x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

Go to page
Interface:

The software on these US Samsung Galaxy S IIIs is identical to the one that we’ve checked out already with the international version. Specifically, we find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich – so yes, it has the best of both worlds out of the box! To tell you the truth, the new software experience is simply what makes the smartphone so refreshing and a pleasure to use. By far, it’s the biggest overhaul we’ve seen with Samsung’s longtime interface, but more importantly, it introduces some new functionality that makes sharing easy and painless. At its core, it maintains all of the refined characteristics of the Android platform – like its wealth of personalization and quick access to certain apps directly from the lock screen. However, it’s doesn’t shock us that they’re stuffed with some carrier apps – like AT&T Navigator and myAT&T on the AT&T model, while the Sprint one packs Sprint Hotspot and Sprint Zone.

We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

We find the TouchWiz Nature UX running on top of Android 4.0 on the Samsung Galaxy S IIIs



Special features:

There are some special new features that Samsung is introducing along with the Galaxy S III. Most of them are designed to ease your life and make the Galaxy S III appear more people-friendly, but we'll let you judge how useful they will be in your case:

S Voice: This is Samsung's version of Siri, so to speak. It's your intelligent personal assistant. You can ask it all kinds of stuff, and in case it manages to “understand” what you've said correctly, there's a good chance that you'll get what you're looking for. We organized a quick head-to-head match vs Siri, and are happy to report that S Voice performed just as well. Here are a few examples of what you can use S Voice for:

- going directly to an app like the camera by saying things like “I want to take a picture”;
- put an alarm to “Snooze” after it rings;
- play music, skip and pause tracks;
- set a timer;
- look up the weather;
- control settings; for example, you can turn Wi-Fi on or off with your voice.

S Voice - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
S Voice - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
S Voice - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
S Voice - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

S Voice


AllShare - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

AllShare

SmartStay: This is actually a rather cool feature, which prevents the display from timing out, while you're looking at it. It works by using the front camera to track your eyes and determine if you're still looking at the phone. Naturally, when you finally doze off, the phone will get a good nap as well (read: the display will turn off).

S Beam: This one uses Wi-Fi direct to let you easily transfer an image or video file to another compatible Galaxy phone. In order to do it, you just have to touch the backs of both phones together, and your file transfer will commence.

AllShare: Samsung is using Wi-Fi Direct connectivity in AllShare now for a complete set of categories like AllShare Cast for video streaming, AllShare Play for file sharing, and Group Cast for sharing screens with multiple other devices on the same Wi-Fi network, pretty cool. The camera department is not forgotten either - the Buddy Photo Share sends photos directly to the people whose faces it's recognized after you take the shot, for example, and you can set it to be automatic. There will be an SDK for application developers to take advantage of the new AllShare possibilities.


Samsung TecTiles:

Basically, they’re programmable NFC sticker tags that are going to be sold for $15 for a 5-pack at carrier stores. Using the accompanying free Samsung TecTiles app that’s available in Google Play, it enables us to scan the tag via NFC, which then performs an action that’s programmed to the chip. For example, we can program the TecTile to place a device on silent, compose a text message, post a tweet, or simply check-in to a place on Foursquare. Obviously, its aim is to increase awareness about the usefulness of NFC, but it definitely has some good personal and business implications. Rather limited with its functions right now, we’re hopeful that Samsung will continue to expand its actions in a timely basis.

Samsung TecTiles - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Samsung TecTiles - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Samsung TecTiles - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Samsung TecTiles - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Samsung TecTiles - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

Samsung TecTiles



Messaging:


Thanks partly to its responsiveness and spacious layout, we don’t find any difficulties composing messages with the handset’s on-screen Samsung keyboard. Between the two, the portrait option is more favorable since our thumbs don’t need to travel as much to press on something – plus, they’re also able to encompass the entire layout with ease.

Composing messages - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Composing messages - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Composing messages - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Composing messages - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

Composing messages


Since this is an Android 4 device, support for all kinds of email services is available, and if you are a Gmail user, you probably won't find a comparable option (except for the top phones from other manufacturers).

Email - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Email - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Email - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
Email - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

Email



Processor and Memory:

Much like what we’ve seen already with the HTC One X, the US versions of the Samsung Galaxy S III favor using a 1.5GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 processor – as opposed to the quad-core Exynos in the international version. Initially, the lower benchmark figures would make some people think that its performance is going to be sub-par, but that’s not the case. Sure, we might see a tiny bit of slowdown every now and then, but it’s still a rare occasion for us to see it. Furthermore, it maintains the same smooth and instantaneous performance as its quad-core packing sibling – so don’t let those benchmark numbers fool you. Oh yeah, did we mention that these US variants are packing 2GB of RAM instead of the usual 1GB? Strangely, the AnTutu benchmark app indicates to us that the both our review units have a RAM amount of 1658.3MB.


Quadrant Standard AnTuTu NenaMark 2
Samsung Galaxy S III US 4520 6111 59,4
Samsung Galaxy S III 5335 12016 58,6
HTC One X AT&T 4958 6863 57,7
LG Optimus 4X HD 3742 11184 52

With the AT&T and Sprint versions, they have 12.05GB of internal storage out of the box, which can then be supplemented by their ever-so-useful microSD card slots.


Internet and Connectivity:

Connected via Wi-Fi, we're presented with an all too predictable top-notch web browsing experience. As expected, pages load in a timely manner, and at the same time, they maintain their fluidity and responsiveness with all actions. Therefore, whether it’s pinch zooming or kinetic scrolling, every process is attached with an instantaneous action. Pushing them to a higher limit with Flash heavy sites, they don’t stutter for a moment with their operations. Overall, they’re more than ideal in providing us with that desktop-like experience.

We're presented with an all too predictable top-notch web browsing experience on the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We're presented with an all too predictable top-notch web browsing experience on the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We're presented with an all too predictable top-notch web browsing experience on the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)
We're presented with an all too predictable top-notch web browsing experience on the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III Review (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint)

We're presented with an all too predictable top-notch web browsing experience on the Samsung Galaxy S III


Surfing the web while connected to AT&T’s 4G LTE network, we’re blown away by the speeds that AT&T’s version is able to deliver. In fact, we managed to obtain max download and upload speeds of 54 Mbit/s and 14 Mbit/s respectively. Without question, it’s lightning fast! Besides that, all versions of the Galaxy S III feature connectivity options like aGPS, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi, NFC, and mobile hotspot functionality.

120 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 19 Jun 2012, 23:18 16

1. dillonc (Posts: 6; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


This phone looks absolutely amazing! I feel like I've been waiting since Christmas for this thing to become available, and the time is finally here!

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:37 8

13. WTHreally (Posts: 3; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


WTF???? really the internationally version scored like 6000 points more on antutu and over a 1000 more on quadrant. The scores are more like my GS2 running on ics... Crapdragons EPIC FAILED here !!!!

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 03:52 8

33. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


your face is epic fail!!!

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 23:53

83. ardent1 (Posts: 1997; Member since: 16 Apr 2011)


denied911, your comment is an epic fail.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 06:18 3

87. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


my coment is classic, but your butt as a nick are as you took "epic fail"

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 13:44 1

59. Ivan6479 (Posts: 244; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Yeah them switching the processors is quite the disappointment and definitely not worth the upgrade if you have a GS2 as they come pretty close to one another if your running ICS minus some of the fun new features the GS3 has. Either way, I would hold out for the GS4, which by then should probably have a flexible display, so no need to worry about broken screens because Gorilla Glass 2 sucks. Also there is the good ole Google Glass project in the works, that could come to life within the next year or so. There really is just too many possibilities for the near future to spend big bucks on this bad boy if you currently have a GS2. I thought long and hard about it myself, but I keep telling myself I just have to be patient.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 14:41

60. bruindog (Posts: 31; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)


Go check out the phonedog review. He talks more about comparing the two and he got higher scores as well. He also discusses the difference in fluidity between the two.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 00:20

84. OMGlook (Posts: 1; Member since: 21 Jun 2012)


pa clearly states that even the adreno 320 is only a little better than the mali 400 on the gs2 so...

LG-E97 adreno 320

how SAD- people who r defending the s4 with adreno 225- please put your heads down in defeat

posted on 30 Nov 2012, 12:28

119. IHateApple (banned) (Posts: 122; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


See GLBenchmark site! Or Engadget reviews. Adreno 320 is around 50% faster than Mali 400MP4. In GLBenchmark 2.5:
Adreno 320 = iPad 3's GPU.

posted on 30 Nov 2012, 13:00

120. IHateApple (banned) (Posts: 122; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


http://www.glbenchmark.com/
compare.jsp?
benchmark=glpro25&showhide=true&certified_only=1&D​1=LG
%20E973&D2=Samsung%20SCH-
I535%20(Verizon%20Galaxy
%20S3)&D3=Samsung%20GT-
I9300%20Galaxy%20S%20III

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 01:40 3

20. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 3672; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


It looks like a cheap plastic phone. Why can't Samsung stop using glossy materials for their phones?

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 02:36 1

30. Commentator (Posts: 2436; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


Samsung needs to stop with the faux-metallic design cues. I'm fine with a phone being plastic, but one that falsely presents itself as metal (i.e. the ring around the side) comes off as slightly disingenuous.

Also, Samsung should have added a dedicated camera button. The one on my Evo is a perfect "R-button" when using console emulators such as N64oid.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 08:42 3

44. zhypher_23 (Posts: 195; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


They can't because Apple will strike a "P-A-T-E-N-T" on them like they always do, Apple always whine about these little things.....Now you know now? :))

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 23:05

79. durag1 (Posts: 32; Member since: 29 May 2012)


Apple starting to get a taste of their own medicine! Samsung sued apple now and won!!!http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-scores-a-3G-patent-litigation-win-against-Apple-will-seek-compensation_id31444 Also Kodak company is seeking software compensations from apple that they so called own but never did! Apple SUX!!!!

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 08:53 2

45. ivanko34 (Posts: 617; Member since: 04 Sep 2011)


because a phone will fall on hard floor many times. if it was metal or glass it will be damaged. Plastic can fall many times without any problem.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 23:29 17

2. mafiaprinc3 (Posts: 325; Member since: 07 May 2012)


should be at least 9.7 out of 10

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 23:48 5

3. ngo2dd (Posts: 787; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


PA is really the only site that said this, both cnet, engadget, and theverge say it on par with the One X/evo LTE

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:39 6

14. WTHreally (Posts: 3; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


r u blind the US version CRAPDRAGON sucks compared to the internation just look at the benchmarks it clearly shows which is the more capable phone

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 01:04 5

17. ngo2dd (Posts: 787; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


I'll just leave this here,http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review-shootout-atandt-vs-sprint/
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review-shootout-atandt-vs-sprint/
with LTE on the US version has better battery then the international version without LTE.
And here is some benchmark for ya comparing
http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/25/3042640/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review
Beside GPU the Tegra 3 is on par with the 4414.
And there is no app/game will take advantage of the extra power before most people upgrade. Hell people has yet to take advantage of the mali underclock on the SII

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 01:49 6

22. CrapdragonCRUSHED (Posts: 3; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


Ok don't know which benchmarks your looking at but the one on engadget clearly shows the international one crushing the US by a large margin except for quadrant which I think is a typo. But also look at the egypt test where the fps was 99 vs 54. Are you seriously telling me that despite all the benchmarks this the two phones are on PAR????

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 02:01 1

24. ngo2dd (Posts: 787; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


kidding me? Antutu just show you that the T3 score higher then the international.
So all your score is base on the GPU not CPU, you know there is a different. Wow for someone who act like he know what he is talking about you know nothing. The nenamark test show that the both are similar. Let not look at the other two test showing that they are no par with each other.
Troll keeping on trolling. Unlike you I look at other site to see a review.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 02:29 3

28. The1upper (Posts: 2; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


OK OK I'll settle this for u 2 engadget reports:

inl wins in quadrant (I really think this is a typo), antutu, glbenchmark, CF bench, and sunspider.

where the US version wins are mainly the bench well are from apps develope by qualcomm like vellamo and nenmark but look at the egpyt test where the intl version scored around 99 fps.

so yeah I think benchmark wise the intl def wins qualcomm isn't really known for superior gpu.

And the charts in the article clearly shows the intl out benchmarks the t3 and the s4 in antutu so where are you coming from?

posted on 17 Jan 2013, 14:53

121. AppleHateBoy (unregistered)


HTC One X (Source=Anandtech):

Sunspider (less is better):
AT&T: 1608 ms
Intl: 1737.7 ms

Browsermark:
AT&T: 102640
Intl: 110038

Linpack (multi threaded):
AT&T: 207.207
Intl: 115.842
It is not a typo. In Linpack, S4 is a hell lot faster than Tegra 3.

GLBench Egypt (Offscreen 720p):
AT&T: 56 fps
Intl: 63 fps

GLBench Pro (Offscreen 720p):
AT&T: 95 fps
Intl: 90 fps

It is not a typo. S4 variant pulls out ahead again.

But I agree with the fact that Adreno 225 is slower than SGS2's Mali-400.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 07:14 2

39. remixfa (Posts: 13935; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


you really are the biggest anti-samsung pro Qualcomm troll on the boards.

The ONLY test where YOUR websites even show that the OneX comes close is on VELLAMO, WHICH IS A QUALCOMM MADE TEST TO SHOW S4'S STRENGTH.

Dude.. get a grip.
The US version is great. Its still the BEST phone in the US. Its certainly better than any barely functioning camera, HTC OneX
It just doesnt measure up to its brother international.

posted on 22 Jun 2012, 06:10

104. gtrxman (Posts: 111; Member since: 10 Sep 2011)


Except that in the real world, the limiting factor isn't the chip. It's that the signal is delivered by the carrier. In actual usage, the US LTE version will stomp the International version on anything that requires streaming data.

It's a shame, though, that we have to have this discussion. I still haven't heard a good reason why the US version doesn't get the Exynos. Maybe they can't produce enough to meet demand?

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 14:54 2

63. bruindog (Posts: 31; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)


im all for benchmarks but if its real world functionality is kick @$$ then thats more important to me.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 23:43 3

82. OKendruu (Posts: 3; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


the US version kick NO @$$ notice the review says that there are some slow down and lags well... thats the s4. There was no lag for s2 with exynos and there is no lag or slow down with the s3 intl. i can assure you there will be none for the gs4 with exynos as well.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 19:15

69. Endruu (Posts: 13; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


Personally judging a phone by its benchmarks is like judging a guy/girl based on their looks, and we all know how those kind of relationships turn out.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 20:10 3

72. remixfa (Posts: 13935; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


hot sex and over before your bored?

works for me.

Anyways, thats BS, because only the worlds ugliest people say "only personality matters". Truth is, we dont hit on people we dont find attractive in the way they look, carry themselves, and act. Its not shallow, its our base nature to find mates with the best features to pass on.

unless were drunk then none of that matters, they just have to be willing.. lol.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 21:53

76. Endruu (Posts: 13; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


I didn't say "only personality matters", but really if we based the phone on one aspect such as benchmarking, it really doesn't help determine if the phone's overall performance.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 23:21 2

80. OKendruu (Posts: 3; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


See endruu if what your saying is REALLY true than go ahead and get last years phone because there are many fine phones that perform more than anyone needs. people here want the BEST- clearly you don't or don't understand. Benchmarks are there to give an idea of what the phone is capable of even if we don't ever use it in that manner. From the test scores the INTL version is clearly the more powerful phone. Please do some research before giving idiotic comments it only makes you look really st_p_d!!!!!

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 09:46 1

92. remixfa (Posts: 13935; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


correct.

anything from Exynos dual core and up is going to be more than "most people" need. Its not about "need", its about wanting the MOST for my money. And yes, the benchmarks are a great indicator of that because rarely do I use stock software. I want the hardware.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 20:41

102. Endruu (Posts: 13; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


I'm giving the thumbs up to remixfa for his reply, we pick the phone we want.

Clearly OKendruu wants the best, and seems awfully passionate about his views so whatever man, I was just sharing mine don't take it personally yo.

I just want something that works for me. I rock a HSPA+ GNex and it's honestly good enough to convince me that having a rock solid OS like ICS does make a difference in performance even though the Nexus is sporting older hardware.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 23:18 1

103. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5620; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


yeah, really we OMAP4 packing device owners shouldn't be in a hurry for anything. if i were to get a Droid Razr HD it would primarily be for the larger HD Display and the 13MP Camera. the extra power would just be a little bonus.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 20:28

101. Endruu (Posts: 13; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


wow, you're really angry, and that's cute cause I wasn't.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 14:23 1

99. MartyK (Posts: 714; Member since: 11 Apr 2012)


hot sex and over before your bored?
works for me.

ding, ding, ding..the winner and best comment of 2012!!!....hahahaha

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 02:07

26. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 3672; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Should be much lower knowing Samsung.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 23:58 4

4. baldilocks (Posts: 522; Member since: 14 Dec 2008)


I have the International version and I think I'll stick with it.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 23:58 5

5. Tjey007 (Posts: 86; Member since: 22 May 2012)


i think s3 deserves better score than one x. one x got some flaws apart from sd card & battery department.HTC also admitted it.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:01 10

6. rsiders (Posts: 277; Member since: 17 Nov 2011)


I have to admit I was hard on Samsung when they first announced this phone, but truthfully they have yet another winner with this phone. Have to give credit when it's due.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:05 10

8. E.N. (Posts: 2329; Member since: 25 Jan 2009)


agreed. Once you get over the initial disappointment of it not having the rumored specs and design, it's easy to see that its a solid device.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 10:02 2

47. archangel9 (Posts: 231; Member since: 07 Feb 2010)


This phone WILL dominate period!!!Apple IpHone 5 or whatever ,eat a d!(%!!!

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:02

7. avataranjie (Posts: 15; Member since: 03 Dec 2011)


Are you sure it's the same processor for TMOUS version? There are two krait s4 chips one with integrated LTE one without. Just like the HTC One XL and One s. Does the TMO version have the soC without integrated LTE radio?

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:08 1

9. biophone (Posts: 1893; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


You know what I don't usually troll but I have to say Samsung definitely did this on purpose.
"Certainly viewed as yet another welcomed change, the home button also activates the S Voice app by double tapping it, and it also activates the multi-tasking pane by executing a long press. "
Siri is activated with a long hold which is how they made multiasking activate on the Sgs3 and switched multitasking activation to s-voice activation method. Not to mention calling it S-voice was a shot at apple clearly meant for people to think of Siri-voice. At least they changed the clear copies of apple charging cable from the sgs2 just changed up the color to black. Samsung really wants to get up apple skin because this is just so clearly copying. Not saying the SGS3 is a copy the design is definitely distinct but these things are urking me. If the iphone is so terrible sammy why do you keep taking pages out of its book????
Troll rant over.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:53 9

16. infernal88 (Posts: 113; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


well ..im not trolling or anything ..but if u had least type of knowledge u would have known that this is how multitasking works in android long ago ..and about the activation of voice assist ..i have the S2 and u can open the voice talk by double clicking the home button it starts ...so by far i have to agree with u ...i would say samsung copied the 4S 6 months perior to the release of 4S

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 07:35 2

40. protozeloz (Posts: 5378; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


WTF dude?

1. Multi task has ALLWAYS being like that before....
2. if you ever used a motorola device (or even CM9) you could use double tap to activate other applications, heck even some applications are well known for hacking the home button double tap feature to do something else...

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 10:47 1

49. biophone (Posts: 1893; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


This was clearly a shot at apple by making these feature activations similar. The fact they use a home buttom fine but to give its the exact same functionality not ok.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 10:50

50. protozeloz (Posts: 5378; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


well they could use search but they dont have it... plus they already use double tap for vlingo if im not mistaken since the Galaxy S2 (ill ask my friend about it, since he has the international version) you should check whats on the S2 first

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 11:20 1

52. protozeloz (Posts: 5378; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


confirmed double tap on the galaxy S2 witch is older than the 4S works to launch vlingo, can you explain who is the one copying now?

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 11:28 2

53. remixfa (Posts: 13935; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


it doesnt matter if android had it first, apple invents it even if they are last to the feature. u know that. ask taco. it must be true if he thinks so.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 11:44

56. protozeloz (Posts: 5378; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


check my vlingo video at the bottom, there is something I really hate and that's someone taking shots at company X and calming they copied without the basic knowledge of that company's , this goes along with other "allegations" of android ripping off iOS ideas, he should also be mad at all the android features introduced on iOS6....

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 11:39 1

55. protozeloz (Posts: 5378; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


heck here is a video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5MfKVvV9PI

look at the date

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 09:38 2

46. MEeee (Posts: 269; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


There is no cure for you. Your weak iClouded mind is already infected.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 22:34

77. jp26sx (Posts: 14; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


I think the charger is Samsung's design. I think the iphone uses a nice chunk of Sammy's dirty business under the hood. :-)

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:12 4

10. biophone (Posts: 1893; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


Anyway the exynos crushed the S4. Where are those trolls now huh? huh?

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 00:41 3

15. WTHreally (Posts: 3; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


yeah... where are all those IDIOTS that were saying how effin great the s4 was???? look at the benchmarks- the score BLOWS

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 01:06

18. ngo2dd (Posts: 787; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/25/3042640/samsung- galaxy-s-iii-review
I leave this here for ya beside CPU the Exynos crushed nothing, the Terga 3 did better then the Exynos on antutu.
You will not see the different and you say you can you are lying

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 01:51 2

23. CrapdragonCRUSHED (Posts: 3; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


i don't think so earlier review put the adreno 225 as only a little faster than the mali 400 found in the gs2. The mali 400 in the gs3 int is way faster. Better check the facts before trying to sound like a smartass

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 02:04

25. ngo2dd (Posts: 787; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


I did and the mali in the GS3 is overclock and it does well in GPU but the overall chip is on par with many other chips in the market. And for you fyi the powerVR 544 (ipad 3 and Vita) is much more powerful then the mali in the SG3.
If you testing the CPU the 4414 is similar to both the T3 and S4.
If you know the different between what CPU and GPU then you would know that.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 02:32 1

29. The1upper (Posts: 2; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)


yes the overclock mali 400 is not as powerful as the 544 but what he said about the oC mali 400 being faster than the adreno 225 is correct. there was a whole article abou this on PA not that long ago.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories