Samsung Galaxy Express Review
0. phoneArena posted on 01 Mar 2013, 02:44
The Samsung Galaxy Express is a 4.5-inch mid-range running on Android 4.1 and featuring Qualcomm’s energy-savvy 28nm Krait processor…
This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here
1. N-fanboy posted on 01 Mar 2013, 03:01 2
I feel the mid range battle is even more intense than the high end and OVIOUSLY dominated by samsung but undeservedly too, i think the 8mp Nokia Lumia 820 is better...
2. XPERIA-KNIGHT posted on 01 Mar 2013, 03:17 5
I Wouldnt get the get the galaxy s3 or 4 because of huge sizes, but if i were to go samsung by some chance lol i would definitely consider this one....with each new purchase of smartphones i get, i realize how much the spec game we've been playing has reallly been a bit exaggerated and over done....thats why i wouldnt mind gettin the express over a top end phone with a better processor because in terms of real world usage, we hit the peak with 2012 dual core phones and ics and jellybean only put the icing on the cake for us
5. dragonscourgex posted on 01 Mar 2013, 07:40 1
Yes. I think I would have to agree with you man. I think from here on out, specs are going be less of a factor. I have 4.2 running on my old Samsung Captivate and it runs very well on it. And that's only a single core 1ghz proc with 512 RAM. Also bring to light all these phone carrier using the excuse that a phone hardware can't handle updates from them as a big fat lie:)
6. g2a5b0e posted on 01 Mar 2013, 09:32 1
To say we "hit the peak" in terms of real world usage is a short-sighted statement. Just because you can't imagine it getting any better, doesn't mean it's not possible. That kind of thinking would never lead to any innovation. The limits must constantly be pushed. What if people said Thomas Edison's original design for the light bulb was good enough? What if people said the Model T was good enough? What if people said 56K modems were fast enough? Sky's not even the limit. The only limits that exist are the ones we place on ourselves.
4. NokiaFTW posted on 01 Mar 2013, 06:37 3
Remember a time (just 3 years ago actually) when 480 X 800 was considered a very high resolution ?
7. downphoenix posted on 01 Mar 2013, 20:03 3
before the Galaxy Nexus it was considered high resolution, LOL.