Nokia X7 ReviewNokia X7 5
Browsing in Symbian was not the prettiest of experiences mostly because of the dated and cluttered browser itself. The Anna update changes that with a reworked Browser 7.3 with support for Flash, HTML5 and hardware accelaration, as well as an improved, clean user interface. Was it for the relatively modest 680MHz processor or some Flash contents on pages we visited, scrolling around in the stock browser was sometimes choppy, but still perceptively improved. Multi-touch worked well, while double tap was on the slow side.
In terms of the user interface, you only have the small back and settings buttons on the left and right side at the bottom. This frees up the screen for viewing, while at the same time tapping on the settings button brings up the numerous features of the stock Symbian browser.
Connectivity on the Nokia X7 is traditionally well-represented with pentaband 3G and quad-band GSM support. In terms of speed, you can get up to 10.2Mbps on the downlink. The phone also comes with a GPS receiver, Bluetooth 3.0 with A2DP and Wi-Fi b/g/n.
The Nokia X7 is the front-runner for Anna and bringing some impressive software with a new version of your platform always helps. The handset displayed its gaming affiliations from its very first appearance and it comes with two pretty popular titles preinstalled on the included 8GB microSD card - Asphalt 5 and Galaxy On Fire. Unfortunately, even those two titles didn't seem perfectly optimized as frame rates would often drop noticeably, especially in Asphalt 5.
In addition, Nokia has also stepped up its Facebook and Twitter app support through its social hub. Basically, the social application brings Facebook/Twitter updates in a unified view, but we found the whole interface of the app to be fairly laggy. The X7 ships with a limited edition of Quickoffice which allows you to view documents, but not edit them.
The 4-inch handset however is the perfect tool for watching videos, and that's why we found particularly useful the Videos and TV section which brings on demand webTV widgets spiced up with a polished interface. Included are videos from CNN and National Geographic among others. There's also a separate application for movie trailers – a great tool to explore acclaimed films. Unfortunately, at the same time, the YouTube client is disappointingly just a link to the mobile version of the website, which seems like a huge omission as that's the single most popular video service.
navigation with GPS and digital compass is a great asset to have. Nokia's Ovi Maps is a great tool allowing you to download local maps for free. It simply works and having that service for free on a handset remains probably one of the company's biggest advantages in comparison to other phone makers.
2. sinple (unregistered)
the review is a bit biased.
3. Eingild (Posts: 203; Member since: 19 Apr 2011)
Seriously? A 5 out of 10? You can at least give it a 6 or 7 out of respect dude. That Nokia hatin' is pretty much obvious in this one. I know the review is subjective to the reviewer's opinion. But seriously? A 5?
16. Jack95 (unregistered)
Hey dude do you know how much does it costs the price is higher than an cool Android device hahaha Nokia are losers now because Androd is the KING . Just because Nokia can't use Android cause "they are special" (but they are not) HAHAHA losers.
27. alec (unregistered)
you release giving a phone a higher review out of respect is incredibly biased right
5. Piotrek007 (Posts: 107; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
LOL !! 5/10 ?? Who the hell made this review ?? =\
6. aamir-250 (unregistered)
hmmmmmm, 5 on 10 this is not fair ,,, phonearena
24. alec (unregistered)
so were you just blown away by the 640 mhz processor or was it the 320x640 resolution or the $650 price tag that just blew you away
nokias dead get over it
43. kastor (Posts: 43; Member since: 15 Jan 2012)
yes,640 mhz processor,but iron made,best navigation on phones and lot of it what only nokia can do!
8. NokTokDaddy (Posts: 21; Member since: 12 May 2010)
Never take one review site's verdict as the Last Word...
Readers of Nokia products on this site would be best served to follow sites like All About Symbian or even Engadget (Myriam Joire knows a good device when she sees one, as does her now-ex colleague Chris Ziegler)
All things in balance...
9. Josh (unregistered)
Are y'all forgetting that it is mid 2011? These specs would suck last year. And it's not that these are just numbers to brag about when they really effect the performance. If you're upset cuz you're a Nokia fan wait until their windows 7 phones come out. The actual desgin looked cool tho. That's bout it.
10. A (unregistered)
some1 else should do over this review, this dude is really baised!!!!!
11. ps (unregistered)
"most resent tasks" cmon those are things u have runnin simultaneously. Wierd to keep 9 applications running at the same time and complainin about small lag...
12. Alinda (unregistered)
I can't blame the reviewer because he has been spoiled by the Apple & Android experience. Phonearena is not the only one harsh to Nokia, just wait what TrustedReview & Mobilechoice UK have to say when they review X7. Even when harshly criticized, I doubt Nokia engineers will listen. They will defend the full focus camera no matter what.
After being Nokia user for as long as I can remember, come Wednesday I'm jumping ship. I'm getting a Samsung Galaxy S2 - there you go Nokia, you just lost a customer.
23. vinay kumar (unregistered)
You are right,they have to get powerful hardware with more ram,probably the chances are more to fight the competition.
42. pipo (unregistered)
Good luck with your samsung Galaxy S2. It doesn't do full 2-way recording out of the box. Like ANY serious communication tool should do these days. It doesn't play xvids with subtitles without additional software. It doesn't sync with your tried and trusted Outlook. Oh, and don't forget to get that hefty data-plan when using Google Maps to find your way around. BTW, could you tell me how you can use the adresses from within your contacts as a navigation-pointer. I know in Symbian I just tap the address and it'll insert it into ovi-maps.
Oh and good luck when Sams**t decides that you don't need any ICE Cream upgrades and you need to resort to jailbrea... I mean "rooting" your device.
13. John (unregistered)
Honestly Victor H. i really hope you get shot or get fired. You make the stupidiest reviews in the world. 5/10? Do you even know how to work a phone? Even MobileSyrup is a better website then this phonearena s**t. I am actually emailing Nokia & the staff member of PhoneArena showing them how This so called " Reviewer" does not know anything about phone what so ever.
Hey Victor just a question. How much do you get paid? Oh wait you are reviewing a phone from a company that makes millions & even billions & you are making what? Thats right nothing. I really hope that staff do something about this tool.
Watch he will delete all teh comments before staff can see & claim that they never were written to save his ass. Just remember Victor something called PRINTSCREEN. Can not wait too see what staff & staff from Nokia have to say about this. Goodluck you will need it :)
33. Hạnh Dzuy (unregistered)
Calm down. You are the one who marketing for Nokia or what? I can see this review is quite fair. I myself like this design a lot and when come to the resolution and proscessor I totally pissed off. Speak frankly, do you think 360x640 and 680Mhz is competitive information? And even 1300mA battery is not standard anymore. I am sometimes dissapointed with some PA review, but not this one.
14. Mobile-X-Pert (Posts: 565; Member since: 20 Dec 2010)
This is why I always say that "Gsmarena" is the best website when it comes to reviews. I don't really think that phones should be rated by numbers, but then again if you guys would like to see an exellent and "well made" review just go to Gsmarena.
15. luis_lopez_351 (Posts: 951; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)
Wow! The E7 and N8 gets an 8.5 and this has better spec but gets a 5? Phonearena your turning into bullsh_t. Just because it cant do what your iphone can. News flash its iphone cant do what Nokia x7 does.
35. HTCiscool (Posts: 449; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)
You're an idiot. When the e7 was released there werent many dual core phones around and so the expectations were lower. the X7 comes into a very different market where it must compete with the best of Sammy and HTC with the same features the N8 was released with 8 months ago. what makes it worse is that Nokia has decided to price it to compete with mid-high range droids where its only saving grace it its screen quality. and build quality
17. mrcrangle (Posts: 9; Member since: 12 Apr 2011)
I'm not going to rush out and buy a Symbian phone these days but 5/10 is an outrageous score that makes me doubt the objective nature of the review. With such negative reportage from sites like this, Nokia's demise will become a self-fulfilling prophecy and that can only be bad news for competition in the mobile phone industry. Phonearena, you should be ashamed of yourselves...
18. Seylan (unregistered)
After the good reviews of the N8, E7 and some other devices, you give a bad one like this?
K, I understand, the X7 doesn't have a high-screen resolution, a dual-core cpu, 1gb ram, auto-focus and a few other things, but then again, MANY phones can't do what the X7 does best.
The camera is actually quite good, I have checked alot of sample shot from other sites.you have to get use to it. It takes time and practice, and me, a E7 owner, is more than satisfied with the results. And HD video recording is really good! My E7, which doesn't have Anna, is fairly fast in performance. I hardly ever experience a problem, and 256mb ram is more than enough! Remember, this is a smartphone, its not trying to be a pc/tablet. This is clearly a biased review. The X7 deserves a good 7. 5? never.
I can't wait to see your faces when Nokia reveals the N9 and other super-phones.
19. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3099; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)
Yea I don't care much for Brokia but even I have to say this phone deserves way more than a 5. In the review, the phone looked very much managable. Yes the price is high but most GSM unlcoked phones are. I will admit, I would buy a unlocked Samsung Galaxy S2 and pay 200 more than buy this any day. However I still believe it deserves a much higher score.
20. box (unregistered)
I agree, this should have gotten a 6 or 7, if only because of build quality, reception, big screen, and design. The lack of the Super Black screen is disappointing, as is the camera review and "digital sounding" voices, but all else being equal, this should be up there with the N8 and E7: not as good, but a decent alternative, and a good choice for the hundreds of millions of Symbian users out there looking for a newer, more engaging experience
25. Nuadar (unregistered)
Get over it...this is really poorly designed phone...specs would be bad even last year, system is horrible, its really tiring to hold, unergonomic, slots for cards are really stupid too...totally giving it 4-5 points
26. pirate_777 (Posts: 16; Member since: 27 Feb 2010)
I bought this phone today, and it is AMAZING, best Symbian device up till now ! touchscreen is amazing and the UI is so good, it feels premium and an amazing phone as much as its a smart phone, loud and clear voices plus a very loud speaker. It has a better web browser so people will like it over the Symbian^3 and i like the new keyboard it feels nice with the haptic feedback.
28. NokiaFan (unregistered)
This reviewer so so f**king bias its not even a joke. He always has negative things to say about Nokia and positive things to say about Android and/or iOS. I know everyone's entitled to their opinion but i honestly think this person is a huge Nokia hater. How the hell can you give this phone 5/10. Are you f**king insane? I can just imagine the negative things he will say about the Nokia N9 running MeeGo Os, when he reviews it. This reviewer should be replaced by someone who is unbiased. Someone who can appreciate the little things each smartphone/smartphone OS has to offer.
29. Stoli89 (Posts: 333; Member since: 28 Jun 2010)
I have an N8 which I love. It's a fantastic device in so many respects. However, the X7 is somewhat conflicted IMO, given today's market. Nothing really stands out beyond the fantastic build quality...but this should be a defining advantage once the rest of the package has claimed relevance. For the price, the camera is not suitable. EDoF should be limited to 6 series devices and below. It's a great tech for the vast majority of users...but for premium devices its simply not competitive (i.e. for business card scanning, macro). I'm not really bothered by the ARM 11 processor, having experienced its performance when properly matched to the overall phone. It's very good with an excellent GPU to boot. However, it falls short in 2011 against single and dual core 1Ghz monsters. That being said, my N8 easily goes 1.5 days with normal/moderate use and averages 3.7 full charges over an entire week. I listen to podcasts in the car with bluetooth and connect to wifi when at home and in the office, so "moderate use" seems justified. The X7's beautiful AMOLED is also hampered by the 360x640 resolution. IMO this nHD rez is fine for a 3.5 inch screen...but not above that dimension. No FM transmitter, no replaceable/removable battery capability, no HDMI out, no front facing camera. Frankly, the N8 is a much better purchase at similar pricing. That being said, a 5 out of 10 seems dramatic for such a device. 6/10 would be more like it IMO...especially since the price will quickly moderate down to a more suitable point once in firmly the channel(s).
30. i hate phone arena (unregistered)
phone arena is stupid s**t.
Bunch of dumb asses blinded by 8.6mm,seriously under 12 mm is also thick,seriously guys,see ur waistline and tell that.
Here's an OS that manages to run at 680 mhz nd still provide all de fancy transitions,show me one android fone run so smoothly at 680 mhz nd 256 mb ram.
Do a proper review not like some jackass paid you to say nokia sucks.
31. xy (unregistered)
I read the review and thought to myself: wow, this review is really giving the X7 a fair break. Having used the device I would have criticized it much more harshly. I have mainly used Symbian phones from year 2002 and only switched away from them last year when it became clear that Symbian simply wasn't going to survive against Android and iOS.
Then I read the comments and didn't know if I should laugh or cry. You people honestly think the reviewer is biased AGAINST Nokia when he is clearly illustrating all the undeniable problems with the device and still finding many positive things to say?
The fact of the matter is that in its current state the X7, or any other Symbian phone for that matter, has absolutely no benefits when compared to a similarly priced Android device. Symbian is outdated in every way: the browser in Anna is still horrible, the interface and menus are convoluted and illogically arranged, there are stutters, monents of unresponsiveness and even crashes all the time etc. etc. The hardware is similarly outdated: the CPU is slow, display resolution is sub par, even the EDOF camera is only ok.
In the end users don't care about the operating system or the specs. They care about what they can do with their phone. With a 400 - 500 € Android device they can make calls, send texts and e-mails, browse the web, play games, take pictures and video, browse maps etc. etc. just as well, an in many ways much more easily, than on a Symbian phone. What reason does a buyer have to choose a Nokia over any similarly priced Android phone? Besides the free navigation, absolutely none. Especially when it is clear that new apps for Symbian will not be developed. It is a dead platform still taking a few steps before disappearing into oblivion.
32. DarkLord (unregistered)
Where did u get that price tag??
In India, the phone is launced at Rs.22k.. thats sub 450$....
34. AAA (unregistered)
Well, one of the cons listed was the price. Is it more expensive in Western countries?
X7 is retailing for MYR1,360 in Malaysia, around USD455. That's Nokia Authorized Center's price, it's MYR100 cheaper in regular handphone shops.
The Samsung Galaxy S 2 is going for MYR2099. So is SE Xperia Arc. Blackberry Torch, which is often compared to Nokia E6, MYR1,999.
Whenever all the sales people & review sites rage on the great benefits of Andriod phones & how Symbian is inferior, I'll be asking/thinking "How much?" .....For $700 to $900 more, of course Android is better,lol.
True, end users dont care that much on specs. My 1st Nokia phone lasted 7 to 8 years. 2nd= 5 years, while my Samsung, konked out by 2nd year.
So,in my part of the world, a 5 for a device costing $500 less, a tad harsh.
36. canuck phone user (unregistered)
I feel bad for you all cross the pond. I only had to pay $299 (£184) for my x7 on pay as you go here in canada. For this pricetag, it is a pretty sweet phone. Getting a 5 is pretty harsh, but it is the reviewers opinion, you dont have to read it.
As for me, i have had a iphone, iphone 3gs, samsung spica, htc legend, a lg optimus and numerous other phones before and they each had their benefits and flaws.
The iphones are good gadgets, but there are way too many 'protections and restrictions' on its media usage. I felt like a cash cow constantly feeding money to it. Come seriously, you have to pay to upgrade the ios so your apps would work properly.
ANDROID, love it. However, the phones tend to bring down really easy.
37. so expensive low-end phone (unregistered)
eeeww, so expensive low-end phone!
38. doniraf (unregistered)
despite the poor ovi collections of apps, this phone is awesome! brilliant design, nice material, perfectly built.
39. butthead2001 (unregistered)
i bought this phone coz its only 30 bucks with a 2 yr plan (no data) very cheap and for the Free gps...anything else that comes with it is extra and I am impress....sometimes its not just the faster processor that wins....if u want free gps turn by turn...try it...u might like it. saves $$$ too. 5 out of 10 is quite bad ...i think this guy likes to compare phones rather than look at the features...oh well.. another la di da.
40. nagendra (unregistered)
Prize kati ho ne
41. kanika (unregistered)
good services provded by nokia
44. anraghfrank (Posts: 1; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
Yea ryt. These people are used to iOS and Android so they think Symbian is crap. X7 is one of the best. Also u can get rid of Anna and get Belle now. And blaming the 657mhz...then go buy a laptop and solve the issue. X7 is darn nice and awsome. I'd recomnd to buy it.
45. hqsoft (Posts: 1; Member since: 08 Mar 2012)
I'm a developer and now the X7 with Belle is the best for me.
The Symbian can do more with lower hardware resources than Android can do.
Because Andriod just an emulator running on linux.
46. kastor (Posts: 43; Member since: 15 Jan 2012)
this is perfect phone coz of it made of metal
47. aangakrom (Posts: 1; Member since: 01 Jul 2012)
hello. would you like to buy my x7 IDR 1.500.000 contact my email email@example.com or call 083821299259