Samsung Galaxy S Advance Review
The Samsung Galaxy S Advance is equipped with a 5-megapixel auto-focus camera, and an LED flash is present for those low-light situations. Video chats are made possible thanks to the 1.3-megapixel front-facing cam. In terms of quality, images aren't bad, but don't expect anything spectacular. Details are sufficient, but a tendency to underexposure is apparent. As the case is with all smartphone cameras, how good your photos look depends greatly on the lighting conditions.
The Samsung Galaxy S Advance can shoot video at 720p, and as the case is with still photos, footage looks good as long as the scene is well illuminated.
Samsung Galaxy S Advance Sample Video:
Samsung Galaxy S Advance Indoor Sample Video:
The stock TouchWiz music player is not the fanciest one out there, but it gets the job done well, as we have seen plenty of times. Instead of an on-screen widget you get controls in your drop-down notification bar. Also, music playback can be controlled straight from the lock screen. The video player handles with ease videos of up to 720p. With the exception of QuickTime videos, all our samples were playable, including those encoded in DivX, Xvid, and H.264 formats.
1. Yummy (Posts: 117; Member since: 28 Mar 2012)
I like this phone. It looks like a mix between a galaxy s and a galaxy s2.
2. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1047; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)
Just another Samsung device... Nothing special. Sony rules when it comes to midrange devices.
10. pegasso (Posts: 137; Member since: 27 Nov 2011)
i prefer this phone,
cause Sony (Ericsson)'s android phones do not support native video call / video telephony.
12. atulhere (Posts: 3; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)
Yep , sony makes great phone at affordable price
4. navaf (Posts: 11; Member since: 19 May 2012)
Samsung is ahead of the pack in a lot of ways huh
5. angelesmec (unregistered)
If I choose this I can buy this next month meanwhile if I stick to my plan I can buy SGS II I9100 2 months from now.. ahh so excited but not enough cash for now.. what should I pick that is good for 3 years usage?
6. Jyakotu (Posts: 819; Member since: 12 Dec 2008)
One word: boring. The Xperia sola seems like it would be a better choice.
7. mike.messiah (Posts: 6; Member since: 07 Apr 2012)
This is a very well around device from samsung.. The NovaThor chipset,decent battery....the nice curved Super AmoLED display....
Its funny that people are actually comparing to that Xperia SOLA whose battery dies after 5-6 hours of heavy use.
8. Sangeet (Posts: 232; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
This is the last variant of the original Samsung Galaxy S and is very much powerful than the original one,
The Samsung Galaxy s2 even had a HD screen, and let's see how the variant of the Galaxy S III will be after the phone starts aging, as every phone does..!!
That would be really incredible!!
9. Sangeet (Posts: 232; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
Can't believe that it is a descendant of the first generation Galaxy S, Noticed the name "Samsung Galaxy S" Advance.
Just thinking of how the descendant of the Galaxy S3 will be..
Maybe the one with a quad core a15 or a quad core krait processor having a 3000 mah+ battery and will score 20000 in Antutu
11. sc_bose66 (Posts: 1; Member since: 12 Jul 2012)
plz dun buy this phone its real fact that i am facing now.
i bought this in bangalore snageetha mobile indira nagar on jun 2nd on the next day i am facing problem that when battery charge is at 25% and we put for charging its get switch off and after that also it wont get charged.
i fed up with the problem and i given to samsung service center twice they said no problem we had upgraded the software, but for me till now the same problem exists.
last week i given to another samsung service center they checked and told main board (i.e mother board) has to be replaced. and they don't know when they when they will get the spare part.
within one month my mobile is sleeping for 15 days in service center for that i had paid Rs.23,000/-
thats how samsung quality was and this is the first time i am trying samsung product.......
subash chandra bose.
13. goutam (Posts: 1; Member since: 06 Aug 2012)
plz dont buy this phone bcz of in this phone no zooming felicities is given . when i takes a fhoto we cant zoom like VGA camera..
17. thedoc (Posts: 2; Member since: 23 Sep 2012)
there is problem with fm. I am getting continuous fluctuation in radio where ever I am. May be due to continuous missing of radio signal by the phone. does anybody have solution for it. Really disappointing and irritating it is. I have shown it to service center. they changed earphone but problem remains.
18. thedoc (Posts: 2; Member since: 23 Sep 2012)
Otherwise the phone works super smooth. beautiful display. video shoot quality is also excellent (but zooming not available, I am still to fully notice its disadvantage as one of my colleagues say is that when you zoom with mobile phone camera it just crops the picture and presents bigger picture but quality remains the same, but still need expert view on that.). also regadring voice quality i personally find quality of my LG optimus much better and soothing than this one or else there may be some equalizer setting i am not getting the nack of.. expect expert advice on this too..if any.
but considering all these things I'll say its a good phone for those whose priority is a faster speed of applications (for gaming) and internet, excellent picture quality (for watching movies) and who are less bothered about minute detains of finness of sound quality.
19. angelesmec (unregistered)
Android 4.1 =)
21. angelesmec (unregistered)
Not yet but coming soon according to Samsung.
|Display||4.0 inches, 480 x 800 pixels (233 ppi) Super AMOLED|
Dual core, 1000 MHz, ARM Cortex-A9 processor
768 MB RAM
|Size||4.85 x 2.48 x 0.38 inches|
(123.2 x 63 x 9.69 mm)
4.23 oz (120 g)
|Battery||1500 mAh, 15 hours talk time|