x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Motorola ATRIX 2 Review

0. phoneArena 24 Oct 2011, 09:30 posted on

Can you believe that it has been only 9 months since our eyes first feasted upon the Motorola ATRIX 4G and its innovative qualities back at CES? Fortunately for all of us, Motorola is quick to pump out its successor in a timely manner as the Motorola ATRIX 2 is happily finding its niche on AT&T’s lineup right now. What’s especially enticing about the ATRIX 2, unlike some of its rivals, is the simple fact that it’s only sporting a manageable $99.99 on-contract price point...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 09:34 10

1. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


If the Affix 2 scores a 9, I can't wait to see how the RAZR is going to do....

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 10:02 10

4. John.V (Posts: 99; Member since: 27 May 2011)


You really need to factor in the its $99.99 on-contract price right from the start. In comparison, other highly respectable Android smartphones are priced between $200 and $300. Additionally, the ATRIX 2 is very well rounded with its offerings, so I believe its score is more than appropriate.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 10:13 3

6. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


So, price is now trumping features? Maybe PA should just wait 90 days before reviewing a handset - then the scores would be at least 3 points higher (Rolleyes).

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 13:55 10

21. Chance3333 (Posts: 1; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)


If PA waited 90 days before reviewing a handset, not many people would be visiting this website. Price should be one of many factors that goes into a phone's rating.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 11:05

10. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 467; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


Also have to consider the time it is released, even though they aren't that far from eachother.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 20:38 3

31. cheetah2k (Posts: 1594; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)


Any Quadrant Scores PA??

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 09:52 4

2. Muhannad (Posts: 455; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)


The Atrix 2 is a great phone but I don't like MotoBlur. Ever since Google bought Motorola Mobility, I was expecting a Stock Android phone from Motorola.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 09:53 4

3. Muhannad (Posts: 455; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)


And also, I really like it's design compared to the original Atrix.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 20:36 1

30. cheetah2k (Posts: 1594; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)


Will it ever get ICS though? It took Moto 10 months from the release of the original Atrix to get Gingerbread....

If history preceeds itself, then its going to be a long wait.....

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 10:04 5

5. yougotkilled1 (Posts: 167; Member since: 27 Apr 2011)


I agree, for a 99.99 on contract price for the Atrix 2, now that's a good deal if you're on a budget.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 10:50 5

7. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 467; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


What background is that? I like it!

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 10:58 5

8. John.V (Posts: 99; Member since: 27 May 2011)


It's preloaded on the phone and it's also available on other Motorola smartphones as well.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 11:00 5

9. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 467; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


The purple one on the top of page 2 in the review?

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 14:33 5

23. John.V (Posts: 99; Member since: 27 May 2011)


Yup, it's on there. Definitely a neat looking one.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 11:14 4

11. WirelessCon (Posts: 311; Member since: 11 May 2010)


The Atrix 2 has "Sub-par calling quality" and gets a 9 on a site called "Phonearena?"

Basically it's a sub-par phone. How does that earn a 9?

John V. please explain this high score.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 13:05 5

16. mightyillidan (Posts: 20; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)


man the 9 is due to the very great ups from original atrix and and lol 99 dollars is that even money hello u get a one or 2 year future proof phone lol its really deserves that 9 the call quality isnot that bad i think

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 13:13 4

17. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 467; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


9 is a great score for this phone, this is a smart phone, smart phone's have a lot of specifications to be judged on, and the call quality is not that bad at all.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 14:17 1

22. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


"How does that earn a 9?"

Check John's response to my post above - the $99 price point was what earned the 9 score. It seems that initial offer price is more important than call quality, camera quality or other features that buyers decide to pay more for.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 14:33 1

24. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 467; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


He did not say that the price is more important, he just said he included the price in his rating, why are you so stubborn? Call quality -.5 + camera quality(which is not bad at all, just slightly fuzzy recording) -.5= -1, 10-1=9! 9 is his rating, wtf is your guys problem with that?

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 18:27

28. bucky (Posts: 2686; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


problem is, this phone is not a 9 compared to the current crop of phones out.

posted on 04 Nov 2011, 19:17

34. PzykoSkillz (Posts: 7; Member since: 29 Aug 2011)


So you've played with this and all the current crop of phones to compare them?

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 11:19 1

12. GrosseFatigue (Posts: 140; Member since: 27 Jul 2011)


I personally found that calling quality was much better and less irritating than on the Atrix 1 which I still have but beside the Atrix 1 and 2 I dont really know how the latest $300 cell phones sound like. And yes the first shock you get compared to the first Atrix is how fast this one connects -that and the beautiful screen. I dont care for camel back/face lift cell phones trying to look thin. I like the business no frill look of this phone.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 11:57 1

13. Ravail (Posts: 182; Member since: 14 Oct 2011)


The atrix is the last motorola phone im ever buying.. they dont fix their problems with one phone then they release another phone of the same name.. Motorola lost a customer.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 13:17 3

18. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 467; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


Ha, change your profile pic then... So what fixable problem did they have with the atrix? it's probably just your phone since I don't see anyone else complaining? Anyways, that's a stupid reason to not buy a motorola phone anymore, too bad your the one missing out, not them!

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 12:59

14. mightyillidan (Posts: 20; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)


hey john great review i really liked it okay can u do me i mean all users a favor
iam really comparing this to the international version of galaxy s2 so it would be really great if u compare both and ill really appreciate thx in forward

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 14:42

25. John.V (Posts: 99; Member since: 27 May 2011)


Personally, they're both great. In terms of overall allure, I have to give it to the SGSII, but you can still get a great experience with the ATRIX 2. If you don't mind shelling out the money, the SGSII is a great option.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 12:59 1

15. mightyillidan (Posts: 20; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)


ya and almost forgot dont forget to upload the 360 degree view thx :)

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 13:19 1

19. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 467; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


So there isn't a video review?

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 14:47

26. John.V (Posts: 99; Member since: 27 May 2011)


You're right. We'll get the video review embedded, but it's available on our YouTube channel right now.

posted on 24 Oct 2011, 13:39 2

20. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


The Atrix 2 gets a higher score than the iPhone 4S? Shock! Horror! Awesome. :D

Halving the memory sucks, and so does getting rid of the fingerprint scanner. I'll stick with the Atrix for the time being, though I can see this being a great deal for other new customers.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories