Nokia Lumia 525 Review
Top marks: the Lumia 525 blazed a trail during our call quality tests
Talking on the Lumia 525 is nothing short of an absolute pleasure. The earpiece is extremely loud at the max setting, and we were impressed by the fact that this involved no trade-off in the sound quality department. The otherwise tiny speaker transmits voice tonality splendidly, and it actually feels as if you're talking to somebody in person. There are no distortions, and no nasty background sounds. The other side of the equation – the microphone – is as equally potent. Raise your voice a few decibels, and you just might deafen the person on the other side, and he'll know it's you without a shadow of the doubt all the while. This is some really good stuff.
The small, 1430mAh battery gets us through two days of usage
A tiny-looking, 1430 mAh cell is what you'll find underneath the exterior shell of the 525. It's of the removable type, which is great if you're looking to maximize the longevity of the phone. Nokia rates the Lumia 525 as good for up to 1014 minutes of talk time on 2G (636 minutes on 3G), and 14 days of stand-by – a moderate increase from the Lumia 520. In our experience, the phone handled a rather focused attention for up to two days, so it's unlikely that you'll have to charge daily.
Unpretentious, effective. Two words that are at the very core of the Nokia Lumia 525's DNA. With a price tag of about $180, and the possibility of another sales frenzy à la Lumia 520, this is Nokia's new device to watch.
But success is hardly ever built on just past laurels, and Nokia likely knows that better than most. The Lumia 520 is now in the past, and it's a different world out there, with devices like the Motorola Moto G launching a serious offensive. For the same price, the Moto G gets you a bigger, more-detailed screen, a quad-core processor, a better all-around camera, and a matured operating system. Thankfully for Nokia, the Lumia 525 is as out-classed by pretty much none other, but mainstream devices like the LG L7 II and the Sony Xperia M are also worth a consideration before you commit. In other words, if the Nokia/Microsoft duo is as intent on getting a win with the Lumia 525, it might have to consider going down the path of crazy sales promotions once more.
- Appealing and sturdy design
- Offline turn-by-turn navigation is a considerable advantage
- The camera produces enviable stills for its class
- Call quality is stellar
- Pixel density is on the low side
- Outdoor display visibility is poor
- Lacks an LED flash
- No front camera
2. akki20892 (Posts: 3237; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
You r seeing front of moto g dude. Moto g is the first phone get damn cheap price with great specs.
16. dratomic (Posts: 428; Member since: 09 Oct 2013)
at the end of the day its just a motorola. no nokia quality
17. cripton805 (Posts: 907; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)
Dont kid yourself. Nokia almost went bankrupt too. And the first slim Razr was probably still better than some barebones OS Nokia when it was released. And it still continues to be barebones with a crippling OS. Let's wait and see if rumors are true.
Moto G>Lumia 525 by a long shot.
Its not an opinion. Its fact. Hardware and OS.
18. sprockkets (Posts: 1075; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
And I say Moto's reputation in that regard is also up there.
4. cripton805 (Posts: 907; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)
I thought the same thing. The profit on this has to be close to $150. It's using just about everything from the 520. All those parts have to be dirt cheap to manufacture right about now. They're milking it far too much. Adding a little ram and bumping up the price back to $180 is cynical. If they had put in a front camera, slimmed it down, and put in a better screen, I'd justify the pricing. Maybe even add $10 if they wanted to make a bit more profit.
19. aksa123 (Posts: 162; Member since: 30 Jan 2014)
Well, 525 isn't cheap YET.
It'll, probably, go the way down to $60, just like 520.
3. lucid.brat (Posts: 79; Member since: 09 Sep 2013)
In my country Lumia 525 is more cheaper than moto g
5. arenanew (Posts: 132; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)
moto is pure chinese company and dont deserve 100$. reason phone means calling ability but motog have very bad quality , next problem poor battery backup plus no offline navigation moto g fail in prime aspect . for lumia 525 skype work for video calling . phone is not for gaming for gaming use pc or xbox . who play crap game on mobile . android people like cheap service and they are addicted to crap even they cant afford and rely on free service behave like poor beggar on street .
6. cripton805 (Posts: 907; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)
Moto G does have offline navigation. I actually own the phone. How is the lack of a front camera working for you for skype??? Fail. The only thing it really fails on is the lack of micro SD. If you had any type of logic, you would have mentioned that.
7. arenanew (Posts: 132; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)
proof me moto g have offlline are going mad . ha ha moto g have offline map battery will down in 5 minute and no x box live support . throw ur moto g with google in dustbin
11. sprockkets (Posts: 1075; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
There is this thing called the Google Play store where plenty of offline solutions exist. That, and Google maps can still re route offline anyhow.
Oh, and the battery life on the moto g speaks for itself not needing extra batteries.
And microsoft gave xbox live suppport to android simply due to the sheer amount of people using it. I'm sure it isn't the same on wp8 but whatever, you can download it anyhow.
13. cripton805 (Posts: 907; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)
Why would I need to prove anything to you? The information is available on every search engine. Also, that the battery on the moto g is great. I find myself forgetting to charge it. Your lack of common sense to research something is incredible. I'm not missing XBL, why would I? I switched over to PlayStation because of the disgusting greed that follows Microsoft products. Good luck to you now that MS owns Nokia.
8. lucid.brat (Posts: 79; Member since: 09 Sep 2013)
If phone is not for gaming than how gaming app is making 16billion a year....plz not everyone is really gamers Bt it doesn't mean they can not play small games in phones...
10. arenanew (Posts: 132; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)
this all article on paper sale and pc , xbox and ps4 even will sale is physical proof of sale .
22. SuperMaoriBro (Posts: 255; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)
It's good you've tried to learn English but using it badly when you are angry just makes you look stupid. Please stop.
9. rajasasuke (Posts: 8; Member since: 19 Feb 2014)
if there is no motog there is no competition for this phone it will crush the opponents.i thought 525 will get 8
12. Jason78 (Posts: 43; Member since: 10 Apr 2013)
You might have mentioned the that unlike the Nokia 520, the 525 does not have the correct 3G bands for North America. Great for those overseas but useless for people in the USA.
14. 7thspaceman (Posts: 1013; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
Hmm HSN sold a lot of lumia 520's so you can bet the farm Microsoft/Lumia 525 will get the LTE transceiver the 520 has for the American model of this 525 smart phone. The 525 has
1 gig of ram it will need that to run all the Windows phone store apps the Lumia 525 could not run and to to be easily upgraded to Windows phone 8.1 coming this Summer 2014. lik
15. 7thspaceman (Posts: 1013; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
I meant say in the previous content that the 525 has 1 gig of that enables it to smoothly run all the windows phone store apps the "Lumia 520 could not run
20. jose.vu (Posts: 16; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)
this phone in Singapore now is 185sgd~145usd which is much cheaper than than Moto G here (~200usd), I imagine it would be even much cheaper in US, great phone for the price :)
21. Snoobab (Posts: 172; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)
"Pixel density is on the low side"??? the 525 is an entry level device PA
23. fzacek (Posts: 1157; Member since: 26 Jan 2014)
This phone is NOTHING compared to the Moto G. The 525 won't be drawing anyone to Windows Phone, because the Moto G is a way better value at the same price.
24. Jason78 (Posts: 43; Member since: 10 Apr 2013)
I have both a Moto G and a Nokia 521. They are BOTH great phones and a great value.
25. redmd (Posts: 857; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
In my country, Nokia Lumia 525 costs more than half the price of Moto G. So its a compromise. Chris is cute BTW.
|Display||4.0 inches, 480 x 800 pixels (235 ppi) IPS LCD|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 MSM8227, Dual core, 1000 MHz, Krait processor
1024 MB RAM
|Size||4.72 x 2.52 x 0.39 inches|
(119.9 x 64 x 9.9 mm)
4.37 oz (124 g)
|Battery||1430 mAh, 16.9 hours talk time|