Samsung Focus 2 Review
Share:
 |
In high coverage areas, the smartphone retains 3 to 4 bars out 5 on the average, but luckily, it didn’t drop any calls during our testing.
Strictly using it with HSPA+ connectivity, we’re very happy with the battery life we’re able to get out of the phone’s 1,750 mAh battery. In fact, after a day of normal usage, we find its capacity at the 40% mark. Clearly, the results are going to lessen once it’s on 4G LTE – since we all know how much of a drain it is to the battery.
Conclusion:
We have to say, at $49.99 with a 2-year contract, the Samsung Focus 2 isn’t that bad of a smartphone – even more when this is a brand spanking new device we’re talking about! Strengthening its value, we love that it sports an adorable design, equipped with 4G LTE connectivity, and offers that casual Windows Phone experience like everything else before it. Thinking more about it more, the Focus 2 is able to compete well against its rival, but looking at the overall picture, the Nokia Lumia 900 still seems to have a tiny bit more polish to its offering. Nonetheless, it’s a valiant effort for Samsung, as they’re finally in the game with a 4G LTE enabled Windows Phone.
Software version of the reviewed unit:
OS Version: 7.10.8112.7
Samsung Focus 2 Review:
Pros
- Affordable $50 on-contract price
- Adorable design
- LTE enabled
Cons
- Shoots terrible photos
- Poor calling quality
Share:
Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC One X 
Panasonic ELUGA Review 
Related phones
Samsung Focus 2
- Specifications
- News (4)
- Review 7.5/10
- User Reviews
12 Comments
1. -box- posted on 17 May 2012, 08:22 1 0
Good review. About as expected, given the introductory price point compared to the other WP7.5 LTE devices
2. jackhammeR posted on 17 May 2012, 08:26 1 0
"Cons
Shoots terrible photos
Poor calling quality"
In particular the last one. It's a phone so if it doesn't have at least a good calling quality does it deserve 7,5?? I doubt.
Moreover, Lumia 900 has great calling quality and shoots much better photos and was scored only half a point higher.
3. lonestrider posted on 17 May 2012, 08:29 0 0
I think this is just another Windows Phone device. With no something new. All the specs is just like the others.
4. Muhannad posted on 17 May 2012, 08:30 1 0
It's ironic that there's review of a Windows Phone when just the previous article is titled "101 reasons not to buy a Windows Phone"
5. Mobile-X-Pert posted on 17 May 2012, 13:42 2 0
Yeah Phonearena made a great mistake by posting that article.
6. Sangeet posted on 17 May 2012, 23:11 1 0
Who has the white theme on in a Windows Phone Device which has an amoled screen, switch to Black theme and then see the beauty of the screen not like the one in this review, this one makes it look so bad, same happened with the nokia lumia 900 review
Windows Phone 7.5 (with black theme, ofcourse) is a joy to be used on the Amoled Display cuz it has the deepest blacks, and the white one really sucks bad on the amoled, looks bad and eats up all the battery
7. Sangeet posted on 18 May 2012, 00:32 0 0
Why the heck just a Windows Phone can't have a microSD card?
i mean that is a feature that is being given in a phone since the late 1990's. What the heck is happening to all these companies, HTC has the one X, but with a limited storage of 16gb out of which only 11 GB is practically accessible by the user, why not just include a micro SD slot and have the user to have more memory,
And having a HD screen in the one X and so contrast and other things, it is a joy to watch movies in it but can't get enough of it as once transferred some movies then everything is dead.
If the companies continued on doing things like this i think they have no better future as the demand for more memory is increasing
8. snowgator posted on 18 May 2012, 17:14 0 0
Okay, I have really done some questioning on this, especially with WP devices only having 8 or 16 G of storage. The best explaination I got was from a tech at the Champaign IL AT&T shop. The story he heard was the use of the storage card really changed some software features that caused a ton of "bricking" during tests. The orignal Focus used a stroage card, but the way it was incorporated more or less turned it into "hard" stroage- once in the software, you could not pull it without really messing with the phones performance. It was expensive to manufacturer, and a headache for all involved. So, future WP devices of the first and second Generations skipped it.
WP8 devices will allow for storage cards, as the software will be optimized.
9. snowgator posted on 18 May 2012, 17:17 0 0
My Focus S isn't great in camera, either. But the bad call quality is strange, as my "S" easily is among the better phones I have owned.
Overall, this will be down to 20.00$ or cheaper fairly quick, and it will be a steal at that price. I think it is a great looking phone, and a great LTE option.
No, not better than the 900, but it is not intending to be.
10. Saamic posted on 21 May 2012, 20:56 1 0
As far as design it looks simple and practical yet awesome
11. Meemomof7 posted on 31 May 2012, 16:03 0 0
My granddaughter graduated from USMC boot camp in February and before she left for MCT she purchased a Samsung Focus Flash cell phone thru AT&T at Walmart (March). She dropped her phone yesterday and the screen shattered. When she purchased the phone, she was not asked if she wanted insurance, and since this is her first cell phone, she didn't think to ask about it.
How can she get a replacement without having to pay full price?
Thank you!
12. lindsayorum posted on 18 Jan 2013, 06:47 0 0
I am as disappointed as can be with this device, can not update without home PC, volume sound is lousy, I have always had an android device phone and after switching to windows I see why. I could do everything rite from my cell phone, including downloading music to my library, again with this phone it must be connected to a home PC. My next phone purchased will definitely have more background done on it, I am not pleased with my phone at all. And there is no slot for an sd card. Can't change the font size in text messaging either, print is very small and hard to read at times, just not very many handy features on this device, it is eye captivating but looks van be deceiving!
