Motorola Photon 4G vs. HTC EVO 3D
If 3D matters to you than the EVO is your phone, but if not then read on for a more detailed comparison. The EVO 3D uses dual 5MP cameras to capture its 3D images, but of course can shoot in 2D mode as well with just one of those cameras. We found results to be above average but not spectacular for a device of this nature. Under proper lighting conditions results were quite good but it did not do so well in low light situations. HTC offers a lot of control with the camera, which we appreciate. It can shoot videos in 720p, but like past HTC devices isn’t very good at doing so.
8-megapixel camera on the Motorola Photon 4G takes decidedly better images than the EVO 3D with plenty of detail and accurate color reproduction. It loses some of its luster in low light situations despite the dual LED flash, but this is a phone not a camera so we can’t dock it too much. HD video capture at 720p was much better than the EVO 3D. The one drawback is that there is very little user adjustment with Motorola’s camera software so what you have is pretty much what you get.
Motorola Photon 4G Sample Video:
HTC EVO 3D Sample Video:
Both devices handle all types and resolutions of video we threw at them. The EVO 3D has the advantage of being able to play 3D content. For those who have problems with 3D pictures, they found the movie mode to be much more pleasing.
Motorola and HTC have included more comprehensive music players than the stock options. The HTC player holds true to the Sense philosophy with sliding “tabs” along the bottom for artists, albums, playlists, songs, genres and composers. With SRS sound was actually pretty good from the single speaker in the back and was equally good thorough headphones.
Motorola’s music player incorporates your library, podcasts, internet radio and FM radio into the interface, so it wins points for easy convergence. It interestingly pulled its own artist images for our music library. The Photon 4G’s speaker is louder than the EVO 3D, but the EVO had better quality sound. The Motorola player has suggested internet radio stations, YouTube videos and news articles based on what you’re listening to. In terms of overall layout they are both good, but the Motorola Photon 4G offers a more comprehensive experience from all media angles.
All of that said, neither support Google Music Beta and we found ourselves installing the inferior music player on both devices for the convenience of streaming our music from the cloud.
1. pandamaja (unregistered)
One very important feature of the photon I didn't see mentioned is that its global GSM
59. NeXoS (Posts: 288; Member since: 03 May 2011)
Can you guys test to see which phone can phone book sync with older Bluetooth 2.x cars? All these phone makers are so quick to rush to the latest tech, Bluetooth 3.x, without really testing for backwards compatibility.
2. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4847; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
So Qualcomm's S3 Snapdragon processor is THE better chip compared to NVIDIA's Tegra 2. Wow & everyone says that Qualcomm's chips were the worst. I always knew the S3 was a sick chip plus the Adreno 220 GPU is completely bada$s when playing games. I can't wait to get CM7 on my HTC Evo 3D so I can really put the phone through its paces. I really want to overclock the HTC Evo 3D to 1.8 to 2.0 GHz & see that beast really fly. From what I read when the phone is at 1.5 to 1.8 GHz the battery life is not impacted too drastically, but on 2.0 GHz they do see a real battery difference. I just can't wait. I already rooted my phone, now I am waiting to get some sweet ROMS. I am so glad I got the HTC Evo 3D, I have NEVER been more satisfied with a phone. This is a CLEAR WINNER!
9. HTCiscool (Posts: 449; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)
Basically if you run Linpack on all of them it clearly shows that in terms of pure oomph, The S3 is actually better than the Exynos. The problem is that Applications must be optimized to make use of its full power, with Exynos and Tegra ll however, both cores are automatically used simultaneously. The Quadrant scores that you and I take on our HTC's rarely exceed 2400 because They are only using one 1.2GHz core. I'm really looking forward to overclocking mine too XD
10. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4847; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
FINALLY someone who understands. To get a Quadrant score of 2300 to 2400 on 1 core is insane. The Exynos & Tegra 2 chips get higher only on 2 cores. Imagine the Quadrant score if BOTH cores were running at the same time like the Exynos & Tegra 2 chips. Yes HTCiscool, I can't wait for CM7 or MIUI with an overclocked dual-core at 1.5 to 1.8 GHz. Man I am salivating! lol :-) I love HTC phones, their developer support is second to none!
11. Niners13 (unregistered)
You are both COMPLETELY clueless.
Quadrant only supports one Core.
Snapdragon is just a turd, there is nothing to "understand". A8 based cortex is ancient.
@1.8ghz it's still weak and barely keeping up with Tegra 2 @1.0ghz
You notice all the Tablets are still using Tegra 2 even Samsung not some crummy Snapdragon.
Exynos, Omap, Tegra 2, all better
14. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4847; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
Dude Quadrant doesn't just run one core, it sees the dual-cores of the Exynos, OMAP, & Tegra 2 as 1 core because it hasn't been updated to recognize both cores. Exynos, OMAP, & Tegra 2 use BOTH cores at the same time not 1 core as you said. Qualcomm's S3 Snapdragon is the only chip that uses 1 core at a time & only uses the other core when needed. That is why it's great on battery life. The S3 is an asynchronous dual-core chip, while the Exynos, OMAP, & Tegra 2 are synchronous. Here is a link so you can better understand the difference from asynchronous vs. synchronous multi-core chips.
19. IEatApples (Posts: 66; Member since: 06 Jul 2011)
nah your wrong quadrant uses 1 core on all dual core phones. Why do you s3 users never speak of smartbench 2011 benchmarks, which is known to utilize both chips in all dual cores including the s3. the results are the same, lower benchmarks. Its a good chip but as usual qualcomm is trailing the rest of the pack.
20. Thump3rDX17 (Posts: 2160; Member since: 10 May 2010)
i can't blame you for wishful thinking based on the little bit you know but you need to think for a minute, how is one A8 Scorpion Core as fast as Dual A9 Cores with different kinds of SoC? i understand the Qualcomm MSM8660 (S3) is asynchronous but as you said Quadrant reads both cores as one because it's not calibrated for Dual-Core handsets but it's not like the MSM hides away the other core under lock & key from Quadrant when it does Benchmarks. they all behave as Quadrant wants them to whether it knows it's Dual-Core or not. the MSM8660 simply uses an inferior processor infrastructure which is ARM Cortex-A8 (or was it A7? help me out here remixfa, we just figured it out in another discussion.) whereas the Exynos & the OMAP uses ARM Cortex-A9 processors and i know for a fact the OMAP uses a power management cycle itself without it having to be asynchronous. i mean the proof is in the pudding. the battery life on an LG Optimus 3D or a Galaxy S II isn't so drastically different from an EVO 3D or a Sensation being that they're supposedly running both cores at 100%, 100% of the time the phone is being used. like Alan here from PA says take the scores with a grain of salt because they aren't 100% accurate but from what Quadrant understands phones with OMAP processors and certainly phones with Exynos are faster and that's what you're getting from normal use. the rest is up to how polished the interfaces are which in most cases it is Sense 3 but i've seen for myself evidence of lag on the Sensation.
24. thatoneguy.... (unregistered)
you seem to know alot about phone processors so could you tell me why the hell htc only uses Qualcomm chips???
25. Thump3rDX17 (Posts: 2160; Member since: 10 May 2010)
because they're having sex? i dunno. i just know what i know from light research and discussions.
27. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4847; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
Hey Thump3rDX17, you know way more about this than I do. I guess what you are saying is these Quadrant scores are NOT 100% correct. What I thought was that the S3 chip (which are underclocked to be 1.2 GHz because it really was a 1.5 GHz chip) would be faster than the newer 1.0 GHz chips from OMAP & Tegra 2. (I excluded the Exynos chip because it is 1.2 GHz & it’s the most powerful one.) I know S3 runs on the A8 technology, but at 1.2 or 1.5 GHz I thought it would be faster than a 1.0 GHz OMAP or Tegra 2 using the newer A9 technology. From what you are saying I guess it’s wrong. So my understanding of the topic was completely wrong. Hey I am a man & I can completely admit that. You can explain things in a manner that doesn’t make me feel stupid. Thank you now I know more about the topic than I did before. That is why I like having discussions with you. You can educate in a positive way, some people would argue with you EVEN if they are wrong. I know when I am right & I also know when I am wrong. My understanding was flawed but now I know better. Thanks for making me see the light! lol :-)
29. HTCiscool (Posts: 449; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)
Quadrant is not accurate for representing the full potential of the CPU that would be for Smartbench 2011 and Linpack. Ironically however, the scores on Linpack represent the number of MFLOPS per second, so in essence, its like its performance on paper without any regard to the GPU. Smartbench 2011 and Quadrant, test the GPU as well, this is the part where the S3 lags, the GPU is nothing compared to an Exynos or Hummingbird chip. My conclusion is, Overall Exynos and Tegra ll are better chips with better Graphics processing units, but the S3 excels in terms of pure power. I've seen a desire HD reach over 1900 with its S2 1GHz core. It makes Sense that the Sensation can top it with one 1.2GHz core and an upgraded Graphics unit. and thats what Quadrant reads. Most of you will just yell at me for being a wishful thinking fanboy with a phone with an underpowered processor but I stand my ground.
30. Thump3rDX17 (Posts: 2160; Member since: 10 May 2010)
i think "excels" is quite an over statement. in which case you can clearly see the Galaxy S II is a much snappier device and the benefit of it's juicy GPU is just icing on the cake.
the S2 and the Hummingbird excelled with their GPU in the Single Core wars. if i did a Quadrant test on say a Droid 2 which has an OMAP3630 processor with GPU as good as what's found on an S2 then theoretically it will be in the 1800-1900 range as well. the S2 wasn't really a bad processor but it came much too late and only came in Devices that were faced with dual-core packing devices either about to be or already on the market. the single core war was dead. i can bet a single, evenly clocked Nvidia, OMAP or Exynos core can score better than an S2 core in a S3 set as they're the newer cores built with A9 processors and better GPU but we're not going to see that happen because the cores in the Nvidia, OMAP & Exynos are brand new and can't be tested as single core SoC. the possibility of Quadrant running a test any differently than an Nvidia, OMAP or an Exynos is highly unlikely because there isn't going to be THAT drastic of a difference between the newer cores in the competitors dual-core chip sets and the S2 cores in the S3 series. the means just isn't there so your theory is really just fantasy because even though we know Quadrant isn't optimized for dual-core phones you can just back track and see the scores of slightly older processors and project what the newer scores will be based on the newer manufacturing methods and GPU that they're equipped with.
40. Kin (unregistered)
I've even seen a Desire HD running 3200 with MIUI! 1GHz single core.
31. Thump3rDX17 (Posts: 2160; Member since: 10 May 2010)
i appreciate that you really took the effort to really think about my explanation and not let your pride make you stubborn and ignorant. you know how often people react as such here. thank you, i'm really only trying to help as long as anyone is open to discussion. it doesn't bother me at all when i think someone may be wrong or even when someone proves me wrong it's when people act like annoying d**ks with what they think they know. it's okay, we're all here to learn, i'm still learning a lot myself. this is a tough topic filled with variables.
34. HTCiscool (Posts: 449; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)
I know its an old core, idc as long as it can do web browsing and the likes. I have seen lag on my phone when navigating Sense 3.0 however, I don't think they can release Sense 3.5 when 3.0 still isn't optimized. Hopefully the 2.3.4 update will fix that.
35. BH (unregistered)
Its funny how you all act like you developed the SoC's themselves... put away the E-p3nises guys.
3. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
The photon 4g has a pentile display which suck
23. Thump3rDX17 (Posts: 2160; Member since: 10 May 2010)
it's really not bad at all when you get used to it. i don't even notice it any more but you see Phone Arena themselves say that the Photon's screen looks better than the EVO 3D's and if you won't take their word on that then their praise for the processor may also be in question.
7. protozeloz (Posts: 5396; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
Thanks for the comparison :D Love to see two great sprint choices going head to head on a match
8. lubbalots (unregistered)
Comparing oranges to oranges? Why not comparisen Apples to oranges or to Mango, etc.. Makes more sense.
12. Niners13 (unregistered)
I almost burst out laughing at the best of the best at the "hardware"
You mean the opposite?
Weakest of all of the dual-cores.
32. JEEPOFFROADV8 (Posts: 36; Member since: 01 Apr 2009)
thats funny i did the same with your comment. do some research the new msm 8260, 8660 is the strongest dual core. tegra 2 doesnt even support neon. and if you new anything about snapdragon u would know its not a cortex a8 its closer to a a9. it will do some out of order. raw power when both cores are being used.
33. Thump3rDX17 (Posts: 2160; Member since: 10 May 2010)
yeah..you need to read the higher comments.
13. Tmachaveli (Posts: 425; Member since: 01 Apr 2011)
i have the photon and its really a dam good phone.i luv HTC but in my heart i all ways liked Moto.the photon is quicker than u think.i like the webtop feature on the phone it is awesome and the dock for it is pretty cool as well just being able to watch netflix on my tv from my phone is a plus.Both phones are the bomb it up to you on which one you want
21. Thump3rDX17 (Posts: 2160; Member since: 10 May 2010)
dude..i get your point, less caps please? xD
yeah, that's pretty much what set apart the EVO 3D and the Photon with me too was the processor and the Webtop capabilities which i see as a more productive feature than gimmicky 3D.
37. William13 (Posts: 27; Member since: 10 Mar 2011)
Agreed completely, I love HTC much better as a manufacturer and found no single-core phone to even touch my Evo (not necessarily performance wise, but the overall package HTC presented). The big differentiation in this comparison is that HTC chose to go with a gimmick and Moto chose to pack extras we will actually use into the phone, i.e. 16 GB internal storage (I know only 9 is accessible), the webtop dock functionality, and the kickstand (most don't use it but it's really slow at my store so we'll all sit and watch Netflix on our phones between customers so we like the kickstands). Either way though, I don't know why people are so angry about a comparison between 2 phones. If you don't like the 3D, get the Photon, if you don't like the Photon, get the 3D. There's no need to go on PA and post in forums how your phone is the coolest and neatest phone ever and all others totally suck... They're just freaking cell phones, productivity tools people, quick looking at them as status symbols.
16. TOdoubleD (Posts: 114; Member since: 28 Mar 2011)
Great to see that Sprint has 2 great options and a 3rd coming soon from Samsung. And with any luck they will have the iPhone. I'm with PhoneArena, in the end I would pick the EVO 3D.
17. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 1142; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)
I had both phones, and I can tell you the Evo 3D only was better when it came to going from one home screen to the next. The app home screen on the EVO 3D sucked when it comes to scrolling....the EVO 4G app screen is way better no slowing down like the EVO 3D. Speaker wise everyone knows the EVO 3D has a terrible speaker, and the antenna signal makes you wanna puke....is it obvious that I ditched the smoke and mirrors EVO 3D for the Photon; which if 3D don't matter and you want a phone that works the Photon is the obvious choice