LG Optimus 4X HD ReviewLG Optimus 4X HD 8.5
sound in the earpiece was just average - neither very strong, nor overly clean, with a bit of an echo, but we could tell the speaker’s voice and didn’t have trouble hearing them fine two notches below maximum volume.
A new SiO+ technology has been used for the battery, says LG, and the change occurred after the handset was announced. This allowed the capacious 2150mAh juicer to pack more lithium ions in less space, making for the compact body it’s in. The battery is quoted for the way above average 11 hours of talk time in 3G mode.
In our daily grind with the handset we did notice that the screen seems to consume much less energy than the 4.5” HD one on the Optimus LTE, for example, but power consumption in standby is pretty significant with Tegra 3, compared to the Snapdragons. Thus despite the large battery you won’t be able to squeeze more than a day and change with power use.
The LG Optimus 4X HD is undoubtedly the best Android smartphone that the company has produced to date. It covers the geeky ground with a quad-core Tegra 3 chip, large and vivid HD display and the latest Android 4.0 out of the box.
The design is simple and pleasant, with a few welcome twists that make the phone a looker from the prism-shaped sides and easier to grip. The handset is more compact than its main rivals this Android season, despite being crammed with the same high-end innards, making it easier to operate with one hand. The only complaints are its preset screen brightness management and the funky camera focus, so hopefully these will be addressed with the first software update.
The new LG Optimus 3.0 UI is an improvement over its predecessor with a number of new features like Quick Memo and a very functional lock screen. Video playback is vastly improved with the new Media Plex features like live video zoom, and the camera module has been given new abilities like the Time Machine precapture. Nothing groundbreaking, but coupled with the light and quick ICS, the UI overlay feels sufficiently enhanced.
Whether or not LG’s best Android effort to date succeeds will be the market’s decision, as it stand against some pretty hefty opposition. The HTC One X has very similar components, but more stylish unibody design, yet all is for the sake of expandability, as it has a sealed battery compartment and no memory card slot.
The Samsung Galaxy S III also sports powerful silicon, but is with a more distinctive design and a slightly larger Super AMOLED HD display, not to mention the better camera. Yet the LG Optimus 4X HD offers the most flexibility out of the three flagships in this price range with its regular SIM slot, removable battery and expandable memory, so if that’s your thing it’s an easy pick.
Software version: IML74K
LG Optimus 4X HD Video Review:
- Most compact of the Android flagships
- Carrying regular SIM and microSD slots, plus a removable battery
- Handy new features like Quick Memo (note taking), Media Plex (video playback) and Time Machine (frame precapture)
- Fiddly camera focus
- Automatic brightness adjustment only works from a preset baseline
1. Tjey007 (Posts: 86; Member since: 22 May 2012)
thats a pretty impressive score..now whoever was criticizing LG ..take THAT.
4. Mafiatounes (Posts: 12; Member since: 13 Jun 2012)
The device itself is very impressive and all, but most critics are on the software/support side at least with previous devices a user had to wait a very long time before a software update removed bugs/improved stability etc
5. Tjey007 (Posts: 86; Member since: 22 May 2012)
in India samsung users hardly get any soft update.so we should consider this fact unless its a gingerbread.
19. nb2six (Posts: 298; Member since: 27 Apr 2011)
I hope they prove me wrong. I have been a critic of LG smartphones for a long time. I really hope this ones succeeds, We need another Great competitor out there to mix up the the constant dominance of the "Big Guys"
24. Tjey007 (Posts: 86; Member since: 22 May 2012)
after this surely "Life's Good" is not behind...One x is in big trouble.
2. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)
Looks like an awesome phone. The third contender is in the ring! Your move Motorola, Apple and Sony, where is your HD Quad Core beast?
13. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
Well we can be sure that Apple's "Quad Core (processor) beast" is not coming anytime soon!
34. DawsonLee (Posts: 26; Member since: 03 Apr 2012)
I'm sure the Xperia's with the s4 chip can rival the quad cores out there, with Sony's knack of producing the perfect optimization with their phones, i don't see an issue here
37. vasboz (Posts: 6; Member since: 22 Jun 2012)
You guessed it... Apple's iPhone(Y) 5 will be quad core 800Mhz bwahaha... like their Original iPhone 4... 800mhz while the rest of the competition was 1GHz+.
Consider Apple's Quad 800Mhz vs Samsung's Exynos Quad 1400Mhz which is the fastest chip around at the moment. :)
40. Sangeet (Posts: 232; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
What will you do of clock speeds??. have dinner with them.
The main thing is that the device should go smooth and Apple achives that Aim, and also lower clock speeds help save battery and Apple definitely suceeds in it
3. wickets (Posts: 12; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)
Thanks for the review. Its nice not to see any physical buttons. I'm guessing this isnt heading to verizon anytime soon?
38. vasboz (Posts: 6; Member since: 22 Jun 2012)
Not having physical buttons can be a rather pain in the arse. One thing about being able to unlock a device on your desk at work by pressing the button is amazing.
Not having to fumble around the top or sides... or in my previous Motorola Atrix's case bloody underneath... bad bad choices in functional form.
30. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1210; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)
I mean it is rectangular? But this is how I wanted the SIII to look!
7. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 813; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)
So far this is the one LG phone I'm interested in, The design is somewhat attractive to my taste.
Now let the 3 way Royal Rumble between the Samsung Galaxy SIII, HTC OneX & LG 4X HD commence. .
8. Tjey007 (Posts: 86; Member since: 22 May 2012)
probably the 3 best right now.for me s3 > one x >4x.
9. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 813; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)
Hard to say on to which will come 2nd, to settle that would be like a coin flip, but s3 is arguably the better of the 3 in my opinion. LG's fall out was the waaaay to late software update of their flagship phones. Hope they straightened out that factor this year. . .
27. OptimusOne (Posts: 694; Member since: 22 May 2012)
one x beats 4x
but sIII smashes one x and 4x
10. Grishm (Posts: 54; Member since: 18 May 2012)
This must be the only LG phone which I cared to even notice! XD
15. u-suck-more (Posts: 529; Member since: 26 Aug 2011)
will this phone sell? yes of course it will. why? it is cheaper than the S3, has a regular SIM card slot (which removes the hassle of having to change the SIM card), expandable memory and removable battery. as the article said, among the 3, the 4x is the most versatile, and i'd take this over the GS3 anyday. this looks so much more nicer
18. Jericho (Posts: 302; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)
Awsome got more score than Htc one X. But its not about the score in the end personal preference is what matters.
Continue your great work LG!
20. guruprasad (Posts: 33; Member since: 13 Jul 2011)
gr8 phone....btw y only 8.5....phonearena..........
21. PhilTech (Posts: 11; Member since: 16 Jun 2012)
Finally!!...LG is listening...I would totally get this over the S3. The S3 is a great phone but it has too many features that I probably wont use on a daily basis. So this is the winner IMO between the One X and S3. I'm guessing it's cheaper that both and pretty much has everything. The 2 things to fix would be the annoying migraine inducing auto focus during video capture and timely updates. If LG can fix that then they definitely have a winner. They might also want to improve their marketing. I guess that's 3 things they need to fix.
22. aoikemono27 (Posts: 177; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
Have read a couple other reviews and this one. The phone is nice on its own, but when compared to other top flagships, it will probably be in fourth or fifth place. There's very little reason to get this phone other than for its design and maybe its compactness, which I find quite enamoring. It's a shame that Samsung's Korean rival still hasn't got their smartphone battle plan in order and instead is just content with poking it's head above the clouds to glimpse the view without actually breaking through.
The all plastic design follows the same faux-leather texture back which I have never liked and now there are TWO prominent chrome rims sticking out. If it was a solid metal maybe, but it's undoubtedly some cheap breakable and squeezable plastic that you have to hold onto. LG hasn't touted any polycarbonate or such, no kevlar, or glass, so materials don't sound too enticing.
LG may also win awards for their LCD tech, but why does the HTC One X have a more impressive screen with the laminated glass and painted on look? Other reviews have mentioned this, but the LG screen has a comparatively thick sheet of reflective glass that you can clearly see in the video tour. Coupled with the thick and unpleasant black border that gives it an old phone or budget phone vibe, the results are not very impressive. Then there is the simplistic UI with large, stretched looking fonts and icons. It looks more like a 800x480 budget display and single-core Froyo innards than its actual 720p goodness and quad-core ICS freshness. Changing the fat looking font and its size, as well as making the icons more compact and less stretched out looking, decreasing the size and increasing the number on-screen, would improve the look and feel drastically. Ditto for transitions. Why LG cannot understand these basic basic concepts, I do not know. The screen brightness issue also seems like something more suitable to an early prototype than a retail product.
The camera doesn't really look better than their old 8MP ones. Actually, it is similar to the HTC One X. They both lack shades of anything, losing significant detail, and instead opt to smear everything in solid colors, giving pictures a cartoony look. The One X oversharpens more and is much darker. The Optimus 4x brightens far too much. Both are more like instagram pictures than real ones.
Then there is the video capture. Audio is quite stellar sounding, and the framerate is smooth, including exposure. But the video has the same cartoony shadeless solid color look of the still images, and if it wasn't obvious from the videos, a very serious issue with focusing. A quick search through youtube will find that this is not an isolated incident, and all video exhibit this epileptic refocusing eye dilating problem, which happens every few seconds. How something so blatantly broken like this got rubberstamped and tested by so many people is probably the 8th wonder of the world.
Neither benchmarks, battery life, nor performance is a
23. aoikemono27 (Posts: 177; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
Neither benchmarks, battery life, nor performance is actually that stellar, in comparison to other flagships of course. Then there is LG's track record of poor updates and class action lawsuits for faulty hardware/software (Optimus 2x) and you wonder why they didn't try harder to give assurances that this device will not fall under the same troubles. No major marketing push, with a tentative European release schedule and seemingly no US plans, really makes it feel like a product pushed out without the desire to support or make into a real success. The more popular a phone, the quicker the bugs are squashed. Is LG still aiming low with this one as well? It seems the Android duopoly between the One X and Galaxy S III has yet to be remotely challenged by anyone so far.
28. Non_Sequitur (Posts: 1111; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)
I didn't even read your comment, I just gave you a thumbs up because of how long it is.
25. androidornothing (Posts: 143; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
LOLLL. and people are actually saying quad core matters???!!!!! This thing got 3500 on quadrant when GS3 gets about 4900 with a dual core and plus higher score on NenaMark.
26. OptimusOne (Posts: 694; Member since: 22 May 2012)
I bet if the samsung galaxy s III didn't come out already this would have got an even higher score
for now though sgsIII seems better
29. Deicide (Posts: 81; Member since: 02 Jul 2011)
OMFG! LG has really upped their game. I might actually get this device. The UI and the design look so beautiful! Orgasms!
31. 123mobile (Posts: 3; Member since: 21 Jun 2012)
This is better than sgs3!!!
WOW it's design is very ELEGANT !
the color& clarity of it's TRUE HD IPS is totally Amazing!
FASTEST PROCESSOR ...........
BIG BATTERY of 2,150mAh
PERFECT SIZE, OF 4.7inch screen.
NEW MEMO APPLICATIONS IS VERY IMPRESSIVE!
LG WorldSmart is also a nice .
32. 123mobile (Posts: 3; Member since: 21 Jun 2012)
LG 4X HD HAS BETTER UI & DESIGN COMPARED TO SGS3!
33. rao4u (Posts: 1; Member since: 21 Jun 2012)
can anyone tell me the price of lg optimus 4x HD in india................
35. nicholassss (Posts: 366; Member since: 10 May 2012)
I really want the Galaxy S3 but I want it to look like the Optimus 4X HD
36. lzsbleach (Posts: 155; Member since: 20 May 2012)
This phone is boring, I almost went to sleep watching the review...
39. cncrim (Posts: 688; Member since: 15 Aug 2011)
I love the phone, I will definitely check it out. Here is the some the criticism I found phone with the large screen need to improve:
1. The power button or wake up button need to in the reach with one hand.
2. The battery need more juice
3. More ram specially on android, I found 1gb ram is not adiquate enough ..... to take damson.lag.
43. TMach (Posts: 442; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)
Never owned an LG before and this is a good phone, I have lived with it for the last week! The down side is in the little details like, no notification light (WTF), no way of knowing level of charge unless charging whilst phone is still on when it tells you the percentage! Specs wise, up there with the S3 and One X but just falls short IMHO.
45. VladUK (Posts: 8; Member since: 24 May 2012)
Nice I like it but why again to copy the same look and design as Samsung Galaxy S2, was there any strike from design department at LG?
46. xiaopi (Posts: 2; Member since: 04 Aug 2012)
Looks like a nice little machine, but like the G2X was last year, it's not gonna last for long with LG being so bad at updating Android. If you're lucky, you'll get Jelly Bean, but when the next version of Android comes six months later, don't expect this phone to get it, LG will be too busy with their future new phone to care about you. LG just doesn't care about updating their phones, even with flagship phones, like the LG Optimus 2X was.
Unless you change your phone every six months, avoid LG at all costs, you'll regret it.
47. Andrew26 (Posts: 2; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
Hello , guys pls help me chose btw LG optimus 4x hd and Sony xperia sl.
|Display||4.7 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels (312 ppi) IPS LCD|
NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30, Quad-core, 1500 MHz, ARM Cortex-A9 processor
1024 MB RAM
|Size||5.21 x 2.68 x 0.35 inches|
(132.4 x 68.1 x 8.9 mm)
4.97 oz (141 g)
|Battery||2150 mAh, 9.36 hours talk time|