Motorola DROID RAZR vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Motorola DROID RAZR takes the crown here with its excellent call quality – a clear and strong sound both in the earpiece and on the receiving end through the noise-canceling microphones is something in the best traditions of one of the first cell phone companies.
The Galaxy S II also provides for a very good calling experience, with clearly defined voices in the earpiece, and discerning microphones, but the ear-speaker is not as powerful.
Battery life is rated as longer on the Motorola DROID RAZR – 9 hours and 20 minutes of talk time in 3G mode - which is becoming a staple for Moto’s handsets with the power-sipping TI OMAP processor family. Samsung Galaxy S II is also very good at power management – we got 62 hours of standby combined with normal usage from the handset during our review.
You can’t go wrong with any of these two Android powerhouses, as they both offer top class specifications, with large and vivid Super AMOLED displays and capable dual-core processors packed in slim bodies.
The Samsung Galaxy S II is a tad narrower than the RAZR, which makes it more comfortable to operate for some. It is able to capture very good pictures and video with the 8MP camera module, and has the DivX/Xvid video codecs hardwired.
The Motorola DROID RAZR, on the other hand, is extremely thin, but rigid with its metal frame and unique with the Kevlar-woven back. It sports excellent call quality with its distinct and strong earpiece, and uncompromising microphones, but the pictures and video from its own 8MP camera are lacking in comparison with the Galaxy S II.
The handsets are running in a comparable price range, so the choice could very well boil down to personal preferences involving the designs and interfaces.
Motorola DROID RAZR vs Samsung Galaxy S II:
Motorola DROID RAZR vs Samsung Galaxy S II - Performance and Conclusion