Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 Review
Call quality with the Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 turned out excellent, both in the earpiece, and on the receiving end. We could hear the voices very loud and true to the origin, whereas on the other side the microphone on the Ace 2 did a bang up job relaying our voice with strength and clarity.
The 1500mAh battery provides for about 8 hours of talk time in 3G mode, which is above average, and overall we didn't find any excessive battery drains, neither in standby mode, nor when we were putting it through its paces - it should last you about day and a half with normal usage.
The Galaxy Ace 2 could have become a bestseller for Samsung, with the notable exception of a more distinctive design. The compact size and good PLS LCD screen will be a boost for the everyday interaction with your smartphone, whether you are in or outside, and the dual-core processor under the hood will make sure you don't feel underpowered. Adding to these a decent 5MP shooter with 720p HD video capture abilities, and about the only things left to wish for in the category are at least Android Ice Cream Sandwich, and a less bland design.
With the current price, however, the Samsung Galaxy Nexus costs only about $50 more (in the US), and offers HD display plus 1080p video, not to mention Android 4.1 Jelly Bean. Granted, it is way bigger than the Ace 2, so if you are looking for a more compact Android, you might want to check out the Sony Xperia U, with its trendy and versatile design, or the Xperia sola.
Even the HTC One V, which has a single-core processor, is a very worthy competitor since it is coming with Android ICS out of the box, and has an appealing design plus a cool camera with all the goodies of HTC ImageSense. With such competitors, firmly planted around the same price range, the Galaxy Ace 2 doesn't shine among them with anything distinct but Samsung's Android mojo, and might be facing a steep market hill, at least until it gets upgraded to Android Ice Cream Sandwich.
Software version: XXLD8
- Excellent call quality
- Easy one-hand operation
- Camera is very slow to focus
- Only about 1GB of user-available memory
1. thunderising posted on 05 Jul 2012, 04:28 4
Deserves that score.
This phone has issues:
1. Selling for $300+ (seriously?)
2. Poor camera (can be forgiven)
3. Unappealing design (can be forgiven)
4. Android 2.3 (what the hell)
5. Point number 4
3. TylerGrunter posted on 05 Jul 2012, 05:00 6
Seriously? I think it will sell quite well.
I'm not ging to defend it defects (like still 2.3) but it has several things against the competition:
Over Sony Xperia Sola: much better battery life, front facing camera and more RAM.
Over HTC one V: dual core processor, front facing camera, better battery life, more RAM, NFC if you want it.
It's just Samsung tactic: they give better tech specs that the other phones in the range, not mojo or anything, just the old bang for the buck.
And I expect price to go down shortly to $250 as in Europe the price is 250 Euros.
Just my opinion, but I would be surprised if it sells bad. The old ACE was REALLY bad and it sold in droves...
6. thunderising posted on 05 Jul 2012, 06:26 2
You can't say for battery life. Xperia Sola too gives 1 and half days of usage.
The extra RAM is hardly making that big a difference, SLOWER processor
One V has a stable and smooth ICS, with the usable Sense UI too.
This phone would make sense when it sells at Xperia U price. You're right, a $250 would be the sweet spot.
7. Jabarkas posted on 05 Jul 2012, 06:39 4
You are wrong. Xperia Sola and Galaxy Ace 2 have exactly the same processor (NovaThor U8500). The only difference is 200 mhz. That means GA 2 is underclocked probably for slightly better battery life. To be honest, it's more than probable, that both phones have more or less the same power.
On the other hand Xperia U is clearly a lower model.
9. thunderising posted on 05 Jul 2012, 09:45 1
I write for a website with phones being my speciality. I already know about the ST-Ericsson Novathor chipset in both of them.
But that alone isn't criteria for battery life. It's the software loads that ultimately decide. Oh yeah screen size too (in case you forgot, Sony's lineup Sola and Xperia U have smalled LED displays)
12. TylerGrunter posted on 05 Jul 2012, 12:42 3
Well, actually I CAN speak about battery life based on the specificications both OEMs give about their phones:
The battery times of the ACE are 50% higher in any account, that´s no joke.
That and the fact the Samsung is famous to optimize battery life. Sony is not bad either there, but they tend to use smaller batteries and that figures.
In this case ACE: 1500 mAh and Sola 1320 mAh.
8. IamYourFather6657 posted on 05 Jul 2012, 07:03 0
All consumers care these days are brand .
People will buy it BECAUSE it's a Samsung
5. Mafiatounes posted on 05 Jul 2012, 05:31 6
1. Here in the Netherlands and Belgium i can buy this device for 220€! That is a nice price for this device.
2. Camera well it is not a high end, but it could get better with updates maybe.
3. To each his own.
4. There was a video of a Ace 2 showing off stock ICS so it will come.
15. IamYourFather6657 posted on 28 Jul 2012, 20:03 1
updates ? you kidding me ? thats not a high end device so you think samsung will care ?
21. PorkyBurger posted on 18 May 2013, 14:01 1
Well, I guess SAMSUNG CARED. Then why Ace 2 has official JB?
23. me0613 posted on 10 Jun 2013, 09:04 0
The Ace 2 has an update to JB.
2. Jabarkas posted on 05 Jul 2012, 04:45 6
The review is nice, but I strongly disagree with the rating. In most aspects Ace 2 is better than its competitor - xperia Sola (which got 8/10).
4. TylerGrunter posted on 05 Jul 2012, 05:03 4
It will be one of those phones were customer reviews will be a lot higher than the PA rating. I'm not going to say that this one is better than the sola, but I'm with you, the difference is too big.
10. Joshing4fun posted on 05 Jul 2012, 10:31 0
Samsung, do you even spend more than 5 seconds designing your phones anymore. "Umm... We'll make it black, rectangular, round edges. Add a little bit of chrome in there too! Ugh, we're so good."
11. saiki4116 posted on 05 Jul 2012, 10:34 0
A phone that covers every thing and wont burn a hole in your pocket.I was thinking of buying ACE2 or xperia U.The only thing that bugged me about the Xperia U is the lack of memory card expansion slot(you have to manage everything in the user accessible 4GB).I have used Xperia U in a mall,it flies through day to day tasks.The processor in Xperia U and ACE2 are same.When i saw the rating,I thought it might have had a large issue,After reading the review,I think that this phone certainly deserves more.
Seriously are you downgrading points for gingerbread?
Any how samsung's ICS is not that beautifull,I would go for CM9.
16. saiki4116 posted on 01 Aug 2012, 12:55 0
if CM10(Jelly Bean) port exists for galaxy pop,fit why not CM9 available for a capable device like this...
14. sylviaali posted on 28 Jul 2012, 00:15 0
plzzzzzzzzzz give an expert opinion which i s better n shud b bought Either is its smasung galaxy ace 2 or HTC One V..............im clueless ...........
17. IamYourFather6657 posted on 02 Aug 2012, 02:41 0
Specs and speed ace
Design , ui , camera , audio get one v
However I would get an Xperia u
18. zianov posted on 18 Dec 2012, 15:45 0
thX fOr all details :) guYs i reallY need help i'm cOnfused between the galaxY ace 2 and the galaxY W so all Opinions r welcOme thx peace !
19. ozziepete posted on 09 Jan 2013, 10:27 0
does the galaxy ace 2 have MHL to HDMI support? and what brand of cable do one recommend? or is there any other way to connect to my HD TV??
20. azizul_samsung posted on 28 Feb 2013, 09:02 0
what is the price of Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 in Malaysia now?
22. PorkyBurger posted on 18 May 2013, 14:06 0
Ahh, can't wait to get this phone. Costs only 180$, awesome (Yeah, and Sola costs 50$ more, dont mention Xperia P)! I love the design, hardware, OS (though, I am upgrading it to JB or CM, ASAP.) It's just brilliant for my budget, can't find a better alternative. Deserves a better score! SRSLY