Motorola DROID Review
Sure the Motorola DROID has a physical QWERTY keyboard you can use to dish out a quick text message, but the on-screen ones seemed just as capable of accomplishing the same feats. We're quite astounded with how responsive it has become with little or no mistakes made during the typing process and the predictive text will aid in figuring out what you're trying to type. There are several suggestions that the phone will generate to best guess what you're saying – even better it will automatically enter the correct word after you press the space bar. In the past, we've sometimes seen the on-screen QWERTY lag and cause you to slow down – you won't even miss a beat with this one luckily. One minor problem that we noticed when speed typing is the tendency to accidentally activate one of the four touch-sensitive buttons. We've experienced hitting the home screen button a few times, which resulted in some minor frustrations. Overall, we're thoroughly impressed with the usability of both the portrait and landscape keyboards and the phone's ability to predict text. If neither of the on-screen keyboards float your boat, you can always rely on using the hardware QWERTY which provides a more accurate input method.
messaging application is broken down to each contact and is displayed in a threaded view. You can even attach a variety of media files to make it an MMS. The interface is simple to use with just about anyone picking up on it without too much complications.
GMail is obviously the default email provider on the Motorola DROID, but fortunately you can add POP, IMAP and Microsoft Exchange accounts. Eclair now places all your messages to one single inbox and color codes them so you know exactly which one is from which account. When viewing the inbox, the color is displayed on the outer left side of the message – we would've preferred having the entire message highlighted in the particular color to make it a bit easier to differentiate. If you can't stand having to see all your messages displayed in a single inbox, you can simply select a specific mail account by pressing the menu key.
Setting up most email accounts a simple process requiring your email address and password. From there, it will look up the specific settings for each provider and automatically start retrieving your messages. If it can’t automatically configure, it will ask you for the detailed settings, such as POP3/SMTP/IMAP servers and Port numbers. One odd thing that did frustrate us was the phone's inability to setup Yahoo! – it just kept on giving us a message that the email address and password were incorrect. You'll have to manually set up the account which is the process users will have to deal with when setting proprietary accounts.
The only instant messaging client to be found installed is Google Talk. With the Android Market in full swing, we were able to download a variety of clients that were free, such as AIM,so we weren't too upset with only Google Talk being offered initially.
It's almost hard to believe that Android has branched out from T-Mobile and is now in the hands of the largest wireless provider in the US. The Motorola DROID is a dual-band CDMA (800/1900 MHz) handset with high speed data connectivity through 3G EVDO Rev A or Wi-Fi. It would have been nice if it were a world phone, working on GSM networks alongside CDMA, but maybe we can hope for this next time.
With the HTC Hero already sporting multi-touch and Flash integration in its web browser, we knew that those were not to be expected on the DROID and just hoped to have a decent web experience. If it weren't for the Hero's release, we would say that the DROID's browsing experience to be tops in the Android market. The Motorola site states that the current browser supports the HTML5 standard, and that Flash 10 is expected the first half of 2010. As far as improvements go with the DROID, pages loaded fairly quick, with a zoomed out view at first, but most text is obviously too tiny to view, but the high resolution screen still enables them to be distinguishable. Pages render correctly with both text and images loading properly as they would on a desktop counterpart. Zooming in can be done by double tapping a specific area and conversely zoom out by doing the same, or by using the on-screen zoom icons – there's a transition effect to give it a nice look. For the most part, the browser is much snappier than the one on the Hero – you can really see it when you scroll throughout the web page. To our enjoyment, the phone was almost instantaneous when switching from portrait to landscape view. We suspect the slightly faster processor and Android 2.0 to be behind the great experience we had with the web browser.
You're going to place your trust in the hands of Google when you use the Motorola DROID. Almost all your information will be entrusted to them because you'll have support through either Microsoft Exchange Server and Google.
1. jmill75 posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:55 1 0
Seemed like a pretty unbiased review for the most part, but how in the hell are you going to knock the score down so low because of the battery, you mean running multiple apps at once all day affects battery...... really really......and compare it to phones that dont even offer multi-tasking,strange. You had me till that point.
36. vmatikov posted on 05 Nov 2009, 21:57 0 0
ya phone arena's scoring is horseshit. like seriously... because the droid seems like an awesome phone. sure it has flaws... but what doesn't? i rly dislike what they base their criteria on. it makes no sense at all.
62. Dadler22 posted on 10 Nov 2009, 15:02 0 2
It was a good idea, but motorola made it, and honestly if there was a phone that was a 9.5 and it was made my motorola, i would knock of a point just because i knew that it was american crap.
2. seebeatty posted on 31 Oct 2009, 08:21 0 0
Yeah, I don't get this score at all!! The scores for the Storm2, Imagio, and TP2 all rank 9 or above and you come forward with this? Hmmm,... I think I smell bias even if you didn't write it into the review.
38. Phoney posted on 06 Nov 2009, 11:07 0 0
IMO I think the others were too high. I tried out my friend's DROID this morning... I had such high expectations and desires for this phone, but the first impression didn't meet them :(. I agree with the PA ranks.
3. idiotwind13 posted on 31 Oct 2009, 11:27 2 0
Does anybody read the "How we rate" section of the page? The numbers aren't really meant to be put up against each other for phones that are in different classes, but rather what they are saying is "How squarely did this manufacturer hit the nail on the head with respect to what they were trying to do?". The newest iPhone is rated lower than the enV Touch, do you really think that they are saying the Touch is a better phone? the Storm2, Imagio and TP2 are not the same type of phone as the Droid, even though they are all smart phones, they are trying to accomplish very different things. Not saying that there is not some bias in the reviews, but just because a certain phone gets a slightly lower score doesnt mean that was the case here. This seems to me to be a very fair review, and accurate, I've had my hands on one and I think everything PhoneArena had to say is quite accurate in this case. Though I do agree that a dig on battery life is not really fair, especially considering it "lasts only a day", that is pretty standard for the type of phone it is.
37. vmatikov posted on 05 Nov 2009, 21:58 1 1
tbh.. if you read their reviews... you wouldn't want ANY phone. nothing is ever good... and the comparison and scoring criteria is bullshit.
42. sgtslayer321 posted on 08 Nov 2009, 02:53 0 0
I can say that this phone is great! I own it. I also owned the Imagio before this and took it back. The Imagio had horrible battery life much worse than the Droid and the Imagio got a better score. That just goes to show that they favor HTC phones. I'm not saying they are that bad but this phone is in a hole other ball park than the Imagio. I know I tried the 2 of them out. P.S. They did the same thing with the omnia2
5. JASON666 posted on 31 Oct 2009, 15:24 0 0
Maybe I'll get an unlocked. 2yrs.+Data plan services still dont add up that well does it.....just my thought.
72. haste_the_day posted on 27 Dec 2009, 06:19 1 1
because people are sick of complaints about data plans? get over it already. you pay for what you get. Now if you want to spend 29.99 a mo. w/ Att, then you get less haha. But honestly, i work for VZW and every day people call in and complain about data plans being a requirement for a phone like this.... like VZW is suppost to put BILLIONS back into the network, set up plans for LTE, and not charge you to use it? a dollar a day for most reliable 3G dosnt seem like alot to me at all... So to answer you question as to why -6 (soon to be -7 after i vote) its bc of the ranting about plans.....GET OVER IT.
6. luisandres58 posted on 31 Oct 2009, 15:32 0 0
In all of the reviews so far, be it PA, Engadget, etc..I see a lot of nickpicking...ugly, KB cramped, you could say the same things about all of the phones...I think that is a matter of choice....I loved the Glyde with the small KB, the only thing was the problems with the touchscreen...I have the Dare now....KB is also cramped...I have the iTouch and I still make mistakes while typing....I think that I'm getting the Droid....it sure looks promising.....was hoping for the HTC Passion, but it looks that is gonna take a while before it shows up. People there isn't the perfect phone.....
73. haste_the_day posted on 27 Dec 2009, 06:21 0 0
to be honest,i though the same thing about the keypad (physical) until i tried it. It take a bit of getting used to, and, as i have huge thumbs, is still a bit clumbsy, but overall alot better than just a touch screen.
7. vzw fanman posted on 31 Oct 2009, 17:51 0 0
i'm totally getting this phone. it looks like it has endless possibilities!!!! good bye crapple iphone and my crappberry storm!
43. sgtslayer321 posted on 08 Nov 2009, 02:58 0 0
ya I had the storm before and this blows it away but I can say the storm did have good email
8. Miacol posted on 01 Nov 2009, 08:37 0 0
This would be a great phone if it was on the GSM networks, the CDMA single use network is a killer. I want to be able to surf and talk on the phone at the same time. Does anyone if a US GSM/3G will become available?
54. Fair&Balanced posted on 08 Nov 2009, 13:11 0 0
Just to be safe you might want to wait until its equivalent is produced by a reputable manufacturer.
9. lennydude posted on 01 Nov 2009, 09:49 1 0
QUOTE: "but how in the hell are you going to knock the score down so low because of the battery, you mean running multiple apps at once all day affects battery...... really really......and compare it to phones that dont even offer multi-tasking,strange. You had me till that point." END QUOTE. Exactly ! This type of "comparison" review is really BS. Phone Arena could have easily rated the battery on 2 levels, normal use and multitasking use. Why rate a phone so low based on something that is a very positive feature of the phone? Phone Arena really should change the review..........of course they will not..............being iPhone lovers.
70. destardi posted on 24 Nov 2009, 10:12 0 0
You're a tool and a douchebag rolled into one; that's pretty amazing. FYI - Droid - 24% of the Android market in just over 2 weeks. I guess you suck at knowing what's up. Good luck with that!
74. haste_the_day posted on 27 Dec 2009, 06:39 0 0
or maybe you dont have anything constructive to add to the conversation? seriously? wow...
10. Vandro posted on 01 Nov 2009, 12:04 0 0
Interesting to see the knock on battery life when BGR claims more than ample performance for a days use. I charge every night, so that isn't a problem. And, firmware update. Still looks like the best offering on Verizon, and probably my first smartphone buy. Droids DO do it better.
11. hockeyfreakb4 posted on 01 Nov 2009, 15:55 0 0
wow.... so biased.... your only three cons were because; 1. it CAN multitask, so you DO, and YOU run the REMOVABLE battery down... your an iphone lover so how about you get an extra battery, something your phone cant do... 2. your too stupid to avoid the touch sensitive buttons. 3. lose some weight and maybe your fat fingers will fit on the keyboard.... and, you talk throughtout the review as if this phone is better than the htc hero, yet the htc hero got a 9 on almost everything, especially the places where the droid beats it.... and sound, cmon, dont knock the volume just it goes to high for your baby ears... turn it down... design, you say its quality built and you give in an 8.5.. you gave the hero a better one and this one is built way better.... camera, the droids camera is obviously 10x better than the hero and you gave them relatively the same score... multimedia, ok what it ships with isnt that great as far as music, but everything else is great and you can download even better stuff in the app store.... and organized, who gives a $H!t if it comes with a freaking voice recorder or the other usless stuff no one ever uses... if u really want it, pick from the plentiful apps for free in the market... most biased review i have ever read... no wonder i prefer phonedog.com
13. JonMayer posted on 01 Nov 2009, 19:15 0 0
I wouldn't be as harsh, but this review is one of the worst I have seen. I just wanted to say Amen brother! The original iPhone's camera got a rating of 7.5... That piece of crap camera in the original iPhone got 0.5 better than the DROID? The battery rating is just BS if they pounded the hell out of the phone and it actually lasted all day. Plus, go buy a second battery if you are worried about long weekend trips to the Australian outback or some crap where you somehow can't find a USB socket. I used to look to phone arena for generally good reviews and now I will take anything posting here with a grain of salt. I registered just today so I could share my complaint with this terrible score.
25. koustik posted on 02 Nov 2009, 21:06 0 0
The reviews are based on the technology at the time of its release, of course you would only know that if you read the little "how we rate" link. PS: its ok, alot of people that come here forget to notice that little link.
32. idiotwind13 posted on 04 Nov 2009, 15:26 0 0
Don't tell anybody that- notice the flaming i took from pointing out that nobody pays attention to what the number actually means. It's not an absolute scale, but don't try to bring up that. It is unfair to say that the battery gets drained by multitasking, but that doesn't necessarily mean that a very good score of 8.5 is unfair or biased. The 0-10 scale is relative, not an absolute. But nobody wants to hear it.
41. efarmdog posted on 07 Nov 2009, 23:03 0 0
"The original iPhone's camera got a rating of 7.5" - Right, that was how long ago? Technology better have evolved by now... it's been a while.
45. sgtslayer321 posted on 08 Nov 2009, 03:05 0 0
but thats what peole see when they go to check the phone out on this sight not to mention they see other(smarphones) that aren't that good with higher ratings
12. Windsponge posted on 01 Nov 2009, 16:54 0 0
I just want to say a few things. One they gave Pre a 9.9 and its battery is far worse than Droid. I have a an I phone 3gs and it is a great phone but if I use it hard as they did the droid for test it would not even last a whole day. 12 hours at best.It also took three updates to correct issues with it. I have both Verizon and ATT. I am a little sick of phonearena being so unfair in there reviews. I read everything I can find on cell phones and feel this phone is finally going in the right direction for Verizon. I have Pre Ordered at Best buy and cant wait to use this phone. After using and giving a fair use I will then give my review here. Looks at least as good as I phone Much better than Pre. Come on Phone Arena Pre 9.9 and Droid just a 8.5. Funny thing I phone 3gs was 8.5 and it got much better reviews from people who accually use the phones. Pre was way less and build was junk. Droid by all accounts is built great. Just my view.
66. weedalin posted on 22 Nov 2009, 22:30 0 0
sigh . . . These ratings aren't absolute or conclusive, merely relative, which you would have known, had you read the 'how we rate' link on the review. The ratings are all relative based on the current competitor set and the technology available. They DON'T serve as an absolute rating for all phones.
14. mr. anderson posted on 01 Nov 2009, 22:02 0 0
i dont see what the big fuss about this phone is. android 2.0 is its biggest selling point, and its already unofficially available on the tmo g1. htc has said it is coming to the hero, and the sense ui is the best thing android has going for it. the droid may have a huge screen, but a huge screen means a huge bulge in my pocket. about 2/3 of the reviews ive read say the keyboard is blah, and some go as far as to say the onscreen one is better. like the storm, this seems like a product of vzws marketing rather than an honest-to-goodness great product. the eris, once updated to 2.0, looks to be where its at for vzw customers.
16. secondcor517 posted on 02 Nov 2009, 07:49 0 0
you say big screen means big bulge in your pocket, if you review the measurements or even the comparisons with other phones you will see that this phone is basically the same size as the iphone.
18. shgam2 posted on 02 Nov 2009, 12:01 0 0
yea I agree lol and when I said it before, people flamed like crazy but seriously, whats up with these people? they just click - whenever they see a negative comment about the phone lol. Sorry I meant a non-positive comment. I'm sure more than half of them haven't even got the chance to use the phone or seen the phone in real life. Apparently it's the first android phone in vzw I heard.. I guess it's a big deal for them but not for many of us who arent with vzw.
15. PhoneArena Team posted on 01 Nov 2009, 22:37 0 0
We appreciate everyone's comments regarding the Droid. As we have only had it a couple days, we will continue to use it, and will make any changes to the review or ratings that we feel are necessary. We will be power-cycling the battery several times and will see how much time we then get using it. -Thank you.
47. sgtslayer321 posted on 08 Nov 2009, 03:19 0 0
come onyou got to admit thow the battery isn't all that bad. I got this phone and have been so excited that I messed with it nonstop so far and the battery was know worse than the storm maybe better and was much better than the Imagio. I really liked the video review but the final rating just doesn't seem right. It is what everyone will look at before they go to buy it and the phone is absolutely in the top three phones in the united states (maybe) even the best.
17. shgam2 posted on 02 Nov 2009, 10:07 0 0
It seems like a lot of supporters here. Seriously though, the people wrote the review have had the chance to use the phone and this is what they came up with. I'm sure they have done all the tests and etc before writing the review and they probably know more about the phone than these supporters. You guys should talk after trying the phone out and you'll know how bad/good the battery life, keyboard, etc are.
19. yhbae002 posted on 02 Nov 2009, 12:20 0 0
This phone looks real nice. Pity its not available in Canada yet. It has pretty much everything I need - CPU speed, high resolution, good volume, sleek look, physical keyboard, etc. For me, Android 2.0 is just more gravy on top - but even without it, the phone still looks good. The reviewer was very harsh on the final score. I looked at the score first them read the review. I was expecting some _significant_ negative comments but couldn't find one. Battery life is ok. I went through HTC Diamond then to the current Magic. I'm sure Droid will outperform battery life of Diamond by a good margin. I (and most others) charge daily. Currently using Hero ROM on Rogers Magic.
20. PhoneArena Team posted on 02 Nov 2009, 14:01 0 0
We've been using the Motorola DROID for a longer period now and in the end decided to bring its battery rating up a bit. We've also taken into consideration the performance of the other CDMA Android phone that's currently out, Sprint's HTC Hero. Having in mind the Hero is capable of delivering about two days of relatively heavy usage, we think the DROID's one day deserves its new rating of 6.5. Thank you for your patience!
48. sgtslayer321 posted on 08 Nov 2009, 03:23 0 0
still could have been a little better but thats just my opinion but I think that is really cool to give it a second chance.
21. narley posted on 02 Nov 2009, 16:34 0 0
i say we have a open vote. say yay or nay if you believe they should retest or atleast rescore this device. the cons are pretty pitiful and gimmes with every single smartphone/touch screen out there.... come on phone arena, really?
22. narley posted on 02 Nov 2009, 20:45 0 0
.... along with that. you gave the storm 2 camera a 7.5 which is only a 3.2 mp and has never been very responsive and doesnt have the dual flash. how do you justify giving a 5 mp with a higher resolution screen a lower score?
23. koustik posted on 02 Nov 2009, 21:01 0 0
I should be the first to be the first to tell you that sadly the storm 2 has better picture quality than this phone. The color shows better on the storm 2. FYI: just because 5mp sounds better, it only makes the pictures bigger. And the storm 2 actually has a brighter flash than the dual flash, which is quite peculiar.
26. LGVX1993 posted on 03 Nov 2009, 05:18 0 0
So was I. The regular android UI isnt appealing to me.
27. testman22 posted on 03 Nov 2009, 08:47 0 0
Going with everyone else, this score is truly absurd... Each one of the cons listed are completely ridiculous. I could go into debunking every incorrect con they mention, but I'll just say this- The Droid is truly a revolution (notice phonearena even uses the word revolution themselves). The design is different, with an air of functionality that not many phones have. And the possibilities of the android platform on the best carrier are endless. I'm not claiming the phone is perfect. Yes the keyboard may be a bit cramped, and it lacks the physical send/end button. (Know what phone doesn't have a keyboard at all, or any send/end buttons? hmm...) And of course the media synchronization is a big miss. But all in all, for a first generation, the Droid got it right. Sorry Phone Arena, this phone is gonna be huge no matter how hard you try to tamper with its score
28. narley posted on 03 Nov 2009, 11:47 0 0
i say we have a open vote. say yay or nay if you believe they should retest or atleast rescore this device. the cons are pretty pitiful and gimmes with every single smartphone/touch screen out there.... come on phone arena, really?
29. rjt185 posted on 03 Nov 2009, 14:20 0 0
I can't wait for all the user reviews, the score should much better reflect the phone.
30. JasonWood posted on 03 Nov 2009, 20:41 0 0
Ok just an FYI on the Battery issue There are several Apps on you can download to conserve your Battery power. Just look on the Android Market place.
33. Griz posted on 05 Nov 2009, 12:18 0 0
This is a tough one for me since up until now I've been very much the opposer of Motorola products. But now, having handled the device and having had a chance to utilize alot of the features including Android Market, I'd have to say its a top-performer. Having the keyboard is nice and the web is lightning-quick. The device is very heavy but i think the benefits of having a dual-processor and the Google 2.0 OS certainly outweigh their impact on battery life and chassis weight. As compared to the Eris, however, this one is tough. The Eris has more of a Palm Pre feel while opening new web pages and interacting with its 7 home screens (page preview) which adds to the ease of use over Motorola's list view style and choppier navigation through its 3 home screens. I personally dig the "Andy Warhol" mode in the photo customization menu; gotta check that out! Expect the launch of both Droids tomorrow to be big! Nice work Motorola....finally!!
35. narley posted on 05 Nov 2009, 17:44 0 0
ya the eris is legit too. id say the biggest difference is the droid is a little bit faster with the better processor, but the Eris does have the seven panels vs droids 3. beside the obvious keyboard vs trackball physically.
34. Mayday3420 posted on 05 Nov 2009, 16:19 0 0
Here is what bothers me about the review. How does the andriod phone on sprint get a higher rating on things when it's newer software. Then they have things that they put on the pros list that only recieved a 7 or 8 in the rankings. Organizer, sprint gets a10 and vzw gets an 8 when it's the same opperating system? Multimedia, sprint gets a 9 and vzw gets an 8 when actually the newer version has more multimedia functions on it? I have no idea how they do reviews here but it's a very poor job they do.