Samsung Galaxy S Advance Review
Voices sound loud, clear, and natural, which makes having a conversation using the Samsung Galaxy S Advance quite enjoyable. The loudspeaker does not disappoint either as it is loud enough and does not distort the sound too much.
In terms of battery life, you can expect getting a bit over 7 hours of continuous talk time, which is an average figure. In stand-by mode, the smartphone should last for at least three weeks, and that is pretty good as well.
Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S Advance has absolutely no major drawbacks, which makes it a splendid mid-range Android device. We are more than content with its design, the hardware has no troubles handling every day tasks with ease, and the in-call audio quality is absolutely ear-pleasing. Add the smartphone's well-justified price tag to the equation and you get a clear winner in this category. It may be a bit disappointing to see that the aging Android 2.3 Gingerbread comes pre-loaded, but having the handset's capable hardware in mind, we really hope that an update to Ice Cream Sandwich will come sooner or later.
Software version of the reviewed unit:
Android version: Android 2.3.6
Baseband version: I9070XXLD1
Build number: GINGERBREAD.XXLD1
Samsung Galaxy S Advance Review:
- Great in-call audio quality
- Fluid performance
- Gingerbread at launch
- Camera could have been better
1. Yummy posted on 23 May 2012, 09:25 10 2
I like this phone. It looks like a mix between a galaxy s and a galaxy s2.
2. Joshing4fun posted on 23 May 2012, 10:07 11 11
Just another Samsung device... Nothing special. Sony rules when it comes to midrange devices.
10. pegasso posted on 28 May 2012, 22:07 1 3
i prefer this phone,
cause Sony (Ericsson)'s android phones do not support native video call / video telephony.
12. atulhere posted on 31 Jul 2012, 09:27 0 0
Yep , sony makes great phone at affordable price
5. angelesmec posted on 23 May 2012, 18:08 1 0
If I choose this I can buy this next month meanwhile if I stick to my plan I can buy SGS II I9100 2 months from now.. ahh so excited but not enough cash for now.. what should I pick that is good for 3 years usage?
6. Jyakotu posted on 24 May 2012, 01:33 6 6
One word: boring. The Xperia sola seems like it would be a better choice.
7. mike.messiah posted on 27 May 2012, 06:34 3 2
This is a very well around device from samsung.. The NovaThor chipset,decent battery....the nice curved Super AmoLED display....
Its funny that people are actually comparing to that Xperia SOLA whose battery dies after 5-6 hours of heavy use.
8. Sangeet posted on 28 May 2012, 08:29 3 0
This is the last variant of the original Samsung Galaxy S and is very much powerful than the original one,
The Samsung Galaxy s2 even had a HD screen, and let's see how the variant of the Galaxy S III will be after the phone starts aging, as every phone does..!!
That would be really incredible!!
9. Sangeet posted on 28 May 2012, 11:09 2 0
Can't believe that it is a descendant of the first generation Galaxy S, Noticed the name "Samsung Galaxy S" Advance.
Just thinking of how the descendant of the Galaxy S3 will be..
Maybe the one with a quad core a15 or a quad core krait processor having a 3000 mah+ battery and will score 20000 in Antutu
11. sc_bose66 posted on 12 Jul 2012, 03:02 0 0
plz dun buy this phone its real fact that i am facing now.
i bought this in bangalore snageetha mobile indira nagar on jun 2nd on the next day i am facing problem that when battery charge is at 25% and we put for charging its get switch off and after that also it wont get charged.
i fed up with the problem and i given to samsung service center twice they said no problem we had upgraded the software, but for me till now the same problem exists.
last week i given to another samsung service center they checked and told main board (i.e mother board) has to be replaced. and they don't know when they when they will get the spare part.
within one month my mobile is sleeping for 15 days in service center for that i had paid Rs.23,000/-
thats how samsung quality was and this is the first time i am trying samsung product.......
subash chandra bose.
13. goutam posted on 06 Aug 2012, 01:53 0 0
plz dont buy this phone bcz of in this phone no zooming felicities is given . when i takes a fhoto we cant zoom like VGA camera..
17. thedoc posted on 23 Sep 2012, 23:28 0 0
there is problem with fm. I am getting continuous fluctuation in radio where ever I am. May be due to continuous missing of radio signal by the phone. does anybody have solution for it. Really disappointing and irritating it is. I have shown it to service center. they changed earphone but problem remains.
18. thedoc posted on 25 Sep 2012, 05:36 0 1
Otherwise the phone works super smooth. beautiful display. video shoot quality is also excellent (but zooming not available, I am still to fully notice its disadvantage as one of my colleagues say is that when you zoom with mobile phone camera it just crops the picture and presents bigger picture but quality remains the same, but still need expert view on that.). also regadring voice quality i personally find quality of my LG optimus much better and soothing than this one or else there may be some equalizer setting i am not getting the nack of.. expect expert advice on this too..if any.
but considering all these things I'll say its a good phone for those whose priority is a faster speed of applications (for gaming) and internet, excellent picture quality (for watching movies) and who are less bothered about minute detains of finness of sound quality.