Samsung Captivate vs. Apple iPhone 4
0. phoneArena posted on 16 Jul 2010, 06:54
It's a safe bet to say at this point that the Captivate is easily the best thing out of Android on AT&T's lineup which can test the iPhone 4's recent tight grasp. So if you're an AT&T customer sitting idle ...
This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here
1. rtimi26 posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:55 0 0
Now this is how reviews should be done. Give your opinion and be fair with it. Yes you gave the Captivate an 8.5 overall and 9.5 to the iphone i don't know why but at least anyone that reads this review will know it's up to their preference.
3. appleeater posted on 16 Jul 2010, 09:33 0 0
Can you say FANBOY!!! What a totally biased review. Take it from someone who has been studying both of these phones for almost a month now(hands-on and online) and almost buying an iphail, the Captivate is the superior phone,from screen to proccessor. "equally impressive 1GHz Cortex-A8 Hummingbird processor" haha you mean superior.
4. BlackSirius16 posted on 16 Jul 2010, 12:52 0 0
But the build quality on the captivate is terrible compared to the iPhone. you should probably just get the hell away from AT&T
6. rtimi26 posted on 16 Jul 2010, 14:35 0 0
Actually the captivate does way better than the iphone just check the browser comparison on pocketnow.com
9. spoonb1 posted on 16 Jul 2010, 17:18 0 0
the captivate feels great and looks it too... im not personally a fan of the glossy gunmetal colored plastic that exudes samsung but it does feel nice, the textured carbonfiber'ish metal battery cover adds a nice touch. the glass of the iphone is still fragile as I have seen several-- yes, in person-- and owners stated that they merely dropped them from waist high(while putting(well, attempting) to put them in their pockets andthe expected result... a few shattered iphone 4 backs, and 2 fronts. also, for what its worth, the iphone 4 will not focus properly in complete darkness... it still needs "some light" to get a good focus, then will snap a pretty good pic. while, not sure what captain jitters was doing while taking the picture samples in this review of the captivate, but I have personally transferred unedited pics from a test unit over to the pc and the pics look great-- and sharp. both are great phones, and agreed that it may be a hard choice for the folks that are neither android nor apple fanboy types.
14. Windsponge posted on 18 Jul 2010, 06:52 0 0
I agree with you very unfair. Even size of pictures were not correct. No real mention of documented droped calls. I am beginning to think phonearena is being paid by apple. I have been researching everything I can find on phones and checked out in person and I must say that I don't see the great quality of I Phone.I feel it looks like it is a little cheap around the glass. Just my feel. Apple should be scared , very scared.
20. de2philly posted on 20 Jul 2010, 09:53 0 0
Build quality? You mean the uncovered Antenna on the iphone4 where when you touch it and youre not in 5 bar perfect signal your call may drop? Thats not good "build quality" in my book, no matter how the phone feels or looks.
34. CRICKETownz posted on 08 Aug 2010, 20:11 0 0
I think when it comes to build quality Apple always accomplishes the visually appealing design. They have mastered that aspect with pretty much all of their products on the market. I think everything beyond that point comes down to personal preference. I carry an Android device right now and personally think that iP4 has a better menu design than the Captivate, but when it comes to HTC's Sense IU or Motorola's menu design I would disagree in this case. TouchWiz just doesn't do it for me but again its just personal preference.
41. E46titan (unregistered) posted on 27 Aug 2010, 15:38 0 0
Better screen?, Better processor? The Captivate's screen is not nearly as high resolution and cannot display as much detail. The Iphone 4 is faster too so how is the processor better? The proff is in the facts. Looks like you're nothing but a hater.
49. LOL (unregistered) posted on 16 Oct 2010, 22:34 0 0
Fail, the processor on the captivate is faster. While the A4 in both phones are meant to run at 1 ghz, the iphone 4 is downclocked to 800 mhz. Unlike the captivate that runs at the original 1 ghz, and with some rooting, can be overclocked to 1.2 ghz and such. Also, the samoled is absolutely gorgeous. now if you were a graphic designer you would want the ips panel of the iphone because it is more color accurate, as in closer to real life, but the samoled screen of any galaxy s phone, makes the picture look more vibrant and in return, better than real life. So, Graphic Designer-> iphone Average Joe -> Captivate Plus the fact that the sgx540 in the galaxy s phones rape the sgx535 in the iphone 4 in the ass. Captivate= winner
5. Supraman21 posted on 16 Jul 2010, 13:16 0 0
Oh and ive actually seen both a video taken with the iPhone and the Galaxy S on a 42 inch tv and the Galaxy S definitely wins.
7. zyoose posted on 16 Jul 2010, 15:31 0 0
Question PhoneArena, why does your review state that there isn't a front facing camera on the Captivate but when you look up the specs on your site it says that there is an additional camera. Can somebody who has played with the Captivate help ?
8. spoonb1 posted on 16 Jul 2010, 17:09 0 0
there is no secondary cam on the captivate... there may have been one in the works on the original galaxy s when the specs were typed here on the site, prob an oversight of the web editors, but the captivate has but the one main cam on the back...
10. spiceguy posted on 16 Jul 2010, 23:24 0 0
I'm pissed off about the little plastic unlock button on the side of the Galaxy. A function that must be used every time you use the phone should be prominent. The search button on the bottom right is never used and is the obvious choice to unlock the screen. A MAJOR Fuck-up! . If I can get over that then the Galaxy is the clear choice for me. I've had the Vibrant for 2 days now and I'm thrilled with the larger screen and Swipe is the deal breaker. Sorry apple.
12. aricept posted on 17 Jul 2010, 10:54 0 0
The Search button is a required button on all Android devices. You'll see it on every model. Blame Google, whose primary business of course is search.
30. mmj (unregistered) posted on 06 Aug 2010, 01:58 0 0
AT&T actually added that search button - it does not appear on the original Galaxy S. Nor is it a requirement on Android phones, though a lot of them do have it. On the ones that don't, you can usually search by holding down some other button.
11. BlackSirius16 posted on 17 Jul 2010, 01:39 0 0
AT&T quarantine I won't have either of these phones because of total fail coverage Captivate is still better though
18. baldilocks posted on 19 Jul 2010, 16:26 0 0
I have far better coverage with AT&T than any other carrier in my area. What's good for you, isn't good for everyone else. So your comment is FAIL.
