneArena would have to rate the GS3 a 1 so it could rate the GS12 a 10 (or whatever). Obviously this doesn't make any sense, so you have to compartmentalize phone rankings by generation. Rankings are good for comparing, say, the GS3 to the One X, or the Xperia S, or any current generation phone. It doesn't work too well when comparing to anything before the Galaxy Nexus though (except maybe the iPhone 4s, since it IS the current generation iPhone...)

As an example, PA ranked the original Palm Pre a 9.9 (for some reason), which would make it the current most powerful phone, as no other phone has been ranked that high since. Clearly it isn't the most powerful phone.

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:41 4

9. Non_Sequitur (Posts: 1111; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


I used to hate the design of the Galaxy S3. It's growing on me, though. The one thing I HATE about LG and Samsung is the favorites bar. It really should be like stock ICS and have the apps drawer in the center. That drives me crazy.

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:49 5

11. bayhuy (Posts: 320; Member since: 23 Jun 2011)


Not for me...i don't like cheap plastic...

posted on 15 May 2012, 09:06 3

52. Dark4o90 (Posts: 205; Member since: 20 Feb 2011)


then buy a metal brick and make calls and watch video on it

posted on 15 May 2012, 10:29 3

63. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


so you would rather buy expensive plastic? you know its all the same plastic right? lol

this isnt cheap plastic, its the same polycarbonate made in the Nokia 900 and HTC OneX/S

And I'll take that over glass and tin any day of the week.

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:52 2

13. tharag (Posts: 26; Member since: 07 Oct 2011)


as expected it will sweep the reviews all over the net ...but let me tell you one thing when the hype around those imaginary will clear out then the true capability of s3 will wow us

posted on 15 May 2012, 05:59 1

15. APPLE_R0YALLY (banned) (Posts: 73; Member since: 08 May 2012)


WE SAY® REALLY NICE REVIEW "RAY. S" WE SAY® we are Amazed......!? EYE SAY® i shall be buying this very Soon......!? WE ARE® Liking This......!?

posted on 15 May 2012, 06:01 4

16. PackMan (Posts: 277; Member since: 09 Mar 2012)


This is just re-branded preview article with ratings.

posted on 15 May 2012, 06:03 2

17. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 4005; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


Time to begin speculations for the 4th version of the Galaxy series!!

posted on 15 May 2012, 06:04 2

18. Martine (Posts: 102; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)


Pros: Fantastic Video Camera, Unlimited Storage cabalities, Great batteey performance, etc

posted on 15 May 2012, 06:11

19. Jericho (unregistered)


When will you guys do a video review or preview of LG Optimus 4x HD. Really waitin 4 it.

posted on 15 May 2012, 06:28 1

20. JDCohen722 (Posts: 39; Member since: 18 May 2011)


Love the copy and paste from the Preview. These days I never trust PhoneArena Reviews, especially the ones by Ray S. The One X gets a rating as horridly low as 7.8 making it average whereas the SIII gets a rating of 9.3?!?! Look at User Opinions of the One X, they rated it 9.4. Not that PhoneArena should rate it 9.4, but ATLEAST +8.8. Whats more, other reviewers from major websites have rated the One X as arguably one of the best phones in the world, giving it ratings of 4.5 or 5 stars, or ratings of ±9/10, but PhoneArena is the only website to give such a low score to it. The Verge claiming it to be probably the Best Phone in the World (With their only drawback being they would rather have it closer to stock ICS) Im not trying to troll, but this isn't fair Ray S. Its pure biased.

posted on 15 May 2012, 06:39 4

23. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


the oneX also has video issues, crash issues, and gets like 1/2 the battery life.

posted on 15 May 2012, 07:49 1

31. ph00ny (Posts: 1268; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Maybe their review unit of the HOX was a defective one (it looks like some owners are going through boatload of defective units and amazon UK pulled it off their sitehttp://www.amazon.co.uk/HTC-One-Sim-Free-Smartphone/dp/B0078LXM40/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337014513&sr=8-1)

As for inconsistency of the scores, there is really no way of getting around the fact that people have different opinions about a device.

Now I'm not entirely sure what happened with the One X review, it just sounded like he didn't like sense. I think he complained about the sense arrangements as much as he complained about plastic in this review

I'm however very surprised by the score of the S3 from the resident iphone fanboy/android hater Ray S

posted on 15 May 2012, 08:39 6

42. Ray.S (Posts: 339; Member since: 19 Jul 2011)


Unfortunately, the problem wasn't with our unit only. We tested several One X units, and all of them performed the same.

posted on 15 May 2012, 09:01 1

50. JDCohen722 (Posts: 39; Member since: 18 May 2011)


What do you mean by performance? Was it laggy or not buttery smooth or was Sense just glitchy? Because as far as I'm concerned anything promoted as "Quad Core" should not display the slightest hint of lag.

posted on 15 May 2012, 10:19 1

58. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


read the review. it details the issues with the camera FPS and other things.

The T3 chip impresses me quite a bit in many areas, but unless they can figure out the 1080p video issues its a non starter with me... at least on a phone. On a tablet I could care less since i wont be using it for much video.

posted on 15 May 2012, 10:48 2

66. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)


The One X is filled with bugs. The device hardware itself has no problems, it's all on the programming part. There was screen glitch, video recording frame drops, and battery bug. I think screeen glitches and battery bug are fixed with the new OTA...

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories