x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung Galaxy S III Preview

0. phoneArena 12 May 2012, 12:56 posted on

Well, it is now 2012, and the time has finally come for the Galaxy S III to show up on stage. The difference between this launch and those of the Galaxy S's before it is that the expectations of the audience are much higher now. It is time to take a good, in-depth look at the device and see just how much of a Galaxy S this new Galaxy S III happens to be...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 13 May 2012, 02:05

30. adi4u4882 (Posts: 137; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)


First Time your getting Thumbs Up in an Android Thread :)

posted on 12 May 2012, 18:35

21. gtrxman (Posts: 122; Member since: 10 Sep 2011)


Seems like a nice phone. Great specs, I don't see a problem with the PenTile arrangement. Touch Wiz is finally not a liability. I see two downsides so far. First is the battery. The Jury is out until I see a few real world user reviews. A 4.8" screen and 2100 mAh rating does not seem to add up to a long life. Second are Sammy's choice of materials. Why can't they deliver on a PREMIUM phone. How about some METAL and some soft touch coatings on the back? Is it that hard to understand that people want quality throughout, not just specs?

posted on 12 May 2012, 20:51 1

23. henrickrw (Posts: 408; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


meet the beast

As mentioned by Mobile & Phone Expert and Geek Murray Winaiate from AndroidNZ:

While some have criticised the launch of the SIII saying it was as disappointing as the iPhone 4S launch, I beg to differ. The iPhone 4S has an almost identical physical design to the iPhone 4 while most people were expecting a departure from this including a larger screen. The SIII provides not only a larger and higher resolution screen, but a progressive new design which has curves inspired by nature.

When it comes to design often it's something you like, or something you don't, the rest of the criticisms are arguably minor. Build quality is much less subjective, but often confused with build materials used. The original Galaxy S I9000 and Galaxy SII I9100 both used very similar materials, both of them also had high build quality and durability. As NZtechfreak has stressed so many times, using premium build materials does not ensure high build quality. In fact, while HTC often uses more premium feeling materials, their build quality is often appalling and most of their recent devices have been affected by one issue or another.

While you might have been shocked that Samsung used a Pentile Matrix Super AMOLED HD 720p display on the SIII, you really shouldn't be - the full RGB stripe technology just isn't ready yet. In fact, you shouldn't even be disappointed, as at over 300 PPI its very unlikely that you will be able to notice any tell-tale cross-hatching or any issues with luminance inconsistency, the latter of which affected the Galaxy Nexus. Sure, it might not best the amazing SLCD-2 display on the HTC One X, but it comes close, and it's a huge step up from the resolution limitations of the Galaxy SII.

While the software enhancements were a major focus; and some feel a major let down, there were actually a few ideas I found to be quite appealing. Keeping my screen on while I'm looking at it might seem fairly minor, but its small usability tweaks like this that become things that annoy you when they are no longer present. Another feature I'm looking forward to is the pop up play functionality, which would allow me to continue watching a video while texting the Fiancée on the train to/from work.

posted on 12 May 2012, 21:04 2

24. Mube1 (Posts: 153; Member since: 22 Sep 2011)


Well I m not against design but the design of s2 is much much better than s3,and overall it will be new hw/sw king sure

posted on 13 May 2012, 01:33 2

29. REYNER (Posts: 187; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


nice preview fairly justified, and it makes me much more excited about this phone i have to agree that the only gripes in here is the size (and the plastic back cover?) but over all performance and innovation samsung seems to really nailed this one in. this will definitely be the next android pack leader.. im also excited about the additional accessories that you can buy the moment that SG III will be release the C-pen(much like the s-pen in note),waterproof house cover ow yeah!

posted on 13 May 2012, 04:18 1

31. aoikemono27 (Posts: 177; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)


Ha, the way you were passive-aggressively talking about how middling the phone's build and design was while tossing it around in your hand and a few nerve signals away from squeezing it to a pulp and slamming it against a wall. :-p I know the feeling. Frustration from getting something that's near perfect, but then finding this gaping gigantic flaw about it that you cannot ignore. Samsung really lost it with the design here.

Samsung can always be counted on for great performance, great camera, great battery, and overall quality. But it can also be counted on for very cheap feeling phones and an undying dedication to their boy the SuperAMOLED, which I like less and less of as I own more devices with it. I think it's easier for Samsung to change than for HTC, since in Samsung's case it's more stubbornness and ignorance, while in HTC's case, they seem to completely lack the skills, talent, and tech to make their cameras competitive with Samsung and Apple. Ditto to smooth phone performance, optimization, and battery life.

posted on 13 May 2012, 09:46

34. REYNER (Posts: 187; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


i have to agree with that samsung phones for me are almost there but its only about the quality of is materials the phone feel less expensive and premium but i still consider this as a great achievement for samsung .

posted on 13 May 2012, 05:02

32. louay_joumaa (Posts: 18; Member since: 09 Dec 2011)


we need a samsung gs3 vs htc one x really soon ;)

posted on 13 May 2012, 07:07

33. Mube1 (Posts: 153; Member since: 22 Sep 2011)


I think htc one x vs samsung s3 vs apple iphone5

posted on 13 May 2012, 10:59

35. gearboxboi (Posts: 4; Member since: 13 May 2012)


LOL Ray S. This article is one of the reasons you can never count on PA for sensible articles. You can smell the bias on this guy from a freaking mile. "Samsung has once again nailed it with the Galaxy S III". SERIOUSLY?!

Wanna read something more sensible? Here.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/4/2998464/how-samsung-broke-my-heart

So what did we get? The Siri-imitating S Voice, a quad-core SoC that's already been announced for the Meizu MX, a suite of camera enhancements that rips off HTC's ImageSense wholesale, and a signature animated lock screen that emulates interaction with water, something that's been a live wallpaper option on Android phones since 2010. Oh, and industrial design and build quality that you'll find on any anonymous South Korean MP3 player — Samsung seems to have tried trickling its design language up, never a good idea.

posted on 13 May 2012, 11:25 1

37. henrickrw (Posts: 408; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


I don’t agree with the article or anything the verge has to say for that matter, but I think Samsung dropped the ball here.

First of all, the S voice copies no one. They used Voice software for the GS2. Second, if S voice works as it could, it will be 50 million times better than Siri. Now with that out of the way.

Samsung is a HARDWARE company first and foremost. If they couldnt put an AMOLED + in time, delay it like Apple did with the 4S. Or if you can’t come up with a new crazy design in time, just use the last one, like Apple. Or they could have spent all the money they spent on software and put it into the hardware, where they excel and clearly have more resources than everyone else. It’s depressing.

posted on 14 May 2012, 09:56

40. Lboogey6 (Posts: 281; Member since: 31 Jan 2012)


I'm not going to thumb down cause you're entitled your opinion but its understandable to dislike a phone I'm not an iPhone fan while millions are mostly cause they're friends have one but I won't deny it works well in this situation not everyone is a techy needing the thirty five cores and hologram screen or 82 MP camera does the phone is the job done? Does the phone have a good screen so that it performs well to the human eye is it fast does it bring about nice features? Material if someone cries about it one more time look guys if you have broken your "plastic" phones buy looking at them get a Casio I've worked with cell phones for yearshis whole plastic thing isn't that serious some people feel better in a 66 stang made of Steele and some people like the 2013 fiber glass Ferrari. Another credible source GSM arena gave it great marks and spoke about the negatives. You're not forced to buy this phone but if you want something different I suggest the Vega or something not as mainstream sense is the same touchwiz the same blur better but still the same calm down and get something from overseas

posted on 14 May 2012, 16:08

41. WILDCAT1935 (Posts: 31; Member since: 23 Mar 2011)


Perhaps the people who sell the larger battery will have a better back panel.

posted on 14 May 2012, 18:19 1

42. animeware (Posts: 24; Member since: 14 May 2012)


The Samsung Galaxy S3 is a wonderful device don't get me wrong. if you choosing a smartphone do research on it before you go out and buy the device just a tip

posted on 14 May 2012, 18:42

44. animeware (Posts: 24; Member since: 14 May 2012)


I'm so confused does the S3 have Super Amoled Plus or is it HD?

some people say it's HD and some people say it's Plus i'm confused if it's only Plus it's not as good as the HD is because the HD has a better pixels then the Plus Version.

posted on 15 May 2012, 07:39

45. adi4u4882 (Posts: 137; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)


Its Super Amoled HD Display. Which means its using Pentile pixel Arrangement Sysyem.

posted on 20 Sep 2012, 05:01

46. KaamaDharman (Posts: 2; Member since: 20 Sep 2012)


Thevidiya punda phone its just awesome i love it !!! if any doubts any thing about the technical specs call to my number India +91 8012342929

posted on 20 Sep 2012, 05:30

47. KaamaDharman (Posts: 2; Member since: 20 Sep 2012)


this comment has been deleted

posted on 20 Sep 2012, 06:25

48. adi4u4882 (Posts: 137; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)


Dai loosu kudhi, why are you posting your number as if someone is going to call you.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories