x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

Pages
Interface and functionality:

The Windows Phone 8 home screen looks fresh and is a definite advantage before the previous WP editions, yet it’s a far cry from the myriad of customizations you can do with Android’s home screens. Resizable tiles are a welcome addition, but are no match for well-made homescreen widgets in terms of the detail and interactivity of information displayed.

The UI of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The UI of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The UI of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The UI of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

The UI of the Nokia Lumia 920


When we add the dock launchers, menu pagination and notification bar switches, Android pulls ahead for its ability to align even the most minute interface detail with your personal preferences.

The TouchWiz Nature UX of Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The TouchWiz Nature UX of Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The TouchWiz Nature UX of Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The TouchWiz Nature UX of Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

The TouchWiz Nature UX of Samsung Galaxy S III


The WP8 interface is more rigid in that regard, providing what Microsoft deemed necessary as default tools. You can choose from tens of different keyboard apps for your Galaxy S III, including ones with Swype-like input, for example, whereas there is only the stock keyboard to peruse with the Lumia 920 - it is very good in portrait mode, but kind of squished in landscape.

On-screen keyboard of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
On-screen keyboard of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
On-screen keyboard of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

On-screen keyboard of the Nokia Lumia 920


The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III


Windows Phone 8’s UI approach is, however, simpler and easier to grasp in its neatly arranged tile format, and list-only app menu. The lock screen in WP8 also can be used by 3rd party apps to display slideshows, Facebook updates, sports scores, messaging notifications and so on, which Android answers with 4.2 Jelly Bean’s lock screen widgets concept, or some 3rd party lock screen solutions from the Play Store.

Both Nokia and Samsung have put a significant effort towards providing unique interface experiences for the brand’s users. Samsung takes the lead here with its Nature UX featuring Smart Stay and Pop Up Play, whereas Nokia makes do with a bundle of exclusive apps and additions like City Lens or Mix Radio, not to mention the integrated free offline voice-guided navigation coming with each Lumia.

One area Android has pulled far ahead, though, is natural language recognition with Google Voice in Jelly Bean, which is much more intuitive than the somewhat limited TellMe-based voice commands that come with Windows Phone 8. To that we have to add the Google Now innovation - that creepy virtual butler that makes our lives easier the more we divulge personal bits and pieces to the service.

Where WP8 excels, on the other hand, is the social networking integration in the contacts list, which syncs Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and other accounts seamlessly in your People hub.

The People hub of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The People hub of the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

The People hub of the Nokia Lumia 920



As for the apps situation, most of your basics are covered with Windows Phone 8, and there’s the nice selection of Xbox games that comes with, but when you dig under the surface, you encounter a lot of the more specialized apps, like your Ameritrade broker, for instance, or Zipcar, missing from the WP Store, and you’d have to use the web experience to manage their services, instead of a dedicated app. The good thing is that you can first try any app before purchase.


Processor and memory:

The Samsung Galaxy S III is powered by a 1.4 GHz quad-core Exynos 4412 processor or a 1.5 GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 in the US, which in conjunction with Android Jelly Bean’s Project Butter make the interface smooth as silk, with no apps giving that phone the hiccups, too.

The same can be said about the Nokia Lumia 920 - Windows Phone 8 is light on resources and finally supports dual-core processors, so the 1.5 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chews through the interface animations and apps perform seamlessly.

There is 1 GB of RAM on the Lumia 920 and the international S III, and double that in the US version of the Galaxy S III. Android’s superior multitasking abilities can line up much more apps running in the system memory before any of them needs to be closed by the OS for lack of resources.

The starting points for internal memory amounts are 16 GB (~12 GB user-available) on Samsung’s device and 32 GB (~26 GB user-available) for the Lumia 920, but the S III also has a 32 GB version, plus it has a microSD slot for cheap storage expansion.


Internet and connectivity:

Both browsers are excellent, with buttery smooth scrolling, zooming and panning, plus they render the pages in real time while pinching.

Internet Explorer on the Lumia 920 seems a tad quicker, which is proven by Browsermark 2.0 as well (1569 vs 1355 points score), but there is no way you can add Adobe Flash support to it, whereas it can be easily used on the Galaxy S III, if the need arises.

Internet Explorer on the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
Internet Explorer on the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
Internet Explorer on the Nokia Lumia 920 - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

Internet Explorer on the Nokia Lumia 920


The web browser of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The web browser of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The web browser of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III
The web browser of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung Galaxy S III

The web browser of the Samsung Galaxy S III


On the connectivity front, the phones offer the works - LTE and HSPA+ baseband radios, plus the set of Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Direct, Bluetooth, A-GPS, FM Radio, NFC and DLNA. The Lumia 920 radio has 42.2 Mbps theoretical HSPA+ download speeds, whereas the Galaxy S III sports a 21.1 Mbps radio, but in reality you’ll be lucky to clock a quarter of those anyway.

As for wired connectivity, the Galaxy S III sports a proprietary MHL port that allows video-out and USB-on-the-go at once, while the Lumia 920 features a microUSB port for charging and syncing, and it supports USB-on-the-go too, but no video-out.

149 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:32 29

1. dickwyn (Posts: 621; Member since: 07 May 2012)


both are excellent devices and are for two different types of people

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:44 15

4. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Precisely. Well done comparison, honest and straightforward.

Will we see a 920 vs Nexus 4 or Optimus G? Since the GS3, while good is an last-Gen device and doesn't even have the newest OS.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:47 8

7. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1163; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


how about L920 vs iphone5....

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:59 7

14. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


That too, but that is kind of a given, and may turn out to be one of those "if you like iPhones, get it; if you don't, the 920 is worth a long look and its $200 lower price tag gives apple a shot across the bow they cannot ignore" or something. I hope not, but there is that chance since there is such a disparate difference in the platforms.
I watched a comparison video of the 920 vs ip5 (it is the one in Russian on YouTube), and while the 5 was faster at some things, it looked ancient in comparison with its awkward chaotically-colored app grid, almost looking psychedelic in comparison to the crisp clean organization and resizable and moveable Tiles of the Lumia, as well as dinky in comparison, and boring and uninviting with its cold, hard, black body. Pure aesthetics alone would make me disregard the 5 if I were a first-time smartphone shopper.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:53 3

10. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


sorry but optimus G has 4.0 version of android. 920 v nexus 4 would be better.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 08:03 3

15. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


I thought OptG had 4.1, and the N4 had 4.2?

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 08:34 2

30. AamirSIII (banned) (Posts: 187; Member since: 04 Oct 2012)


booooooo....

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 11:28 4

59. brandonrana (Posts: 57; Member since: 04 Nov 2012)


LUMIA 920 is the boss for sure..!!!! Sgs3 was also great, but it is a thing of past now.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 10:17 1

49. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


nope. that's the sad truth. But anyways, for sure the update's on the way. But the thing is, Optimus G is kind of a flop product. The software and hardware integration is not superb. That's what makes LG not on the top line. They make a great hardware but the software kills it. Good thing there's the Nexus 4, where they don't have to worry about OTA updates.

So, nexus 4 and 920 it is.

+ note 2 and 920

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 08:26 6

27. wp8forever (unregistered)


is really nice to see , that nobody here is surprice that the lumia is better , i remember when i used to say it, they were no u crazy never never . I told u lumia 920 is the best phone out there , i know s4 is coming but nokia is coming harder too wp8 is in the game now and is no going anywere , dont get me wrong i thing android is good better thank ios but is just too unique , once again im no hating on dissin android cuz i had the s3 is a really good phone .

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:33 6

2. _Bone_ (Posts: 2155; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


I love everything about the 920 but the size, I held one and it's monstrous, so I'd put it in the phablet category where the actually silighly more pocketable (because it's thinner) Note II is all around a better package. But to stay on topic, I'd recommend the 920 over the SIII, if thickness is not a problem for you, well done Nokia!

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:48

8. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


I disagree with the "phablet" designation. It may be heavier than some mainstream models, but not grossly so; the HTC Vivid and some of the rugged smartphones are the same weight class it heavier.
None of the review videos have had the narrator groan and complain about the extra heft or be unable to pick it up; other phones are just thinner and lighter, like a model, whereas the Nokia is like the nerdy photographer girl/boy next door, being a lot of fun, natural, and with amazing capabilities you enjoy discovering together. The Note, DNA, and Streak are like the basketball players, taller but highly capable because of it. Also, the Lumia can still fit in many pockets the "phablets" cannot.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 08:54 7

35. Johnnokia (Posts: 1108; Member since: 27 May 2012)


I have Galaxy S3, but I see the Lumia much better than in S3 in almost all specs.
I can't imagine, would the galaxy or Note be popular if Nokia had adopted Android ??!!.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 09:16 5

40. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


I really doubt you have an S3.

I love my S3 to bits and would never ever consider that uniformed, restricted tank over it

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 09:41 7

48. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


wow your not been a fanboy are you

''uniformed, restricted tank over it''

well that tank is all round ahead of the s3, you will always slate its weight but fact is you over exagerate it. if you cant hold the 920 your in need of help

second restricted, what else will the general user been in desperate need of that wp8 doesnt offer

posted on 04 Dec 2012, 03:17 1

84. Alex123 (Posts: 241; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)


I do love Everything that Nokia had maded on L920. It is the best WP8. and Nokia adopt Android, i guess Nokia will be more popular phone than Samsung

posted on 04 Dec 2012, 00:13 1

77. tashreef (Posts: 476; Member since: 24 Nov 2012)


It is because weight is the only drawback that can be considered while comparing lumia 920 with any other flagship....

anything else....nothing..don't say apps availability...since WP is new in the market...

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 09:02 3

37. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Why do you recommend WP over the best Android experience?
Please, bring me one valid reason!

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 10:31 5

52. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


ease of use, uniformed and refreshing

wp8 might be a better option for many, why wont you accept not everyone wants android or even likes it. me myself use android too but i dont shove it down peoples throats like you try

i use android, symbian, ios, dont use bb but i dont have a problem when others do....its there and this is the key word kid ''choice''

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:33 7

3. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


Nokia Lumia 920 just cuts it for me. No other phone for me - except the Nexus 4.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:44 12

5. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


a suggestion, please use the black background of Windows Phone devices. the white makes it ugly. :)

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 09:04 1

38. Mobile-X-Pert (Posts: 565; Member since: 20 Dec 2010)


Yeah, I kinda hate the white background on videos. The black makes the live tiles look much better.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 11:51 2

61. Aeires (unregistered)


Does WP8 have black tiles? A black background with thin white bordered black tiles would look sick.

posted on 04 Dec 2012, 08:59

86. Bilpocalypse (Posts: 301; Member since: 13 Oct 2012)


Make the background white and turn on high contrast mode. It does look sick. But, for colored tiles, the black background looks much better.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:45 6

6. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1163; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


you do know that making the 920's weight a drawback in usability is just plain silly.

oh and you forgot their prices...

-still a good comparison

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:51 2

9. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 813; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)


Excellent phones of 2012. Imma skip 2012 phones though. Hope 2013 would be SPECstacular in any way. . .

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 07:59 3

13. dickwyn (Posts: 621; Member since: 07 May 2012)


Galaxy S IV, Galaxy Note III, HTC DLX, Sony Yuga/Odin, Lumia 930 yeah you betcha 2013 is gonna be great

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 08:08 1

16. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 813; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)


I'm with ya there man. it's either Galaxy S4 or Sony Yuga/Odin for me right now. Can't w8 to lay my hands on either of them.

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 08:15 2

22. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 813; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)


W8 someone migt get mad since you forgot to mention the iPhone or to whatever they're gonna name it in 2013. ^_____^

posted on 03 Dec 2012, 09:20 3

41. mashilive (Posts: 3; Member since: 22 Nov 2012)


You forgot the NEW iPhone. lol.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories