Samsung Captivate vs. Apple iPhone 4
In all of the recent comparisons we've done with the iPhone 4, it has managed to beat out others that offered higher megapixel count cameras – so it doesn't necessarily mean that bigger is better. It actually all comes down to the lens and optics employed on the handset, but this time around, both the Captivate and iPhone 4 settle with a 5-megapixel auto-focus shooter. Right off the bat, the Captivate sorely lacks a flash, which already finds itself in the hole when you think about how it should be considered a standard feature among high-end smartphones. Again, the Apple iPhone 4 easily produced sharper looking images and natural looking colors. The Samsung Captivate's reproductions might be seen as tolerable by most people looking for a decent point and shoot replacement, but you can tell that they're less detailed with washed out colors. When taking images in poor lighting conditions, the iPhone 4 also had a leg up in this department – ultimately making it the choice for people who truly want to meticulously capture precious memories.
There have been many Android smartphones we've pitted against the iPhone 4, but the latter still manages to come out on top when it comes down to shooting videos. Now the Captivate comes to the table offering 720p video recording like everything else we've been seeing of late, and it actually presents itself as a decent competitor to the iPhone 4's performance. Clocking in at a capture rate of 29fps, the Captivate boasts the smoothest looking videos out of any Android handset we've seen thus far, but you can still see a minimalistic jerkiness with fast moving objects in view. The iPhone 4 captures at a rate of 30 fps and looks pretty fluid for the most part, but we still notice how the white balance can adversely change when going through different lighting conditions. Detail is pretty good at all times with the iPhone 4 just because you can tap to focus at any time while continuously shooting, which is something not featured with the Captivate. The Captivate is easily the best phone to date to challenge the iPhone 4 when it comes to recording videos, but ultimately we believe that Apple's pride and joy still has a slight advantage.
Samsung Captivate sample video 1 at 1280x720 pixels
Samsung Captivate sample video 2 at 1280x720 pixels
Apple iPhone 4 sample video 1 at 1280x720 pixels
Apple iPhone 4 sample video 2 at 1280x720 pixels
Well, well, the Samsung Captivate's music player is hands down one of the prettiest for Android – and it also gives the iPhone's Coverflow interface a good run for its money as well. Presentation is clearly what's placed highest on the totem pole for each handset as there are some 3D like effects going on when you're browsing through your laundry list of songs. Coverflow on the iPhone 4 remains to be the same experience as it was on the original, but it's difficult to find something that can pleasantly follow its prowess. Nonetheless, the music player in use with the Captivate goes all out, and maybe more, by meeting the level of experience seen with the iPhone's Coverflow. We like how it presents a carousel of discs when you're browsing in landscape, but we also like the tasteful amount in options like specific equalizer settings and to even enable a visualization to run when playing a song. The iPhone 4's speaker didn't stand a chance against the Captivate's sharp and powerful tunes. In addition, the option of 5.1 channel sound effect on the Captivate exhibits more natural sounding tunes through the 3.5mm headset jack.
Video playback is smooth all around with no presentable issues whatsoever on either smartphones as they played fluidly with no evidence of hiccups. If you're watching some kind of animated video where colors are plentiful throughout its playback, then the Samsung Captivate's Super AMOLED display is naturally more suitable as colors have a saturated look to them. Detail was also great on both handsets, but the Captivate's 4-inch screen has an advantage in the size department.
1. rtimi26 (Posts: 42; Member since: 16 Mar 2009)
Now this is how reviews should be done. Give your opinion and be fair with it. Yes you gave the Captivate an 8.5 overall and 9.5 to the iphone i don't know why but at least anyone that reads this review will know it's up to their preference.
3. appleeater (Posts: 2; Member since: 16 Jul 2010)
Can you say FANBOY!!! What a totally biased review. Take it from someone who has been studying both of these phones for almost a month now(hands-on and online) and almost buying an iphail, the Captivate is the superior phone,from screen to proccessor. "equally impressive 1GHz Cortex-A8 Hummingbird processor" haha you mean superior.
4. BlackSirius16 (Posts: 84; Member since: 21 May 2010)
But the build quality on the captivate is terrible compared to the iPhone. you should probably just get the hell away from AT&T
6. rtimi26 (Posts: 42; Member since: 16 Mar 2009)
Actually the captivate does way better than the iphone just check the browser comparison on pocketnow.com
9. spoonb1 (Posts: 77; Member since: 02 Jan 2010)
the captivate feels great and looks it too... im not personally a fan of the glossy gunmetal colored plastic that exudes samsung but it does feel nice, the textured carbonfiber'ish metal battery cover adds a nice touch. the glass of the iphone is still fragile as I have seen several-- yes, in person-- and owners stated that they merely dropped them from waist high(while putting(well, attempting) to put them in their pockets andthe expected result... a few shattered iphone 4 backs, and 2 fronts. also, for what its worth, the iphone 4 will not focus properly in complete darkness... it still needs "some light" to get a good focus, then will snap a pretty good pic. while, not sure what captain jitters was doing while taking the picture samples in this review of the captivate, but I have personally transferred unedited pics from a test unit over to the pc and the pics look great-- and sharp. both are great phones, and agreed that it may be a hard choice for the folks that are neither android nor apple fanboy types.
14. Windsponge (Posts: 92; Member since: 01 Nov 2009)
I agree with you very unfair. Even size of pictures were not correct. No real mention of documented droped calls. I am beginning to think phonearena is being paid by apple. I have been researching everything I can find on phones and checked out in person and I must say that I don't see the great quality of I Phone.I feel it looks like it is a little cheap around the glass. Just my feel. Apple should be scared , very scared.
20. de2philly (Posts: 31; Member since: 30 Jun 2010)
Build quality? You mean the uncovered Antenna on the iphone4 where when you touch it and youre not in 5 bar perfect signal your call may drop? Thats not good "build quality" in my book, no matter how the phone feels or looks.
34. CRICKETownz (Posts: 980; Member since: 24 Oct 2009)
I think when it comes to build quality Apple always accomplishes the visually appealing design. They have mastered that aspect with pretty much all of their products on the market. I think everything beyond that point comes down to personal preference. I carry an Android device right now and personally think that iP4 has a better menu design than the Captivate, but when it comes to HTC's Sense IU or Motorola's menu design I would disagree in this case. TouchWiz just doesn't do it for me but again its just personal preference.
41. E46titan (unregistered)
Better screen?, Better processor? The Captivate's screen is not nearly as high resolution and cannot display as much detail. The Iphone 4 is faster too so how is the processor better? The proff is in the facts. Looks like you're nothing but a hater.
49. LOL (unregistered)
Fail, the processor on the captivate is faster. While the A4 in both phones are meant to run at 1 ghz, the iphone 4 is downclocked to 800 mhz. Unlike the captivate that runs at the original 1 ghz, and with some rooting, can be overclocked to 1.2 ghz and such. Also, the samoled is absolutely gorgeous. now if you were a graphic designer you would want the ips panel of the iphone because it is more color accurate, as in closer to real life, but the samoled screen of any galaxy s phone, makes the picture look more vibrant and in return, better than real life. So, Graphic Designer-> iphone Average Joe -> Captivate Plus the fact that the sgx540 in the galaxy s phones rape the sgx535 in the iphone 4 in the ass. Captivate= winner
5. Supraman21 (Posts: 324; Member since: 09 Jun 2010)
Oh and ive actually seen both a video taken with the iPhone and the Galaxy S on a 42 inch tv and the Galaxy S definitely wins.
7. zyoose (Posts: 6; Member since: 11 Dec 2008)
Question PhoneArena, why does your review state that there isn't a front facing camera on the Captivate but when you look up the specs on your site it says that there is an additional camera. Can somebody who has played with the Captivate help ?
8. spoonb1 (Posts: 77; Member since: 02 Jan 2010)
there is no secondary cam on the captivate... there may have been one in the works on the original galaxy s when the specs were typed here on the site, prob an oversight of the web editors, but the captivate has but the one main cam on the back...
10. spiceguy (Posts: 10; Member since: 09 Jul 2010)
I'm pissed off about the little plastic unlock button on the side of the Galaxy. A function that must be used every time you use the phone should be prominent. The search button on the bottom right is never used and is the obvious choice to unlock the screen. A MAJOR Fuck-up! . If I can get over that then the Galaxy is the clear choice for me. I've had the Vibrant for 2 days now and I'm thrilled with the larger screen and Swipe is the deal breaker. Sorry apple.
12. aricept (Posts: 4; Member since: 17 Jul 2010)
The Search button is a required button on all Android devices. You'll see it on every model. Blame Google, whose primary business of course is search.
30. mmj (unregistered)
AT&T actually added that search button - it does not appear on the original Galaxy S. Nor is it a requirement on Android phones, though a lot of them do have it. On the ones that don't, you can usually search by holding down some other button.
11. BlackSirius16 (Posts: 84; Member since: 21 May 2010)
AT&T quarantine I won't have either of these phones because of total fail coverage Captivate is still better though
18. baldilocks (Posts: 749; Member since: 14 Dec 2008)
I have far better coverage with AT&T than any other carrier in my area. What's good for you, isn't good for everyone else. So your comment is FAIL.
15. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
all i have to say, is that for PA to give a glowing comparison next to anything with an apple logo, must mean that its the best phone ever.. lol I do have to say, im quite impressed with the battery life of the galaxy S. I ran it with gps,wifi,google earth, and mobi tv running and it still lasted about 7 hours without a battery warning. Show me another high end phone that can do that.
31. mmj (unregistered)
Certainly, after looking at those photo samples and then at the text analysis, I have no idea how they came to the conclusion that the iPhone took superior photos, it seems the actual photos show the opposite, heaps of detail lost in the iPhone due to over-agressive noise filtering. Compare the indoor, dim lighting samples.
42. dwayne (unregistered)
I test drove the Captivate while waiting for the IPhone 4 and the battery last 5-6 hrs at best. That's after shutting down the 5 or 6 apps that were running in the background. I might have more running that I'm not aware of.
16. Jeradiah3 (Posts: 1038; Member since: 11 Feb 2010)
I like how they review the captivate without making it an i-phone killer within AT&T. both phones are worth getting and i think tht its a good alternative while the i-phone 4 works on its antenna issues. I work for AT&T and ive told customers about the phone and what its supposed to do. i think the captivate could be one of the best non i-phones within AT&T besides the Aria, Palm Pre Plus, and the Tilt 2 (when windows mobile doesnt freeze up lol)
17. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
If people knew how good the captivate was - then, it would be an iphone killer - it is an awesome phone - call quality is better than what phonearena states it to be, too.
19. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
the only categorys where the captivate/vibrant/galaxyS doesnt stomp the iphone is Apps and lowlight camera usage. The rest belongs to the Galaxy. I'd say that makes the galaxy the winner. Oh yea, and the galaxy is easily rooted to make it faster, put a better camera app on there, so on and so forth, to make it even better than it already is.
21. de2philly (Posts: 31; Member since: 30 Jun 2010)
So if this competes w/ the iphone4... What will you say for Sprints version that also has a physical keypad AND 4G? Hmmmm
22. applesr4eating (Posts: 32; Member since: 01 Jul 2010)
I want a physical keyboard also. I hate virtual keyboards.
48. thisguy (unregistered)
Sprints 4G network is only available in less than 10 cities nationwide
23. mikeytx (Posts: 2; Member since: 21 Jul 2010)
My wife has the iPhone 4 and she likes all the ease of use like her music. I have the captivate and I like the large screen and I can customize the phone to my personality. I went from iPhone to captivate because of all of the article reasons but, it failed to mention 2 important features. Android 2.2 will have wifi tethering which is expected release for Captivate in fall. iPhone you still need to pay the extra 10 a month and it's cable tether to a laptop. 2nd feature is memory is expandable where iPhone you are set to whatever you purchased. One thing I do not like about the captivate is file management on and off the phone but that's a Android limitation.