x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Samsung Galaxy Pocket Review

0. phoneArena 06 Jul 2012, 08:05 posted on

The Samsung Galaxy Pocket represents the true meaning of low-end. It's hard to imagine that you can go any lower than that in terms of specs, yet it's much better to have a smart OS like Android powering this device, rather than a feature phone platform. Even though the screen is very small for today's standards, and the resolution is the exact opposite of Retina-grade, it's still a device that lets users on budget experience what it is to have a smartphone...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 08:52 3

1. mercorp (Posts: 968; Member since: 28 Jan 2012)


lets see how it compares to the nokia asha 311!

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 09:06 4

2. Martine (Posts: 102; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)


but Asha is a dumb phone so why the rubbish comparison?

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 10:29 2

3. sinple (Posts: 102; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)


galaxy pocket probably cant run too many android apps, and is not catered to people who wans to play game. Hence Asha may be able to compete with a better screen, camera and i think whatapp is probably 1 reason why people would consider Asha

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 11:20 2

4. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


This phone is an android phone that can't support most apps in play store. Compared to Asha 311 or even 305/306, i rather choose asha. It's screen res. is better, bigger display, better camera and better UI.

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 13:21

5. OptimusOne (Posts: 694; Member since: 22 May 2012)


pocket has wifi. so faster internet

asha has to use slow 3g/2g

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 13:27 3

7. mobilefuture (Posts: 206; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)


http://www.phonearena.com/phones/Nokia-Asha-311_id7132

and you say it has no wifi. b***h please!

posted on 08 Jul 2012, 08:42

12. ehas423 (Posts: 18; Member since: 24 May 2012)


*facepalm

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 01:29

15. Raymond_htc (Posts: 430; Member since: 06 Apr 2012)


Yeah right. 3G is faster than Wifi.

posted on 07 Jul 2012, 01:38 2

9. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


phone is a phone. dumb can be only the end user

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 13:22 3

6. OptimusOne (Posts: 694; Member since: 22 May 2012)


wow this got higher score than optimus t and optimus t is like 2 years old, but 10 times better in every catagory

posted on 06 Jul 2012, 16:00 5

8. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3008; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


Oh, for Christ's sakes Sammy!! It's like "Champ" with Android in it!! A touchscreen with minimal screen size to touch!!

posted on 07 Jul 2012, 01:56

10. aldridhl (Posts: 49; Member since: 12 Feb 2011)


Not everyone wants a huge slab of a phone... come on OEMs, make more pocketable high-end phones!

posted on 07 Jul 2012, 04:35

11. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3008; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


Aye, "Not everyone wants a huge slab of a phone..."!!
But this little thing is too "pocketable" it might just get carried away!! :D

posted on 11 Jul 2012, 11:15

13. randomguest (Posts: 20; Member since: 26 Jun 2012)


Xperia Ray fo you.

posted on 12 Jul 2012, 08:38

14. Crossblade (Posts: 190; Member since: 21 Apr 2005)


or Xperia U

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories