x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II

Posted: , by John V.

Tags:

Go to page
Interface and Functionality:

Running the most up-to-date version of Windows Phone, version 7.5 (aka Mango), there’s nothing dramatically different in terms of the experience – well, you know, Microsoft likes to keep it that way. Therefore, whether you’re checking out the People Hub for you social networking fix, or using the calendar to keep up with your schedule, you won’t find anything different between them.

The Nokia Lumia 900 - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
The HTC Titan II - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II

The Nokia Lumia 900

 

The HTC Titan II

 

However, we have to point out that HTC Titan II offers the HTC Hub, which is none other than a slimmed down version of HTC’s Sense UI over on Android. Conversely, the unique thing about the Nokia Lumia 900 is that it has the benefit of being able to download Nokia’s specific apps – like Nokia Drive and Maps. Initially, some might be enticed by the voice guided turn-by-turn navigations available with Nokia Drive, but you can’t forget that the HTC Titan II has access to HTC Locations, which is its comparable GPS navigation app. So what can we say about it all? Don’t hinge on the core experience to make a decision on what to side with.

The HTC Hub app brings Sense-like experience - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
The HTC Hub app brings Sense-like experience - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
The HTC Hub app brings Sense-like experience - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
The HTC Hub app brings Sense-like experience - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II

The HTC Hub app brings Sense-like experience


Nokia Drive and Maps - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Nokia Drive and Maps - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Nokia Drive and Maps - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Nokia Drive and Maps - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II

Nokia Drive and Maps


Likewise, we can say the same when it comes to typing messages with each device, as neither one is able to distinguish itself as the superior one – that’s because of their spacious layouts and responsiveness in keeping up with our rate. Throw in one phenomenal auto-correct feature found with the Windows Phone keyboard, we find both to deliver a great messaging experience.


Processor and Memory:

Becoming a consistent theme amongst Windows Phones in general, we’re not all that concerned about raw specs with them, mainly because they seemingly all run flawlessly and without any distracting issues. Nevertheless, the Nokia Lumia 900 is powered by a single-core 1.4GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon APQ8055 processor, whereas the HTC Titan II relies on a single-core core 1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 CPU. When it comes to pure performance, it’s hardly determinable to say which has the edge over the other, as they perform equally with all tasks.

When it comes down to internal storage, they’re both advertised as offering 16GB, but out of the box, but it’s actually 13.61GB of free memory – meaning, you’re still required to manage stored content to maximize their capacities. Sorry folks, there’s no expansion with them!


Internet and Connectivity:

Arriving on the scene at the same exact time, both have the prestigious title of being the first 4G LTE enabled Windows Phones on the market – and the timing couldn’t have been better! Relying on AT&T’s network, they’re both able to load our web site in its entirety in under 30 seconds. As for the rest of the web browsing experience, they once again perform similarly with their fluid kinetic scrolling and pinch zooming.

Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900 - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II

Web browsing with the Nokia Lumia 900


The web browser of the HTC Titan II - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II
The web browser of the HTC Titan II - Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II

The web browser of the HTC Titan II


In our testing, data speeds remained consistent as they both deliver similar results in the same locations. Specifically, we’re able to see them obtaining maximum download and upload HSPA+ speeds of 5Mbit/s and 1Mbit/s respectively. Under 4G LTE connectivity, we’re seeing better results at 10Mbit/s and 3Mbit/s, but they’re nothing stellar when compared to devices running off of Verizon’s LTE network. With other connectivity options, they both feature aGPS, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and mobile hotspot functionality.

31 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 17 Apr 2012, 08:28 9

1. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


the price is indeed the selling point of the lumia...

will wait for apollo before getting a wp.

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 08:42 21

2. santaclaus (Posts: 52; Member since: 20 Jul 2011)


apollo + pureview = killing device

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 15:57 4

11. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


oh i ment to thumb u up.
WP 8 will be amazing.

posted on 02 May 2012, 06:40

30. epdm2be (Posts: 164; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


nnaatthhaannx2 : ...but require me to buy yet another phone again since "they" won't release it for the current range of lumia's.

posted on 02 May 2012, 07:01

31. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


Wait, what are you talking about?

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 09:47 5

3. snowgator (Posts: 3210; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Nokia is the company most likely to support it's WP. More apps, better color choice, better call quality, and the better price. Nokia does win.

But credit where credit is due. The T2 is a better camera, and a more solid device. The lens on the 900 scratches easy, and the hard edges on the device will annoy some people. Drop the price on the T2 to a more comparable 100.00 - 120.00, and this choice isn't as clear. It then becomes what do you use your phone for more. But at 100.00 more, it isn't even close.

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 16:00 3

12. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


Don't you think it would be so much better if PA just listed a winner under each subhedding in the article?
It's strange that in most of the comparisons, they don't take a side, they just show you what one has against another.
If any editor is reading this, please consider. It makes the articles more worthwhile.

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 17:14 1

14. Birds (Posts: 991; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


Why would they do that then? No one would read the review. The reveiw points out the advantages and disadvantages in each device and a simple sub header can't explain that at all. The point of this sight is to give in-depth reviews to consumers. Like if people went with the device with the most disadvantages in the comparison, they should know the flaws they would face right of the bat so your point is kinda...well??? I don't agree. lol

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 20:54 2

15. snowgator (Posts: 3210; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Actually, I kinda like the idea. Break it down to sections (screen performance, OS/UI, camera/recording, multimedia, ECT.), and let the readers see which device wins each section. They pretty much do that already, and truthfully the "overall" winner isn't as important as getting the devices strengths matched up with the users needs. The 900 may be a better device, but someone may want a smartphone for a reason the 900 is weak in, and be disappointed.

This would be very useful in Android devices, as their differences are so vast.

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 09:49 4

4. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


htc threw in it 16 mpx and there is no difference between titan and lumia with "just" 8 mpx.
Htc could use even 32 mpx and it would be a crap.
Lack of experience, lack of knowledge=dissapointment

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 10:48 7

7. ngo2dd (Posts: 781; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


You know nothing, HTC don't make their camera. check the one on Cnet and you see a night a day different from the lumia and the Titan. The Titan was over all better.http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57411421-94/camera-phone-shootout-htc-titan-ii-versus-nokia-lumia-900/

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 10:51 2

8. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Well..I do know more than you, sir htc-blindmaniac.
And I did say many times, HTC don't know how to make good cameras. And I don't give a crap who's making cameras for them. They use it in their phones. Period.

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 10:52 4

9. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


and...I'm so sorry..but even S II (which has "only" 8 mpx) makes a lot better pictures than your almighty titan the second.

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 10:52 3

10. -box- (Posts: 3798; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


HTC's cameras are actually quite good. My HTC Sensation 4G shoots as well as (and sometimes better than) my Lumia 900, and.the Amaze, Vivid, and One series have had positive reviews for their cameras as well.
Also, megapixels aren't everything. A quality sensor, lens, and software make a huge impact. It's like a car: more cylinders or more power doesn't mean the car is.better, faster, or the best choice for the needs of the user.

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 16:08 5

13. quesoesgrande (Posts: 217; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


my sensation's camera is great too! You cant judge a company by just one product. (Except McDonalds)

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 05:56 2

16. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


$g is an exception and he makes really good photos. I wonder why HTC hasn't utilizedthis technology in further models.
And maybe diamond many years ago (it has 3,2 or 5 mpx? don't remember). My point is that HTC tends to make a big BANG about their phones. Titan II has been announced for many months. N8 killer, better than 4s, blablabla marketing gibberlish.
Smaller sensor, lack of xenon, 16 mpx...and what? Titan II makes photos which are often on par with Lumia 900 (whioch is not superb in this ascept) and for sure not better than for example, S II. HTC stopped.
Apple made a progress with camera in 4s. Huge progress, And it is visible.
HTC is always trying (vide dr dre bass)...and nothing more. I have a feeling that they are focused too much on their so called unibody cases than on the rest of the phone.

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 09:42

19. ngo2dd (Posts: 781; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


Have you check the cnet one I guess not because you would not say it is on par. And for the last time HTC don't make their camera they buy it from other company. You know nothing. Not many phone company make their camera. The one on the 4s is from sony,

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 10:39

21. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


I don't care about cnet. have you checked uewrrewuy? N? So shut up. I've had either. Nokias, HTC's, Moto and even samsung. I make a statement based on my own experience. You use internet. Be my guest.
The only phones which make good pictures are mytouch 4g and old diamond. I don't say Titan II is a mess but it is not as good as it was announced. It produces quite good pictures, but worse than 4s or SII. Taking into account it was supposue to be a "N8 killer" and something no one never seen before, it's a joke. HTC just bumped up specs to higher resolution so no one should spot weak points. But it's not a proper way. They just don't know how to do it properly. HTC was close to a really good camera. It was 4g. Period. They can put in it even 24 mpx and yet they will be beaten by apple, samsung, let alone Nokia.

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 10:40

22. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


...sorry, but if Cnet is your source of information...good luck!

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 09:55

5. kshell1 (Posts: 1143; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)


The only real difference in any windows device is occasionally clock speed, screen size and camera

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 07:09 4

17. Altair (Posts: 325; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)


When I buy a PHONE, the most important factor in it, is a CALLING QUALITY. Nokia wins almost every phone in that aspect.

Clock speed is important factor only for laggy androids

The best screen size for handsets is 4" - 4.3". That size has the best usage enjoyment. Imagine how you look while holding some 4.5"-4.7" brick on your ear while walking in the street. No thanks!

Last but not least, the design. I don't want any of those androidlooklike clones.

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 10:11

20. kshell1 (Posts: 1143; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)


I don't call lol dude im 15 i facebook and text. and in my spare time dismantle broken computers for the good parts or reset the hard drive to resell it. I dont care for calling quality.

posted on 02 May 2012, 06:38 1

29. epdm2be (Posts: 164; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


kshell1 Wasn't a small, cheap Wifi-tablet then a better choice instead of a cellPHONE?

posted on 17 Apr 2012, 10:43

6. -box- (Posts: 3798; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


@John V.: the internal storage may not be expandable, but Windows Phones come with 25 GB free storage via Microsoft SkyDrive, bringing the total to 41 GB, or 38 for user-accessible data. A person would have to get the 32 GB iPhone with icloud to get that close (still 1 GB short). Granted I strongly prefer expandable memory (especially in the era of capped data plans for data syncing) but one must give credit where credit is due. Plus side of SkyDrive (and cloud services like DropBox, which I also use) is that if the phone is lost or stolen, the online data is safe.

posted on 21 Apr 2012, 07:40 1

25. epdm2be (Posts: 164; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


The problem is this:

1) on Windows Phone cloud-usage (Live!) is obligatory and therefore require punters to fork out for these data-plans. Even the most trivial things (like e.g. transfering a ringtone or photo to another phone)

2) target audience for many smartphones are people whom don't have the income to spend on expensive data-plans. Proof is XBox-Live integration (which only works through the cloud) and is directly geared toward a younger audience.

The removal/restriction of expandable storage is a bad one. And this will only get worse when you take into account apps like offline-navigation, HD video-recording, high MPixels photo's etc...

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 08:13 1

18. bbblader (Posts: 580; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)


if it's the camera you want go buy a SGSII,iPhone 4S,N8 or wait for the almighty 808PW
but if it's a good WP buy the L900 because in my opinion the sweetspot 4-4,3'' screens
and for me I would like a 4'' screen
and I'm going to wait for the 808PW to come out because I need a good phonecamera
to shoot my freerun vids and pics on

posted on 18 Apr 2012, 22:02

23. deadhead (Posts: 17; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


I held them both in the store today, the Lumia wins hands down. Its just a better device overall, and its cheaper.. that combination is kind of rear these days.

posted on 21 Apr 2012, 07:33

24. epdm2be (Posts: 164; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


I see all these comments on the video and mpixels on both HTC and Lumia but hasn't anybody heard how horrible the AUDIO-recording was on the Titan?

Strange how vendors keep neglecting the sound-departement. Only Nokia seems to divert some efforts in that.

posted on 21 Apr 2012, 09:54

26. fenixsama (Posts: 32; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


Sometimes I wonder if the lumia 900 would have been great if it were meego. -sent from my N9

posted on 25 Apr 2012, 02:47

27. Dadler22 (Posts: 161; Member since: 11 Dec 2008)


and the winner is.... NO ONE because you bought a Windows Phone.

posted on 01 May 2012, 18:09

28. mruppel2 (Posts: 3; Member since: 29 Apr 2012)


HTC makes great Windows Phones, but Nokia has better experience with call quality and antennas, I can notice because I have a Lumia 710 and the voice quality is far superior than my old HTC HD7

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories