Nokia 8600 Luna Review
The phone has a rounded shape and smooth lines, and is colored prevailingly in black, as the only silver parts are the lines around the display and the keyboard, as well as the thin line along the side of the device.
|Model||Dimension (Inches)||Dimension (mm)||Weight (oz)||Weight (Gramms)|
|Nokia 8600 Luna||4.21 x 1.77 x 0.62||107 x 45 x 15.9||4.93||140|
|Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition||4.21 x 1.77 x 0.64||107 x 45 x 16.5||4.9||139|
The first more important improvement in comparison to 8800, which strikes the eye, is the display. It is a TFT, but larger (2 inches), its form is rectangular, rather than square, its resolution is 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA), and it is capable of depicting 16 million colors. It would be a good decision for Nokia designers to include a light-sensitive sensor for regulating the display brightness. However, there is no such censor. Nevertheless, the display can be seen even in bright daylight, therefore irrespective of whether you stay in the dark or in the light, there would be no problem working with the phone. We see that QVGA turns into a standard for resolution for the new models of Nokia of average or high class (6120, 5700, N95), as the only difference is in the diagonal size. It can only make us happy and we can hope that other manufacturers will follow Nokia’s benchmark.
The back is made of stainless steel with a holding, which not only impedes sliding the phone when using it or when having a conversation, but also makes it look more opaque. Here you can find also the 2 mega pixel camera, as it is seen when the phone is open, and hidden and protected the rest of the time. The lens is located at the middle of the phone and is surrounded by a silver line, while in the shiny black part around it, there is nothing else, we don’t see even a flash. When the phone is closed, there is a 1 mm-opening; this is most probably a designer decision, rather than a technological shortcoming.
Opening and closing the phone is done by a spring mechanism, which is very tight and holds the device well closed/open without any irritating loose-fittings or gaps between the two parts. The mechanism is so strong that when opening and closing you hear a clicking sound between the upper and lower part of the phone. Most probably Nokia has not made the mechanism quieter on purpose in order to make stronger the feeling of the customer of owning something different.
There is a small protruding part just under the display. This part supports the thumb when pushing/pulling the upper part. This is another proof that no compromise is made with the quality in favor of the price and that in the course of elaboration and designing even the smallest detail has been taken into account.
Control is entrusted to the five-position navigation button with an internal mirror part, left and right selection keys, as well as a call/end key. It is unusual for Nokia, and quite unlike 8800, that switching on/off is done by the end key and not by a specially-intended button above.
All keys, located on the front side, are backlit in white. When the phone is closed the numerical keyboard switches off. Nokia has made a very interesting effect. Located under the opaque glass, it pulsates with a glowing light at equal intervals (almost 10 seconds), thus creating a breathing effect.
The mic is located at the bottom part of the device exactly in the middle, thus ensuring the closest distance to the mouth for best reception of human speech. Just at the opposite side, on top, where we are used to see the on/off button, we can now find only the place for putting a neck or hand string.
Working with the phone is a real pleasure. All buttons are easily pushed without requiring any strength and have a great tactile feedback. It is a little bit harder to push the navigation button upwards because the distance from it to the protruding part above is small and you have to push by the your fingertips or, even better, with a nail.
1. tartakovsky (unregistered) posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:55 0 0
Apart from design and display that scored 10 and 8 respectively, other categories got 7 and below, SO WHY IS IT THAT THE OVERALL RATING OF THIS PHONE IS 9????????. Phonearena should do some explaining on what category that most matters to them. I did some recomputation and IF phonearena intended that each category is equally important, then the overall rating should've have been 6.7. In order to reach an overall rating of 9, given the individual category ratings, Phonearena would have regarded DESIGN as 18 times more important than the other catogeries, which is bullshit. Make a computation yourselves.
6. wizzjizzer (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2011, 11:02 0 0
relax ur math is correct, however, the nokia 8xxx are design phones so what is wrong with grading it more stringently on design. we all know aura and 8xxx have nothing to do with groundbreaking tech, only breathtaking, mind-blowing design.
Last week i saw a film, as i recall it was a horror film. I walked outside into the rain, checked my 8600 and i jizzed in my pants.
7. wizzjizzer (unregistered) posted on 21 Jun 2011, 11:04 0 0
(stereo) jizz in my pants
yes i jizz in my pants
2. tartakovsky (unregistered) posted on 19 Aug 2007, 22:55 0 0
I checked the SE P1i review and the phone got the ff scores: Design: 10 Display: 9 Camera: 8 Sound quality: 7 Battery: 7 Connectivity: 8 Multimedia: 7 Organizer: 8 If you can see, P1i got higher scores in each category (except design, which is equal) compared to Nokia 8600.....BUT P1i got an overall rating of 8.5?????????????????????? And not to mention PRICE/FEATURES ratio. What the heck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3. Andre (unregistered) posted on 31 Aug 2007, 11:27 0 0
It's amazing, how this phone get 9 of rating!!! Signal is a shit - " it is recommended during conversation to hold the phone so that you do not cover it, otherwise you can impede the reception". The single point for a nokia's phones is in your software.
4. Stanislav (unregistered) posted on 04 Nov 2007, 03:32 0 0
Guys, i think you have no conception of the rating. It's SUBJECTIVE. So read the (?) in the rating box and you will probably understand. Greetings!
5. anubhav2412 (unregistered) posted on 14 Dec 2007, 10:33 0 0
All those of you who are confused by the supposedly strange rating have not taken the time to point their cursor at the small question mark next to the "excellent" rating given to the phone, it clearly states " PhoneArena overall rating is the subjective mark for the device as a whole. For example, if one is targeted to the fashion-cautious user it may score low on its multimedia and organizer, but still get very high overall rating." So next time all of you look before you leap.