Samsung Galaxy Pocket Review
call quality is actually pretty good with the Galaxy Pocket. Voices have some nice loudness and even depth to them. Unfortunately, the mic doesn't seem so good, because our callers didn't enjoy our voice as much as we enjoyed theirs.
The battery of the Galaxy Pocket is a 1200mAh unit, which should be able to provide enough juice for 6 hours of continuous 3G talk-time, or 19 days of 3G stand-by time.
We like the concept behind the Samsung Galaxy Pocket. This is the handset that can bring much of the power of a smartphone to the hands of yesterday's feature phone users, without costing them more. It covers pretty much every basic Android functionality, and manages to build on top of that by being able to run most of the applications found in the Google Play store.
However, do not think that you'll be able to taste the sweetness of using a top-class smartphone with the Galaxy Pocket, because the experience here is totally different, mostly due to the low-resolution screen.
If you don't plan to use it very heavily for web browsing and media consumption, though, the Pocket will get the job done without too much hassle.
Software version of the reviewed unit: Android 2.3.6, Baseband: S5300XXLCB
- Good performance
- 3GB internal memory
- Low-resolution screen
2. Martine posted on 06 Jul 2012, 09:06 4 3
but Asha is a dumb phone so why the rubbish comparison?
3. sinple posted on 06 Jul 2012, 10:29 2 0
galaxy pocket probably cant run too many android apps, and is not catered to people who wans to play game. Hence Asha may be able to compete with a better screen, camera and i think whatapp is probably 1 reason why people would consider Asha
4. neutralguy posted on 06 Jul 2012, 11:20 2 0
This phone is an android phone that can't support most apps in play store. Compared to Asha 311 or even 305/306, i rather choose asha. It's screen res. is better, bigger display, better camera and better UI.
5. OptimusOne posted on 06 Jul 2012, 13:21 0 0
pocket has wifi. so faster internet
asha has to use slow 3g/2g
7. mobilefuture posted on 06 Jul 2012, 13:27 3 0
and you say it has no wifi. b***h please!
12. ehas423 posted on 08 Jul 2012, 08:42 0 0
15. Raymond_htc posted on 03 Dec 2012, 01:29 0 0
Yeah right. 3G is faster than Wifi.
9. jackhammeR posted on 07 Jul 2012, 01:38 2 0
phone is a phone. dumb can be only the end user
6. OptimusOne posted on 06 Jul 2012, 13:22 3 0
wow this got higher score than optimus t and optimus t is like 2 years old, but 10 times better in every catagory
8. Nathan_ingx posted on 06 Jul 2012, 16:00 5 0
Oh, for Christ's sakes Sammy!! It's like "Champ" with Android in it!! A touchscreen with minimal screen size to touch!!
10. aldridhl posted on 07 Jul 2012, 01:56 0 0
Not everyone wants a huge slab of a phone... come on OEMs, make more pocketable high-end phones!
11. Nathan_ingx posted on 07 Jul 2012, 04:35 0 0
Aye, "Not everyone wants a huge slab of a phone..."!!
But this little thing is too "pocketable" it might just get carried away!! :D