LG Optimus G Pro vs Sony Xperia Z
Both LG and Sony don't give any indication that the megapixel war is over for them, despite HTC announcing so with the One – hearty 13 MP units are placed in both the Xperia Z and the Optimus G Pro.
Sony's camera app interface is a bit simpler to use and more functional, with a rich selection of scene modes for every occasion out there. It also features the still and video camera shutter buttons on one screen, instead of having to switch back and forth like on the G Pro.
While both handsets support HDR modes in stills and video, LG throws in a couple of new tricks like VR Panorama, which can stitch a 360 view of your surroundings, while Sony's Sweep Panorama can only do one axis at a time. The G Pro also sports a handy Dual Recording mode, which lets you make a picture-in-picture footage with the front and rear cameras recording simultaneously.
As far as picture quality goes, the ones from the Optimus G Pro seem a tad more color-accurate and defined than the samples from the Xperia Z, but could use a little more contrast. White balance measurements are more correct on LG's phone, while the sky on the Z's samples often comes out purplish.
LG Optimus G Pro
Sony Xperia Z
LG Optimus G Pro
Sony Xperia Z
capture Full HD 1080p video with 30fps, and high dynamic range video as well. The footage from the Xperia Z comes out choppier and with some skipped frames, compared to the more fluid one from the G Pro, but Sony's phone automatic settings produce higher, more appealing contrast volume. Sony's HDR video mode also looks better than the fairly bland WDR footage from the G Pro.
LG Optimus G Pro Sample Video:
LG Optimus G Pro HDR Sample Video
Sony Xperia Z Sample Video:
Sony Xperia Z HDR Sample Video:
LG Optimus G Pro Indoor Sample Video:
Sony Xperia Z Indoor Sample Video:
Sony uses its renowned Walkman branding for the music player, which has cool graphics, and easy access to sound enhancements and equalizers, whereas the G Pro has it less functional, with no presets, but a handy video button that takes you to a YouTube playlist with the song currently running.
Sony usually has the upper hand in loudspeaker strength and quality, but here the Xperia Z sounds about on par with the loudspeaker on the Optimus G Pro – fine, but not great.
Where the Optimus G Pro shines is video playback, thanks to the huge high-res display, but also because the video player sports more features than the minimalistic app on the Xperia Z, like subtitle support, loop function and the like. Other than that, both handsets can play anything thrown at them up to 1080 definitions.
35. Airforce (Posts: 68; Member since: 24 Jul 2012)
why do i have a feeling..NOTES AND PHONES ARE BECOMING SIMILAR..in screen size..Like what the FCUK...phones are now having screen sizes of 5" or higher..I guess in 2014..there wont be any difference in a phone nd NOTE any more
32. SonyFan (Posts: 22; Member since: 22 Jan 2013)
+faster software updates
+more custom roms for xperia z
now you know why?
36. RiseAgainst94 (Posts: 281; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
You can name everything the LG does better as well. At least try to approach this from both sides or your comment becomes completely irrelevant.
I'd personally go with the Xperia Z because it is more comfortable to hold and has a premium feel to it, wish it was coming to AT&T.
50. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)
-Water resistance is a bulls**t, created by Sony ;)
-Faster software updates? You must be kidding...slow and no quality (ICS 4.0 for 2012 lineup).
-Really small percent of users are using custom roms.
-LG plastic has brilliant quality, and it´s not as fragile as glass. (personal experience).
-You can eat the 13mpx sensor for dinner and lunch...the same: no quality.
Now I would like to ask you, do you know, why I don´t know?
52. harshithh (Posts: 12; Member since: 18 Feb 2013)
we can see some guy is really jealous of sony xperia z
53. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)
Oh, of course...How can a human being be jealous of a TELEPHONE? Maybe, you have put something in your breakfast hat shouldn´t be there.
55. taikucing (unregistered)
and more importantly, LG has IPS display while xperia Z still uses TFT crap. And the exmor sensor is too overrated.
59. rgxVOiD (Posts: 440; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)
So water resistance is bulls**t but not having one is a good thing?
68. bshp2000 (Posts: 5; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)
-Water resistance is not bulls**t, I know from experience,
-LG plastic may be tougher but plastic can never match glass or metal in terms of quality,
-Sure, megapixels don't usually matter much, but it still counts, in terms of the image resolution.
20. wendygarett (unregistered)
I choose neither, both looks crap to me :)
24. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)
Says person in whose user profile "Want it" section we can see "Sony Xperia Z"...
25. Commentator (Posts: 3701; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Says the person whose user profile says:
"My goal is to attract as many red thumb as I can, and pretend Apple fanboys (and Samsung fanboys as well) to show how stupidity these fanboys are :)."
37. RiseAgainst94 (Posts: 281; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
While I would personally choose the HTC One over these device they certainly do not look like crap. It's sad to think that you believe Samsung's plastic phones do NOT look like crap and that these do.
*Samsung makes great phones, but they do not look very good IMHO.
54. amiroo (Posts: 269; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)
whats this hell??
sony only focus on watter proof but whats another its has??
-not good screen
-non removable battry
-mid battary but not good at all
then sony want to cover all this sabotage with water proof!!
60. rgxVOiD (Posts: 440; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)
The English in this comment gave me cancer
66. skyguy7567 (Posts: 148; Member since: 17 Nov 2012)
I bath with my Xperia Z. What's the problem? The screen is 100% gorgeous! Don't remember that there's the Mobile Bravia Engine 2 there for great photos and great video. The camera is extremely detailed and delivers very realistic photoshots. If you are not satisfied with somehow strange color, you can surely fix that in the standard photo mode, instead of using Superior Auto. Good screen but compact device always comes with a not too long-lasting battery. I don't know what you're talking about the high cost but in my city is 1/5 cheaper than the other expensive phones.
69. bshp2000 (Posts: 5; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)
Not good screen? Xperia Z has the same screen resolution as S4, 441 ppi. Camera is excellent, or at least on the same level as Optimus G Pro, tons of other phones (iPhone 5, HTC One, Z10, etc.) have non-removable battery. And as for price, Xperia Z is cheaper than Optimus G
5. ajac09 (Posts: 1481; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)
g pro over most phones right now till the gs4 note 3 come out anyway lol
8. mocir (Posts: 23; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
If you show both phones to random people, they would obviously choose the Z.
10. smallworld (Posts: 485; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
And btw Xperia Z also support Wifi direct and Miracast.
12. ryq24 (Posts: 731; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Optimus g pro should have won but it loses because its an lg!