x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020

Go to page
Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020

Introduction


Flagship smartphones are in abundance as we speak, as the first half of the year saw some noteworthy models that still continue to turn heads, but the second half is already in full swing with an equally stellar lineup on tap. The Nokia Lumia 1020 has shown us that it’s THE Windows Phone 8 to go to, especially with its impressive 41-megapixel PureView camera in tow. Although the Moto X has yet to arrive officially onto the scene, it’s no doubt already stirring up plenty noise for a device that’s redefining the notion of a flagship device with its simplistic Android experience. Two great smartphones in the landscape no doubt, but it’s going to come down to which one has the greater drawing factor to win the hearts and minds of consumers all around.


Design


Without touching them, our eyes continue to fancy the design of the Lumia 1020 – it’s just not your average looking device, which helps it to tower over the Moto X. Then again, the customizable aspect of the Moto X’s design with Moto Maker will undoubtedly attract those who have a flavor for being different. However, as we grasp the two, it’s instantly recognizable that we favor the Moto X, as its compact size, curved rear casing, and soft touch coating provides the goods to make it more comfortable and natural to hold in the hand. In contrast, the Lumia 1020 is just bulky and top heavy by today’s flagship standards – albeit, it’s sturdier with its unibody matte polycarbonate body.

The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020

The sides of the Motorola Moto X (left, bottom) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right, top)



Display


For flagship devices, some people would think that these are behind the times, especially when they don’t pack that imposing 1080p resolution with their displays. To be frank, there’s not one that’s more than attractive than the other, as they boast all the same qualities. Specifically, it’s a 4.7-inch 720 x 1280 AMOLED display on the Moto X, and a 4.5-inch 768 x 1280 PureMotion HD+ with ClearBlack AMOLED panel on the Lumia 1020. Somewhat notable to mention, the slim bezels on the left/right sides of the Moto X’s display help to make it stand out more, since it helps in contributing to a smaller overall size than the Lumia 1020. Beyond that, everything else seems to be identical with one another – like their wide viewing angles, over-saturated color reproduction, and iridescent glow.

The Motorola Moto X (left) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The Motorola Moto X (left) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020
The Motorola Moto X (left) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right) - Motorola Moto X vs Nokia Lumia 1020

The Motorola Moto X (left) and the Nokia Lumia 1020 (right)





Motorola Moto X 360-Degrees View



Nokia Lumia 1020 360-Degrees View



32 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 16 Aug 2013, 05:24 8

1. Rehankhan (Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


Moto x all the way

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 07:16 2

9. ShenAlJoker (Posts: 100; Member since: 19 Jul 2013)


"Moto x all the way" DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 21:12

22. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


The L1020 sets itself apart by incorporating camera technology that is at least a full generation ahead of the competition...

The Moto-X is a good smartphone, and it does have the advantage of Android OS. However, that is meaningless to somebody who's primary consideration is photography. Fact is that no self respecting photographer enthusiast would ever choose the Moto-X over the Lumia 1020!

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 22:09

23. roscuthiii (Posts: 1801; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)


No self-respecting photography enthusiast would go for the 1020 in lieu of a professional set up. Those that do go for the 1020 will be fewer and further between. Fact is... for a smartphone camera, "good enough" is good enough for most consumers.

posted on 17 Aug 2013, 02:33

26. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


roscuthiii, you make it sound like those of us who are keen about photography have to choose one or the other, which is completely absurd...

If I am willing to spend thousands on my DSLR camera body, as well other accessories, then why on earth would I be content to settle for anything less than the absolute best camera available in a smartphone? Your definition of "good enough" simply doesn't cut it in my books, and the Lumia 1020 is clearly in a league of it's own.

Those of you that are not into photography have no clue about what I'm saying, and those who do will understand that you always choose the best weapon for the job. On those occasions when I don't have a heavy camera body and lens slung around my neck, I want to have the best camera technology available in a mobile device at my finger-tips.

The Nokia Lumia 1020 suits my portable photography needs better than other compromise devices, including the Moto-X, and WP8 OS is no obstacle. Android loving geeks may argue otherwise, but rooting your smartphone and taking quality photographs are completely different, and those who have no genuine interest in photography or art for that matter don't deserve to have the final word about which smartphone is best. The Moto-X is a great device, but it's camera is vastly inferior, and that alone is a deal breaker for me.

posted on 18 Aug 2013, 12:41

29. Ronny666 (Posts: 108; Member since: 08 Jun 2013)


Having knowledge on photography alone don't deserve to have final say about a smartphone, my friend. We are taking about smartphones not cameraphones here. Welcome to 2013. :)

posted on 18 Aug 2013, 21:00

30. iguano (Posts: 101; Member since: 10 May 2012)


lol dude... did you understand what the guy wanted to say?

posted on 24 Aug 2013, 13:09

32. sniper1087 (Posts: 368; Member since: 31 Dec 2011)


That is the main reason why I own both devices, and will be switching between both. they are both great, because of their unique offerings, while nokia gives me the great camera, (which will be used in special occasions) the moto x gives you utility with touchless controls, and active notifications, bigger app selection, I still love the nokia it does have some unique camera apps, and substitution to all other apps I use, the moto is more compact and feels better in the hand. I think both are great and I will still use both from time to time will do the switch.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 05:32 17

2. rigorimpossible (Posts: 22; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)


Lumia 1020 all the way

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 05:52 1

3. BillyBoy (Posts: 18; Member since: 01 Jul 2013)


2 loosers

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 06:30 7

6. user996 (Posts: 181; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)


i see one looser and that's you

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 07:17

10. ShenAlJoker (Posts: 100; Member since: 19 Jul 2013)


AND ONE HOMOSEXUAL!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 13:31 1

20. ZeroCide (Posts: 688; Member since: 09 Jan 2013)


When you enter a comment you don't have to annouce yourself.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 05:59 1

4. valapsp (Posts: 474; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)


Nexus 5 all the way.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 06:25 1

5. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 1296; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


Can't wait for the vs Honami comparison

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 06:49 1

7. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 2625; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)


Moto X for Android and 1020 for Camera + everything ;).

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 07:03 4

8. mousesports (Posts: 251; Member since: 28 Feb 2013)


Lumia 1020 FTW !!!

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 07:23 3

11. RobotMan (Posts: 125; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Nokia look ugly.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 07:39 3

12. Packer29 (Posts: 56; Member since: 10 Sep 2011)


Moto X beats the 1020 overall imp!

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 09:07 5

16. tashreef (Posts: 476; Member since: 24 Nov 2012)


please mention some? and please don't lag...

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 08:02 7

13. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 819; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


One of the few cases where I'd pick the WP. The Moto X is nothing but a mid range phone being sold at a premium price, I'd rather take a Lumia1020 knowing that I'm getting something incredibly unique.

posted on 17 Aug 2013, 09:16

27. Dro (Posts: 27; Member since: 23 Dec 2009)


A mid-ranged phone that doesn't stutter like the GS4. One can only imagine if Motorola uses the more expensive chips like the 600 & 800 along with their x8 system and optimizations.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 08:02 1

14. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 819; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


One of the few cases where I'd pick the WP. The Moto X is nothing but a mid range phone being sold at a premium price, I'd rather take a Lumia1020 knowing that I'm getting something incredibly unique.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 08:19 1

15. papss (unregistered)


I have the 1020 and its pretty darn nice. I also like this motox it wish it moved with something that I fine a compelling reason to get it over other flagships. Android is a turn off for me personally but do like the motox

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 10:11

17. jimjam (Posts: 238; Member since: 28 Jun 2011)


I could have written your review in two lines:
Lumia 1020 has the best camera by far
moto x has android though so wins

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 10:18 2

18. papss (unregistered)


You mean you could have written your opinion.. A real reviewer leaves their opinion out.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 15:48 1

21. jimjam (Posts: 238; Member since: 28 Jun 2011)


I was summarizing this guy's review. I've never used either so do mot offer any opinion.

the point was that with a lumia vs android that is usually the end summary from reviewers. Lumia has better camera but andoid is better than wp so wins.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 22:13

24. roscuthiii (Posts: 1801; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)


No reviewer can perform a review without their subjective opinion. If you want the reviewer's opinion left out, all you have left is a spec sheet. And those don't always tell the whole story.

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 11:09

19. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1141; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


is that real carbon fibre on motoX?

posted on 16 Aug 2013, 23:59

25. AlHaptismMY (Posts: 1; Member since: 16 Aug 2013)


for design maybe i choose Moto X. really superb
but for photography i still consider Lumia 1020

posted on 17 Aug 2013, 13:37

28. freeze360 (Posts: 3; Member since: 17 Aug 2013)


Last month, i was visiting one palace. On the inside, no cameras are allowed except phones. On that time if i have lumia 1020, how lucky i would be.

posted on 22 Aug 2013, 18:58

31. shahulvm (Posts: 116; Member since: 01 Apr 2012)


moto x is good, yet i would prefer the lumia 1020 just for its photography prowess

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories