x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Nokia Lumia 710 Review

Nokia Lumia 710 7

Posted: , by

Tags:

Pages
Performance:

Nokia Lumia 710 Review
Despite having a weak volume output with its earpiece, we still find its calling quality to be tolerable:  voices are clear and distinctive on both ends of the line, with no background noise or static evident. Additionally, its speakerphone might not be the strongest as well, but it’s gracious enough to produce audible voices. We didn’t experience any dropped calls during our testing in the greater Philadelphia region.

Considering that we’ve been disappointed by many top-shelf smartphones in the battery life department of late, it’s always refreshing to experience a device that offers us a reasonable amount of life. After charging the Lumia 710 completely, we’re able to get approximately 1.5 days of juice on normal usage, which is easily a winner in our books.


Conclusion:

Behind the lights and glamor of being the first Nokia smartphone to arrive in the US with Windows Phone on board, there’s some expectations riding with its release. However, we’re simply not convinced that the Nokia Lumia 710 is going to be THAT device to bring Nokia from the ashes, but rather, we’ll have to wait a bit longer to find it. It’s not to say that it’s a totally boring device, but it simply lacks the star power to propel it over other recent Windows Phones. Frankly, it is a nice Windows Phone and the best thing going for this one is its $49.99 on-contract pricing right from the starting line – so it’s sure to attract those on a budget. Beyond that, it’s hardly a gleaming competitor to even things like the HTC Radar 4G or the Samsung Focus Flash.

OS Version: 7.10.7740.16

Nokia Lumia 710 Video Review:



Pros

  • Affordable $49.99 on-contract cost
  • Free turn-by-turn directions with Nokia Drive
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Boring design
  • Lacks a front-facing camera
PhoneArena rating:
7 Good
User rating:
9.5 18 Reviews
Pages:

50 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 04 Jan 2012, 23:24 1

1. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1237; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)


Isn't "ClearBlack" an amoled screen? How does it have bad viewing angles! That would have been the only factor that made this phone decent. Oh well... T-Mobile should have got the Lumia 800.

posted on 04 Jan 2012, 23:43 13

3. the_s2 (Posts: 239; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)


ClearBlack is not a display type, rather its a screen technology which puts in an extra polarising layer over the display to avoid reflectance, thus increasing the depth of black and offering clear sunlight visibility. There is the ClearBlack AMOLED display found in the C6-01, E7 etc and the ClearBlack IPS TFT found in the Nokia 603,(ah well, I find the 710 as the twin of 603) , Nokia 701 and yeah, the 710. Good day!!

posted on 07 Jan 2012, 08:16 3

31. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1237; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)


Wow thanks! I guess it just shows how little most Americans know about Nokia (and vice versa probably).

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 20:41 4

27. matt1q2aw3 (Posts: 13; Member since: 30 Dec 2011)


The HTC Vivid was rated as having poor viewing angles by PA but it was not bad at all in the store. PA also said that its screen was not very bright which was also inaccurate, in my opinion.

Read all the WP7 and Android reviews and take note about the tone of voice used. Compare it to the iphone reviews and you'll note a striking bias towards the iphone.

One example is the use of excuses when noting something bad about an iphone.

I went from WP7 to Android to see what it was all about, and b/c of the file explorer and Adobe flash. If WP7 added flash, a file explorer, and better multi tasking, it would be a fantastic phone. The design is elegant, beautiful, and simple to use.

posted on 16 Mar 2012, 04:58 1

47. thelegend6657 (unregistered)


And they are also bias to Samsung too .
See the gs2 review compare to sensation xe

posted on 04 Jan 2012, 23:32 5

2. ILikeBubbles (Posts: 525; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)


so i hear all this about how pretty wp7 is and yet none of these screenshots do anything to pique my interest... but i guess that goes to how wp7 is "competing more with iphone than with android"

posted on 04 Jan 2012, 23:56 8

4. The_Miz (Posts: 1496; Member since: 06 Apr 2011)


It doesn't need to compete with something it's better than. ZING!

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 00:12 7

5. JGuinan007 (Posts: 685; Member since: 19 May 2011)


So your saying the Nokia Lumia 710 is better than iphone?

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 01:14 3

6. Glim12808 (Posts: 394; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


I think he means the other one LOL!

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 13:43 1

19. wakingup (Posts: 51; Member since: 13 Aug 2011)


After using androids and breifly going through iphones, I raealy grew bland, even with my beloved androids. Although I really love the customizeable aspect of androids, I still really want to try out WM7 which ILikeBubbles didnt like...seems great to me; probaly cause i dint try it before

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 16:13 3

22. rayjones09 (Posts: 149; Member since: 16 Dec 2010)


Admittedly it looks boring on the computer. But if you use it in person it's quite an immersive experience.

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 03:49 2

8. seylan (Posts: 20; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)


It puzzles me why Nokia chose to use an ordinary TFT display with Lumia 710, but used a higher quality and very bright IPS LCD on the 701 and even the 603, which run Symbian and are even cheaper...I'm fine with the design, it looks quite good, but it could be a tad thinner and maybe do with some metal...I wouldn't call it "boring" especially with the interchangeable rear covers. Well I don't mind the omission of a front-facing camera, I only tried video calling once with my current smartphone and would never use it again.

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 04:49 2

9. Landmarkcm (Posts: 506; Member since: 11 Aug 2009)


I think I am going to go w the radar on my value plan and get it this weekend with tmobile sale plus theres still offering another 100 back through the 10th if you trade in another phone any working phone. I just read where the htc radars camera flash works up to 10 feet away as well & that is one of the impt features to me.. So I think that seals the deal for me.. And I thought I was all set on the Nokia!
But with the reviews coming in overall it's not more compelling then the htc Radar afterall!..

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 06:46 2

10. HTCiscool (Posts: 449; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)


Now, who the hell is going to choose this over the HTC Radar??? The design looks absolutely horrible

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 06:56 2

11. StreetNerd (Posts: 821; Member since: 08 Dec 2010)


i got the white with cyan cover + cyan Purity HD headset

for only 350 euros off contract.... super deal huh?!

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 08:31 7

14. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


if i had to chose one over the other, id chose the nokia over the HTC

1) nokia's navigation is the best navigation availible on WP7 right now... and its free, works in offline, ect ect ect.
2) i sell the darn things and i still see very little use out of video calling so its not important to me.
3) 1.4ghz processor > 1 ghz
4) They are both "entry level" devices so why pay $50 more for the HTC brand name and a slightly nicer design when the Nokia actually gives you more for less?
5) nokia only apps. It can do everything the HTC can do and yet more.

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 09:24 3

15. phunkinc (Posts: 16; Member since: 08 Nov 2011)


I sell for TMo too. I am a huge HTC fan (well before their monotony recently) and I am getting the 710. I will post my opinion on it as it is being given to me. I love Nokia as well and there are some huge selling points of that over the Radar.

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 09:35 1

16. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


i was offered to champion it, but turned it down as i need my wifi tethering too much for school. Won the HD7 before as well which was pretty nice. Let us know how u like it after putting it through its paces.

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 11:46

17. phunkinc (Posts: 16; Member since: 08 Nov 2011)


Yea I'm championing it. Will do. Where are you located, always nice to see another TMo employee :)

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 19:12

24. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


In Jax, FL, you?

posted on 07 Jan 2012, 01:56

29. snowgator (Posts: 3601; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Did not know you were in Jacksonville, remixfa. I grew up in F-L-A, raised in Fort Myers and lived in Tampa for a few years. LOVE Jax. Had some friends that lived in Orange Park, and spent a ton of time there. Good memories.

While in your T-Mo store, give the Nokia a good once over. Very interested in the overall performance. Nokia hardware is supposed to be top notch. Very interested in your opinion.

posted on 08 Jan 2012, 22:43

38. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


nokia's build quality is normally very nice. we have the 710's in stock.. have had them for a while.. but we dont have a demo device to play with. dont worry, im not one to hold my opinion back. :)

posted on 08 Jan 2012, 22:48

40. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


Yea, I like it here. Its a city without feeling like a city since its so spread out. My biggest issue is the FL school system sucks and I'm a big winter fan. Took me a decade but I finally convinced my wife to move from FL once we are done with our degrees.

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 16:02 1

21. mallkioskguy (Posts: 7; Member since: 09 Aug 2011)


Do t-Mobile customers still even like the Nokia brand name? Serious question...

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 19:14 1

25. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


yes, surprisingly enough we still get regular "is there a new nokia" questions. I've had 4 customers come in asking about the 710 in the last 2 weeks.. i was quite surprised. And happy... that means people are doing homework for once. :)

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 16:55 1

23. Landmarkcm (Posts: 506; Member since: 11 Aug 2009)


I love wp & thought I was gonna be settling in with the 710 even switched from Sprint due to there slow support of wp. But the camera is of great importance to me & that alone is why I am choosing the radar over the lumia. The reviews coming in say the radars is better & also it has a better camera flash as well and better build quality…The slighly faster processor on the 710 will go unnoticed by me.
The camera apeture is an f2.2 on the radar as well vs 2.4 on the Lumia. So the radar is better in low light.

posted on 07 Jan 2012, 13:30 1

34. ReturningToNokia (Posts: 130; Member since: 09 Jul 2011)


@Landmarkcm...You switched from Sprint, to T-Mobile? And you switched because Sprint supports one WP device, while T-Mobile has only two WP devices? And want the Radar because the aperature is 2.2 vs 2.4 for the Lumia 710? Really?

Wow.

posted on 07 Jan 2012, 11:05

33. DCBureaucrat (Posts: 1; Member since: 07 Jan 2012)


My thoughts exactly! The Radar is a better design (imho) and has wifi tethering - which saves me $$ since it provides mobile data for my tablet and laptop. And the Radar is currently FREE now that they are adding an extra $100 off rebate. If this phone was on Sprint or Verizon I could see it filling a need in their lineup - but both T-Mo and ATT already have good low-end WM7 Mango phones. Now, show me the new Nokia Ace and I might be interested.

posted on 08 Jan 2012, 22:45

39. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


since when does the radar have wifi tethering?

posted on 05 Jan 2012, 07:17

12. hunted (Posts: 403; Member since: 21 Sep 2011)


i like this phone, descent for what it has been manufactured.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Nokia Lumia 710

Nokia Lumia 710

OS: Windows Phone 7.5 Mango
view full specs
Display3.7 inches, 480 x 800 pixels (252 ppi) TFT
Camera5 megapixels
Hardware
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2, Single core, 1400 MHz, Scorpion processor
0.5 GB RAM
Size4.69 x 2.46 x 0.49 inches
(119 x 62.4 x 12.48 mm)
4.43 oz  (126 g)
Battery1300 mAh, 6.9 hours talk time

Latest stories