Motorola DROID RAZR HD Review
During out testing, we didn’t drop any calls and it showed good signal strength of -91dBm. But when using data connections, we saw 4G LTE signal strength vary between -98dBm and -106dBm when outside, and up to -120dBm inside, which often times would then change over to 3G EVDO on its own. This is not uncommon, as we’ve experienced the same thing on most all of Verizon’s 4G LTE smartphones.
The original Motorola DROID RAZR featured a 1780mAh battery, which was capable of 12.5 hours of talk time. The new DROID RAZR HD comes with a larger 2530mAh battery and we were able to get up to 14 hours of talk time on a full charge, or 3 days of mixed usage. But if you have the need for even more power, you can step-up to the DROID RAZR MAXX HD with its impressive 3300mAh battery
If you are looking at purchasing a high-end Android smartphone from Verizon, your choices are currently the Samsung Galaxy S III or the Motorola DROID RAZR HD (and RAZR MAXX HD), as they offer large 720p HD displays, and are using the 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor for fast performance.
The Galaxy S III may look more stylish and “flashy”, though its plastic construction does have a cheap feeling to it and doesn’t hold up well to abuse. Meanwhile, the DROID RAZR HD is more utilitarian in its appearance, but it is built like a tank with Gorilla Glass on the front, Kevlar backing on the rear, and nano coating inside and out to protect it from the occasional splash of water.
Overall, the DROID RAZR HD is a nice update from last year’s model, and comes in at $199.99 with a 2 year contract, which happens to be the same price as the 16GB version of the Galaxy S III. It appears that Verizon has positioned the price of the DROID RAZR HD in the middle-of-the-road between the DROID RAZR M for $99.99 and the DROID RAZR MAXX HD for $299.99, which offers a larger battery and twice the storage memory. As we get closer to the Holiday season, it will be interesting to see how well the Motorola DROID RAZR HD stands up to other devices that will be coming out, and hopefully it will receive its update to Android Jelly Bean before the Turkey is on the table.
Software version on the reviewed unit:
System version: 0.6.25.XT926
Android version: 4.0.4
Baseband version: VANQUISH_BP_1045.711.53.20P
Kernel version: 3.0.8-00039-g4115279
Build number: 7.7.1Q-144_VQW_S334-25
Build date: Sat Sep 15 2012
Motorola DROID RAZR HD Video Review:
- Excellent build quality
- 4.7” Super AMOLED HD display
- Good call quality
- Camera quality should be better at this price
- Not running Android Jelly Bean out of the box
- Obnoxious push-pin required for SIM and microSD card access
|Carrier||New Contract||Contract Extension||Add a Line||Phone Only|
10. THE-DARK-KNIGHT (banned) posted on 22 Oct 2012, 07:27 2 0
Motorola listens to consumers!- last year people said that the razr was very thin but very wide for a 4.3 inch phone. This year the razr HD has a big display but is still small for a handset with a 4.7 inch display. The edge to edge work with razr M was also very cool. Buti have to admit, Motorolas future phones will never be as thin as the original razr :'-( anyway, I really wanna buy a quad core razr!!!!!! Hurry up Motorola !!! I can't wait!!!
11. bobfreking55 posted on 22 Oct 2012, 07:35 1 0
sorry for the short effortless comment. my sister typed it.
30. AnTuTu posted on 22 Oct 2012, 17:19 1 0
I love Moto, its phones and its build quality.
I really loved when Google bought Moto mobility because I knew something awesome is on the way.
2. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 22 Oct 2012, 06:31 2 5
Take Verizon branding off and it deserves a 9.
5. sorcio46 posted on 22 Oct 2012, 06:54 7 3
Obnoxious push-pin required for SIM and microSD card access
I can't see this con on the iPhones reviews...Why?
29. quickweevil posted on 22 Oct 2012, 16:55 1 0
Because it's also where you access the microSD card and the pin-hole is too small to use a paperclip. It's incredibly inconvenient.
6. PapaSmurf posted on 22 Oct 2012, 06:57 5 3
8.5? It deserves at least a 9 without a doubt.
Who's FAUguy anyways?
21. Brewski posted on 22 Oct 2012, 12:05 2 0
If you recognize the statue of Walt Disney on the home screen you've read a review by FAUguy. He's been around for a few years now, he even had to defend himself recently on a review to these exact comments. He doesn't do many news articles like John V or Mike H but he has plenty of time under his belt with Phone Arena.
8. RORYREVOLUTION posted on 22 Oct 2012, 07:10 2 0
This device would have been so much better looking without that dang Verizon logo on the front. Keep it nice and clean like the sgs3 does but its still just a minor gripe for me.
Tho I would spend the extra 100 for the bigger battery and storage.
9. redmd posted on 22 Oct 2012, 07:21 1 0
Moto build quality is excellent. but their software is meh. really. they haven't come up with a nice camera module either.
13. johnriii posted on 22 Oct 2012, 08:19 1 0
I got a chance to hold this phone the day before they released it. I like it, a lot. it is "built like a tank", and I like that. I was holding an S3 at the same time, and the S3 felt so....cheap. I know the S3 is a great phone, but in my line of work, I need something that doesn't feel like it could snap in half by accident while in my pocket. Unless HTC comes up with something similar, I'll be going with this when I upgrade.
14. lzsbleach posted on 22 Oct 2012, 08:25 1 2
The Galaxy S 3 mini got a higher score than this lol. I cant believe it doesnt have jelly bean; that is sad.
15. kingpet13 posted on 22 Oct 2012, 08:36 3 1
I can't believe how low this phone scored. I don't see what it lacks from the s3, except for RAM. And it makes up for that with Its better battery and IMO superior build. Also I am yet to see a non nexus with JB out of the box, except for Note II, which is the current king of all phones, and if Motorola had done this fist, it would have angered the OEMs. (because google owns Moto if you didn't know) This phone should get a 9, with the Razr maxx HD getting a 9.3-9.5. Sorry about my rage, I just love this phone. We need KingKurogii in here to defend Motorola.
On a completely unrelated note this is my first comment on the ASUS Transformer Pad Infinity.I finally got rid of that terrible iPad. No more ios in my house : )
17. KingKurogiii posted on 22 Oct 2012, 10:57 1 1
this review was done pretty badly. after all these years talking about how you guys wish you had a closer to stock Android experience and you finally get it you knock it for not having all the bloat from other UI's and you guys should've did the HD MAXX in the same review like all the other sites are doing because the HD and the HD MAXX are the same phone but $100 gets you a bigger battery and more memory just like how $100 gets you more memory on the SIII and the iPhone.
18. MorePhonesThanNeeded posted on 22 Oct 2012, 11:16 2 0
8.5 Solid score, just wondering how come the camera and video section were so scant and basically condensed? What's worse is that the reviewer talked about the UI which has been Motorola's scaled back since back on the Droid X, not sure what he means it's not as good as the other OEM UI out there(when they all suck) that doesn't even compute. S-Beam is just Samsung giving their own name to the Android Beam which is also on the Droid Razr HD and it's probably just as clunky to activate and use as on the SGS3.
The cons are interesting, the camera should be better at this price point? Really? Since there are a gaggle of phones at this price point, what on earth does the reviewer mean by such a statement? Camera is a mixed bag would be something to take note of, but not camera should be better, what the hell? That could mean anything, when in your review you state that the camera has auto white balance problems and auto focus doesn't always work on the first tap. That's all fine, sounds like a software issue.
Why on earth is the push pin to remove the sim card and SD card a con? Who on earth removes SIM cards and SD cards that much on a smartphone? Is it because you don't see these devices that much; is that why it's a problem for you? Like you were looking for a con to give the phone to justify your strangely negative but trying to remain objective review.
ICS is a con? Seriously?!?
19. KingKurogiii posted on 22 Oct 2012, 11:44 2 0
it's real funny considering that the iPhone uses the same push pin card door. xD Jelly Bean is so close that ICS should really be a non-issue. i'm rocking Jelly Bean on my M now and it works perfectly.
32. nyuvo posted on 23 Oct 2012, 03:51 1 0
All motorola phones are analysed and given cons for stupid reasons on this site.
Look at the gs3 mini... Look at the explanation on the display portion of the review, they are so optimistic and are trying to talk up something that is bad. They even go as far to say that it is pleasant.
Now look at for example the RAZR i. It has a much higher pixel density with the same display technology yet it just gets slammed to the floor.
They need some sort of moderation on these reviews.
20. Brewski posted on 22 Oct 2012, 11:57 0 0
I just ordered my Maxx HD yesterday and should get it tomorrow.
I still have the grandfathered unlimited data package and the Verizon salesperson was able to keep the unlimited data by adding a line. This way I get the subsidized price and not have to worry about data consumption, especially on an LTE network which will eat way more data than 3G. The only downside to that is I can't use my new phone as a hotspot without paying an added fee. :-(
23. KingKurogiii posted on 22 Oct 2012, 13:01 0 0
i might do that after seeing what's coming over the next few days. o:
22. jaheimRakim posted on 22 Oct 2012, 12:51 0 0
I thought that this was a review?... why are you quoting motorola's talk time, you don't test the battery life yourself? what a joke, you have the most inconsistent reviewing system of them all text sites.
27. FAUguy posted on 22 Oct 2012, 14:55 1 1
We recently finished the talk time test, and it got 14 hours on a full charge.
25. Izzy_V posted on 22 Oct 2012, 13:51 1 3
So after reading this review here are a few things I must point out:
"This is actually the same processor that is found on the Motorola DROID RAZR M and the Samsung Galaxy S III, through the Samsung does have twice the RAM."
The SIM card slot and microSD slot con(s). There is also an apparent color shift when viewing the phone at "extreme angles".
"Overall it works well, through doesn’t support Adobe Flash, but it can be side-loaded and used with other browser" (no the 's' isn't cut off, knowing when to use the singular and plural variants of the word appears to be very hard for this person)
On top of all that he still found time to complain about the almost complete stock ICS feel that Motorola has been trying to implement, which is strange because I haven't heard a single complaint about it until now since people seemed to enjoy them abandoning MotoBlur or any variation of it. Oh yeah, and a lower score than the SGS3 Mini.
Can we get another reviewer, preferably with a brain, please?
28. Brewski posted on 22 Oct 2012, 15:49 5 0
I find most of Phone Arena's articles interesting tend to agree with a lot of what they say but if you don't like their review check out this one by Engadget.
26. Berzerk000 posted on 22 Oct 2012, 14:37 3 1
"Camera quality should be better at this price"
Won't argue with that. Motorola needs to work on their cameras, or just order them from Sony like everyone else.
"Not running Android Jelly Bean out of the box"
How in the world is this a con? I mean, really? I bet if any other manufacturer released a device with ICS at this time you wouldn't have a problem with it. Just because Google acquired Motorola, you think there will be instant results, but that's not how it works. Maybe later in 2013 when Motorola moves to using stock Android that will be the case, but not now.
"Obnoxious push-pin required for SIM and microSD card access"
Oh, you mean like almost EVERY other phone without a removable back plate has? The iPhone, One X, and Optimus G(?) have that, but they weren't docked points for it.
This review was a bit unfair. The Razr HD deserves a 9, just dock a point for the lackluster camera; otherwise, this is a GREAT device.
Excellent build quality
Good spec count
Great signal strength/call quality
Overall, a very well rounded device that should make anyone satisfied.
31. spoily posted on 22 Oct 2012, 21:12 2 2
This phone is not perfect. However, it is unique and innovative from the standpoint of materials and battery life.
What really puzzles me is of the few things the phone is critized for, PhoneArena critizing the sim tray. I had to go back to old iPhone reviews to check if this was consistent, unfortunately I was very disappointed.
The next complaint about Jelly Bean is also maddening. Come on guys, we know the OS update cycle is broken in Android but you can't apply that negative assessment to the manufacturer, even one owned by Google. It takes time, but as always, it is worth the wait. There is nothing dated about ICS compared any competing OSes like iOS and WinPhone 8.
Being critical of Moto's camera implementations is more than appropriate. Concern over form factor/ergonomics is reasonable. I think this review missed the mark.
33. enGet posted on 24 Oct 2012, 21:06 0 0
Ugh... I was considering this until I saw it has an amoled screen... no thanks.
34. KingKurogiii posted on 24 Oct 2012, 21:35 0 0
what's wrong with having an AMOLED display? i like it even if only for the deepest contrasts you can find on a display except for maybe Sony's display, i've forgotten what it's called but it's impressive too.
35. SupermanayrB posted on 25 Oct 2012, 15:28 0 0
uFck what the review says, this phone to me is bangin! I went to the store & looked at it & the Maxx HD & was ready to drop the full retail price on the Maxx HD right then & there. I'm still tempted to do it, but after reading Brewski's comment, I might add a line myself so I can save some money.